本研究旨在發展高中資訊科技概論電腦科學史教材，並評估該教材對高中生科學本質、學習態度、學習成就以及概念脈絡發展之影響。教材的範圍為電腦網路單元，依此蒐集約二十多則相關的歷史素材，並以HEM圖發展電腦科學史教材。教材評估採取準實驗設計，參與者為南部某公立高中兩個班級，一共64位學生，實驗時間共五節課，依班級分成實驗組32人和控制組32人，兩組教學的差異在於教材內容是否包含電腦科學史。教學後學生填答科學本質量表、成就測驗以及態度問卷。研究結果顯示，電腦科學史教材能夠：（1）有效提昇學生的科學事業本質觀及科學方法本質觀，（2）增進學生對於電腦網路概念脈絡的理解，（3）增加學生學習電腦網路的興趣。建議未來設計電腦科學史教材可以採用HEM圖方式，並運用吸引學生之歷史素材以及資訊科技，以提昇學生學習科學史的興趣。

This study explored the effects of integrating history of computing into teaching high school computer science classes. We aimed to promote students’ understating of science nature, learning the context of concept development, achievement, and attitudes on learning through computing history materials. The materials developed with historical episodes map (HEM), and had three storylines and more than 20 events related to the history of networking. A total of 64 students from two Grade 11 classes participated in this study. One class with 32 students served as the control group, and the other class also with 32 students was the experimental group. The control group was taught using traditional textbook, while the experimental group was taught using the HEM-designed materials. The two groups were taught with the same concepts about networking and doing similar discussions in class. The experiment lasted for 5 class periods. The finding revealed that teaching through computing history materials could (1) improve students’ the nature of scientific method and scientific enterprise, (2) enhance the understanding of the context of concept development, and (3) have- positive effects on students’ attitudes toward learning network. We suggested that computer educator to use HEM to develop historical-related teaching materials to promote student learning, and to design the materials with interesting history events and advanced technology, such as augmented reality, to enhance students’ interesting in learning history.

王正如（2010）。機器車前導組織對程式設計心智模型之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學：台北市
巫俊明（1997）。五專普通物理課程中加入科學史事例對學生之科學本質的了解、科學態度、及物理學科成績之影響研究，元培學報，4。
李明昆、劉靜怡和洪振方（2011）。科學史融入物理教學對高一女生的科學本質觀與電磁學概念改變之研究。屏東教育大學學報，36，133-168。
林淑梤、劉聖忠、黃茂在、陳素芬和張文華（2008）。運用科學史傳達科學本質之教學實務探討--以簡單機械單元為例。科學教育月刊，315，2-18。
林陳涌（1996）。「了解科學本質量表」之發展與效化。科學教育月刊，4（1），31-58。
林陳涌、鄭榮輝和張永達（2009）。融入科學史教學對高中學生的科學本質觀、對科學的態度以及學習成就的影響。科學教育學刊，17（2），93-109。
邱明富和高慧蓮（2006）。科學史融入教學對國小學童科學本質觀影響之探究。科學教育學刊，14（2），163-187。
洪振方（1997）。科學史融入科學教學之探討。高雄師大學報，8，235-246。
胡瑞萍和林陳涌（2006年12月）。歷史事件圖(HEM)教材對國一學生的科學本質觀、對科學的態度以及學習成就的影響。載於國立臺灣師範大學（主編），中華民國第22屆科學教育學術研討會論文集（439-445頁）。臺北：國立臺灣師範大學。
高慧蓮和蘇明洲（2004）：科學本質的理論回顧與課程設計的實例分享。九十三學年度自然與生活科技學習領域課程研討會，279-310。
高慧蓮和蘇明洲（2011）。國小科學本質能力指標的詮釋研究。屏東教大科學教育學報，34，30-45。
張容君、張惠博和鄭子善（2007）：國二學生對「純物質」和「混合物」之微觀粒子概念研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，48，33-62。
教育部（2008）：普通高級中學「資訊科技概論」課程綱要。
許良榮（1998）：科學史課文對於科學理論之閱讀學習的效果。中師數理學報, 2卷1期, 111-141頁。
許良榮和蕭培玉（2007）。中小學之科學本質與科學史的教學需求之研究。科學教育學刊，15（1），1-23。
陳怡芬（2013）。高中資訊教師對電腦科學史融入教學之看法。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳秋燕（2009）。高中電腦教科書之電腦科學史內容分析。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
傅麗玉 (1999)。 國小教科書中科學史之呈現方式:以七個地區之國小自然科學教科書為例。台北市: 中央研究院科學史委員會。
傅麗玉（2001）。兒童科技史：台灣兒童讀物中科技史材料之研究。科學教育學刊，9（4），417-434。
彭孟凱（2013）。LEGO NXT機器人3D 模擬軟體於程式設計教學之行動研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學：台北市。
廖麗貞、林寶英和洪振方（2000）。將達爾文演化論發展史融入大學生命科學通識課程之研究。科學教育學刊，8（2），179-198。
劉君燦（1999）。軌範、典範、科學教育。科學史、哲與科學教育學術研討暨研習會與生活科技學習領域課程研討會，279-310。
謝甫宜和洪振方（2010）。不同教學方法增進學生科學本質學習成效之比較與分析。屏東教育大學學報，35，1-32。
蘇明洲和高慧蓮（2006） : 國小科學本質教學與多元評量之探究。論文發表於第二十二屆中華民國科學教育學術研討會，國立台灣師範大學。（NSC 94-2511-S-153-001）。
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989). Project 2061: Science for All Americans.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arons, A (1989). Historical and philosophical perspectives attainable in introductory physics courses. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20, 13-23.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
