簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林仲威
Lin, Chung-Wei
論文名稱: 碩士生學習歷程社會化之研究
A Study on the Socialization of the Master Students’Learning Process
指導教授: 許殷宏
Hsu, Yin-Hung
口試委員: 許殷宏
Hsu, Yin-Hung
楊洲松
Yang, Chou-Sung
武佳瀅
Wu, Chia-Ying
口試日期: 2024/09/26
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育學系
Department of Education
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 220
中文關鍵詞: 因應策略社會化碩士生
英文關鍵詞: coping strategies, socialization, the master students
研究方法: 文件分析法半結構式訪談法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401944
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:262下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

因大學學歷貶值使業界提高徵才門檻,造成許多大學生為了就業而選擇讀碩士班,故攻讀碩士已成為臺灣社會趨勢,但是碩士生在研究所學習歷程裡,學習困難對其壓力極大,所以因應策略在碩士生學習困難應對上有重要性,而社會化相關理論,有助於探討碩士生的學習過程,涵蓋碩士生在研究所面臨的學習困難,以及擬定因應策略去應對學習困難,因此本研究選擇以有關社會化的理論去探討碩士生學習歷程。
根據研究動機,本研究有以下四個目的:壹、對碩士生就讀研究所的期盼還有動機進行探討。貳、對碩士生於研究所學習歷程裡,所碰到的困難進行探究。參、理解碩士生為了應對學習困難,所使用的因應策略。肆、對於碩士生學習過程社會化帶來影響的脈絡因素進行分析。
本研究選擇某所大學的教育研究所作為研究場域,並挑選該大學教育研究所的碩士班學生作為研究對象。本研究所選擇的研究法為質性研究法,且經由文件分析還有半結構訪談去蒐集資料。依照對資料的分析,歸納下列五點結論:壹、碩士生就讀研究所的動機還有期望主要為功利性考量,其次為學術研究考量。貳、對英文資料的理解、指導教授針對論文的不明確指引,還有由於疫情產生的影響或系所研究重心而捨棄論文題目,為碩士生在研究所學習的主要困難。參、打混策略常用來應對作業、變通性策略常用在論文撰寫,至於順從策略是碩士生學習時最常運用的策略。肆、尊重教師的社會期望和研究所教師的教學方式係對碩士生學習帶來影響的主要社會脈絡。伍、碩士生論文常受到大學制度影響,至於碩士生在大學所學知能、在學校的教學經驗,以及研究所教師所設計的課程常對碩士生作業撰寫產生影響。

That the industry raised the threshold for the employees of the recruitment because of the depreciation of the university degrees resulted in many college students choosing to study for a master's degree in order to find a job. Therefore, studying for a master's degree has become a social trend in Taiwan. However, during the process of the master students studying in the graduate schools, the learning difficulties that the master students face put great pressure on them, so coping strategies are significant to cope with the master students' learning difficulties, and socialization-related theories are beneficial to research the learning process of the master students, including the learning difficulties the master students face in the graduate schools and formulating the coping strategies to cope with the learning difficulties. Therefore, this study chose to research the learning process of the master students through the socialization-related theories.
According to the motivation for the research, the four purposes of this study are as follows: 1.To discuss the master students’ motivations for studying in the graduate school and their expectations of studying in the graduate school. 2.To explore the difficulties the master students encountered in the process of learning in the graduate school. 3.To understand the coping strategies the master students used in order to cope with the learning difficulties. 4.To analyze the contextual factors influencing the socialization of the master students' learning process.
This study selected the Graduate Institute of Education in the university as the research area, and selected the master students studying in the Graduate Institute of Education in the university as the research subjects. This study selected the qualitative research as the method to research, and taked document analysis and semi-structured interviews as the method to collect data. Based on the data analysis, the five conclusions are summarized as follows: 1.The master students' motivations behind studying in the graduate school and the expectations of studying in the graduate school are mainly utilitarian considerations, followed by considerations of academic research. 2.The main difficulties of the master students learning in the graduate schools are understanding English materials, the topics of the theses abandoned due to the emphasis-research of the department or the affection of the epidemic, and the unclear instructions the supervisors give the master students in the theses. 3.The strategies of drifting are often used to cope with schoolwork, the strategies of flexibility are often used to write the theses. As for the strategies of compliance are the most commonly strategies used by the master students in the process of learning. 4.The main social contexts affecting the master students' learning are the social expectations of respecting teachers and the teaching methods of the graduate school teachers. 5.The master students' theses are often affected by the system of the university. As for the skills and knowledge the master students learned during the university period, the master students' teaching experience at school, and the courses designed by the teachers of the graduate school often affect the master students' schoolwork of writing.

