簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 江妍
Chiang, Anita Yen
論文名稱: 伴侶言談與關係親密感:以關係促進策略和逾界語言建立伴侶中心立足點
Couple's Discourse and Relational Closeness: Relational-enhancing Strategies and Verbal Transgressions in Constructing a Couple-Centered Footing
指導教授: 蘇席瑤
Su, Hsi-Yao
口試委員: 蘇席瑤
Su, Hsi-Yao
林淑敏
Lin, Shu-Min
蔡宜妮
Tsai, I-Ni
張妙霞
Chang, Miao-Hsia
陳乃嫻
Chen, Lindsey N. H.
口試日期: 2024/06/17
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 315
中文關鍵詞: 伴侶中心立足點關係促進策略逾界語言親暱稱謂幽默對話髒話性相關談話兒語伴侶語伴侶言談關係親密感
英文關鍵詞: couple-centered footing, relational-enhancing strategies, verbal transgression, terms of endearment, conversational humor, swearing, sex-related talk, baby talk, couple-lect, couple’s discourse, relational closeness
研究方法: 言談分析
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401074
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:36下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文探討語言如何協助伴侶提升親密感,和建立幸福伴侶關係;以互動社會語言學的研究方法,來檢視親密伴侶在互動中,使用關係促進策略(如:親暱稱謂、幽默對話)和逾界語言(如:講髒話、性相關談話、兒語)建立伴侶中心立足點;我將伴侶中心立足點定義為,伴侶輸出與解讀語句時,優先考慮維繫關係和諧與促進親密感的溝通方式。
    本研究的語料來自美國和臺灣情侶的訪談及自然對話,總計超過120小時的錄音內容,透過分析這些語料,討論伴侶如何於語言情境中,以伴侶中心立足點溝通,進而增進伴侶親密感、緩解傷害關係的情境、並為彼此提供情緒支持。伴侶的語言使用,構成伴侶中心立足點的三個概念領域,分別為愛情區、安全地、遊樂場,這些概念領域,為伴侶相處提供相關的心理動機、概念資源、及對親密關係的期待,支持伴侶建立以關係和諧為優先的溝通。
    隨著親密關係發展,伴侶通過互文性語言使用,反覆協商和創造語意,將增進關係親密感的語言資源,整合成他們專屬的伴侶語,藉著使用伴侶語中的語言策略,伴侶可在伴侶中心立足點和個人中心立足點間切換,在對話中兼顧親密連結和個人需求。本論文對語言如何建立親密伴侶關係的研究成果,能為社會語言學和關係科學領域,提供理論及應用層面的寶貴見解。

    This dissertation explores the role of language in enhancing intimacy and building fulfilling relationships in the context of romantic relationships. Taking an interactional sociolinguistic approach, I examine the relational-enhancing strategies (i.e., terms of endearment and conversational humor) and verbal transgressions (i.e., swearing, sex-related talk, and babytalk) romantic couples may use as linguistic cues to establish a couple-centered footing in interaction. I define a couple-centered footing as the ways romantic partners align with each other to prioritize the harmony of the relationship and foster intimacy in utterance production and interpretation.
    Based on over 120 hours of conversational data from American and Taiwanese couples’ elicited conversations, interviews, and naturally occurring interactions, I investigate how couples establish a couple-centered footing to enhance relational closeness, mitigate relational-harming situations, and provide emotional support in context. Three conceptual spheres—the love zone, the safe space, and the playground—emerged as the main sources that constitute and are constituted by the linguistic constructions of the couple-centered footing, providing the psychological motivations, conceptual resources, and shared relational expectations for romantic couples to manage their conversations.
