簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 朱思翰
論文名稱: 不同先備知識小學學生於資訊課進行分享式數位筆記活動之路徑分析研究
A Path Analysis of Elementary Students with Different Prior Knowledge Implementing Shared Electronic Note-taking Activity in Computer Class
指導教授: 邱瓊慧
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 121
中文關鍵詞: 先備知識分享式數位筆記異質分組提問策略筆記品質
英文關鍵詞: prior knowledge, shared electronic note-taking, heterogeneous grouping, self-questioning, the quality of note
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:162下載:32
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在分別探討高、低先備知識的國小高年級學生於資訊課以小組進行分享式數位筆記活動,其小組的組成方式和使用的複習策略對於立即、綜合學習成效和學習態度的預測能力,並檢驗學生的筆記品質是否為一有效的中介變項。本研究由台南市某國小六年級中的四個班級,共120位學生參與,首先依照學生資訊課測驗的成績將學生分成高或低先備知識群,並以班級為單位進行實驗教學活動。學生於此實驗教學活動中,以同性別且隨機的方式兩人一組,學生在上課的過程中以小組進行分享式數位筆記活動,記下自己的筆記,接著以一般的閱讀方式或提問策略來複習筆記。整個教學活動共歷時四週,學生於每周一節40分鐘的資訊課進行。本研究並蒐集學生在課堂上記下的筆記、在課後的立即和綜合測驗成績,與其對資訊課的學習態度。經簡單相關與路徑分析後發現,高先備知識學生若是在同質組(先備知識相同),能有較好的立即學習成效;其筆記品質也能直接預測其立即學習成效;其立即學習成效也能直接預測其綜合學習成效。低先備知識學生若是在異質組(先備知識相異),能產出較佳的筆記品質;若使用提問複習策略,能有較好的立即學習成效,但對資訊課的學習態度則會較差;其立即學習成效也能直接預測其綜合學習成效。而不論是高或低先備知識學生,其筆記品質都不是一個有效的中介變項。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate respectively 6th-grade students with high or low prior knowledge who participate a shared electronic note-taking activity in computer class, the predictive ability of students’ group composition and strategy of reviewing note on immediate learning gains, comprehensive learning gains and attitudes toward computer class, and test the mediated effect of note’s quality. One hundred and twenty 6th-grade students in Tainan city participated in this study. Students were randomly assigned to dyads and participate a shared electronic note-taking activity in computer class for four weeks(40 minutes per week). The results indicated that, students with high prior knowledge in homogenous group have much immediate learning gains; the quality of notes have exerted a significantly direct effect on immediate learning gains; immediate learning gains also have exerted a significantly direct effect on comprehensive learning gains. And students with low prior knowledge in heterogeneous group have better quality of notes; review notes by self-questioning have much immediate learning gains but have less attitudes toward computer class; immediate learning gains also have exerted a significantly direct effect on comprehensive learning gains. However, the quality of notes does not have mediating effect for all students.

    中文摘要...................................i 英文摘要...................................ii 誌謝......................................iii 目錄......................................iv 表目錄.....................................vi 圖目錄.....................................viii 第壹章 緒論.................................1 第一節 研究背景.............................1 第二節 研究目的.............................6 第三節 待答問題.............................7 第四節 名詞釋義.............................9 第貳章 文獻探討..............................11 第一節 認知論取向的學習觀點...................11 第二節 先備知識.............................12 第三節 寫筆記策略...........................13 第四節 合作學習.............................20 第五節 以提問策略複習筆記.....................24 第六節 筆記品質與學習成就的關係................26 第七節 學習態度.............................27 第八節 研究假設.............................28 第參章 研究方法..............................30 第一節 研究架構.............................30 第二節 參與者...............................31 第三節 實驗教學活動..........................32 第四節 實驗教學活動教材.......................34 第五節 教學活動支援平台.......................35 第六節 實驗教學活動前的訓練....................37 第七節 資料蒐集..............................38 第八節 實驗流程..............................42 第九節 資料分析..............................44 第肆章 結果..................................45 第一節 有效樣本..............................45 第二節 描述性統計............................45 第三節 高、低先備知識學生其各個變項之相關分析......47 第四節 高、低先備知識學生之路徑分析..............55 第伍章 討論...................................63 第一節 高、低先備知識學生產出的筆記品質...........63 第二節 高、低先備知識學生的立即學習成效...........64 第三節 高、低先備知識學生的綜合學習成效...........68 第四節 高、低先備知識學生的資訊課學習態度改變......69 第陸章 結論與建議..............................70 第一節 結論..................................70 第二節 建議..................................71 參考文獻......................................73 附錄.........................................84 附錄一、第一單元教學教材-網頁的內容與存取..........84 附錄二、第二單元教學教材-檔案分享.................87 附錄三、第三單元教學教材-電腦連線上網的方式.........90 附錄四、第四單元教學教材-影像檔案.................92 附錄五、各單元之雙向細目表.......................95 附錄六、各單元之學習成就測驗.....................100

    中文部分:
    李登隆、王美芬(2004)。資訊融入專題導向學習對國小學生自然科學習態度與問題解決能力之影響。科學教育研究與發展季刊,69-94。
    林清山(1997)。教育心理學:認知取向。台北市:遠流。
    辜玉旻(2007)。提升學童科學文章的閱讀理解:運用附加問題與做筆記策略。行
    政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告(計畫編號NSC 95-2511-S-008-001-)。
    黃克文(1996)。認知負荷與個人特質及學習成就之關聯。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    黃政傑、林佩璇(1996)。合作學習。台北:五南圖書。
    詹志禹(1993)。認知學派在教學方法上的應用。政大機構典藏。
    張春興(2009)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:臺灣東華。
    陳品華(2009)。大學生的先備知識、課堂筆記策略與學業表現之關係研究。
    行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告(計畫編號NSC 97-2410-H-153-001-)。
    魏永興、邱佳椿(2011)。以認知學派之學習理論為基礎的教育理念。雄工學報, 10,237-246。
    英文部分:
    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Person & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1043-1047.
    Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York Worth Publishers.
    Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wins.
    Baker, L., & Lombardi, B. R. (1985). Students' lecture notes and their relation to test performance. Teaching of Psychology, 12(1), 28-32.
    Barnett, J. E., Di Vesta, F. J., & Rogozinski, J. T. (1981) What is learned in note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 181-192.
    Barnett, J. E., & Freud, D. (1985). Prior knowledge and the generative theory of notetaking. Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
    Bauer, A., & Koedinger, K. (2006, 5-7 July 2006). Pasting and encoding: Note-taking in online courses. In Proceedings of Advanced Learning Technologies, 2006. Sixth International Conference on (pp. 789-793).
    Beane, W. E. (1971). Group variables influencing the transfer of conceptual behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(3), 215-218.
    Boyle, J. (1996). Thinking while notetaking: Teaching college students to use strategic notetaking during lectures. In B. G. Brown (Ed.), Innovative learning strategies: Twelfth yearbook (pp. 9–18). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Boyle, J. R. (2001). Enhancing the notetaking skills of students with mild disabilities. Intervention in School & Clinic, 36, 221–225.
    Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1981). Note-taking and passage style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 242-250.
    Call, P. E. (2000). Reflective questioning: A strategy to review notes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 487.
    Carrier, C. (1983). Notetaking research: Implications for the classroom. Journal of Instructional Development, 6(3), 19-26.
    Chan, C. K. K. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information. Instructional Science, 29(6), 443-479.
    Chen, C. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2011). Integrating blogs into elementary classrooms: Shared note taking and questioning review. In F. Dong (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering (pp. 6629-6633). New York, NY: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
    Chiu, C. H. (2002). The effects of collaborative teamwork on secondary science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 262-271.
    Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 8-14.
    Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1973). Listening and note taking: Ii. Immediate and delayed recall as functions of variations in thematic continuity, note taking, and length of listening-review intervals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(3), 278-287.
    Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69(2), 145-186.
    Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1994). Prior knowledge and learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 4698-4702). Oxford New York: Pergamon Press.
    Dyson, B., & Grineski, S. (2001). Using cooperative learning structures in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 72(2), 28-31.
    Ebenezer, J. V., & Zoller, U. (1993). Grade 10 students' perceptions of and attitudes toward science teaching and school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 175-186.
    Faber, J. E., Morris, J. D., & Lieberman, M. G. (2000). The effect of note taking on ninth grade students' comprehension. Reading Psychology, 21, 257-270.
    Faust, J. L., & Paulson, D. R. (1998). Active learning in the college classroom. Excellence in College Teaching, 9(2), 3-24.
    Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 321-325.
    Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 689-703.
    Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2005). The relation between prior knowledge and students' collaborative discovery learning processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 264-282.
    Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 197-213.
    Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. The American psychologist, 39(2), 93-104.
    Hartley, J. (1983). Note-taking research: Resetting the scoreboard. Bulletin of the British Psychological, 36, 13-14.
    Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1978). Note‐taking: A critical review. Innovations in Education & Training International, 15(3), 207-224.
    Hembree, R., & Dessart, D. J. (1986). Effects of hand-held calculators in precollege mathematics education: A meta-analysis. Journal for research in mathematics education, 83-99.
    Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. (1988). Cooperative cbi: The effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous grouping on the learning of progressively complex concepts. Journal of educational computing research, 4(4), 413-424.
    Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 27-40.
