休閒已被證實為是提升人們生活品質的重要媒介，然而智能障礙者在參與休閒時遇到許多的阻礙。非營利組織在社會上扮演著推動智能障礙者各項福利的重要推手，當然休閒也不例外，考量智能障礙者在休閒時的特殊需求，非營利組織所推展的休閒方案便要加以設計，協助智能障礙者獲得休閒相關的技能及內涵，提升生活品質。本研究以財團法人育成社會福利基金會智障青年友誼社為個案，透過個案分析及參與式觀察的方式，配合Beck-Ford與Brown休閒訓練與治療方案模型，訪談5位方案領導者和9位方案參與者及其主要照顧者，探討友誼社在推展智能障礙者休閒方案的現況、方案執行的過程以及9位長期或多次參加的參與者休閒能力現況。研究結果發現，友誼社休閒方案逐年的內容修正和方案遠景，符合休閒訓練與治療方案模型的休閒層級晉級，參與者皆認為友誼社是他們認識朋友和好玩的所在。研究建議，友誼社未來可以繼續往休閒層級第三層級的方向去設計休閒方案，逐步引導智能障礙者透過休閒的參與，提升休閒能力及自主權益。

Leisure had been proved to be an important medium of promoting the living standard, but most of the intellectually disable people had barriers to leisure activities. Non-profit organizations(NPOs) played important roles to every social welfare of intellectually disable people, included of leisure. Those NPOs which promoted leisure programs for intellectual disables, must take intellectual disables’ special needs into consideration, to assist them learn leisure skills and leisure awareness. The research was a case study which took Intellectually Disable Adults’ Friendship Group of Yu-Chen Social Welfare Foundation for example. In order to know the whole content and procedure of the Intellectually Disable Adults’ Friendship Group, case study and participant-observation were used to collect the data. Besides, the research also used Leisure Training and Rehabilitating Program as a model, to interview five program leaders and nine participants, who had joined the Intellectually Disable Adults’ Friendship Group many times, and their main carers. The results indicated that the content and program goals of the Intellectually Disable Adults’ Friendship Group tallied with Leisure Training and Rehabilitating Program on leisure level. All the nine participants thought that the Intellectually Disable Adults’ Friendship Group was a place to meet friends and have fun. The suggestion to the Intellectually Disable Adults’ Friendship Group was that, leading those participants step by step to promote leisure abilities and self-awareness by upgrading the level of program to the third level.

內政部統計處（2005）。93年底身心障礙者年度統計。2005.5.12取自內政部統計處網站http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp
內政部社會司（2005）。我國智能障礙者福利單位查詢系統。2005.10.1取自內政部社會司網站http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/05/new05.htm
毛亞玲（2003）。高職特教班學生休閒活動參與與休閒教育需求之探討。未出版碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
王雅各、盧蕙馨、范麗娟、成虹飛、顧瑜君、吳天泰、蔡篤堅、魏惠娟、謝臥龍、駱慧文（2004）。質性研究。臺北市：心理。
宋巧雰（2000）。非營利組織之社會行銷策略研究-以文教基金會為例。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
吳佩娟（2002）。輕度心智障礙成人社會角色之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
吳冠穎（2005）。他們是社會人嗎？─兩名啟智學校畢業青年的生活樣貌。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學，臺北市。
林千惠（1992）。從社區統合觀念談重度殘障者休閒娛樂技能之教學。特教園丁，8（2），1-7。
林佳燕（2003）。自我管理教學方案對智能障礙學生休閒活動之介入成效研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
林純真（2004）。我運動所以我健康─談心智障礙者的休閒運動。國民體育季刊，33（1），15-22。
林純真、盧台華（2001）。成年智障者友伴關係之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，23，95-119。
林寶貴、邱紹春、蘇芳柳（1998）。臺灣地區特殊教育暨殘障福利機構簡介。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心。
胡文婷（1994）。淺談智能障礙兒童的休閒生活。社教資料雜誌，193，16-19。
胡幼慧（1994）。質性研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市：巨流。
胡雅各（1992）。談智能不足者休閒活動之輔導。特教園丁，8（2），8-11。
洪榮照（1995）。特殊學校、教養機構休閒教育及障礙學生休閒活動之探討。臺中師院學報，9，27-60。
洪榮照（1997）。啟智班學生休閒生活與休閒教育之研究。臺中師院學報，11，511-578。
許家璇（2003）。高職階段智能障礙學生休閒娛樂轉銜服務之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
許媛婷（2006）。智能障礙社會新鮮人的休閒生活休閒生活樣貌─以6位宜蘭特殊教育學校應屆畢業生為例。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，5，19-27。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北市：五南。
陳美惠、鄭佳昆、沈立（譯）（2003）。休閒活動企劃：休閒原理與構想發展。臺北市：品度。（Rossman, J. R., & Schlatter, B. E., 2000）
陳盈芊（1983）。休閒治療師─專業人員的新領域。特殊教育季刊，9，36-37。
陳啟森、林曼蕙（2001）。青少年階段智能障礙者休閒活動阻礙因素之探討。國立臺灣體育學院學報，8，123-136。
郭靜姿、蔡明富、吳淑敏（2002）。臺灣地區身心障礙教育暨殘障福利機構簡介。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心。
鈕文英、陳靜江（1999）。臺灣地區智能障礙青年心理生活素質之研究。特殊教育學報，13，1-32。
鈕文英（2003）。啟智教育課程與教學設計。臺北市：心理。
葉源鎰、張偉雄（2003）。智能障礙青少年學生休閒活動與休閒教育之研究。旅遊管理研究，3（1），43-62。
鄭欽明（2002）。專業型非營利組織管理之研究－以雅文基金會為例。未出版碩士論文，國立政治大學，臺北市。
顏妙桂（譯）（2002）。休閒活動規劃與管理。臺北市：桂魯。Edginton, C. R., Hanson, C. J., Edginton, S. R., & Hudson, S. D., 1998）
顏妙桂等（譯）（2004）。休閒教育訓練手冊。臺北市：幼獅。（Beck-Ford, V. B., & Brown, R.I., 1984）
西文文獻
Bender, M., Brannan, S., & Verhoven, P. J.（1984）. Leisure education for the handicapped: curriculum goals, activities and resources. CA, San Diego: College-Hill Press.
Brightbill, C. K.（1960）. The challenge of leisure. NJ, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Cordes, T. L., & Howard, R. W.（2005）. Concepts of work, leisure and retirement in adults with an intellectual disability. Education and Ttraining in Developmental Disabilities, 40（2）, 99-108.
Dattilo, J.（1999a）. Inclusive leisure service. PA, State College: Venture Pubilshing.
Dattilo, J.（1999b）. Leisure education program planning- a systematic approach. PA, State College: Venture Pubilshing.
Devine M. A.（2004a）. Constraining and freeing: the meaning of inclusive leisure experiences for individuals with disabilities. Leisure/ Loisir, 28（1-2）, 27-47.
Devine M. A.（2004b）. ”Being a ‘Doer’ instead of a ‘Viewer’”: The role of inclusive leisure context in determining social acceptance for people with disabilities. Journal of Leisure Research, 36（2）, 137-159.
Edginton, C.R., Hudson, S.D., & Ford, P. M.（1999）. Leadership for recreation and leisure programs and settings. Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing.
Fenton, J. N.（1995）. Leisure services trends for people with mental retardation. Parks and Recreation.2006.4.11.取自http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1145/is_n5_v30/ai_16898371
IDEA（2006）. What familities can expect. Wellington: IDEA New Zealand Incorporated.
IHC（2002）. What we believe in it. Wellington: IHC New Zealand Incorporated.
Jones, D. B.（2004）.“Denied from a lot of places” Barriers to participation in community recreation programs encountered by children with disabilities in Maine: perspectives of parents. Leisure/ Loisir, 28（1-2）, 49-69.
Kraus, R.（1997）. Recreation programming- a benefits-driven approach. MA , Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
Mahon, M. J., Mactavish, J., & Bockstael, E.（2000）. Social integration, leisure and individuals with intellectual disability. Park and Recreation, 25-40.
Ministry for Disabilities Issues（2001）. The New Zealand Disability Strategy: Making a World of difference Whakanui Oranga. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
Mundy, J.（1976）. A conceptualization and program design. Journal of physical education and recreation, 41-43.
Mundy, J.（1998）. Leisure education theory and practice. IL , Champaign: Sagamore.
Nash, J. B.（1953）. Philosophy of recreation and leisure. IA, Dubuque: William C. Brown Company.
National Health Committee（2003）. To have an “oridinary” life. Wellington: National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability.
Nisbet, R. S.（1994）. Recreation and leisure programming at the high school level for individuals with mild or moderate mental retardation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi.
Pegg, S., & Compton, D. M.（2004）.Creating opportunities and ensuring access to leisure and recreation services though inclusion in the global community. Leisure/ Loisir, 28（1-2）, 5-26.
Roger, N. B., Hawkins, B. A., & Eklund, S.J.（1998）. The nature of leisure in the lives of older adults with intellectual disability. Journal of intellectual disability research, 42（2）, 122-130.
Schleien, S. J., & Ray, M. T.（1981）. Community recreation and persons with disabilities. MD, Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Schleien, S. J., Meyer, L.H., Heyne, L. A., & Brandt, B. B.（1995）. Lifelong leisure skills and lifestyles for persons with developmental disabilities. MD, Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
Sivan, A., & Ruskin, H.（2000）. Leisure education, community development and populations with special needs. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
Smith, R. W., Austin, D. R., & Kennedy, D. W. （2003）. Inclusive and special recreation- opportunities for persons with disabilities. New York: McGraw-Hill.
TREATS（2004）. TREATS annual report 2003/2004. Hong Kong: TREATS.
Wehman, P., & Schleien, S. J.（1981）. Leisure programs for handicapped persons. TS, Austin: PRO-ED.
Witt, P. A., & Caldwell, L. L.（2005）. Recreation and youth development. PA, State College: Venture Publishing.
World Leisue and Recreation Association（2001）. World leisure and recreation association international position statement on leisure education and populations of special needs. Leisure Sciences, 23, 293-297.
Zijlstra, H.P., & Vlaskmp, C.（2005）. Leisure provision for persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: quality time or killing time? Journal of Intellectual Research, 49（6）, 434-448.