    As relationships develop, couples negotiate and create meaning through intertextual language use, integrating linguistic resources into their couple-lect to achieve relational and communicative goals. By balancing between a couple-centered footing and an individual-centered footing in conversations, romantic partners can tend to their relational connection while managing a sense of selfhood. With a view to bridging the fields of sociolinguistics and relationship science, the current research provides valuable insights into the ways couples can use language to nurture intimacy and loving connection in romantic relationships.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT I CHINESE ABSTRACT III ENGLISH ABSTRACT IV TABLE OF CONTENTS V LIST OF TABLES VIII CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 OVERVIEW 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 6 1.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE DISSERTATION 11 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 13 2.1 INTERACTIONAL SOCIOLINGUISTIC APPROACH TO COUPLE’S DISCOURSE 13 2.1.1 Contextualization, Miscommunication, and Gender Discourse 14 2.1.2 Framing, Footing, Intertextuality, and “Couple-lect” 19 2.2 LANGUAGE, RELATIONAL WORK, AND RELATIONAL-ENHANCING STRATEGIES 24 2.3 COUPLE’S COMMUNICATION AND RELATIONAL CLOSENESS 31 CHAPTER 3: DATA COLLECTION AND METHODOLOGY 39 3.1 ELICITED CONVERSATION DATA 40 3.1.1 The Couples 41 3.1.2 The 20 Questions Game 43 3.2.1 The Desert Island Survival Game 45 3.2 INTERVIEW DATA 46 3.3 NATURALLY OCCURRING DATA 48 3.2.1 Couple 1: Jerry and Lynn 48 3.2.2 Couple 2: Anita and Kyrios 49 3.4 DATA ANALYSIS 51 CHAPTER 4: RELATIONAL-ENHANCING STRATEGIES AND VERBAL TRANSGRESSIONS IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS 55 4.1 TERMS OF ENDEARMENT 58 4.1.1 Spousal Titles 59 4.1.2 Affectionate Nicknames 66 4.1.3 Name-related Nicknames 71 4.1.4 Pejorative Nicknames 90 4.2 CONVERSATIONAL HUMOR 95 4.2.1 Banter 97 4.2.2 Comical Hypothetical 111 4.2.3 Teasing 123 4.3 SWEARING 140 4.4 SEX-RELATED TALK 154 4.5 BABY TALK 175 4.6 DISCUSSION: RELATIONAL-ENHANCING STRATEGIES AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF CONCEPTUAL SPHERES IN THE COUPLE-CENTERED FOOTING 199 CHAPTER 5: MANAGING CLOSENESS AND BALANCING FOOTINGS IN COUPLE’S DISCOURSE 208 5.1 FOOTINGS SHIFTS AND THE ESCALATION AND RESOLUTION OF COUPLE’S DISAGREEMENT 210 5.2 BALANCING FOOTINGS TO MAINTAIN CLOSENESS IN POTENTIALLY RELATIONAL-HARMING SITUATIONS 228 5.3 DISCUSSION: COUPLE-CENTERED FOOTING AND INDIVIDUAL-CENTERED FOOTING IN COUPLE’S DISCOURSE 254 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION 266 6.1 SUMMARY OF MAJOR FINDINGS 267 6.2 SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPLICATION OF THIS STUDY 271 6.3 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH 275 REFERENCES 279 APPENDICES 294 APPENDIX 1: RESEARCH INVITATION 294 APPENDIX 2: BASIC AND RELATIONSHIP INFORMATION OF COUPLES PARTICIPATED IN THE INTERVIEW 297 APPENDIX 3: QUESTIONS USED IN 20 QUESTIONS GAME 299 APPENDIX 4: PROMPT FOR DESERT ISLAND SURVIVAL GAME 301 APPENDIX 5: PRE-INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE 303 APPENDIX 6: INTERVIEW QUESTIONS 308 APPENDIX 7: GLOSSARY OF TRANSCRIPTION SYMBOLS 312 APPENDIX 8: CONCEPTUAL SPHERES ANALYSIS OF RELATIONAL-ENHANCING STRATEGIES 313

    Alberts, J. K. (1986). The role of couples' conversations in relational development: A content analysis of courtship talk in Harlequin Romance novels. Communication Quarterly, 34(2), pp. 127-142.
    Arnett, J. J. (1997). Young people's conceptions of the transition to adulthood. Youth & Society, 1(29), pp. 3-23.
    Arundale, R. B. (2006). Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 2, pp. 193-216.
    Attardo, S. (2018). Universals in Puns and Humorous Wordplay. In E. Winter-Froemel, & V. Thaler, Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research (pp. 89-110). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    Bailey, B. (2015). Interactional Sociolinguistics. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel, he International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (pp. 826-840). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Bailey, B. (2017). Street remarks to women in five countries and four languages: Impositions of engagement and intimacy. Sociolinguistic Studies, 4(10), pp. 589-609.
    Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    Bartholomaeus, C., & Riggs, D. W. (2017). Terms of Endearment: Meanings of Family in a Diverse Sample of Australian Parents. In R. Harding, R. Fletcher, & C. Beasley, Revaluing Care in Theory, Law and Policy: Cycles and Connections (pp. 182-197). New York: Routledge.
    Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.
    Baumgarten, N. (2022). Love as a term of address in British English: Micro-diachronic variation. Contrastive Pragmatics, pp. 31-58.
    Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guildford Press.
    Beers Fägersten, K. (2012). Who’s swearing now? The social aspects of conversational swearing. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    Bell, A. (1984). Language Style as Audience Design. Language in Society, 2(13), pp. 145-204.
    Bell, N. (2017). Multiple Perspectives on Langauge Play. Boston: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
    Berg, C., Johnson, M. M., Meegan, S. P., & Strough, J. (2003). Collaborative problem-solving interactions in young and old married couples. Discourse Processes, 35(1), pp. 33-58.
    Bombar, M. L., & Littig, L. W. (1996). Babytalk as a communication of intimate attachment: An initial study in adult romances and friendships. Personal Relationships, 2(3), pp. 137-158.
    Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. New York: Jason Aronson.
    Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1 Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
    Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics(27), pp. 275-294.
    Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this ‘‘we’’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), pp. 83-93.
    Brinberg, D., & Jaccard, J. (1989). After the decision: compliance-gaining in marital interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University PRess.
    Brown, R. D., & Weigel, D. J. (2018). Exploring a contextual model of sexual self-disclosure and sexual satisfaction. The Journal of Sex Research, 2(55), pp. 202-213.
    Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok, Style in Language (pp. 253-276). Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Bucholtz, M. (2003). Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics,, pp. 398-416.
    Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2004). Language and Identity. In A. Duranti, A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 369-394). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies(7), pp. 585-614.
    Carstensen, L. L., Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long- term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10, pp. 140-149.
    Cekaite, A. (2020). Touch as embodied compassion in responses to pain and distress. In A. Cekaite, & L. Mondada, Touch in Social Interaction: Touch, Language, and Body (pp. 81-102). London: Routledge.
    Channell, J. (1997). ‘I just called to say I love you’: Love and desire on the telephone. In K. Harvey, & C. Shalom, Language and Desire: Encoding Sex, Romance and Intimacy (pp. 143-170). London: Routledge.
    Chen, S.-c. (1996). Code-switching as a verbal strategy among Chinese in a campus setting in Taiwan. World Englishes, 3(15), pp. 267-280.
    Chen, X. (2019). “You’re a nuisance!”: “Patch-up” jocular abuse in Chinese fiction. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, pp. 52-63.
    Chiaro, D. (1992). The Language of Jokes. London: Routledge.
    Chiu, C., Wei, P.-C., Noguchi, M., & Yamane, N. (2019). Sibilant fricative merging in Taiwan Mandarin: An investigation of tongue postures using ultrasound imaging. Language and Speech, 4(63), pp. 877-897.
    Clancy, B. (2020). 8 Intimacy and identity in Irish English: A corpus pragmatic approach to the study of personal pronouns. Irish Identities: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, pp. 153-172.
    Clark, H. H. (1996). Communities, communalities, and communication. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson, Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 324-355). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Coates, J. (1997). The organization of men’s talk. In U. H. Meinhof, & S. Johnson, Language and Masculinity (pp. 107 – 129). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Coates, J. (2005). Masculinity, collaborative narration and the heterosexual couple. In J. Thornborrow, & J. Coates, The Sociolinguistics of Narrative (pp. 89-106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Coates, J. (2007). Talk in a play frame: more on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics(39), pp. 29-49.
    Cohn, A., & Richters, J. (2013). "My vagina maes funny noises": Analyzing online forums to assess the real sexual health concerns of young people. International Journal of Sexual Health, 2(25), pp. 93-103.
    Coupland, J., & Jaworski, A. (2003). Transgression and Intimacy in Recreational Talk Narratives. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 1(36), pp. 85-106.
    Coupland, N. (2010). The Authentic Speaker and the Speech Community. In C. Llamas, & D. Watt, Language and Identities (pp. 99-112). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    Coupland, N., Garrett, P., & Williams, A. (2005). Narrative demands, cultural performance and evaluation: Teenage boys’ stories for their age-peers. In J. Thornborrow, & J. Coates, The Sociolinguistics of Narrative (pp. 67-88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Langauge to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Custer, L., Holmberg, D., Blair, K., & Orbuch, T. L. (2008). "So how did you two meet?": Narratives of raltionship initiation. In J. Harvey, S. Sprecher, & A. Wenzel, Handbook of Relationship Initiation (pp. 453-470). New York: Psychology Press.
    Daly, N., Holmes, J., Newton, J., & Stubbe, M. (2004). Expletives as solidarity signals in FTAs on the factory floor. Journal of Pragmatics, pp. 945-964.