    Hopkins, K. D. (1998). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Howe, M. J. (1970). Using students' notes to examine the role of the individual learner in acquiring meaningful subject matter. Journal of educational research, 64, 61-63.
    Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (1986). Revised circle of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Minnesota: Interaction Book Company.
    Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (1994). Cooperative Learning in the classroom. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Part vii, prior knowledge. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Katayama, A. D., & Crooks, S. M. (2003). Online notes: Differential effects of studying complete or partial graphically organized notes. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(4), 293-312.
    Katayama, A. D., Shambaugh, R. N., & Doctor, T. (2005). Promoting knowledge transfer with electronic note taking. Teaching of Psychology, 32(2), 129-131.
    Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 23-32.
    Kiewra, K. A. (1988). Cognitive aspects of autonomous note taking: Control processes, learning strategies, and prior knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 23(1), 39-56.
    Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147-172.
    Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., Kim, S.-I., Risch, N., & Christensen, M. (1995). Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(2), 172-187.
    Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 240-245.
    Kiewra, K. A., & Fletcher, H. J. (1984). The relationship between notetaking variables and achievement measures. Human Learning, 3, 273-280.
    King, A. (1991). Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(4), 331-346.
    King, A. (1992a). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303-323.
    King, A. (1992b). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 111-126.
    Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 459-477.
    Laidlaw, E. N., Skok, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1993). The effects of notetaking and self-questioning on quiz performance. Science Education, 77(1), 75-82.
    Landay, J. A. (1999, 10-13 Nov. 1999). Using note-taking appliances for student to student collaboration. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999. FIE '99. 29th Annual (pp. 12C14/15-12C14/20 vol.12).
    Lee, P.-L., Lan, W., Hamman, D., & Hendricks, B. (2008). The effects of teaching notetaking strategies on elementary students’ science learning. Instructional Science, 36(3), 191-201.
    Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423-458.
    Marx, J. D., & Cummings, K. (2007). Normalized change. American Journal of Physics, 75(1), 87-91.
    Matthew, K., Jingtao, W., Alastair, I., Eric, T., Jane, C., Daniel, G., et al. (2005). Livenotes: A system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Portland, Oregon, USA.
    Mayer, E. R. (1987). Educational Psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little Brown.
    Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, I. J. (1984). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology (3 ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
    Palkovitz, R. J., & Lore, R. K. (1980). Note taking and note review: Why students fail questions based on lecture material. Teaching of Psychology, 7(3), 159-161.
    Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 514-522.
    Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 34-38.
    Peverly, S. T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., Alidoost, M., & Garner, J. (2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 167-180.
    Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291-312.
    Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In R. Vasta & Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of child development (Vol. 4): JAI, Greenwich, Connecticut.
    Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers and policymakers. New York: Harper Collins College Pulishers.
    Rakes, T. A., & Scott, S. M. (1983). Using teacher/student generated questions. Paper presented at the 21st Florida Reading Association. Hollywood, FL.
    Rickards, J. P., & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3(2), 136-143.
    Riley, J. D., & Dyer, J. (1979) The Effects of Notetaking While Reading or Listening. Reading World, 19(1), 51–56.
    Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & De Jong, T. (2005). Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instructional Science, 33(2), 105-119.
    Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Schunk, D. H. (2004). Learning theories: An educational perspective (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Siegler, R. S., & Klahr, D. (1982). When do children learn? The relationship between existing knowledge and the acquisition of new knowledge. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 121-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Singh, G., Denoue, L., & Das, A. (2004). Collaborative note taking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'04).
    Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of educational research, 95(6), 323-332.
    Smith, M., Teske, R., & Gossmeyer, M. (2000). Improving student achievement through the enhancement of study skills. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 441256).
    Strough, J., & Covatto, A. M. (2002). Context and age differences in same- and other-gender peer preferences. Social Development, 11(3), 346-361.
    Swanson, P. N., & De La Paz, S. (1998). Teaching effective comprehension strategies to students with learning and reading disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33(4), 209-218.
    Swing, S. R., & Peterson, P. L. (1982). The relationship of student ability and small-group interaction to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 259-274.
    Thomas, A. (1993). Study skills. Eugene: Oregon School Study Council.
    Thompson, R. A., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2003). Prior knowledge and its relevance to student achievement in introduction to psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30(2), 96-101.
    Trawick-Smith, J. (2003). Early childhood development, a multicultural perspective. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
    Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students' interest in physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 47-58.
    Van Der Meij, H. (1994). Student questioning: A componential analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(2), 137-161.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Ward, N., & Tatsukawa, H. (2003). A tool for taking class notes. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6), 959-981.
    Webb, N. M. (1982). Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(5), 642-655.
    Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative activity. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87-95.
    Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227-268.
    Zakaria, E., & Iksan, Z.(2007). Promoting Cooperative Learning in Science and Mathematics Education: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 35-39.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE