摘 要
面對全球化競爭激烈的發展，企業競爭的優勢並非單純的新產品研發、市場拓展或降低成本，而是組織學習的速度。團隊學習是組織學習成功的關鍵。
本研究主要目的為探討高科技企業團隊運作、團隊學習型態與學習成效之彼此間之關係。研究方法以「文獻分析法」、「個案訪談法」與「問卷調查法」進行。研究對象採取立意抽樣原則，選出半導體與光電產業六家企業進行實證研究。問卷發出190份，回收151份，扣除無效卷，回收率達78.9%，(擔任團隊領導者33人，團隊成員117人)。應用次數分配、百分比、t 考驗、變異數分析、積差相關係數分析、逐步多元迴歸、徑路分析等統計方法分析後，獲得結論如下：
一、不同個人背景變項於團隊條件、團隊運作、學習型態、團隊學習成效與組織學習成效之間有顯著差異。
二、不同團隊背景變項於團隊條件、團隊運作、學習型態、團隊學習成效與組織學習成效之間有有顯著差異。
三、團隊條件、團隊運作、團隊學習型態與團隊學習成效、組織學習成效間有顯著正相關。
四、團隊運作與團隊學習型態對團隊學習成效表現具有預測力，能解釋團隊學習成效表現52.3%的變異量。以團隊聯繫、自我學習、團隊動力、社群學習等分量具影響力。團隊條件對團隊學習成效不具顯著影響力。
五、團隊條件與團隊學習型態對學習成效表現具有預測力，能解釋組織學習成效表現58.2%的變異量。以自我學習、社群學習、行政支援、教育訓練等分量具影響力。團隊運作對組織學習成效不具顯著影響力。
六、團隊運作、團隊學習型態對團隊學習成效具徑路模式；團隊條件、團隊學習型態對組織學習成效具徑路模式。
七、不同產業、公司在團隊學習型態表現上有顯著差異。
針對以上結果，本研究對實務界及後續研究提出建議。

Abstract
To face with the competitive development world wide, the advantage of business competition is not only the new production innovation, market implementation or cost down plan, but the path (speed) of organizing learning.
This research was investigated on team conditions, team process, team learning patterns and team learning outcomes at High –Tech companies. These research methods were used document analysis、interview and research survey analysis. The research surveyed audiences are chosen randomized by specific groups in semiconductor and LCD (liquid crystal display industries as survey samples. 190 survey sent out, returned 151 samples, deduct the invalid samples, the reclaim rate is 78.9%. Applied with T test, variable and difference analysis, metrics error difference analysis the results as below:
1. There are the remarkable difference of personnel background base on team conditions, team process, learning patterns, team learning outcomes and organization learning outcomes.
2. There are the notable difference of team background, team process, learning patterns, team learning outcomes and organization learning outcomes .
3. Team conditions, team process, team learning patterns and team learning results are shown in positive proportion.
4. The team process and team learning patterns are showing anticipation of team learning outcomes; this can explain the variable and analysis in 52.3% of learning performance outcomes. The variable elements as team affiliation; self-learning, team agency and community of practice are influenced. Team learning outcomes does not affected by the team condition.
5. The team conditions and team learning patterns are showing anticipation of learning performance, this can explain the variable and analysis in 58.2% of organization learning results. The variable elements as self-learning, community of practice, administration support, technical training are influenced. Team process does not affect much on organization learning.
6. Team process and group learning patterns are based on the loop module of team learning performance; team condition and team learning patterns are based on the loop module of organization learning.