    De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyazing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    del-Teso-Craviotto, M. (2006). Language and sexuality in Spanish and English dating chats. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4), pp. 460-480.
    Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics(25), pp. 219-253.
    Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Drouin, M., Vogel, K. N., Surbey, A., & Stills, J. R. (2013). Let’s talk about sexting, baby: Computer-mediated sexual behaviors among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior(29), pp. 25-30.
    Du Bois, I. (2012). Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Aspects of the First Person Plural Pronoun. In N. Baumgarten, I. Du Bois, & J. House, Subjectivity in Language and in Discourse (pp. 319-338). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Dynel, M. (2008). No aggression, only teasing: The pragmatics of teasing and banter. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(2), pp. 241-261.
    Dynel, M. (2009). Beyond a Joke: Types of Conversational Humour. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(3), pp. 1284-1299.
    Dynel, M. (2012). Swearing methodologically: The (im)politeness of expletives in anonymous commentaries on Youtube. Journal of English Studies, pp. 25-50.
    Eğeci, İ. S., & Gençöz, T. (2006). Factors associated with relationship satisfaction: Importance of communication skills. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28, pp. 383–391.
    Eckert, P. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language and Variation and Change, 1, pp. 245-267.
    Eckert, P. (2006). Communities of Practice. In K. Brown, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 683-685). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology(41), pp. 87-100.
    Eckert, P. (2014). The Trouble with Authenticity. In V. Lacoste, J. Leimgruber, & T. Breyer, Indexing Authenticity: Sociolinguistic Perspectivea (pp. 43-54). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    Erikson, E. H. (1982). The Life Cycle Completed: A Review. New York: Norton.
    Everts, E. (2003). Identifying a particular family humor style: A sociolinguistic discourse analysis. Humor, 4(16), pp. 369-412.
    Falk, J. (1980). The conversational duet. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 507-514). eLanguage.
    Farris, S. C. (1995). A semeiotic analysis of sajiao as a gender marked communication style in Chinese. In M. Johnson, & F. Y. Chiu, Unbound Taiwan: Closeups from a Distance (Vol. 8, pp. 2-29). Chicago: Center for East Asian Studies, University of Chicago.
    Farris, S. C. (2000). Cross-sex peer conflict and the discursive production of gender in a Chinese preschool in Taiwan. Journal of Pragmatics, pp. 539-568.
    Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2006). Relationship satisfaction. In A. L. Vangelisti, & D. Perlman, The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 579-594). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Fon, J., Hung, J.-m., Huang, Y.-H., & Hsu, H.-j. (2011). Dialectal variations on syllable-final nasal mergers in Taiwan Mandarin. Language and Linguistics, 2(12), pp. 273-311.
    Gable, S. L., Gonzaga, G. C., & Strachman, A. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right?: Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, pp. 904-917.
    Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. (2005). Communication Accommodation Theory: A Look Back and a Look Ahead. In W. B. Gudykunst, Theorizing about Intercultural Communication (pp. 121-148). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    Giele, J. Z., & Holst, E. (2003). New life patterns and changing gender roles. Advances in Life Course Research(8), pp. 3-22.
    Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (1991). Contexts of Accommodation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Gill, D. S., Christensen, A., & Fincham, F. D. (1999). Predicting marital satisfaction from behavior: Do all roads really lead to Rome? Personal Relationships, 6, pp. 369-387.
    Godwin, D. D., & Scanzoni, J. (1989). Couple consensus during marital joint decision-making: A context, process, outcome model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51(4), pp. 943-956.
    Goebel, Z. (2021). Reimagining Rapport. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon.
    Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.
    Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
    Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. In E. Goffman, Forms of Talk (pp. 124-159). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Goodwin, M. H. (2021). The interactive construction of a hug sequence. In A. Cekaite, & L. Mondada, Touch in Social Interaction: Touch, Langauge, and Body (pp. 27-53). London: Routledge.
    Gordon, C. (2003). Aligning as a team: Forms of conjoined participation in (stepfamily) interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(4), pp. 395-431.
    Gordon, C. (2009). Making Meanings, Creating Family: Intertextuality and Framing in Family Interaction. NY: Oxford University Press.
    Gottman, J. M. (1995). Why Marriage Succeed or Fail: And How You Can Make Yours Last. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, pp. 221-233.
    Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Worke: A Practical Guide from the Country Foremost Relationship Expert. New York: Harmony Books.
    Greene, K., & Faulkner, S. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles(53), pp. 239-251.
    Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization and Understanding. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin, Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 229-252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Gumperz, J. J. (2001). Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton, The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 215-228). MA: Blackwell.
    Haugh, M. (2016). "Just kidding": Teasing and claims to non-serious intent. Journal of Pragmatics(95), pp. 120-136.
    Haugh, M. (2017). Teasing. In S. Attardo, The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor (pp. 204-218). New York: Routledge.
    Haugh, M., & Bousfield, D. (2012). Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics(44), pp. 1099-1114.
    Haugh, M., & Pillet-Shore, D. (2017). Getting to know you: Teasing as an invitation to intimacy in initial interactions. Discourse Studies, 20(2), pp. 246-269.
    Haugh, M., Kádár, D. Z., & Reiter, R. M. (2022). Offence and morality: Pragmatic perspectives. Language & Communication(87), pp. 117-122.
    Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(52), pp. 511-524.
    Heller, M. (1988). Strategic Ambiguity: Code-switching in the Management of Conflict. In M. Heller, Codeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp. 77-96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .
    Hess, J. A., & Coffelt, T. A. (2012). Verbal communication about sex in marriage: Patterns of language use and its connection with relational outcomes. The Journal of Sex Research, 6(49), pp. 603-612.
    Hildebrand, L. K., Monteith, M. J., Carter, E. R., & Burns, M. D. (2022). Honey, sweetie, dear: Terms of endearment communicate, reflect, and reinforce sexism toward adult women. Sex Roles(87), pp. 185-210.
    Holmberg, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Veroff, J. (2004). Thrice Told Tales: Married Couples Tell Their Stories. New York: Routledge.
    Hsu, H.-j., & Tse, J. K.-p. (2007). Syllable-final nasal mergers in Taiwan Mandarin—Leveled but puzzling. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 1(33), pp. 1-18.
    Hultgren, A. K. (2011). ‘Building rapport’ with customers across the world: The global diffusion of a call centre speech style. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1(15), pp. 36-64.
    Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Ilie, C. (2018). "Behave yourself, woman!": Patterns of gender discrimination and sexist stereotyping in parliamentary interaction. Journal of Language and Politics, 5(17), pp. 594-616.
    Jay, T., & Janschewitz, K. (2008). The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research(4), pp. 267-288.
    Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button, & J. R. Lee, Talk and Social Organisation (pp. 152-205). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    Johnson, D. I., Roloff, M. E., & Riffee, M. A. (2004). Politeness theory and refusals of requests: Face threat as a function of expressed obstacles. Communication Studies, 2(55), pp. 227-238.
    Johnstone, B. (1989). Linguistic strategies and cultureal styles for persuasive discourse. In S. Ting-Toomey, & F. Korzenny, Language, Communication, and Culture: Current Directions (pp. 139-156). Beverly Hills: Sage.
    Johnstone, B. (1994). Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Vol. 1). NJ: Ablex.
    Johnstone, B. (2014). "100% Authentic Pittsburgh": Sociolinguistic Authenticity and the Linguistics of Particularity. In V. Lacoste, J. Leimgruber, & T. Breyer, Indexing Authenticity: Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp. 97-112). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    Jonason, P. K., Garcia, J. R., Webster, G. D., Li, N. P., & Fisher, H. E. (2015). Relationship dealbreakers: Traits people avoid in potential mates. Personality and Social, 12(41), pp. 1697-1711.
    Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Kövecses, Z. (1991). A linguist's quest for love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, pp. 77-97.
    Kangasharju, H. (1996). Aligning as a team in multiparty conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, pp. 291-319.
    Kangasharju, H. (2002). Alignment in disagreement: Forming oppositional alliances in committee meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, pp. 1447-1471.
    Kelly, A., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2003). Emerging perspectives on couple communication. In J. O. Greene, & B. R. Burleson, The Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills (pp. 723-752). NJ: Erlbaum.
    Keltner, D., Capps, L., Kring, A. M., Young, R. C., & Heerey, E. A. (2001). Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 2(127), pp. 229-248.
    Kendall, L. (2000). "Oh no! I'm a nerd!" Hegemonic masculinity on an online forum. Gender & Society, 2(14), pp. 256-274.
    Kendall, S. (2006). ‘Honey, I’m home!’: Framing in family dinnertime homecomings. Text & Talk, 4/5(26), pp. 411-441.
    Korobov, N. (2016). A discourse analytic approach to accusations of infidelity in romantic couples' natural conversations. The Qualitative Report, 21(7), pp. 1266 – 1287.
