本研究主張，地理空間資料為個人資料隱私權中的一部分，應該受適當保護，惟臺灣社會中少有具地理空間資訊隱私面向的思考，民眾亦普遍較無隱私意識，但其實地理空間資訊的應用在日常生活中十分廣泛，其隱私問題也在在影響了我們日常行為，因此若未主動關心自身相關權益的話，將可能導致地理空間資訊隱私遭到侵犯，或被作為不當利用。
而在如此的風險之前，應有一套合適的地理空間資訊隱私保護機制，其應充分考量地理空間資訊、數位足跡、資料分級保護等議題。此外，為了推進各種地理資訊應用，並確保其在發展的過程中不會因隱私問題而過度限制資料的取得，本研究認為必須透過法規要求和資料管理等實務作法，來平衡個人資料隱私權與地理空間資訊發展的需求。
此外，本研究建議我國應盡速設置獨立且專責之資料保護機構，並建立問責機制，再搭配區塊鏈分散式身分認證系統等先進技術達到更高的安全性和隱私保護，並同時保有對個人資料的隱私自主控制權。

This study asserts that geospatial data constitutes a part of individual privacy rights and should be accorded proper protection. However, in Taiwanese society, there is scant consideration given to the privacy aspects of geospatial information, and the public generally lacks awareness of privacy. In reality, the application of geospatial information is extensively prevalent in daily life, and its privacy issues continually affect our everyday actions. Therefore, if one does not proactively concern oneself with relevant rights and interests, it may lead to the infringement of geospatial information privacy or its improper exploitation.
Prior to such risks, there should be an appropriate mechanism for the protection of geospatial information privacy, which should comprehensively take into account aspects such as geospatial information, digital footprints, and graded protection of data. Moreover, in order to promote various geospatial information applications and to ensure that privacy issues do not unduly restrict data access during development, this research believes that it is necessary to balance individual data privacy rights and the needs of geospatial information development through legal requirements and data management practices.
Furthermore, this study recommends that our country should promptly establish an independent and dedicated data protection agency, set up accountability mechanisms, and combine decentralized blockchain identity authentication systems and other advanced technologies to achieve higher levels of security and privacy protection. This should also maintain individual control over personal data privacy.

Brandeis, L., & Warren, S. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard law review, 4(5), 193-220.
California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, (2018). https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&division=3.&title=1.81.5.&part=4.&chapter=&article=
European Convention. (2000). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. European Convention,. http://data.europa.eu/eli/treaty/char_2012/oj
General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR, (2018). https://gdpr-info.eu/
Facebook. (2023). 隱私政策. Meta. Retrieved May 22 from https://www.facebook.com/privacy/policy
Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). (2018). GEOSPATIAL DATA ACT OF 2018. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC),. Retrieved from https://www.fgdc.gov/organization
Folger, P. (2018). The Geospatial Data Act of 2018. In: CRS Report.
General Services Administration & the Office of Management and Budget. (2018). President's Management Agenda Release. Retrieved from https://trumpadministration.archives.performance.gov/PMA/PMA.html
Goodchild, M. (2010). Twenty years of progress: GIScience in 2010. Journal of spatial information science(1), 3-20.
Goodchild, M. F. (2009). Geographic information systems and science: today and tomorrow. Annals of GIS, 15(1), 3-9.
Kang, J. (1997). Information privacy in cyberspace transactions. Stan. L. Rev., 50, 1193.
McDonnell, R., & Kemp, K. (1995). International GIS dictionary. John Wiley & Sons.
National Science and Technology Council. (2016a). The National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/microsites/ostp/NSTC/national_ai_rd_strategic_plan.pdf
National Science and Technology Council. (2016b). Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/microsites/ostp/NSTC/preparing_for_the_future_of_ai.pdf
Netflix. Netflix 推薦系統如何運作. Netflix. Retrieved May 22 from https://help.netflix.com/zh-tw/node/100639
Office of Management and Budget. (2020). Components of the Federal Data Strategy. https://strategy.data.gov/overview/
Office of the Federal Register, N. A. a. R. A. (2013). Federal Register Volume 78, Issue 12. Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/coppa-safe-harbor-program
Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, (2018). https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/p-8.6/page-1.html
S.994 - DATA Act, (2014). https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/994
Snow, J. (1856). On the mode of communication of cholera. Edinburgh medical journal, 1(7), 668.
The Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1986). Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA). Washington, D.C.: The Bureau of Justice Assistance Retrieved from https://bja.ojp.gov/program/it/privacy-civil-liberties/authorities/statutes/1285
Overview of The Privacy Act of 1974 (2020 Edition), (2020). https://www.justice.gov/opcl/overview-privacy-act-1974-2020-edition
Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic geography, 46(sup1), 234-240.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2018). Cloud Act Resources. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/criminal-oia/cloud-act-resources
UCGIS. (2014). Roger Tomlinson. UCGIS. https://www.ucgis.org/roger-tomlinson
United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
S.512 - Law Enforcement Access to Data Stored Abroad Act, (2015). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/512
H.R.6216 - National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020, § 5201 (2020). https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6216
Weiss, M. A., & Archick, K. (2016). US-EU data privacy: from safe harbor to privacy shield. In: Congressional Research Service Washington.
內政部地政司. 全國地政電子謄本系統. https://ep.land.nat.gov.tw/Home/SNEpaperKind
內政部地政司. (2021). 不動產交易實價查詢服務網. 內政部. https://lvr.land.moi.gov.tw/
內政部地政司. (2022). 實價登錄2.0. https://www.land.moi.gov.tw/chhtml/content/1141
即時路況資料標準, (2021). https://traffic.transportdata.tw/TrafficStandard#
個人資料保護法, (2015). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawOldVer.aspx?pcode=I0050021
行政院. (2023). 政院通過「個人資料保護法」第1條之1、第48條、第56條修正草案 設置個資保護獨立監督機關並提高個資外洩罰責. Taipei Retrieved from https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/2d6bb590-fa47-435f-818e-c196c25733e0
法務部. (2016). 個人資料保護法規及參考資料彙編. 法務部
邱文聰. (2009). 從資訊自決與資訊隱私的概念區分—評 [電腦處理個人資料保護法修正草案] 的結構性問題. 月旦法學雜誌, 168, 172-189.
桃園市政府智慧城市推動會. (2021). 桃園市政府智慧城市推動委員會設置要點. 桃園市政府. https://smartcity.tycg.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=718
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心. (2022). 2022台灣網路報告. 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心. https://report.twnic.tw/2022/
國家發展委員會. (2021). 我國獲准設立 APEC 跨境隱私保護規則(CBPR)體系當責機構. 國家發展委員會. Retrieved Apr 15 from https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_27_35052
國家發展委員會. (2023). 立法院三讀通過個資法修正案 將強化企業個資外洩罰責 並盡速設置個資保護委員會籌備處. Taipei: 國家發展委員會 Retrieved from https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_27_36901#
郭戎晉. (2012). 論數位環境下個人資料保護法制之發展與難題－以「數位足跡」之評價為核心 [Study on Legal Evaluation of Digital Footprint under the Personal Information Protection Act in Taiwan]. 科技法律透析, 24(4), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.7062/stlr.201204.0018
郭翡玉、曾詠宜. (2018). 三維地理資訊未來發展趨勢. 國家發展委員會. https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_27_28567
陳昱帆. (2012). 地理資訊公開之相關法律問題研究 銘傳大學]. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/784q74
新北市政府資訊中心. (2019). 以「智慧程式」打造「智慧城市」. 新北市政府. https://www.imc.ntpc.gov.tw/home.jsp?id=MTA=&act=be4f48068b2b0031&dataserno=723e1ce966d74367b2aac13166aec200
溫祖德. (2018). 從Jones案論使用GPS定位追蹤器之合憲性－兼評馬賽克理論 [The Constitutionality of the Use of GPS Monitoring and Tracking Devices-A Note on Mosaic Theory]. 東吳法律學報, 30(1), 121-167.
臺北智慧城市專案辦公室. (2016). 臺北智慧城市. 臺北市政府, 臺北市政府資訊局. https://smartcity.taipei/about?lang=zh-Hant
臺北智慧城市專案辦公室. (2021). 台北市市場實聯分流管理資訊站. 臺北市政府, 臺北市政府資訊局. https://smartcity.taipei/projdetail/266?lang=zh-Hant
鄭名翔. (2021). 台北通爆侵犯個資 議員促停用實名制. 自由時報. https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/1489894?fbclid=IwAR2oF-fvFpSWlm3wkTQ_9y3hMbgZOcmA1Yy5abKlVc3MSIRBG2AJmikagRw
憲法法庭. (2000). 釋字第509號解釋. Taipei: 憲法法庭 Retrieved from https://cons.judicial.gov.tw/docdata.aspx?fid=100&id=310690
憲法法庭. (2022). 111年憲判字第13號【健保資料庫案】. (會台字第13769號). Taipei: 憲法法庭 Retrieved from https://cons.judicial.gov.tw/docdata.aspx?fid=38&id=309956