簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 胡肇勳
Hu, Chao-Hsun
論文名稱: 國小低年級孩童與父母於親子衝突的反應方式之研究
A Study of Response Types in Taiwan Lower Grade Elementary School and Their Parents during Parent-Child Conflicts
指導教授: 程景琳
Cheng, Ching-Ling
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
中文關鍵詞: 親子衝突社會領域理論父母親的衝突反應孩童的衝突反應
英文關鍵詞: parent-child conflicts, social domain theory, parental conflict response, children's conflict response
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:183下載:42
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討國小低年級孩童與其家長在面對不同領域的親子衝突時,使用不同反應方式的情況。主要的研究目的如下:(一)探討在不分領域的衝突事件中,國小低年級孩童與父母親使用不同反應方式的情況。(二)探討在不同領域的衝突事件中,國小低年級孩童與父母親使用不同反應方式的情況。(三)分析在不分領域的衝突事件中,國小低年級孩童與父母親使用不同反應方式間的關係。(四)分析在不同領域的衝突事件中,國小低年級孩童與父母親使用不同反應方式間的關係。
    本研究採用「觀察研究法」,以三十四對國小低年級孩童(平均年齡7.83歲,)與父母親為研究對象,請父母親用錄音機錄下四個時段共兩個小時的親子互動。所得的資料以編碼的方式分析出衝突領域和親子的反應方式。衝突領域共有五種:道德慣例、課業、安全、個人以及其他(無法歸類)。父母親的反應方式為要求、引導、壓制與安撫,而孩童的反應方式為拒絕、爭論、抗爭與妥協。並且以皮爾遜相關係數的統計方式來分析資料。綜合整個研究結果,本研究的主要發現如下:
    一、以衝突領域而言(不包含其他領域),出現次數由高到低依序為課業、安全、道德慣例和個人領域。
    二、以出現頻率而言,父母親反應由高到低依序為要求、引導、安撫和壓制;而孩童反應由高到低依序為拒絕、爭論、妥協和抗爭。
    三、整體來說,父母親的引導反應分別和孩童的爭論反應與妥協反應有正相關,而父母親的壓制反應與孩童的抗爭反應有正相關。
    四、在四個領域中,出現頻率第一和第二高的家長反應均為要求和引導。若只討論壓制反應,其較常出現在道德慣例領域;若只討論安撫反應,其較常出現在個人領域。
    五、在四個領域中,出現頻率第一和第二高的孩童反應均為拒絕和爭論。若只討論抗爭反應,其較常出現在個人領域;若只討論妥協反應,其較常出現在道德慣例領域。
    六、在課業與安全領域裡,家長的壓制反應和孩童的抗爭反應有正相關;在道德慣例領域中,家長的壓制反應和孩童的爭論反應有負相關;在個人領域中,家長的壓制反應與孩童的拒絕反應有負相關。
    本研究發現,家長的壓制反應和孩童反應種類的相關情形會依照不同領域而有所變化,這可能和各領域所涉及的性質有關。因此在面對親子衝突時,要特別注意在不同領域中,父母親使用壓制反應所代表的意涵和其所帶來的不同影響。

    This study investigates how lower grade elementary school children and their parents, when different types (domains) of parent-child conflicts occur, use different responses. Its main objectives are (1) to study the differences in the responses of lower grade elementary school children and their parents when dealing with parent-child conflicts; (2) to study the differences in the responses of lower grade elementary school children and their parents when dealing with the parent-child conflicts of different domains; (3) to study the correlation between the responses of lower grade elementary school children and their parents when dealing with parent-child conflicts; (4) to study the correlation between the responses of lower grade elementary school children and their parents when dealing with the parent-child conflicts of different domains.
    This study made use of observation research, and the subjects consisted of 34 lower grade elementary school children (with the average age of 7.83) and their parents. Parents were asked to record parent-child interaction using a voice recorder at four different times for a total duration of two hours. The acquired information was coded and analyzed for conflict domains and response types. There were a total of five conflict domains, namely moral-convention, achievement, prudence, person, and other. Parents’ responses could be differentiated as demanding, inductive, power assertive, or soothing, and those of the child as rejecting, argumentative, fighting or compromising. Data was analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Summarizing study results, this study found the following:
    1.In terms of conflict domains, the order of high-to-low occurrence was achievement, prudence, moral-convention, and person (other domain is not included).
    2.In terms of the types of parents’ response, the order of high-to-low occurrence was demanding, inductive, soothing, and power assertive response. Furthermore, in terms of the types of children’s response, the order of high-to-low occurrence was rejecting, argumentative, compromising, and fighting response.
    3.A positive correlation was found between parents’ inductive response and children’s argumentative response, between parents’ inductive response and children’s compromising response, and also between parents’ power assertive response and children’s fighting response.
    4.In all four domains, the first and second most frequent parents’ responses were demanding and inductive response, respectively. The power assertive response occurred more frequently in the moral-convention domain; however, the soothing response occurred more frequently in the personal domain.
    5.In all four domains, the first and second most frequent children’s responses were rejecting and argumentative response. The rejecting response occurred more frequently in the personal domain; however, the compromising response occurred more frequently in moral-convention domain.
    6.In the achievement and prudential domain, a positive correlation was found between parents’ power assertive and children’s fighting response; in the moral-convention domain, a negative correlation was found between parents’ power assertive and children’s argumentative response; in the personal domain, a negative correlation was found between parents’ power assertive and children’s rejecting response.
    According to this study, the correlation between parents’ power assertive response and different children’s responses is dependant on the conflict domains. This may be due to the nature of involvement in the domains. Therefore, when dealing with parent-child conflicts, special attention must be paid to the specific meaning of parental power assertion in each different domain, and the different effects.

    中文摘要------------------------------------------- Ⅰ 英文摘要------------------------------------------- Ⅲ 目錄----------------------------------------------- Ⅴ 附表目次------------------------------------------- Ⅶ 附圖目次------------------------------------------- Ⅷ 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的---------------------------- 1 第二節 研究問題與假設---------------------------- 5 第三節 名詞釋義---------------------------------- 6 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 親子互動的相關研究------------------------ 9 第二節 社會領域取向的理論架構-------------------- 23 第三節 社會領域理論的親子衝突研究---------------- 28 第四節 相關研究比較------------------------------ 35 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構---------------------------------- 38 第二節 研究對象---------------------------------- 39 第三節 研究程序---------------------------------- 40 第四節 研究工具---------------------------------- 42 第五節 資料分析方式------------------------------ 49 第四章 研究結果 第一節 衝突與反應次數的描述統計分析-------------- 50 第二節 領域衝突與親子衝突的描述統計分析---------- 51 第三節 領域間之各類親子反應的頻率分析------------ 55 第四節 父母親與孩童之各類反應間的相關分析-------- 57 第五章 討論與建議 第一節 討論-------------------------------------- 61 第二節 建議-------------------------------------- 70 參考文獻 中文部份------------------------------------------- 75 西文部份------------------------------------------- 77 附錄 附錄一 參與研究意願調查表------------------------- 83 附錄二 錄音時間表--------------------------------- 84

    一、中文部份
    王珮玲(1991)。兒童氣質、父母教養方式與兒童社會能力關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