    Korobov, N. (2017). The playful and gendered use of insults and criticisms in romantic couples’ everyday banter. Gender and Language, 11(2), pp. 278-305.
    Kotthoff, H. (2009). Joint construction of humorous fictions in conversation: An unnamed narrative activitiy in a playful keying. Journal of Literary Theory, 2(3), pp. 195-218.
    Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Langlotz, A., & Locher, M. A. (2013). The role of emotions in relational work. Journal of Pragmatics(58), pp. 87-107.
    Lee-Kim, S.-I., & Chou, Y.-C. (2022). Unmerging the sibilant merger among speakers of Taiwan Mandarin. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 1(13), pp. 1-36.
    Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    Levenson, R. W., Haase, C. M., Bloch, L., Holley, S. R., & Seider, B. H. (2014). Emotion Regulation in Couples. In J. J. Gross, Handbook of Emotion Regulation (pp. 267-283). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambride University PRess.
    Lindström, A. (2009). Projecting nonalignment in conversation. In J. Sidnell, Conversation Analysis: Comaprative Perspectives (pp. 135-158). Cambridge: Cambride University Press.
    Linguistic Politeness Research Group. (2011). Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Walter de Grutyer.
    Llamas, C., & Watt, D. (2010). Language and Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    Lo, A. (1999). Codeswitching, speech community membership, and the construction of ethnic identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(3), pp. 461-479.
    Locher, M. A. (2013). Relational work and interpersonal pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics(58), pp. 145-149.
    Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, pp. 9-33.
    Mäkilähde, A. (2018). Approaching the functions of historical code-switching: The case of solidarity. In P. Pahta, J. Skaffari, & L. Wright, Multilingual Practices in Language History: English and Beyond (pp. 299-318). Boston: Walter de Gruyter Inc.
    MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S. (2005). Dyadic assessment of sexual self-disclosure and sexual satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. International Association for Relationship Research, 2(22), pp. 169-181.
    Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A Cultural Approach to Male-Femlae Miscommunication. In J. J. Gumperz, Language and Social Identity (pp. 196-216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Mao, L. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: 'Face' revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), pp. 451-486.
    Margolin, U. (1995). Telling our story: on ’we’ literary narratives. Language and Literature, 2(5), pp. 115-133.
    Markman, H. J., Floyd, F. J., Stanley, S. M., & Storaasli, R. D. (1988). Prevention of marital distress: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(2), pp. 210-217.
    Masanet, M.-J., & Buckingham, D. (2015). Advice on life? Online fan forums as a space for peer-to-peer sex and relationships education. Sex Education, 5(15), pp. 486-499.
    Maslow, A. (1946). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 4(50), pp. 370-396.
    McCoy, A., Rauer, A., & Sabey, A. (2017). The meta marriage: Links between older couples’ relationship narratives and marital satisfaction. Family Process, 56(4), pp. 900-914.
    McDaniel, B. T., & Drouin, M. (2015). Sexting among married couples: Who is doing it, and are they more satisfied? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 11(18), pp. 628-634.
    McKinnon, S., & Prieto, P. (2014). The role of prosody and gesture in the perception of mock impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research, 2(10), pp. 185-219.
    Meeks, B. S., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1998). Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), pp. 755-773.
    Meinhof, U. H. (1997). ‘The most important event of my life!’ A comparison of male and female written narratives. In U. H. Meinhof, & S. Johnson, Language and Masculinity (pp. 208 – 228). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Meyerhoff, M. (1998). Accommodating your data: the use and misuse of accommodation theory in sociolinguistics. Language & Communication(18), pp. 205-225.
    Mitchell, R. W. (2001). Americans' talk to dogs: Similarities and differences with talk to infants. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 2(34), pp. 183-210.
    Monaghan, L., & Goodman, J. E. (2007). A Cultural Approach to Interpersonal Communication: Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    Morgan, M. (2022). More than a mood or an attitude: Discourse and verbal genres in African-American culture. In S. S. Mufwene, J. R. Rickford, G. Bailey, & J. Baugh, African-American English: Structure, History, and Use (pp. 277-312). New York: Routledge.
    Mufwene, S. S., Rickford, J. R., Bailey, G., & Baugh, J. (2022). African-American English: Structure, History, and Use. New York: Routledge.
    Muntigl, P. (2013). Resistance in couples counselling: Sequences of talk that disrupt progressivity and promote disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 49(1), pp. 18-37.
