在目前產品設計及製造的運用上，產品的生產開發過程可分為設計、設計驗證與量產三階段，而在設計驗證階段常因產品設計的差異或其它因素進行設計變更，因此若能減少此階段的開發時間與費用，則將對產品的時效性與成本競爭力有極大的助益。快速生成模具(型)的新製程技術，使得生產製造業者面對科技創新所帶來新的製造模式改變。由於廠商導入3D列印技術的投資規模、技術複雜性與競爭策略等考量，其評估因素選擇可以被看作是一個多屬性決策過程，因此，本研究以台灣模具廠商導入3D列印技術為例，目的為提供一個系統方法對技術導入的決策評估，其中提出了兩個階段的程序。第一階段經由專家訪談與文獻蒐集建立初始準則後，透過模糊德爾菲法獲得專家意見於廠商導入新技術的重要評估構面與關鍵準則。在第二階段，使用模糊層級分析法將導入3D列印技術評估因素作為衡量的指標，找到每個標準的重要性程度，並建立了一個實證評估模型，為決策者提供參考。最後，本研究經專家評估各關鍵因素之重要性，結果以「技術趨勢」、「購建設備成本」、「財務策略」與「同業競爭優勢」為廠商在評估新技術導入時最重視之因素。

In the current use of industrial manufacturing, the product development process can be divided into production design, design verification and mass production in three stages, and in the design validation stage often due to differences in product design, design changes or other factors, therefore, it would reduce this stage development time and costs, then the product timeliness and cost competitiveness of great help. As the mold maker import 3D printing technology, the scale of investment, technical complexity and competitive strategy considerations, its assessment of factors that can be considered as a multi-attribute decision-making process. Therefore, this paper aimed to provide a systematic approach for the assessment of technology into the decision-making, which proposed a two-stage process. The first phase collected via expert interviews and literature to establish the initial guidelines, the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) to get through expert advice on vendors introduce new technology is an important criterion. In the second stage, the use of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) screening of the expert evaluation criteria for each dimension of the indicator as a measure to find the degree of importance of each criterion, and the establishment of an evaluation model to provide reference for decision-makers. This paper was approved by experts to assess the importance of the key factors that result in technology trends, the cost of acquisition, construction equipment, financial strategy and competition advantage for the manufacturers to evaluate new technologies in the most important factors when importing.

一、中文文獻：
王福山、黃昆明、林恆育，(2008)，從模具產業發展趨勢談台灣模具產業之發展策 略，機械工業雜誌，第 309 期，第 3-12 頁。
江梓桐，(2007)，企業導入新資訊科技應用之探索性研究，國立台灣科技大學企業 管理研究所碩士論文。
邱莊磊，(2005)，製造業廠商產銷流程導入新技術科技決策與程序之研究，東吳大 學企業管理系碩士論文。
張有恆、徐村和，（民82），模糊度量AHP 法— 交通運輸計畫評估新模式，中華 民國第一屆模糊理論與應用研討會，365-371頁。
張偉民，（2006），「模糊多準則決策分析於國家太空通訊系統之評估」，中原大學 企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳仲宜，(2005)，微模具技術發展趨勢，金屬工業發展中心。
陳賜賢，(2013)，2013年3D Printer技術與市場發展趨勢，MIC產業研究報告。
王立志，(1999)，系統化運籌與供應鏈管理。台中市：滄海。
陳振東、許錫美，(1994)，多位專家模糊評估值整合方法之研究，中華民國第二屆 模糊理論與應用研討會論文集，72-77頁。
陳銘禪，(2010)，台灣金屬模具業之產業價值鏈移動與出口競爭力分析，國立成功 大學資源工程學系碩士論文。
陳昭宏，(2001)，亞太港埠競爭力與核心能力指標之研究，《運輸學刊》，13，1-25。
潘淑滿，(2003)，質性研究：理論與應用，心理出版社，台北。
鄧振源，（1992），相關性運輸投資計畫選擇之研究- 非模糊與模糊多目標規劃方 法，博士論文，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所。
鄭滄濱，(2001)，軟體組織提昇人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式，國立臺灣科技大 學資訊管理系碩士論文。
鄭正元、汪家昌，(2000)，「快速原型技術至快速模具技術之發展」，國立台灣科技 大學機械工程系。
衛萬里，(2007)，應用分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之決策分析模式，國 立臺灣科技大學設計研究所博士論文。
經濟部統計處，(民國100年)，經濟部工業產品分類(第15次修訂)，經濟部統計 處。
經濟部工業局，(民國102年)，塑膠製品產業聚落高值化推動計畫，財團法人塑膠 工業技術發展中心。