    何俞(1992)。不同家庭結構中父母管教方式對子女自尊心與偏差行為之影響研究。中國文化大學家政學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    林昭溶(1997)。國中生親子衝突歷程之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    周婉湘(2000)。父母以負向言語管教之情境及孩子的因應策略:大學生的文字回溯報告。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    林惠雅(1999)。母親信念、教養目標與教養行為(一):內涵意義之探討。應用心理研究,2期,143-180頁。
    林惠雅(2000)。母親與幼兒互動中之教養行為分析。應用心理研究,6期,75-96頁。
    柯佳美(2003)。高中生知覺父母教養方式與情緒智力研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
    韋乃鳳(2003)。台中市國小高年級學童父母管教方式、人格特質對心理健康影響之研究。臺中師範學院諮商與教育心理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中。
    徐春蓉(2000)。國小學童的自尊、內外控、父母管教方式與害羞關係之研究。屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
    倪履冰(1998)。父母管教態度與青春期子女控制知覺之關係。國立政治大學心理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    張春興(2000)。教育心理學。台北市:東華書局。
    梁珪瑜(1995)。父母說負向言語之動機及影響:父母與國中生之觀點的差異比較。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    許筱梅(1994)。青少年知覺父母教養方式與其情緒穩定之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
    黃家燊(2003)。國小高年級學童內外控信念、父母及教師管教方式與焦慮之相關研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    曾慧芸(2001)。負向言語對國中小學生自我效能、自我喜愛及關係品質之影響。 國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    楊子萱(1998)。國小高年級學童親子衝突經驗與因應之研究--以家庭系統理論分析。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    葉光輝(1999)。家庭中的循環性衝突。應用心理研究,2期,41-82頁。
    楊佳雯(1999)。父母說負向言語、孩子覺知父母態度與孩子自尊之關係。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    劉淑媛(2003)。父母教養方式與青少年行為困擾之調查與訪談研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
    蔡宜妙(2002)。成就動機的文化特徵:台灣地區青少年的努力信念。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    賴嘉凰(1998)。青少年氣質與父母管教態度對親子關係之影響。國立政治大學心理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    薛雪萍(1999)。青少年家庭功能、親子衝突、因應策略與生活適應之相關研究。 國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。

    二、西文部份
    Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). 1989 APA Award Recipient Address: An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 34, 333-341.
    Baumrind, D. (1967). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37, 887-908.
    Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph, 4(1, Pt. 2).
    Baumrind, D. (1973). The development of instrumental competence through socialization. In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 3-46). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Baurmind, D. (1977). Socialization determinants of personal agency. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, March 27-30.
    Baumrind, D. (1983). Rejoinder to Lewis’s reinterpretation of parental firm control effects: Are authoritative families really harmonious? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 132-142.
    Baurmind, D. (1989). Rearing competent children. In W. Damon (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 349-378). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Baurmind, D. (1991). Parenting style and adolescent development. In J. Brooks-Gunn,
    R. Lerner, & A. C. Peterson (Eds.), The encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 746-758). New York: Garland.
    Bearison, D. J., & Cassel, T. Z. (1975). Cognitive decentration and social codes: Communication effectiveness in young children from differing family contexts. Developmental Psychology, 11, 29-36.
    Bell, R. Q. (1979). Parent, child, and reciprocal influences. American Psychologist, 34, 821-826.
    Bell, R. Q., & Chapman, M. (1986). Child effects in studies using experimental or brief longitudinal approaches to socialization. Developmental Psychology, 22, 595-603.
    Bretherton, I. (1985) Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1-2, Serial No. 209), 3-35.
    Brody, G.. H., & Shaffer, D. R. (1982). Contributions of parents and peers to children’s moral socialization. Developmental Review, 2, 31-75.
    Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111-1119.
    Damon, W. & Hart, D. (1992). Self-understanding and its role in social and moral development. In M. H. Bornstein, & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Dishion, T. J. (1990). The family ecology of boys’ peer relations in middle childhood. Child Development, 61, 874-892.
    Eisenberg, A. (1992). Conflicts between mothers and their young children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38, 21-43.
    Eisenberg, A. (1996). The conflicts talk of mothers and children: Patterns related to culture, SES, and gender of child. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42, 438-452.
    Eisenberg, N. (1998). Introduction. In N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.) & W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 1-24). New York: Wiley.
    Freud, S. (1930). Three contributions to the theory of sex. New York: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co. (Original work published in 1905)
    Gewirtz, J. L. (1969). Mechanisms of social learning: Some roles of simulation and behavior in early human development. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 57-212). Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Grusec, J. E. (1992). Social learning theory and development psychology: The legacies of Robert Sears and Albert Bandura. Developmental Psychology, 28, 776-786.
    Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4-19.
    Grusec, J. E., & Kuczynski, L. (1980). Direction of effect in socialization: A comparison of the parent’s versus the child’s behavior as determinants of disciplinary techniques. Developmental Psychology, 16, 1-9.
    Hasebe, Y., Nucci, L., & Nucci, M. S. (2004). Parental control of the personal domain and adolescent symptoms of psychopathology: A cross-national study in the United States and Japan. Child Development, 75, 815-828.
    Hasting, P. D., & Coplan, R. (1999). Conceptual and empirical links between children’s social sphere: Relating maternal beliefs and preschoolers’ behaviors with peers. In C. C. Piotrowski, & P. D. Hasting (Eds.), Conflict as a context for understanding maternal beliefs about child rearing and children’s misbehavior. New Directions for Child Development, 73(pp. 7-24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Hoffman, M. L. (1960). Power assertion by the parent and its impact on the child. Child Development, 31, 129-143.
    Hoffman, M. L. (1970). Conscience, personality, and socialization techniques. Human Development, 13, 90-126.
    Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 281-313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Hoffman, M. L. (1983). Affective and cognitive processes in moral internalization: An information processing approach. In E. T. Higgins, D. Ruble, & W. Hartup (Eds.), Social cognition and social development: A sociocultural perspective (pp. 236-274). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Moral development. In M. Bornstein & M. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (pp. 497-548). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Hoffman, M. L., & Saltzstein, H. D. (1967). Parental discipline and the child’s moral development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 45-57.
    Kanagawa, C., Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (2001). “Who am I?” The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 90-105.
    Kim, J. M. (1998). Korean children’s concepts of adult and peer authority and moral reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 34, 947-955.
    Kochanska, G. (1995). Children’s temperament, mothers’ discipline, and security of attachement: Multiple pathways to emerging internalization. Child Development, 66, 597-615.
    Kochanska, G., Padavich, D. L., & Koening, A. L. (1996). Children’s narratives about hypothetical moral dilemmas and objective measures of their conscience: Mutual relations and socialization. Child Development, 67, 1420-1436.
    Loeb, R. C., Horst, L., & Horton, P. J. (1980). Family interaction patterns associated with self-esteem in preadolescent girls and boys. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 26, 203-217.
    Maccoby, E. E. (1984). Socialization and developmental change. Child Development, 55, 317-328.
    Maccoby, E. E. (1992). The role of parents in socialization of children: An history overview. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1006-1017.
    Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 1-102). New York: Wiley.
    Main, M., Kalpan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1-2, Serial No. 209), 66-104.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 224-253.
    Nucci, L. (1981). The development of personal concepts: A domain distinct from moral or society concepts. Child Development, 52, 114-121.
    Nucci, L., & Nucci, M. S. (1982). Children’s responses to moral and social-conventional transgressions in free-play settings. Child Development, 53, 1337-1342.
    Nucci, L. & Smetana, J. G. (1996). Mothers’ conceptions of young children’s areas of personal freedom. Child Development, 67, 1870-1886.
    Nucci, L., & Weber, E. K. (1995). Social interactions in the home and the development of young children’s conceptions of the personal. Child Development, 66, 1438-1452.
    Parke, R, & Buriel, R. (1998). Socialization in the family: Ethic and ecological perspectives. In N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.) & W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 863-932). New York: Wiley.
    Patterson, G. R. (1977). Accelerating stimuli for two classes of coercive behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5, 334-350.
    Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castilia Press.