    Myketiak, C. (2020). Online Sex Talk and the Social World: Mediated Desire. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Noland, C. M. (2010). Sex Talk: The Role of Communication in Intimate Relationships. CA: Praeger.
    Norrick, N. (1993a). Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Norrick, N. (1993b). Repetition in canned jokes and spontaneous conversational joking. Humor: International Journal of Humor Studies, 4(6), pp. 385-402.
    Norrick, N. R. (2005). Contextualizing and recontextualizing interlaced stories in conversation. In J. Thornborrow, & J. Coates, The Sociolinguistics of Narrative (pp. 107-128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Norrick, N. R. (2010). Humor in Interaction. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(4), pp. 232-244.
    Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems. Journal of Family Therapy(22), pp. 144-167.
    Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J., & Holmberg, D. (1993). Becoming a married couple: The emergence of meaning in the first years of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, pp. 815-826.
    Pan, Y., & Kádár, D. Z. (2011). Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    Pauletto, F., Aronsson, K., & Galeano, G. (2017). Endearment and address terms in family life: Children's and parents’ requests in Italian and Swedish dinnertime interaction. Journal of Pragmatics(109), pp. 82-94.
    Pease, A. (1988). Body Language: How to Read Other's Thoughts by Their Gestures. Oxford: Sheldon Press.
    Peng, X., Zhang, W., & Drew, P. (2021). ‘Sharing the experience’ in enactments in storytelling. Journal of Pragmatics, 183, pp. 32 – 52.
    Pichler, P. (2007). ‘This Sex Thing Is such a Big Issue now’: Sex Talk and Identities in Three Groups of Adolescent Girls. In H. Sauntson, & S. Kyratzis, Language, Sexualities and Desires: Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 68-95). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Pichler, P. (2016). ‘You are stupid, you are cupid’: Playful polyphony as a resource for affectionate expression in the talk of a young London couple. Gender and Language, 11(2), pp. 153-175.
    Pietikäinen, K. S. (2018). Silence that speaks: The local inferences of withholding a response in intercultural couples' conflicts. Journal of Pragmatics, 129, pp. 76-89.
    Pinker, S. (2007). The Stuff of Thought: Langauge as a Window into Human Nature. London: Viking Penguine.
    Placencia, M. E. (2004). Rapport-building activities in corner shop interactions. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2(8), pp. 215-245.
    Pluszczyk, A. (2015). An analysis of swearing from a positive perspective. Alfinge(27), pp. 103-127.
    Ponzetti Jr., J. J. (2005). Family beginnings: A comparison of spouses’ recollections of courtship. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 13(2), pp. 132-138.
    Preece, S. (2016). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity. New York: Routledge.
    Real, T. (2007). The New Rules of Marriage: What You Need to Know to Make Love Work. New York: Ballantine Books.
    Rees-Miller, J. (2000). Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics, pp. 1087-1111.
    Rehman, U. S., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2007). A cross-cultural examination of the relation of marital communication behaviour to marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), pp. 759–763.
    Robinson, M. D., Persich, M. R., Sjoblom-Schmidt, S., & Penzel, I. B. (2019). Love stories: How language use patterns vary by relationship quality. Discourse Processes, 57(1), pp. 81-98.
    Rotter, J. C., & Cretzmeyer, S. M. (1998). Do you remember the day we met?: Early couple relationship memories. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, pp. 308-311.
    Søndergaard, B. (1991). Switching between seven codes within one family—A linguistic resource. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1-2(12), pp. 85-92.
    Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), pp. 696-735.
    Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Adult attachment strategies and the regulation of emotion. In J. J. Gross, Handbook of Emotion Regulation (pp. 446-465). New York: Guilford Press.
    Sillars, A. L., Pett, R. C., Canary, D. J., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2022). Conflict and Relational Quality in Families. In A. L. Vangelisti, The Routlege Handbook of Family Communication (pp. 312-329). New York: Routledge.
    Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Nelligan, J. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(62), pp. 434-446.
    Solomon, O. (2012). Rethinking Baby Talk. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B. B. Schieffelin, The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 121-149). MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In H. Spencer-Oatey, Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory (pp. 11-47). New York: Continuum.
    Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, pp. 639-656.
    Spencer-Oatey, H. (2013). Relating at work: Facets, dialectics and face. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, pp. 121-137.
    Spiro, R. L. (1983). Persuasion in family decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 393-402.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, pp. 119-135.
    Su, H.-Y. (2009). Code-switching in managing a face-threatening communicative task: Footing and ambiguity in conversational interaction in Taiwan. Journal of Pragmatics(41), pp. 372-392.
