簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 龐潤嬌
論文名稱: 臺北市高職學生休閒活動態度與休閒輔導需求之研究-以私立育達高職為例
指導教授: 黃人傑
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 政治學研究所
Graduate Institute of Political Science
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 163
中文關鍵詞: 休閒活動休閒態度休閒輔導
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:99下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘 要
    本研究之主要目的是探討台北市育達高職學生對休閒活動的態度,以及對休閒輔導的需求。以九十二學年度第二學期就讀於台北市育達高職日間部,一至三年級全體學生為母體共5,776人。採分層集束抽樣,於民國九十三年四月至五月間進行結構性問卷施測,利用自填問卷取得有效樣本956人。調查結果以描述性統計、七考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、回歸分析所得結果如下:
    一、 休閒活動態度與休閒輔導需求方面,整體而言,台北市育達高職學生在休閒活動態度方面,尤其是認知方面的心理特質需再加強,休閒輔導需求方面,內涵與資源需求方面較高,因此藉由休閒輔導提供協助。
    二、 不同性別家庭結構、父(母)親教育程度、父(母)親職業類別、學業成績在休閒活動態度上無顯著差異、休閒輔導需求亦無顯著差異。
    三、 不同年級、科系、住宿、社團在休閒活動態度,在休閒輔導需求皆有顯著差異。
    四、認知、情感、行為與意義功能的需求、能力與技巧的需求、自我探索的需求、內涵與資源的需求、休閒活動態度與休閒輔導
    需求之相關分析上,皆有顯著相關。
    根據本研究結果,建議政府機關重視青少年休閒活動,而學校能加強並實施休閒教育,因青少年能在學生階段,就建立正確休閒觀念,培養正當娛樂,能助其個人成長與在校學習,同時也為其一生樹立良好典範,並成為最開心,最快樂成長的公民。

    The purpose of this research is to explore and discover the attitudes and view of high school students towards leisure activities and their need of recreational counseling. In this study 5776 subjects, who enrolled in the second semester of day session in the 92nd year, were selected from Taipei Yuda High School of Commerce. The subjects were comprised of students from all three academic years. Self-answered questionnaire was used to gather data from the subjects. The result was generated between the months of April to May in the 93rd year from an effective sampling size of 956 subjects. The gathered data were further analyzed through descriptive statistics, t test, one-way analysis of variance and Pearson product-moment correction.
    Based on the analyzed data, several assumptions can be made:
    1. Regarding the subjects' attitude towards leisure activities, reinforcements need to be made on students' recognition of leisure activities. As for the need of recreational counseling, there is a higher demand of resources and intention, and it is recommended to be aided through recreational counseling.
    2. Difference in subjects' family structure, educational backgrounds or occupations of subjects' parents, even subjects' own academic performance does not seem to have any correlation with their attitude towards leisure activities or their need of recreational counseling.
    3. The difference in subjects' academic year, area of major, lodging or social group activities appears to have a significant effect on subjects' need of recreational counseling.
    4. The needs of recognition, emotion, behavior, functions of meaning, skills, abilities, self-exploration, intention and resources seems to have a high correlation with leisure activities and recreational counseling.
    From the results of the study, the government should be more attentive on youths' leisure activities; and that schools should emphasize and enforce leisure education so that the youths can learn how to spend their past time healthily and constructively from an early age. This will ensure that youths will grow up to be role models for others during their schooling years to become happy citizens.

    第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………..1 第二節 研究問題與假設……………………………………..5 第三節 研究方法與步驟……………………………………..7 第四節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………..9 第五節 名詞解釋……………………………………………..10 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 休閒活動理論………………………………………..13 第二節 休閒活動的有關研究………………………………..28 第三節 休閒活動態度………………………………………..50 第四節 休閒輔導的理論……………………………………..57 第三章 研究設計與實施 第一節 研究的架構…………………………………………..65 第二節 研究程序……………………………………………..69 第三節 研究工具的編製……………………………………..70 第四節 調查實施……………………………………………..76 第五節 資料處理……………………………………………..81 第四章 研究結果與討論 第一節 學生基本資料之分析………………………………..83 第二節 休閒活動態度之分析………………………………..87 第三節 休閒輔導需求之分析………………………………..92 第四節 休閒活動態度、休閒輔導在性別上的t檢定……..96 第五節 休閒活動態度與休閒輔導需求差異性之分析……..97 第六節 休閒活動態度與休閒輔導需求之相關分析………..133 第五章 結論 第一節 發現…………………………………………………..137 第二節 建議…………………………………………………..143 第三節 展望…………………………………………………..148 參考書目 一、 中文部分……………………………………………..150 二、 英文部分……………………………………………..155 附錄 附錄一…………………………………………………………158 附錄二…………………………………………………………159 附錄三…………………………………………………………160

    一、中文部分
    1. 文崇一(1978),〈台灣休閒生活的趨勢〉,《中華文化發展評估與展望》,行政院文化建設委員會印,頁73-74。
    2. 民生報(2004),6月15日,A2版。
    3. 甘家馨(1974),〈休閒與康樂的社會學研究〉,《珠海學報》,7,頁77-109。
    4. 江貞昱(1993),《經濟發展中社經結構變遷與休閒活動關係保持》,國立政治大學社會研究所碩士論文。
    5. 行政院主計處(1979),《青少年調查報告》,台北,行政院主計處。
    6. 行政院青輔會(1995),《青少年白皮書》,台北,行政院青輔會。
    1.Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitutedes, personality, and Behavior, open University Press.
    2.Bloland, P.A. (1987). 〝Leisure as a campus resource for fostering student develop〞. Journal of Counseling and Develop, B5, P291-294.
    3. Crandall,R.& Slirken,K. (1980).〝Leisure attitude and their measurement〞. In Iso-Ahola, S.(Ed.) Social Psychological on Leisure and Reaction 261-284 Spnongfield, IL : Charles C. Thomas.
    4.Dumazedier, J.(1974). Socialogy of Leisur. NY : Elsevier North-Holland.
    5.Ducan, D.J.(1978).Leisure type :〝Factor analysis of leisure profiles〞.Journal of Leisure Research, 10(2), P113-125.
    6.Eagly,A. & Chaiken,S.(1993). The Psychology of attitudes Forth Worth. Tx ; Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    7.Erikson,E.H.(1968). Identoty: Youth & crisis, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

    QR CODE