    Patterson, G. R. (1983). A change agent for family process. In N. Garmezy, & M. Rutter (Eds.), Stress, coping, and development in children (pp. 235-245). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Patterson, G. R. (1988). Family process: Loops, levels, and linkage. In N. Bolger, A. Caspi, G. Downey, & M. Moorchouse (Eds.), Persons in context: Developmental processes (Human development in culture and historical context series, pp. 114-151). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Patterson, G. R., Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1982). A comparative evaluation of parent training procedures. Behavior Therapy, 13, 638-650.
    Patterson, G. R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1984). The correlation of family management practices and delinquency. Child Development, 55, 1299-1307.
    Phillips, D. A. (1987). Socialization of perceived academic competence among highly competent children. Child Development, 58, 1308-1320.
    Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. San Diego, CA: Harcount Brace Jovanovich.
    Sears, R. R. (1951). A theoretical framework for personality and social behavior. American Psychologist, 6, 476-483.
    Sears, R. R., Maccoby, E. E., & Levin, H. (1957). Patterns of child rearing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Smetana, J. G. (1981). Preschool children’s conceptions of moral and social rules. Child Development, 52, 1333-1336.
    Smetana, J. G. (1983). Social-cognitive development: Domain distinctions and coordinations, Development Review, 3, 131-147.
    Smetana, J. G. (1988). Adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority. Child Development, 59, 321-335.
    Smetana, J. G. (1989). Adolescents’ and parents’ reasoning about actual family conflicts. Child Development, 60, 1052-1067.
    Smetana, J. G. (1994). Parenting styles and beliefs about parental authority. In J. G. Smetana (Ed.), Beliefs about parenting: Origins and developmental implications. New Directions for Child Development, 66(pp. 21-36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Smetana, J. G. (1995). Parenting style and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66, 299-316.
    Smetana, J. G. (1997). Parenting and development of social knowledge reconceptualized: A social domain analysis. In J. E. Grusec, & L. Kuczynski (Eds.). Parenting and children’s internalization values: A handbook of comtemporary theory (pp. 162-192). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    Smetana, J. G., & Asquith, P. (1994). Adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority and personal autonomy. Child Development, 65, 1147-1162.
    Smetana, J. G., Braeges, J. L., & Yau, J. (1991). Doing what you say and saying what you do: Reasoning about adolescent-parent conflict in interviews and interactions. Journal of Adolescent Research, 6, 276-295.
    Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Daddis, C. (2004). Longitudinal development of family decision making: Defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle-class African American adolescents. Child Development, 75, 1418-1434.
    Smetana, J. G., & Daddis, C. (2002). Domain-special antecedents of parental psychological control and monitoring: The role of parenting beliefs and practices. Child Development, 73, 563-580.
    Smetana, J. G., Toth, S. L., Cicchetti, D., Bruce, J., Kane, P., & Daddis, C. (1999). Maltreated and nonmaltreated preschoolers’ conception of hypothetical and actual moral transgressions. Developmental Psychology, 35, 269-281.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1992). Intellectual development: A satiric fairy tale. In R. J. Sternberg, & C. Berg (Eds.), Intelligence development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Stevenson, H. W., & Lee, S. Y. (1990). Contexts of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55(1-2, Series No. 221).
    Strassberg, Z. (1995). Social information processing in compliance situation by mother of behavior-problem boys. Child Development, 66, 376-389.
    Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Weiss, B., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1992). Some consequences of early harsh discipline: Child aggression and a maladaptive social information processing style. Child Development, 67, 2101-2114.
    Yau, J., & Smetana, J. G. (1993). Chinese-American adolescents’ reasoning about culture conflicts. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8, 419-438.
    Yau, J., & Smetana, J. G. (1996). Adolescents-parent conflict among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Child Development, 67, 1262-1275.
    Yau, J., & Smetana, J. G. (2003). Conceptions of moral, social-conventional, and personal events among Chinese preschoolers in Hong Kong. Child Development, 74, 647-658.
    Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., & King, R. A. (1979). Child rearing and children’s prosocial initiations toward victims of distress. Child Development, 50, 319-330.

    QR CODE