簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林錦昌
Chin-Chang Lin
論文名稱: 不同離心收縮比例阻力訓練對上臂肌群效果之探討
The study of different ratios of eccentric contraction in upper arm's muscle training
指導教授: 方進隆
Fang, Chin-Lung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 48
中文關鍵詞: 不同離心收縮比例阻力訓練上臂圍最大力矩
英文關鍵詞: Different ratios of eccentric contraction, resistance training, upper-arm circumference, peak torque
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:253下載:30
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討三種不同離心收縮比例1:1(2秒:2秒)、1:2(2秒:4秒)、1:3(2秒:6秒)對手臂屈伸肌群之訓練效果。以28名男性為受試對象(平均年齡21.07±1.86歲),隨機分派至上列三組,每組人數各為9名、9名、10名。受試者於訓練前後接受下列測驗:一、用Biodex等速測力機兩種速度(每秒60度及120度)進行最大力矩測試,二、測量上臂圍、肱二頭肌和肱三頭肌皮脂厚。訓練計畫包括八週肱二頭肌屈曲(biceps curl)啞鈴阻力訓練,每週兩次、每次3組、每組10下,強度為最大肌力(1RM)的70%。將資料分為肱二頭肌向心期、離心期及肱三頭肌向心、離心期之最大力矩四組資料,以混合設計23(動作速度及組別)二因子變異數分析進行變項考驗;上臂圍、肱二、三頭肌皮脂厚前後測進步差異,以單因子變異數分析來考驗,結果如下:等速測力機以60 o S-1施測,發現肱二頭肌離心收縮期之最大力矩,1:2組顯著優於1:1組與1:3組,而肱二頭肌向心收縮期和肱三頭肌之向心和離心收縮期之最大力矩則無進步差異;其他120°‧S-1速度下施測,發現肱二、三頭肌向心和離心收縮期之最大力矩皆未達顯著進步差異;三組不同離心收縮訓練比例的上臂圍和肱二、三頭肌皮脂厚進步幅度亦未達顯著差異。建議以1:2離心收縮比例對肌力訓練產生離心最大力矩最好。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different ratios of eccentric contraction training on upper arm’s muscle performance. Twenty eight male volunteers(mean age were 21.07±1.86 years)were recruited to participate in this study and randomly assigned into three groups:group A(ratios of concentric/eccentric was 1:1;two seconds:two seconds );group B(1:2;two seconds:four seconds);group C(1:3;two seconds:six seconds). Before and after training, subjects accepted pre-test and post-test using Biodex isokinetic force machine to measure concentric and eccentric contraction peak torque(PT )of biceps and triceps. The measurements were set at two different speed of 60°‧S-1 and 120°‧S-1. The 8-week training regimens were two days a week, three sets every day, 10 repetitions every set at intensity of 70% of 1RM with dumbbell. The upper-arm circumference(CIR)and skinfold thickness of biceps and triceps were measured too. The dependent factors were two different testing speed and three different ratios of eccentric contraction. The data were analyzed using a two-way [ speed(60°‧S-1 and 120°‧S-1)×group(A,B and C)] mixed factorial ANOVA. Significant difference of PT was found between group B and A, group B and C in 60°‧S-1 biceps eccentric contraction. Group B was superior to group A and C. But biceps concentric, triceps concentric, and triceps eccentric contraction were no significant difference of PT in 60°‧S-1. There was no significant difference of PT existed among A , B and C groups in 120°‧S-1 .No significant difference was found of CIR and skinfold thickness of biceps and triceps among different groups. The study suggests that resistance trainers should use 1:2 ratio of eccentric contraction to make the best eccentric contraction of PT when training their upper arm.