    Tannen, D. (1989). Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Tannen, D. (1990). Gender Differences in Conversational Coherence: Physical Alignment and Topical Cohesion. In B. Dorval, Conversational Organization and Its Development (pp. 167-206). NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
    Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
    Tannen, D. (1993). The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies: Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance. In D. Tannen, Gender and Conversational Interaction (pp. 165-188). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Tannen, D. (2003). Power maneuvers or connection maneuvers? Ventriloquizing in family interaction. In D. Tannen, & J. E. Alatis, Linguistics, Language, and the Real World: Discourse and Beyond (pp. 50-62). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    Tannen, D. (2004). Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional re-sources in family discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 4(37), pp. 399-420.
    Tannen, D. (2005). Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Tannen, D. (2007). Preface and "Put Down that Paper and Talk to Me!": Rapport-talk and Report-talk. In L. Monaghan, & J. E. Goodman, A Cultural Approach to Interpersonal Communication: Essential Readings (pp. 179-194). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    Tannen, D., & Wallat, C. (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In D. Tannen, Framing in Discourse (pp. 57-76). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Tannen, D., Kendall, S., & Gordon, C. (2007). Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Terkourafi, M. (2015). Conventionalization: A new agenda for im/politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, pp. 11-18.
    Thaler, V. (2016). Varieties of Wordplay. In S. Knospe, A. Onysko, & M. Goth, Crossing Languages to Play with Words: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 47-62). Boston: De Gruyter.
    Thornborrow, J., & Coates, J. (2005). The sociolinguistics of narrative: Identity, performance, culture. In J. Thornborrow, & J. Coates, The Sociolinguistics of Narrative (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Todorov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The Dialogical Principle. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Tolman, D. L. (2005). Dilemmas of Desire: Teenage Girls Talk about Sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Shulman, S. (2006). Resolution of disagreements between romantic partners, among adolescents, and young adults: Qualitative analysis of interaction discourses. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(4), pp. 561-588.
    Vaynman, M. J., Sandberg, S., & Pedersen, W. (2020). ‘Locker room talk’: male bonding and sexual degradation in drinking stories. Culture, Health, Sexuality, 11(22), pp. 1235-1252.
    Veroff, J., Sutherland, L., Chadiha, L., & Ortega, R. M. (1993). Newlyweds tell their stories: A narrative method for assessing marital experiences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, pp. 437-457.
    Wight, D. (1994). Boys' thoughts and talk about sex in a working class locality of Glasgow. The Sociological Review, 4(42), pp. 703-737.
    Wilkins, R., & Gareis, E. (2006). Emotion expression and the locution ‘‘I love you’’: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(1), pp. 51-75.
    Williamson, H. C., Ju, X., Bradbury, T. N., Karney, B. R., Fang, X., & Liu, X. (2012). Communication behavior and relationship satisfaction among American and Chinese newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(3), pp. 308-315.
    Wilson, S. R., Guntzviller, L. M., Gettings, P. E., & Baker, J. T. (2022). Persuasion and Families. In A. L. Vangelisti, The Routledge Handbook of Family Communication (pp. 330-344). New York: Routledge.
    Winchatz, M. R., & Kozin, A. (2008). Comical hypothetical: arguing for a conversational phenomenon. Discourse Studies, 3(10), pp. 383-405.
    Wlodarski, R., & Dunbar, R. I. (2013). Examining the possible functions of kissing in romantic relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, pp. 1415-1423.
    Wolfram, W. (2024). Urban African American Vernacular English. In B. Kortmann, K. Lukenheimer, & K. Ehret, The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. http://ewave-atlas.org/languages/15.
    Yu, G., Wu, Y., & Drew, P. (2019). Couples bickering: Disaffiliation and discord in Chinese conversation. Discourse Studies, 21(4), pp. 458-480.
    Yueh, H.-I. S. (2013). Body performance in gendered language: Deconstructing the Mandarin term sajiao in the cultural context of Taiwan. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 1(8), pp. 159-182.
    Yueh, H.-I. S. (2017). Identity Politics and Popular Culture in Taiwan: A Sajiao Generation. Lexington Books.
    Zirker, A., & Winter-Froemel, E. (2015). Wordplay and its interfaces in speaker-hearer interaction: An introduction. In A. Zirker, & E. Winter-Froemel, Wordplay and Metalinguistic / Metadiscursive Reflection. Authors, Contexts, Techniques, and Meta- Reflection (pp. 1-22). Boston: De Gruyter.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE