簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 周志聰
Chou, Chih-Tsung
論文名稱: 德勒茲(Gilles Deleuze)的多元性哲學及其教育應用
Deleuze’s Philosophy of Multiplicity and Its Application on Education
指導教授: 林逢祺
Lin, Ferng-Chyi
洪仁進
Hung, Ren-Jin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育學系
Department of Education
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 137
中文關鍵詞: 德勒茲多元差異後結構主義教育哲學
英文關鍵詞: Deleuze, Gilles., multiplicity, difference, poststructuralism, philosophy of education
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:583下載:148
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在於探討Deleuze多元性哲學,並闡述與發展其在教育中應用的可能性。本研究首先就Deleuze生平與學術發展環境探討其多元性哲學的形成背景;其次,分析Deleuze多元性哲學的思想脈絡與其多元性哲學實踐的發展;最後,詮釋Deleuze多元性哲學的意涵,並闡述與發展Deleuze多元性哲學在教育應用上的可能性。
    根據前述之探討,本研究之結論如下:
    一、Deleuze承接二戰前後法國哲學氛圍與自由的社政風氣後,發動結構主義轉化到後結構主義的哲學風潮,以及參與激進政治的社會運動,並在其後面對反動的社會政治風氣,以哲學為武器提出開放的呼聲。
    二、Deleuze在對Hume、Bergson、Nietzsche與Spinoza的研究解讀中,發現與提取諸多多元性哲學的概念。
    三、Deleuze多元性哲學倒轉再現論哲學中差異與同一的關係,以差異與重複概念構成了多元性實現化與不斷流變的運動;並以內在性本體論構成差異而平等的多元性世界。
    四、Deleuze提出向域外開放的思考機制以及地下莖的思想影像,目的在於使思想由教條思想影像中解放出來,邁向更多元的開放創造。
    五、Deleuze多元性哲學可分為差異、重複、內在性、關係之外部性與脈絡以及開放系統五個要點。
    六、Deleuze多元性哲學可有助於學習本質與教育目的之探討。
    七、Deleuze多元性哲學可提供課程統整、道德教育與多元文化教育新的解釋方式與反思觀點。
    八、Deleuze多元性哲學可為教育改革以及通識教育提供省思,並且對教育系統的開放性提出展望。

    The purpose of this study is to explore Deleuze’s philosophy of multiplicity, and develop its application on education. First, it describes the life, and the academic background of Deleuze. Second, it analyzes the philosophical context of Deleuze’s philosophy of multiplicity, and explicates the development of its “doing” in philosophy of multiplicity. Third, it interprets the connotation of Deleuze’s philosophy of multiplicity. Finally, it illuminates and develops the application of Deleuze’s philosophy of multiplicity on education.
    The conclusions of the study are as follows:
    1. Deleuze incited the philosophical transformation from structuralism to poststructuralism, and joined the radical social movements. Later, he advocated philosophy of multiplicity to resist the reaction of social climate.
    2. Deleuze interpreted philosophy of Hume, Bergson, Nietzsche, and Spinoza. Hence, he found many concepts for his philosophy of multiplicity.
    3. Deleuze overturned the relationship of identity and difference in representationism. He took concepts of difference and repetition to construct the actualization of multiplicity and eternal movement. The ontology of immanence justified the coexistence of multiplicity and equality.
    4. The purpose of the image of thought of rhizome is to free thought from the dogmatic image of thought. And let it to be more multiple, open, and creative.
    5. There are five main points in Deleuze’s philosophy of multiplicity. They are difference, repetition, immanence, context and exteriority of relation, and open system.
    6. Deleuze’s philosophy of multiplicity can explore the essences of learning and the aims of education.
    7. Deleuze’s philosophy of multiplicity can supply the new methods of interpretation and viewpoints of reflection in curriculum integration, moral education, and multicultural education.
    8. Deleuze’s philosophy of multiplicity can advance new reflections in educational reform and general education. It can also promote the foresight of open educational system.