7. Different industries and companies appear highly differences on team learning patterns.

參考文獻
中文部份
丁導民(民92)企業實務社群的知識分享與組織學習關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
丁櫻華(民88)，淺析學習型組織在圖書館的應用。國立成功大學圖書館刊第四期88年10月。http://www.lib.ncku.edu.tw/journal/journal/4/3_1.htm
王如哲(民90)。知識管理與學校教育革新。中正大學知識經濟與教學研究中心。http://www.ccunix.ccu.edu.tw/~deptkmc/paper/paper_c3.htm。
王如富、徐嬡(1999)。知識管理的職能與組織學習的關係。
http//www.chinakm.com/mapers/1999/11-12-4.htm。
王幼玲(民93，12月16日)。工商時報，第23版，「企業人力資源研討會」。
王 溥(民89)影響專案工程團隊績效之團隊管理研究，中山大學人力資源研究所碩士論文。
田靜婷（民92），影響高科技產業研發團隊學習績效相關因素之研究，彰化師範大學工業教育學系博士論文。
玉井智子(民90)團隊組織特徵、運作過程、團隊績效之關係研究─台日學生之差比較。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
江紋彬(民90)。製造業與服務業教育訓練人員能力內涵及培訓策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
朱芳葶(民92)高科技產業組織學習策略之研究，國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
宋鎮照(民89)。團體動力學。台北：五南。
汪明生、朱斌妤（2000）。衝突管理。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
何子平(89)台灣食品企業組織溝通與學習之關聯性研究東海大學食品科學系，研究所碩士論文。
李啟誠(民92) 國際合資事業控制機制之研究-以組織學習觀點，國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
李弘暉、鍾麗英，「團隊運作過程對團隊績效影響之研究」，人力資源學報，第1期（民國八十八年），1-30。
余如玉(民93)影響企業員工組織承諾因素之探討－統一超商店經理之案例，國立中興大學農業推廣教育研究所碩士論文。
吳清基(民79)，精緻教育的理念。台北：師大學苑。
吳惠君（民89），半導體公司的組織學習機制對其組織學習表現的影響，國立交大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
林文寶(民90)技術知識特性,整合,知識能量與組織學習對核心競爭力及創新績效關聯性之研究國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
林振春，「團體規範的發展與應用(上)(下)」，諮商與輔導，第81卷（民國八十一年），34-37。
林振春，「團體規範的發展與應用(上)(下)」，諮商與輔導，第80卷（民國八十一年），25-30。
邱明瑩(民93)基層主管團隊領導能力之研究--以西式速食連鎖產業為例，國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育系碩士論文。
周忠信(民93)新產品開發團隊衝突、創新與研發績效之研究 ─以高科技產品製造公司為例。元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
周龍鴻(民91)知識管理雙環路架構。台灣知識管理專案之個案，http://thlee.creativity.edu.tw/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=269&forum=31，
周毓敏(民93)團隊信任與其績效之關聯性研究－以建立虛擬社群為例大葉大學工業關係學系碩士論文。
洪榮昭（民90）。知識創新與學習型組織。臺北：五南圖書公司。
高希均(民89)。知識經濟的核心理念。載於高希均、李誠（主編），知識經濟之路，頁1-25。臺北市：天下遠見出版社。
高義展(民90)國民小學教師知識管理、學習型態、專業成長與專業表現關係之研究，國立高雄師範大學/教育學系博士論文。
袁世珮（譯）（2003）。L. Holpp著。團隊管理立即上手。台北：麥格羅•希爾。
翁賢哲（2002），應用團隊互動訓練促進團隊知識分享，國立交通大學工業工程與管理系碩士論文。
翁靜玉(民93) 行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局企業訓練聯絡網--人資專欄。http://www.b-training.org.tw/btraining/Activity/new/new931118-8.htm。
教育部(民87)。邁向學習社會白皮書。http://lifelong.edu.tw/佈告區.htm。
莊謙本、陳枝祥(91)工作導向學習成就認證之探討，全球化：教育變革新領域國際研討會。香港中文大學。
陳進江(民93)組織正義、信任與知識分享行為關係之研究—以台灣高科技產業研發部門為例，真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
郭莉真(民93)策略領導對組織績效之影響－以學習型組織為中介變數
國立台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
郭進隆譯(1998) P.M.Senge,et al.原著，(1995)。第五項修練。台北：天下文化。
郭麗玲(民89)自我導向學習理論與模式社會教育學刊．第 29 卷．頁 1 - 34。
許月瑛(民87)台灣精密機械業產品創新與組織知識流通之研究，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
許是祥譯(民76) 企業管理：理論、方法、實務。台北：中華企業管理中心，1987，三版，頁464-465。
張吉成(民89)科技產業知識創新模式建構之研究，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
黃昆輝(民76) 教育行政學。台北：東華書局。
黃哲宏(民93)高科技公司組織學習之實證研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
董怡君(民92)團隊多元化及衝突對團隊學習行為的影響，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
黃國隆、蔡啟通（民92）企業內之關係類型、互動關係品質與衝突處理方式之關係。行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。
黃建博(民93)主管與部屬交換關係對衝突之因應方式的影響，淡江大學管理科學研究所企業經營碩士論文。
孫本初(1995)。學習型組織的內涵與運用。空大行政學報第三期，頁4-5.