    目次 口試委員與系主任簽字證書……………………………………………… i 授權書……………………………………………………………………… ii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………… iv 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………… v 謝誌………………………………………………………………………… vi 目次………………………………………………………………………… vii 表次………………………………………………………………………… ix 圖次………………………………………………………………………… x 第壹章 緒 論 一、前言………………………………………………………………… 1 二、研究背景…………………………………………………………… 3 三、研究目的…………………………………………………………… 4 四、研究假設…………………………………………………………… 5 五、研究範圍…………………………………………………………… 5 六、名詞操作性定義…………………………………………………… 5 第貳章 文 獻 探 討 一、向心收縮與離心收縮不同收縮形態特性之探討………………… 7 二、阻力運動下離心收縮效果之探討………………………………… 11 三、離心訓練對神經肌的影響………………………………………… 13 四、反覆次數的向心、離心收縮時間之探討……………………… 14 第參章 研 究 方 法 一、研究對象…………………………………………………………… 17 二、實驗設計…………………………………………………………… 18 三、實驗工具與器材…………………………………………………… 18 四、實驗流程圖與及項目、步驟……………………………………… 20 五、資料處理與分析…………………………………………………… 25 第肆章 結果 一、肱二、三頭肌前、後測之最大力矩比較結果………………… 27 二、上臂圍進步幅度之比較結果…………………………………… 31 第伍章 討論與結論 一、肱二、三頭肌前、後測最大力矩差異之討論………………… 35 二、反覆次數的向心、離心收縮時間之討論……………………… 37 三、上臂圍進步幅度之討論………………………………………… 38 四、結論與建議……………………………………………………… 39 引 用 文 獻 中、英文部分………………………………………………………… 42 附錄一 受試者需知與同意書………………………………………… 46 附錄二 健康狀況調查表……………………………………………… 47 附錄三 慣用手檢定問卷……………………………………………… 48 表 次 表3.1 受試者基本資料……………………………………………………… 17 表4.1 肱二頭肌速度與接受訓練變項之重複量數變異數分析摘要表…… 28 表4.2 肱二頭肌在60 °‧S-1時之單純主要效果變異數分析摘要表…… 29 表4.3 肱三頭肌速度與接受訓練變項之重複量數變異數分析摘要表…… 30 表4.4 受試者最大力矩前後測的t檢定分析表…………………………… 31 表4.5 三組受試者上臂圍前後測的t檢定分析表………………………… 31 表4.6 上臂圍進步百分比之單因子變異數分析摘要表…………………… 32 表4.7 三組受試者肱二頭肌皮脂厚前後測的t檢定分析表……………… 33 表4.8 三組受試者肱三頭肌皮脂厚前後測的t檢定分析表表…………… 33 表4.9 肱二頭肌皮脂厚之單因子變異數分析摘要表……………………… 33 表4.10 肱三頭肌皮脂厚之單因子變異數分析摘要表…………………… 34 圖 次 圖2-1  上臂伸張動作起點處……………………………………………… 11 圖2-2  上臂伸張動作中點處……………………………………………… 11 圖2-3 上臂伸張動作終點及曲屈動作起點處…………………………… 11 圖2-4 上臂曲屈動作終點處……………………………………………… 11 圖3-1  等速測力機………………………………………………………… 18 圖3-2 皮脂夾、皮尺……………………………………………………… 18 圖3-3 啞鈴………………………………………………………………… 19 圖3-4 斜板………………………………………………………………… 19 圖3-5 握把、鋼珠、裝填袋、計時器、節拍器…………………… 19 圖3-6 組成物……………………………………………………………… 19 圖3-7 上臂圍之測量……………………………………………………… 22 圖3-8 肱三頭肌皮脂厚…………………………………………………… 23 圖3-9 肱二頭肌皮脂厚…………………………………………………… 23 圖3-10 一反覆次數起點、終點處 ………………………………………… 24 圖3-11 一反覆次數之轉折處……………………………………………… 24 圖4-1 上臂圍進步百分比………………………………………………… 32

    中文部分

    方進隆。(1992)。運動與健康。台北:漢文。
    王百川。(1995)。肌肉的運動傷害。國立體育學院論叢,4(2),139-150。
    林正常。(1993)。運動科學與訓練。台北縣:銀禾。
    林正常。(1998)。運動生理學。台北市:師大書苑。
    林正常、蔡崇濱、劉立宇、林政東、吳忠芳。(2001)。運動訓練法(T. O. Bompa原著)。台北市:藝軒。
    林政東、呂宏進。(2001)。肌肉肥大的生理機制與訓練法。大專體育學刊,3(1),201-212。
    林麗娟。(1994)。不同比例之等速離心和向心聯合收縮對肱三頭肌肌力和肌耐力之影響。體育學報,18,255-266。
    黃啟煌。(1996)。運動傷害的預防模式。體育與運動,100,46-52。
    蔚順華。(2000)。肌肉適能。載於行政院體育委員會和體育學會(編輯)。運動訓練法(223-237)。台北市:中華民國體育學會。
    劉強。(2001)。有無運動訓練經歷學童手眼協調能力與辨識能力之比較。桃園縣:國立體育學院教練研究所碩士論文。

    英文部分

    Anshel, M. H., Freedson, P., Hamill, J., Haywood, K., Horvat, M. and Plowman, S. A. (1991). Dictionary of The Sports and Exercise Sciences. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Publishers.
    Basmajian, J. V. and Deluca, J. C. (1985). Muscles Alive, 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams&Wilkins.
    Brzycki, M. A. (1995). Practical to strength training. Indianapolis: Masters Press.
    Caiozzo, V. J., Perrine, J. J. & Edgerton, V. R. (1981). Training induced alterations of the in vivo force –velocity relationship of human muscle. Journal of Applied Physiology, 51, 750-754.
    Colliander, E. B. & Tesch, P. A. (1990). Effect of eccentric and concentric muscle actions in resistance training. Acta Physiological Scandinavica,140. 31-39.
    Darden, E. (1990). The Nautilus Book. Chicago: Contemporary Books Inc.
    Davies, C. T. M. & Barnes, C. (1972). Negative (eccentric) work, Physiological responses to walking uphill and downhill on a motordriven treadmill. Ergonomics,15, 121.
    David, C. N. (1997). Assessing body composition. United States: Human Kinetics.
    Dudley, G. & Djamil, R. (1985). Incompatibility of endurance and strength-training modes of exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology, 59, 1446-1451.
    Dudley, G. A., Tesch, P. A., Miller, B. J. and Buchanan, P. (1991). Importance of eccentric action in performance adaptations to resistance training. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine,62, 543-550.
    Friden, J., Seger, J., Sjostrom, M. & Ekblom, B. (1983). Adaptive response in human skeletal muscle subjected to prolonged eccentric training. Internation Journal of Sports Medicine,4, 177-183.
    Hather, B. M., Tesch, P. A., Buchanan, P. & Dudley, G. A. (1991). Influence of eccentric actions on skeletal muscle adaptations to resistance training. Acta Physiol. Scand, 143, 177-185.
    Hortobagyi, T., Barrier, J. and Beard, D. (1996). Greater initial adaptations to submaximal lengthening than maximal shortening. Journal of Applied Physiology, 81, 1677-1682.
    Hortobagyi, T., Hill, J. P., Houmard, J. A., Fraser, D. D., Lambert, N. J. and Israel, R. G. (1996). Adaptive responses to muscle lengthening and shortening in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology,80, 765-772.
    Hortobagyi, T., Paul, D. & Jeff, M. (2001). Effects of standard and eccentric overload strength training in young women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,33(7), 1206-1212.
    Hutchins, K. (1992). Super slow: the ultimate exercise protocol. Casselberry, FL: Media Support.
    Jones, D. A., Rutherford, O. M. (1982). Human muscle strength training: the effects of three different vegims and the nature of the resultant changes. Journal of Applied Physiology,3, 1-11.
    Keeler, L. K., Finkelstein, L. H., Miller, W. and Fernhall, B. (2001). Early-phase adaptations pf tradition-speed vs. superslow resistance training on strength and aerobic capacity in sedentary individuals. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,15(3), 309-314.
    Komi, P. V., Kaneko, M., and Aura, O. (1987). EMG activity of the leg extensor muscles with special reference to mechanic efficiency in concentric and eccentric exercise. International Journal of Sports Medicine,8, 22-29.
    Komi, P. V. (1973). Relationship between muscle, EMG, velocity of contraction under concentric and eccentric work. New Development in Electromvography and Clinical Neurophysiology,1, 596-606.
    Moritani, T. , Muramatsu, S. & Muro, M. (1987). Activity of motor unit during concentric and eccentric contraction. American Journal of Physical Medicine,66(6), 338-350.
    Newham, D. J. (1998). The consequences of eccentric contractions and their relationship to delayed onset muscle pain. Journal of Applied Physiology,57, 353-359.
    Stanish, W. D., Rubinovich, R. M. and Curwin, S. (1986). Eccentric exercise in chronic tendonitis. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research,208, 65-68.
    Westcott, W. (1994). Regular vs. slow nautilus training. Nautilus, 1-6.
    Winter, D. A. (1990). Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Canada: Wiley-Interscience.

    QR CODE