    第一章 緒論 --------------------------------------1 第一節 研究動機與目的-----------------------------1 第二節 研究方法與步驟-----------------------------5 第三節 研究限制--------------------------------------8 第二章 Deleuze的生平與其學術發展環境-----------------11 第一節 Deleuze的哲學生命------------------------------12 第二節 Deleuze多元性哲學的學術發展環境--------------20 第三章 Deleuze多元性哲學的思想脈絡-------------------27 第一節 活化Hume:關係的外部性----------------28 第二節 解讀Bergson:綿延與潛在--------------------32 第三節 重述Nietzsche:強力意志與永劫回歸--------------41 第四節 詮釋Spinoza:內在性與喜樂---------------------51 第四章 Deleuze多元性哲學實踐的發展-------------------61 第一節 「差異」與「重複」概念的發掘-----------------62 第二節 慾望的平反與解放-------------------------68 第三節 文學與藝術的多元性機器-----------------------78 第四節 新的思想影像----------------------------------87 第五章 Deleuze 多元性哲學的詮釋----------------------97 第一節 差異-----------------------------------------97 第二節 重複---------------------------------------101 第三節 內在性-------------------------------------103 第四節 關係的外部性及脈絡--------------------------104 第五節 開放系統----------------------------------105 第六章 Deleuze 多元性哲學在教育上的應用-------------111 第一節 「差異」概念的教育運用----------------------112 第二節 「重複」概念的教育運用-----------------------114 第三節 「內在性」概念的教育運用--------------------115 第四節 「關係之外部性與脈絡」概念的教育運用---------117 第五節 「開放系統」概念的教育展望------------------120 第七章 結論-----------------------------123 參考文獻---------------------------------------------127

    壹、 中文著作:
    (一)中文原著:
    王超群(1993)。德勒茲與瓦達利《反伊底帕斯》一書之研究。輔仁大學哲學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    吳康(1964)。柏格森哲學。台北:台灣商務。
    李幼蒸(1998)。慾望倫理學:佛洛伊德與拉康。嘉義:南華管理學院。
    李年豐(1995)。游牧型作家米勒:以精神分裂模式剖析《北迴歸線》與《南迴歸線》。國立政治大學英國語文研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    沈清松(1987)。思想的游牧者。台北評論,2。228-239。
    周國平(1990)。尼采與形而上學。長沙:湖南教育出版社。
    林志明(1996)。德勒茲生平年表。台灣賦格,Fevrier 1996。72-80。台北:留法台灣同學會。
    林春明(1993)。後結構主義與差異哲學。哲學雜誌,4。42-48。
    林逢祺(1998)。美感經驗與教育。載於伍振鷟等(合著),教育哲學,(頁327-343)。台北:五南。
    洪漢鼎(1992)。斯賓諾莎。台北:東大。
    苗力田(1990)。古希臘哲學。北京:中國人民大學出版社
    唐力權(1993)。權力、意志與詮釋-尼采的透視主義與後現代思想。哲學雜誌,4。26-40。
    項退結 編(1988)。西洋哲學辭典。台北:華香園出版社。
    傅偉勳(1990)。西洋哲學史。台北:三民書局。
    馮俊(1994)。當代法國倫理思想概論。台北:遠流。
    馮朝霖(2001a)。教育哲學專論—主體、情性與創化。台北:元照。
    馮朝霖(2001b)。橫繫理性與網化思維—生態經濟時代的通識教育。論文發表於教育部主辦,國立政治大學教育學系承辦之「知識管理與教育革新發展」研討會,台北。
    楊李榮(1996)。德勒茲的差異哲學。國立政治大學哲學系碩士論文。未出版,台北。
    歐崇敬(1999)。從結構主義到解構主義。台北:揚智。
    蔡源煌(1987)。德勒茲的關鍵術語及其引申義。台北評論,2。240-250。
    羅貴祥(1997)。德勒茲。台北:東大。
    蘇永明(2000)。垂直多元與水平多元的思考模式。載於但昭偉、蘇永明(主編),文化、多元文化與教育(頁133-179)。台北:五南。
    (二)中文譯著
    Bergson, H. (1970/ 1976). Matter and memory.
    張君(譯)。物質與記憶。台北:先知。
    Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991/ 1994). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations.
    朱元鴻(譯)。後現代理論-批判的質疑。台北:巨流。
    Deleuze, G. (1986/ 2000). Foucault.
    楊凱麟(譯)。德勒茲論傅柯。台北:麥田。
    Deleuze, G. (1990/ 2000). Pourparlers.
    劉漢全(譯)。哲學與權力的談判—德勒茲訪談錄。北京:商務印書館。
    Deleuze, G. (1986, 1988/ 2001). Foucault, Le pli.
    于奇智、楊潔(譯)。傅柯‧摺子。長沙:湖南文藝出版社。
    Deleuze, G. (1962/ 2001). Nietzsche et la philosophie.
    周穎、劉玉宇(譯)。尼采與哲學。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
    Deleuze, G. (1997/ 2002). Le bergsonisme, La philosophie critique de Kant.
    張宇凌、關群德(譯)。康德與柏格森解讀。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
    Ferguson, M. (1987/ 1993). The aquarian conspiracy: Personal and social transformation in the 1980s.
    廖世德(譯)。寶瓶同謀。台北:方智
    Harari, J. V., & Bell, D. F. (1982/ 1994). Introduction: Journal à plusieur svoies.
    毛榮富(譯)。邁向多線通路的旅誌—塞荷導論。思與言(32)2。175-217。
    Kafka, F. (1925/ 1987). The trial.
    黃書敬(譯)。審判。台北:志文。
    Mayer, R. E. (1987/ 1991). Education psychology: A cognitive approach.
    林清山(譯)。教育心理學—認知取向。台北:遠流。
    Nietzsche, F. (1974/ 1982). The joyful wisdom.
    余鴻榮(譯)。歡悅的智慧。台北:志文。
    Nietzsche, F. (1883/ 1983). Also sprach Zarathustra.
    余鴻榮(譯)。查拉圖斯特如是說。台北:志文。
    Nietzsche, F. (1967/ 1992). On the genealogy of morals.
    周紅(譯)。論道德的系譜。北京:三聯書店。
    Nietzsche, F. (1967/ 2000a). The will to power.
    張念東、凌素心(譯)。權力意志:重估一切價值的嘗試。北京:中央編譯出版社。
    Nietzsche, F. (1969/ 2000b). Ecce homo.
    張念東、凌素心(譯)。看那個人:尼采自述。北京:中央編譯出版社。
    Rorty, R. (1989/ 1988). Contingency, irony, and solidarity.
    徐文瑞(譯)。偶然‧反諷與團結:一個實用主義者的政治想像。台北:麥田。
    Sauvigny, G. B. & Pinkney, D. H.(1977/ 1991). History of France.
    蔡百銓(譯)。法國史。台北:五南。
    Spinoza, B. (1927/ 1981). Ethic.
    賀麟(譯)。倫理學。北京:商務印書館。
    荻原資明(1997/ 2001)。德魯茲—游牧民。
    徐金鳳(譯)。德魯茲—游牧民。石家莊:河北教育出版社
    貳、 英文著作:
    Badiou, A. (1997/ 1999). Deleuze: The clamor of being.(L. Burchill Trans.)Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1997).
    Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    Best, S & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. New York: The Guilford Press.
    Bogue, R. (1990). Gilles Deleuze: Postmodern philosopher? Criticism, 32(4), 401-418.
    Bogue, R. (1993). Gilles Deleuze: The aesthetics of force. Journal of British Society of Phenomenology, 24(1), 56-65.
    Bouge, R. (1989). Deleuze & Guattari. New York: Routledge
    Boundas, C. V. Eds. (1993). The Deleuze reader. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Colebrook, C.(2002). Gilles Deleuze. New York: Routledge.
    Daignault, J. (1992). Traces at work from different places. In W. F. Pinar & W. M. Reynolds (ed.), Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp. 195-215). New York: Teachers College Press.
    Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1972/ 1977). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seems, & H. R. Lanes, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1972).
    Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1975/ 1986). Kafka: Toward a minor literature (D. Polan, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1975).
    Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1980/ 1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980).
    Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1991/ 1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson, & G. Burchell, Trans.). London: Verso. (Original work published 1991).
    Deleuze, G. & Parnet, C. (1977/ 1987). Dialogues (H. Tomlinson, & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1977).
    Deleuze, G. (1962/ 1983). Nietzsche and philosophy (H. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1962).
    Deleuze, G. (1973/ 1985). Nomad thought. (D. B. Allison, Trans.) In D. B. Allison, (Eds.), The new Nietzsche. (pp. 142-149). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1973).
    Deleuze, G. (1966/ 1988). Bergsonism. (H. Tomlinson, & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York: Zone Books. (Original work published 1966)
    Deleuze, G. (1981/ 1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy (R. Hurley, Trans.). San Francisco CA: City Lights Books. (Original work published 1981)
    Deleuze, G. (1968/ 1990). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Zone Books. (Original work published 1968)
    Deleuze, G. (1969/ 1990). The logic of sense (M. Lester, & C. Stivale, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1969)
    Deleuze, G. (1953/ 1991). Empiricism and subjectivity. (C. V. Boundas, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1953)
    Deleuze, G. (1968/ 1994). Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1968)
    Deleuze, G. (1990/ 1995). Negotiation 1972-1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1990)
    Deleuze, G. (1956/ 1999). Bergson’s conception of difference. (M. McMahon, Trans.). In J. Mullarkey (ed.). The new Bergson. (pp. 42-65), Manchester: Manchester University Press. (Original work published 1956)
    Deleuze, G. (1988/ 1999). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. (T. Conley, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1988)
    Deleuze, G. (1986/ 2000). The brain is screen. (M. T. Guirgis Trans.). In G. Flaxman, (ed.). The brain is screen: Deleuze and the philosophy of cinema. (pp. 365-373), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1986)
    Deleuze, G. (1964/ 2000). Proust and signs. (H. Richard, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1964)
    Deleuze, G. (1995/ 2001). Immanence: A life. (A. Boyman, Trans.). In J. Rajchman, (ed.).Gilles Deleuze pure immanence: Essay on a life (pp. 25-33), New York: Zone Books. (Original work published 1995)
    Derrida, J. (1995). I‘ll have to wander all alone. Retrieved May 15, 2001, from http://www.usc.edu/dept/comp-lit/tympanum/1/derrida1.html
    Descombes, V. (1989). Modern fench philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
    Donkel, D. L. (2002). Deleuze’s challenge: thinking internal difference. Philosophy Today. 323-329.
    Evans, D. (1996). An introductory dictionary of lacanian psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge
    Ferry, L., & Renaut, A. (1985/ 1990). French philosophy of the sixties: An essay on anti-humanism(M. H. S. Cattani, Trans.). Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press. (Original work published 1985)
    Foucault, M. & Deleuze, G. (1972/ 1977). Intellectuals and power. (D. F. Bouchard, & S. Simon, Trans.). In D. F. Bouchard, (Eds.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. (pp. 203-217). Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1972)
    Foucault, M. (1970/ 1977). Theatrum philosophicum. (D. F. Bouchard, & S. Simon, Trans.). In D. F. Bouchard, (Eds.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. (pp. 165-196). Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1970)
    Foucault, M. (1984/ 1990). The use of pleasure: Volume 2 of the history of sexuality (R. Hurley Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1984)
    Groves, C. R. (2001). Deleuze’s Kant: enlightenment and education. Philosophy Today. 77-94.
    Gutting, G.(2001). French philosophy in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Hall, W. D.(1976). Education, culture and politics in modern France. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Hardt, M. (1993). Gilles Deleuze: An apprenticeship in philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Hayden, P. (1998). Multiplicity and becoming: The pluralist empiricism of Gilles Deleuze. New York: Peter Lang.
    Holland, E. W. (1999). Deleuze and Guattari’s anti-Oedipus: Introduction to schizoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
    jagodzinski, j. (1992). Curriculum as felt through six layers of an aesthetically embodied skin: The Arch-writing on the body. In W. F. Pinar, & W. M. Reynolds (Eds.) Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text. (pp. 159-183), New York: Teachers College Press.
    Ladwig, J. G. (1995). Educational intellectuals and corporate politics. In R. Smith, & P. Wexler, (Eds.). After postmodernism: Education, politics and identity. (pp. 209-224), London: The Falmer Press.
    Leach, M & Boler, M. (1998) Gilles Deleuze: Practicing education through flight and gossip. In M. Peters (Eds.). Naming the multiple: Poststructuralism and education. (pp. 149-172). Westport, New Zealand: Bergin & Garvey
    Lechte, J. (1994). Fifty key contemporary thinkers: From structuralism to postmodernity. New York: Routledge.
    May, T. (1994). Difference and unity in Gilles Deleuze. In C. V. Boundas, & D. Olkowski, (Eds.). Gilles Deleuze and the theather of philosophy. (pp. 33-50). New York: Routledge.
    McMahon, C. (1996). Hysterical academies: Re-imagining lacan’s theory of the four discourses. Queensland, Australia: James Cook University.
    McWilliam, E. (1997). Beyond the missionary position: Teacher desire and radical pedagogy. In S. Todd, (Eds.). Learning desire: Perspectives on pedagogy, culture, and the unsaid. (pp. 217-235), New York: Routledge.
    Melville, H. (1988). Moby Dick. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Miller, H. (1965). Sexus. New York: Grove Press.
    Morss, J. R. (2000). The passional pedagogy of Gilles Deleuze. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 32(2), 185-200.
    Murphy, T. S. (2001). Deleuze, Gilles. In V. E. Taylor, & C. E. Winquist, (Eds.) Encyclopedia of postmodernism. (pp. 86-89), New York: Routledge.
    Nietzsche, F. (1990/ 1999). On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense. (D. Breazeale Trans.).In E. Sosa, (ed.). Epistemology: The classical readings. (pp. 182-195), New York: Blackwell.
    Peters, M. Eds.(1998). Naming the multiple: Poststructuralism and education. Westport, New Zealand: Bergin & Garvey.
    Polan, D. (1994).Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation. In C. V. Boundas, & D. Olkowski, (Eds.). Gilles Deleuze and the theater of Philosophy.(pp. 229-254). New York: Routledge.
    Protevi, J.(2000). Deleuze and Guattari. Retrieved Novenber 30, 2000. from http://www.artsci.lsu.edu/fai/Faculty/Professors/Protevi/DG/index.html
    Proust, M. (1923/ 1992). In search of lost times: Volume V. (C. K. Moncrieff, & T. Kilmartin Trans.). New York: Random House. (Original work published 1923)
    Richmond, J. L. (1997). Roland Barthes and decomposing/ deterritorializing the writing classroom.(ED 415 505)
    Sarup, M. (1993). An introductory guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
    Scherer, R.(2001). On four formulas that might sum up the Deleuzian philosophy. In G. Gensko, (Eds.). Deleuze and Guattari: Critical assessements of leading philosophers. (pp. 466-472), New York: Routledge.
    Schrift, A. D. (1995). Nietzsche’s french legacy: A genealogy of poststructuralism. New York: Routledge.
    Serres, M. (1982/ 1995). Genesis. (G. James, & J. Nielson, Trans.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1982)
    St. Pierre, E. A. (1996). The space of nomadic enquiry: Deterritorializing mental space and the space of the field, papers presented to Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City, April.
    Stivale, C. J. (1996a). Gilles Deleuze’s ABC primer, with Clair Parnet(1988-1989). Retrieved July 3, 2000. from
    http://www.langlab.wayne.edu/Romance/FreD_G/ABC1.html
    Stivale, C. J. (1996b). Gilles Deleuze’s ABC primer, with Clair Parnet(1988-1989). Retrieved July 3, 2000. from
    http://www.langlab.wayne.edu/Romance/FreD_G/ABC2.html
    Stivale, C. J. (1996c). Gilles Deleuze’s ABC primer, with Clair Parnet(1988-1989). Retrieved July 3, 2000. from
    http://www.langlab.wayne.edu/Romance/FreD_G/ABC3.html

    QR CODE