彭懷真(民88) 團隊高績效。台北：希代書版。
曾介宏（民86）團隊式組織之研究—設計與文化創造觀點。國立政治
大學公共行政學系碩士論文。
游玉梅(民88) 知識管理 公務人員月刊 第40、41期 台北市。
張榮發(民90) 。知識管理與公務人力資源發展關係之研究--兩個案之運作分析。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
張翊祥(民93) 團隊成員人格特質組合對團隊效能影響之研究 —以團隊互動過程為中介變項。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
蔡智鏗(民94)研發專案中工作環境、專案領導人能力、團隊運作與研發專案績效關係之研究-以IC設計產業為例，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
蔡靜婷(民89)工作團隊多元化、衝突與任務績效之相關性研究，國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
廖月娟、陳琇玲譯(民90) Peter.Senge,Charlotte Roberts, Richard Ross,George Roth, Bryan Smith原著，(1999)。第五項修練Ⅲ變革之舞(上)。台北：天下文化。
鄭少禎(民93)6σ管理系統中工作環境、專案領導人能力、團隊運作與專案績效影響之研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
劉家鴻(民90)團隊運作對團隊工作態度影響之研究以台北市政府為例，國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。
賴志堅(2001)高科技企業組織學習能耐研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
盧佩秋(民92)團隊領導對集體效能與團隊表現之影響，國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
謝利其（1999），「企業組織學習、組織再造對其全面品管制度及企業績效之影響研究-以國內高科技產業為例」，成大企管碩士論文。
蕭錫錡、沈健華(民87) 自我導向學習。人力發展(57) 46-51。
職業訓練局(民94) 九十四年度補助辦理重點產業在職勞工進修訓練(全民共通核心職能課程)計畫」http://training.evta.gov.tw/DATA/940629.htm
羅偉(民92)科技產業高階主管與組織間衝突成因之探討，國立交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士論文。
龔湘蘭(民87)高科技產業組織學習模式建構之研究，國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。

英文部份
Adair, J. (1987). Effective team building. UK: Gower Publishing Company.
Argryris, C., & Schn, D.A.(1978).Organizational learning：A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA：Addision-Wesley.
ANTA( 1998) Australian National Training Authority. Framing the future: Workbased Learning-A ready Reference, ISBN1865060666 p.11.
Bailey, D.& Gainsburg,J., & Sept, L.,(2004) Apprentices and Gurus: Two Models of Modern Workplace Learning. National Science Foundation grant IIS-0070468.
Barnard C.I. (1938) The Function of the Executive. Cambrige, MA: Harvard Unoversity Press.
British Petroleum (2002) Mentoring and Development Programs
http://www.bp.com/company_overview/profile/what_we_knw.asp retrieve:12/05/02
Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P.(1996). Organizational learning and Communities of
　 practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. In M.D.
Chin, W. W., Salisbury, WM. D., Pearson, A. W. and Stollak, M. J., (1999) “Perceivedcohesion in small groups: Adapting and testing the perceived cohesion scale in a small-group setting,” Small Group Research, Vol. 30, No. 6, 751-766.
Cannon-Bowers J.A.,,Salas E. (2001), Dr. Kass, Steven J., Chapter 9 Team and teamwork powerpoint. http://uwf.edu/psych/skass/i-o_presentation/%20Present4/Chapter%2090_INP3004.ppt. retrieve 06/07/04.
Collison, Chris & Parcell, Geoff (2002) Learning to Flying. Published by John Wily & Sons,Inc. p57~74
Crawford, J. (2003) Final Report: Workforce Training Needs Analysis Project. (HRDC Contract No.U780193) Human Resources Development Canada.
Dechant. K., Kasl, E., & Marsick, V.J.(1993). Learning together: The team process. In K. E. Watkins & V.J. Marsick, Sculpting the learning organization: Lessions in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dechant. K., & Marsick, V.J.(1993a).Team learning survey. King of Prussia, PA: Organizatio Design & Development.
Dechant. K., Marsick, V.J., & Kasl, E.,(1993).Towards a model of team learning. Studies of Continuing Education. 15, 1-13
Dattner, Ben(2004) Learning teams.
www.dattnerconsulting.com/ presentations/teamlearning.pdf
Dixon, N. M. (1999). The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn
collectively. (2nd ed). Brookfield, Vermont: Gower.
Dodgson, M. (1993), “Organizational Learning: A Review of Some
Literatures”, Organizational Studies, Vol. 14(3), pp. 375-394.
Dunne, Elisabeth( 2004) A Framework for the development of
Personal management skill. http://www.services.ex.ac.uk/cas/employability/pdp/students/framework.rtf.
Edward, F. M. (2000). Investigation of factors contributing to the success of
　cross-functional teams. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(3), 221-235.
Fiol, C. M. and M. A. Lyles (1985), “Organizational Learning”, Academy
of Management Review, Vol. 10, pp. 803-813.
Galer, G. and K. Van Der Heijden (1992), “The Learning Organizations:
How Planners Great Organizational Learning”, Marketing Intelligence and
Planning, Vol. 10(6), pp. 5-12.
Garratt, R. (1987), The Learning Organization, London: Fontana/Collins.
Garvin, D. A. (1998). Building a learning organization. In Harvard Business Review on Knowledge Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Ghoshal, S., & Gratton, L.,. (2002). Integrating the Enterprise, MIT SMR, Fall 2002, Volume 44, Number 1, pp. 31-38
Gladstein, D. L. (1984), “Groups in context: A model of task group
effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, pp.499-517.
Gronhaug, G. (1977),“Water to Spain: An Export Decision Analyzed in the
Context of Organization Learning”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 14, pp. 26-33.
Grow, Gerald (1991)”Teaching learners to be Self-Directed”, Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 125-149,
Hackman, J. R. (1983), A Normative Model of Work Team Effectiveness, CT:Yale University.
Henry, John (2001), Literature Review, Work Based Learning and Professional Development in the VET Sector of Australia, p17
Hodge, B. J., W. P. Anthony and L. M. Gales (2003), Organization Theory (
6th), New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Huber, G. P. (1991), “Organizational Learning: The Contributing
Processes and Literatures”, Organization Science, Vol. 2(1), pp. 88-117.
Inkpen, A. C. and M. M. Crossan (1995), “Believing is Seeing: Joint
Ventures and Organization Learning”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 32, pp. 595-618.
Jashapara, A. (1993), “The Competitive Learning Organization: A Quest
for Loly Grail”, Management Decision, Vol. 31(8), pp. 5-15.
Jessup, H. R. (1990). New roles in team leadership. Training and Development,
　 44(11), 79-83.
Johsnson, R., & Johnson, D. W. (1982). "Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning on Students’ Achievement in Science Class, " Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(5), pp. 351-356.
Keating, et. al,(2003) A practical guide for working more effectively with people and groups. Department of environment Protection, Water and Rivers Commission and Department of Conservation and Land Management. ISBN 1-920687-17-3
Kim, D. H. (1993), “The Link between Individual and Organizational
Learning”, Sloan Management Review, 35(1), pp. 37-50.
Langfred, C. W. (1998). "Is Group Cohesiveness a Double-Edged Sword? An Investigation of the Effects of Cohesiveness on Performance, " Small Group Research, 29(1), pp. 124-143.
Lave, J. & Wenger E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levitt, B. and J. G. March (1988), “Organizational Learning”, Annual
Review of Sociology, Vol. 14, pp. 319-340.
Lyles, M. A.& J. E. Salk (1996), “Knowledge Acquisition from Foreign
Parents in International Joint Ventures: An Empirical Examination in the
Hungarian Context”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 27(5),
Special Issue, pp. 877-903.
Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (1998). Team leadership in practice. Thrust for
　 Educational Leadership, 28(2), 26-29.
Marquardt, M. J. (1996), Building the Learning Organization: A System
Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success, London: McGraw-Hill.
Marquardt, M.J. (1999). Action Learning in Action. Palo Alto, California: Davies-Black Publishing.
Mitchell, J., Henry, J.,Young, S.,( 2001): A new model of work based learning in the VET sector. ISBN 1865063738。
Mitchell, J., Wood, S., Young, S.,( 2001): Communities of Practice Australian National Training Authority ISBN 1865063746。
Nadler, L. (1983). Designing Training Programs : The Critical Event Model.
Addision-Wesley, 268(6), 13-17.
Nadler,D. A., Spencer,J.L.,Associates(1998) Executive teams (pp.4-5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nieva, V. F., Fleishman, E. A. & Rieck, A. (1978), Team Dimensions: Their
Identity, Their Measurement, and Their Relationship, Washington, DC: Advanced Research Resources Organizations.
Nonaka, I. (1994), “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge”,
Organization Science, Vol. 5, pp. 14-37.
Paris, C. R., Salas, E.,& Cannon-Bowers, J. (2000) Teamwork in multi-person system: A review and analysis. Ergonomics.43, 1052-1075.
Perrow,C.（1986）. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. New York: Newbery Award Records, Inc.,132.
Pondy, L.R.（1967）Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12,296-320.
Powers,T.A.,Sims-Knigt,J.,Topciu,R.A.,& Haden,S.C.,(2002) Assessing Team Functioning in Engineering Education. Paper presented at 2002 american Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
Rahim,M.A（1986）.Managing Conflict in Organizations. New York:Praeger.
Robbins, S. P.（1998）Organizational behavior（8th ed.）Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice-Hall Inc.
Rogers, J. (2002) A Study of Team Learning in a Communications Company. Unpublished doctoral dissertation of Teachers College, Colmbia University. New York.
Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A. & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992),
“Toward an understanding of team performance and training,”In Swezey R. W. & Salas E. (Eds.), Teams: Their Training and Performance, NJ: Ablex, pp.3-29.
Simon, H. A. (1969), Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA:M.I.T.
Press.
Skippington, P., (2002) Learning@work:Good Practice in Workbased Learning ISBN1865064262, p39-42
Spong,D.(2003) Creating and Leading a Collaborative Enterprise. Paper presented at Collaborative Organizations: International Conference. Fort Worth, Texas.
Svensson, L., Brewster, C., Heraty, N., Larsen, H. H., Hoogendoorn, J., Kjellberg,Y., Madsen, P. L., Morley, M., Tregaskis, O.,(2002), Learning Environment of Knowledge Intensive Company Units in Five European Countries, p10
Tannenbaum,S. T., Bear,R.L., & Salas,E.(1992) Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical development. In K. Kelly (Ed),Issue, theory, and research in industrial organizational psychology (pp117-153) Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Thomas, K. W. & Schmidt, W. H.,（1976）. A survey of managerial interests with respect to conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 315-318, 891, 1089-1102.
Watkins, K. E. and V. J. Marsick (1993), Sculpting the Learning
Organization: Lessons in the Art and Science of Systemic Change, San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wenger, E. (1998b), ‘Communities of Practice – Learning as a Social System’, Systems Thinker, June.
Wenger, E., and Snyder, W. (2000), ‘Communities of Practice: The Organisational Frontier’, Harvard Business Review, v. 78, no. 1, pp. 139–145.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W., (2002), Cultivating Communities of Practice, A Guide to Managing Knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, Boston Mass.
Whigham, D. M. (2001). How to be a player. Black Enterprise, 31(7), 113-120.