二、英文文獻：
Banakar Z. and Tahriri F., 2010. Justification and Classification of Issues for the Selection and Implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies. In World Academy of Science. Engineering and Technology volume 65, 341–349, May.
Buckley, J.J., 1985. Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 343-350; 233-247.
Chuang, Ming-kuo. Yang, Yuan-Shan. & Lin, Ching-Torng., 2009. Production technology selection: Deploying market requirements, competitive and operational strategies, and manufacturing attributes. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1-11, Jan.
Chen, L.J. and Small, M.H., 1994. Implementing Advanced Manufacturing Technology：An Integrated Planning Model. Omega. Int. J. Mgmt Sci, Vol.22, No, 91-103.
Cho, D. and Yu, P., 2000. Influential factors in the choice of technology acquisition mode: an empirical analysis of small and medium size firms in Korean telecommunication industry. Technovation 20 (2), 691–704.
Chang, P.T., Huang, L.C. and Lin, H.J., 1999. The Fuzzy Delphi Method via Fuzzy Statistics and Membership Function Fitting and An Application to The Human Resources. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 112, 511-520.
Chan, F.T.S., Chan, M.H., & Tang N.K.H., 2000. Evaluation methodologies for technology selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 107 330–337.
Chan, F. T. S., Chung, S. H., & Wadhwa, S., 2005. A hybrid genetic algorithm for production and distribution. Omega, 33(4), 345–355.
Corbett, M. L., 1998. Benchmarking manufacturing performance in Australia and New Zealand. Benchmarking Quality Management Technology, 5(4), 271-82.
Datta, V., Sambasivarao, K.V., Kodali, R. and Deshmukh,, S.G., 1992. Multi-attribute decision model using the analytic hierarchy process for the justification of manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2, 227-34.
Dalkey, G.B., 1969. The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. Rand Corp, Research Paper RM-5888-PR.
Dubois, D.,Prade, H., 1978. Operations on Fuzzy Number”, International Journal of Systems Science. vol.9, 613-629.
Frederick Betz, 2011. Managing technological innovation : competitive advantage from change. 3rd, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
Hsu, His-Mei. and Chen, Chen-Tung., 1996. Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Volume 79, Issue 3, 279-285.
Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H., 1993. The max -min Delphi methos and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 55 (3), 241-253.
Kakati, M., 1997. Strategic evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology. International Journal of Production Economics, 53 (2), 141–156.
Kochan D, Chua CK, Du ZH., 1999. Rapid prototyping issues in the 21st century. Computers in Industry, Vol. 39, 3-10.
Lin, G.T.R. and Shen, Y.C., 2010. A collaborative model for technology evaluation and decision-making. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 69(2), 94-100.
19.Lena Ellitan. 2007. The influence of manufacturing strategies and environmental munificence as moderators of technology manufacturing performance relationship: An Evidence From Indonesia. Journal Management, Vol. 6, No. 2, Mei.
Lee A.H.I., Wang W.M., Lin T.Y., 2010. An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 77 (135) 150.
Laarhoven, P. J. M. and W. Pedrycz., 1983. A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3, 229-241.
Melissa A Schilling. 2010. strategic management of technological innovation, 3e, McGraw-Hill, 19-38.
Mohonty, P.R., & Deshmukh, S.G., 1998. Advanced technology manufacturing selection: A strategic model for learning and evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 55 (3), 295–307
Murry, T. J., Pipino, L. L. & Gigch, J. P., 1985. A Pilot Study of Fuzzy Set Modification of Delphi. Human Systems Management, Vol.5, No.1：76-80.
Oeltjenbruns, H., Kolarik, W. J., & Schnadt-Kirschner, R., 1995. Strategic planning in manufacturing systems-AHP application to an equipment replacement decision. International Journal of Production Economics, 38, 189–197.
Rosochowski A., Matuszak A. 2000. Rapid tooling：the state of the art. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 106, 191-198.
Robbins, S.P., 1994. Management. Prentice Hall Inc.
Sambasivarao, K.V., Deshmukh, S.G., 1995. Selection and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15 (10), 43–62.
Sirikrai, S.B. & Tang, J.C.S., 2006. Industrial competitiveness analysis: using the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of High Technology Management Research.
Saaty, T. L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York. 50.
31.Tan, K.; Noble, J.; Sato, Y.; Tse, Y.K., 2011. A Marginal Analysis Guided Technology Evaluation and Selection. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.131 (1), 15-21.
Tuzkaya, G., Gülsün, B., Kahraman, C., & Özgen, D., 2010. An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology for material handling equipment selection problem and an application. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 2853–2863.
Ward, P. T., D. J. Bickford, and G. K. Leong., 1996. Configurations of manufacturing strategy, business strategy, environment and structure. Journal of Management 22, 4.
Wong, J.K.W. and Li, H., 2008. Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems. Building and Environment, Vol. 43 No. 1, 108-25.
Zadeh,L.A., 1965. Fuzzy set. Information and Control, Vol.8, 338-353.
Zwick, Rami, Edward Carlstein and David V. Budescu., 1987. Measures of similarity among fuzzy concepts: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Vol. 1, 221-242.
Zmud, R. W. and Apple, M. E., 1989. Measuring Information Technology Infusion, unpublished manuscript.