Bülent, K., & Bilal, B, & Cemalettin, Y. & Selahattin, A. (2011). The effect of teaching the subject of Fibonacci numbers and golden ratio through the history of mathematics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 961–965.
Clement, J. (1983). A coceptual model discussed by Galileo and used intuitive by physics students. In D.Gentner & A.Stevens (eds.) Mental Models., 325-340.
Conant, J. B. (1951). On understanding science: An history approach.New
York:Mentor
Cooley, W. W., & Klopfer, L. E. (1961). TOUS-Test on Understanding Science, From W: Manual for Administering, Scoring, and Interpreting Scores, Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Cortina, T. J., & McKenna, R. (2006). The design of a history of computing course with a unique perspective. SIGCSE Bulletin , 38(1), 67-71.
Denning, P. J. (1989). Computing as a Discipline. Communication of the ACM 32(1), 9-23
Denning, P. J. (2005). Is computer science science? Communications of the ACM, 48(4), 27-31
Gal-Ezer, J., & Harel, D. (1998). What (else) should CS educators know? IEEE
Communications of the ACM, 41(9), 77-84.
IFIP TC3 and TC9 Joint Task Group (1999). History in the computing curriculum.
Annals of the History of Computing, 21(1), 4-16.
Kauffman, G.B. (1991). History in the chemistry curriculum. In M.R.Matthews(ed.). History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching: Selected Readings,185-200.
Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2).
Lee, J. A. N. (1996). Those who forget the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it : or, Why I study the history of computing. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 18(2), 54-62.
Lee, J. A. N. (1997). History in the computer science curriculum. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 29(4), 2.
Lin, C.-Y. (1994). Perspectives of science teaching, understanding of the nature of science, and attitudes toward science among preservice elementary teachers in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Lin, C.Y., & Cheng, J.H., & Chang, W.H. (2011). Making Science Vivid: Using a historical episodes map. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 2521-2531.
Lin, H.-S., Hung, J.-Y., & Hung, S.-C. (2002). Using the history of science to promote students' problem-solving ability. International Journal of Science Education, 25(5), 453-464.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge.
McCloskey, M. (1983).Naive theories of motion. In D.Gentner & A.Stevens, Mental Models., 299-324.
Rubba, P. A., & Andersenm H. (1978). Development of an Instrument to Assess Secondary School Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449-458
Rupf, J. A. (2004). Teaching the history of computing (painlessly). Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 20(2), 7.
Ruse, M. (1989). Making use of creation. A case-study for the philosophy of science class-room. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 10, 81-93
Simona, S.K. & Barbara, V. (2010). Active teaching of diffusion through history of science, computer animation and role playing. Journal of Biological Education, 44, 116-122.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J. Scot, L., & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the Nature of Science through History: Action Research in the Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29(4), 409-421
Stinner, A. (1995). Contextual setting, science stories, and large context problems: Toward a more humanistic science education. Science Education, 79, 555-581.
William J. S., & Susan, G. Z., & Wilke, R. R. (2011). Connecting Students to Science Through Structured Reading of Historical Nonfiction. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40, 26-31.
Zhang, C., & Howland, J. E. (2005). Brief and yet bountiful: the history of computing, why do students need it? Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 20(4), 308-314.