簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳安琪
Wu, An-Qi
論文名稱: 國中生社會目標與社交行為之關聯探討—以受歡迎度為調節變項
Relationship Between Social Goals and Social Behavior among Middle School Students: Popularity as a Moderator
指導教授: 程景琳
Cheng, Ching-Ling
口試委員: 吳文琪 黃絢質 程景琳
口試日期: 2021/07/01
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 61
中文關鍵詞: 外顯攻擊受歡迎度利社會行為關係攻擊社會目標
英文關鍵詞: overt aggression, popularity, prosocial behavior, relational aggression, social goals
研究方法: 調查研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101842
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:386下載:43
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究旨在探討國中生社會目標與社交行為之關聯,並檢視受歡迎度在社會目標與社交行為之間的調節效果。研究參與者為565位來自臺灣北部、四所國中共15個班級的七至九年級學生(男生291人,女生274人,平均年齡為14.25歲)。本研究以自陳式量表測量社會目標,使用同儕提名問卷測量社交計量受歡迎度、同儕知覺受歡迎度、以及外顯攻擊、關係攻擊和利社會行為。研究結果如下:
(一)國中生的親密感目標與利社會行為顯著正相關,支配性目標與攻擊行為顯著正相關、與利社會行為顯著負相關;受歡迎目標與攻擊行為和利社會行為均無顯著關聯;受歡迎目標和親密感目標與同儕知覺受歡迎度均顯著正相關。社交計量受歡迎度與外顯攻擊和關係攻擊顯著負相關、與利社會行為顯著正相關;同儕知覺受歡迎度與利社會行為顯著正相關。
(二)性別差異方面,男生在支配性目標上的得分顯著高於女生,女生在親密感目標上的得分顯著高於男生,男、女生在受歡迎目標的得分無顯著差異;另外,男生在外顯攻擊上的得分顯著高於女生,女生在利社會行為上的得分顯著高於男生,而在關係攻擊的得分上並無顯著性別差異。
(三)控制性別後,國中生的受歡迎目標與社交計量受歡迎度之交互作用對關係攻擊有顯著影響:具有高受歡迎目標且不受同儕喜愛的青少年,有較多的關係攻擊行為;親密感目標與社交計量受歡迎度的交互作用對關係攻擊與利社會行為均有顯著影響:具有高親密感目標且不受同儕喜愛的青少年有較多關係攻擊行為,而具有高親密感目標且受到同儕喜愛的青少年,有較多利社會行為。受歡迎目標、支配性目標、親密感目標與社交計量受歡迎度的交互作用均對外顯攻擊無顯著影響力。
(四)控制性別後,國中生的支配性目標和親密感目標均與同儕知覺受歡迎度存在交互作用,顯著影響青少年的利社會行為:具有低支配性目標且高人氣、或是具有高親密感目標且高人氣的青少年,有較多利社會行為。受歡迎目標、支配性目標、親密感目標與同儕知覺受歡迎度的交互作用均對外顯攻擊無顯著影響力。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between social goals and social behavior among middle school students, and further examine the moderating effect of popularity between social goals and social behavior. Participants were 565 students (291 boys and 274 girls; the mean age is 14.25) in grades 7-9 from 15 classes of four junior high schools in northern Taiwan. The study measured social goals by using a self-report scale and used peer nomination questionnaire to measure “sociometric popularity”, “peer-perceived popularity”, “overt aggression”, “relational aggression”, and “prosocial behavior”. The findings show that:
(a) Intimacy goal positively correlates with prosocial behavior, while dominance goal positively correlates with aggression and negatively correlates with prosocial behavior. There is no significant correlation between popularity goal and three kinds of social behavior. Both popularity goal and intimacy goal positively correlate with peer-perceived popularity. Sociometric popularity negatively correlates with overt aggression and relational aggression. Both kinds of popularity positively correlate with prosocial behavior.
(b) With respect to gender difference, boys score significantly higher than girls on dominance goal, and girls score significantly higher than boys on intimacy goal; there is no significant difference between the scores of boys and girls on popularity goal. In addition, boys score significantly higher than girls on overt aggression, and girls score significantly higher than boys on prosocial behavior; there is no significant difference in the score of relational aggression.
(c) After controlling for gender, the interaction between popularity goal and sociometric popularity is predictive of relational aggression. The interaction of intimacy goal and sociometric popularity is predictive of both relational aggression and prosocial behavior. When adolescents who with high popularity goal or high intimacy goal are not liked by peers, they tend to have more relational aggression. If adolescents with high intimacy goals are liked by peers, they tend to have more prosocial behavior. The interactions between all social goals and sociometric popularity have no significant effect on overt aggression.
(d) After controlling for gender, the interactions between dominance goal and peer-perceived popularity, intimacy goal and peer-perceived popularity, are predictive of prosocial behavior. If adolescents who have low dominance goals or high intimacy goals are popular among their peers, they tend to have more prosocial behavior. The interactions between all social goals and peer-perceived popularity have no significant effect on overt aggression.

第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題 4 第三節 名詞解釋 4 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 社會目標之理論分類及其與社交行為之相關研究 7 第二節 受歡迎度之概念發展及其與社交行為之相關研究 13 第三節 社會目標、受歡迎度與社交行為之關聯探討 16 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 研究架構 19 第二節 研究對象 19 第三節 研究工具 20 第四節 資料分析 22 第四章 研究結果 23 第一節 社會目標、受歡迎度與社交行為之描述統計與相關情形 23 第二節 性別在不同社會目標、受歡迎度與社交行為之差異分析 24 第三節 受歡迎度對社會目標與社交行為之調節效果 25 第五章 討論與建議 39 第一節 研究結果討論 39 第二節 研究應用 47 第三節 研究限制與建議 49 參考文獻 51

中文部份
邱皓政(2019):量化研究與統計分析:SPSS與R資料分析範例解析。五南。
馮華潤(2014):青少年同伴群體中的社會地位:基於受歡迎度的系統探索(未發表)。華東師範大學應用心理學系碩士論文。
程景琳(2010):社交計量及同儕知覺受歡迎度與青少年關係攻擊及孤寂感之相關研究。教育心理學報,42(1),143–162。

英文部份
Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65(3), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112807
Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (1999). Social predictors of changes in students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0978
Archer, J. (2001). A strategic approach to aggression. Social Development, 10(2), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00163
Aslund, C., Starrin, B., Leppert, J., & Nilsson, K. W. (2009). Social status and shaming experiences related to adolescent overt aggression at school. Aggressive behavior, 35(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20286
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and. content. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 338–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338
Banny, A. M., Heilbron, N., Ames, A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Relational benefits of relational aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive associations with adolescent friendship quality. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1153–1166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022546
Bergeron, N., & Schneider, B. H. (2005). Explaining cross-national differences in peer-directed aggression: A quantitative synthesis. Aggressive Behavior, 31(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20049
Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2<117::AID-AB2480180205>3.0.CO;2-3
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
Bukowski, W. M., Laursen, B., & Rubin, K. H. (2018). Peer relations: Past, present, and promise. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 3–20). The Guilford Press.
Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Gest, S. D., & Gariépy, J.-L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 815–823. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.815
Caravita, S. C. S., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012). Agentic or communal? Associations between interpersonal goals, popularity, and bullying in middle childhood and early adolescence. Social Development, 21(2), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00632.x
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x
Charlesworth, W. R. (1988). Resources and resource acquisition during ontogeny. In K. B. MacDonald (Ed.), Sociobiological perspectives on human development (pp. 24–77). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3760-0_2
Chen, X., French, D., & Schneider, B. (2006). Culture and peer relationships. In X. Chen, D. French, & B. Schneider (Eds.), Peer relationships in cultural context (Cambridge studies in social and emotional development, pp. 3–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499739.001
Chung, T., & Asher, S. (1996). Children's goals and strategies in peer conflict situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(1), 125–147.
Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
Cillessen, A. H. N., Mayeux, L., Ha, T., de Bruyn, E. H., & LaFontana, K. M. (2014). Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 40(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21518
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
Crain, M. M., Finch, C. L., & Foster, S. L. (2005). The relevance of the social information processing model for understanding relational aggression in girls. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51(2), 213–249. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2005.0010
Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children's future social adjustment. Child Development, 67(5), 2317–2327. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131625
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131945
Crick, N. R., Grotpeter, J. K., & Bigbee, M. A. (2002). Relationally and physically aggressive children's intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations. Child Development, 73(4), 1134–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00462
Dawes, M., & Xie, H. (2014). The role of popularity goal in early adolescents’ behaviors and popularity status. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032999
Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(6), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558406293966
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256
Dyk, P. A. H., & Adams, G. R. (1987). The association between identity development and intimacy during adolescence: A theoretical treatise. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355488723004
Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58(3), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112416
Eisenberg, N. (1991). Meta-analytic contributions to the literature on prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291173007
Ellis, W. E., & Zarbatany, L. (2007). Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children’s deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 78(4), 1240–1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01063.x
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 915–981). McGraw-Hill.
Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs (1st ed.). SAGE Publications.
Galen, B. R., & Underwood, M. K. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.589
Grotpeter, J. K., & Crick, N. R. (1996). Relational aggression, overt aggression, and friendship. Child Development, 67(5), 2328–2338. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131626
Hagemeyer, B., & Neyer, F. J. (2012). Assessing implicit motivational orientations in couple relationships: The partner-related agency and communion test (PACT). Psychological Assessment, 24(1), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024822
Hartl, A. C., Laursen, B., Cantin, S., & Vitaro, F. (2020). A test of the bistrategic control hypothesis of adolescent popularity. Child Development, 91(3), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13269
Hartup, W. W., Glazer, J. A., & Charlesworth, R. (1967). Peer reinforcement and sociometric status. Child Development, 38(4), 1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127099
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1998.0470
Hawley, P. H. (2007). Social dominance in childhood and adolescence: Why social competence and aggression may go hand in hand. In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, & P. C. Rodkin (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior (pp. 1–29). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Card, N. A. (2007). The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407074630
Heidgerken, A. D., Hughes, J. N., Cavell, T. A., & Willson, V. L. (2004). Direct and indirect effects of parenting and children’s goals on child aggression. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 33(4), 684–693. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3304_4
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Ip, P. K. (2013). Harmony as happiness? Social harmony in two Chinese societies. Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 719–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0395-7
Jarvinen, D. W., & Nicholls, J. G. (1996). Adolescents’ social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.3.435
Kiefer, S. M., Matthews, Y. T., Montesino, M., Arango, L., & Preece, K. K. (2013). The effects of contextual and personal factors on young adolescents’ social goals. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.630046
Kiefer, S. M., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Striving for social dominance over peers: The implications for academic adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.417
Kiefer, S. M., & Shim, S. S. (2016). Academic help seeking from peers during adolescence: The role of social goals. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 42, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2015.12.002
Kiefer, S. M., & Wang, J. H. (2016). Associations of coolness and social goals with aggression and engagement during adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.02.007
Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x
Lagerspetz, K. M., Björkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11- to 12-year-old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14(6), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1988)14:6<403::AID-AB2480140602>3.0.CO;2-D
Liem, G. A. D. (2015). Academic and social achievement goals: Their additive, interactive, and specialized effects on school functioning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12085
Li, Y., & Wright, M. F. (2014). Adolescents' social status goals: Relationships to social status insecurity, aggression, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9939-z
Lochman, J. E., Wayland, K. K., & White, K. J. (1993). Social goals: Relationship to adolescent adjustment and to social problem solving. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00911312
Locke, K. D. (2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa7502_6
Lu, T., Li, L., Niu, L., Jin, S., & French, D. C. (2017). Relations between popularity and prosocial behavior in middle school and high school Chinese adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416687411
Malamut, S. T., van den Berg, Y., Lansu, T., & Cillessen, A. (2021). Bidirectional associations between popularity, popularity goal, and aggression, alcohol use and prosocial behaviors in adolescence: A 3-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(2), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01308-9
Mayeux, L., & Kraft, C. (2018). Social goals moderate the associations between peer status and behavior in middle school. Social Development, 27(4), 699–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12298
McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press.
Meijs, N., Cillessen, A. H. N., Scholte, R. H. J., Segers, E., & Spijkerman, R. (2008). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9373-9
Merrick, K. E., & Shafi, K. (2011). Achievement, affiliation, and power: Motive profiles for artificial agents. Adaptive Behavior, 19(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712310395953
Niu, L., Jin, S., Li, L., & French, D. C. (2016). Popularity and social preference in Chinese adolescents: Associations with social and behavioral adjustment. Social Development, 25(4), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12172
Ojanen, T., Aunola, K., & Salmivalli, C. (2007). Situation-specificity of children’s social goals: Changing goals according to changing situations? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(3), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407074636
Ojanen, T., & Findley-Van Nostrand, D. (2014). Social goals, aggression, peer preference, and popularity: Longitudinal links during middle school. Developmental Psychology, 50(8), 2134–2143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037137
Ojanen, T., Findley, D., & Fuller, S. (2012). Physical and relational aggression in early adolescence: Associations with narcissism, temperament, and social goals. Aggressive Behavior, 38(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21413
Ojanen, T., Grönroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children’s social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41(5), 699–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.699
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431698018002001
Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., & Ryan, A. M. (2002). Social motivation and the classroom social environment. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 85–108). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Affiliative and aggressive dimensions of dominance and possible functions during early adolescence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00033-1
Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002166442
Pellegrini, A. D., Roseth, C. J., Ryzin, M. J. V., & Solberg, D. W. (2011). Popularity as a form of social dominance: An evolutionary perspective. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 123–139). The Guilford Press.
Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). Reactive and proactive aggression: Evidence of a two-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.12.2.115
Puckett, M. B., Aikins, J. W., & Cillessen, A. H. (2008). Moderators of the association between relational aggression and perceived popularity. Aggressive Behavior, 34(6), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20280
Renshaw, P., & Asher, S. (1983). Children's goals and strategies for social interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(3), 353–374.
Rodkin, P. C., Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R., & Wilson, T. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029389
Rose, A. J., & Asher, S. R. (1999). Children’s goals and strategies in response to conflicts within a friendship. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.69
Rose, A. J., & Swenson, L. P. (2009). Do perceived popular adolescents who aggress against others experience emotional adjustment problems themselves? Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 868–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015408
Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.378
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., Parker, J. G., & Lerner R.M. (Eds.). (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 571–645). John Wiley & Sons.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., Bowker, J. C., Lerner R. M. (Eds.). (2015). Children in peer groups. Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Ecological settings and processes (pp. 175–222). John Wiley & Sons.
Ryan, A. M., Hicks, L., & Midgley, C. (1997). Social goals, academic goals, and avoiding seeking help in the classroom. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 17(2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431697017002003
Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2006). Social achievement goals: The nature and consequences of different orientations toward social competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1246–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206289345
Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents’ social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 672–687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.672
Samson, J. E., Ojanen, T., & Hollo, A. (2012). Social goals and youth aggression: Meta-analysis of prosocial and antisocial goals. Social Development, 21(4), 645–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00658.x
Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Likeable versus popular: Distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406072789
Schwartz, D., Tom, S. R., Chang, L., Xu, Y., Duong, M. T., & Kelly, B. M. (2010). Popularity and acceptance as distinct dimensions of social standing for Chinese children in Hong Kong. Social Development, 19(4), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00558.x
Shim, S. S., & Finch, W. H. (2014). Academic and social achievement goals and early adolescents’ adjustment: A latent class approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.015
Shulman, S., Laursen, B., Kalman, Z., & Karpovsky, S. (1997). Adolescent intimacy revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(5), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024586006966
Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20282
van den Berg, Y., Lansu, T., & Cillessen, A. (2020). Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research. Journal of Adolescence, 84, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.010
van den Broek, N., Deutz, M. H., Schoneveld, E. A., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2016). Behavioral correlates of prioritizing popularity in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(12), 2444–2454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0352-7
van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2017). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1
Visconti, K. J., Ladd, G. W., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2015). The role of moral disengagement in the associations between children’s social goals and aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 61(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.61.1.0101
Wang, M., Wang, J., Deng, X., & Chen, W. (2019). Why are empathic children more liked by peers? The mediating roles of prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.029
Wentzel, K. R. (1994). Relations of social goal pursuit to social acceptance, classroom behavior, and perceived social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.173
Wentzel K. R. (2000). What is it that I'm trying to achieve? Classroom goals from a content perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1021
Wentzel, K. R. (2002). The contribution of social goal setting to children's school adjustment. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 221–246). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50011-5
Wentzel, K. R. (2014). Prosocial behavior and peer relations in adolescence. In L. M. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 178–200). Oxford University. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199964772.003.0009
Wentzel, K. R., Filisetti, L., & Looney, L. (2007). Adolescent prosocial behavior: The role of self-processes and contextual cues. Child Development, 78(3), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01039.x
Wright, M. F., Li, Y., & Shi, J. (2014). Chinese adolescents’ social status goals: Associations with behaviors and attributions for relational aggression. Youth & Society, 46(4), 566–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X12448800
Xiao, S. X., Hashi, E. C., Korous, K. M., & Eisenberg, N. (2019). Gender differences across multiple types of prosocial behavior in adolescence: A meta-analysis of the prosocial tendency measure-revised (PTM-R). Journal of Adolescence, 77, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.09.003
Xie, H., Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (2002). The development of social aggression and physical aggression: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts. Aggressive Behavior, 28(5), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.80008

下載圖示
QR CODE