第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究緣起 1 第二節 研究動機 3 第三節 研究目的 8 第四節 名詞解釋 8 第五節 研究限制 9 第二章 文獻探討 13 第一節 社會化 13 第二節 學生因應策略 35 第三節 相關研究 45 第三章 研究設計與實施 55 第一節 研究方法 55 第二節 研究場域與研究參與者 57 第三節 研究步驟和流程 62 第四節 資料整理與分析 66 第五節 研究信實度 70 第六節 研究倫理 71 第四章 研究發現與討論 73 第一節 碩士生就讀研究所的動機與期望 73 第二節 碩士生在學習上遇到的困難 86 第三節 碩士生在學習上的因應策略 101 第四節 綜合討論 159 第五章 結論與建議 197 第一節 結論 197 第二節 建議 202 第三節 研究者省思 206 參考文獻 211 附錄 219

方德隆(2004)。班級社會體系。載於陳奎憙(主編),現代教育社會學(139-177頁)。師大書苑。
王元貞(2011)。適應困難碩士生之生涯轉換〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺南大學。
王文科、王智弘(2010)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29-50。
吳芝儀(2011)。以人為主體之社會科學研究倫理議題。人文社會科學研究,5(4),19-39。
宋鎮照(1999)。社會學。五南。
林天祐(1996)。認識研究倫理。教育資料與研究,12,57-63。
林佩璇(2002)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育學研究所(主編),質的研究方法(239-262頁)。麗文。
林松齡(1989)。社會化。載於張華葆(主編),社會學(63-100頁)。三民。
林淑惠、黃韞臻(2008)。研究生之生活壓力與因應策略現況分析。臺中教育大學學報,22(2),61-84。
林清江(1987)。教育社會學新論:我國社會與教育關係之研究。五南。
林瑜庭(2014)。根與地下莖-從後現代知識轉型過程探究大學生學習型態〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
柯玉珊(2019)。非典型社工所學生的社工職涯與學習之路〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學。
胡幼慧(1996)。轉型中的質性研究:演變、批判和女性主義研究觀點。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性主義研究實例(7-26頁)。巨流。
胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何收集資料、登錄與分析?。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性主義研究實例(141-158頁)。巨流。
秦宛萱(2021年,3月29日)。大學文憑貶值 接近一成新鮮人選擇留在校園幫自己加值加薪。信傳媒。https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/home/articles/26564
教育部(2017)。105學年度大專校院概況統計。教育部。
教育部(2021)。109學年度大專校院概況統計。教育部。
教育部(2023)。111學年度大專校院概況統計。教育部。
教育部(2024)。112學年度大專校院概況統計。教育部。
教育部a(2023)。成語典。教育部國語辭典公眾授權網。2024年2月15日,取自https://language.moe.gov.tw/001/Upload/Files/site_content/M0001/respub/dict_idiomsdict_download.html
教育部b(2023)。重編國語辭典修訂本。教育部國語辭典公眾授權網。2024年2月15日,取自 https://language.moe.gov.tw/001/Upload/Files/site_content/M0001/respub/dict_reviseddict_download.html
教育部統計處(1997)。85學年度大專校院概況統計。教育部。
教育部統計處(1998)。86學年度大專校院概況統計。教育部。
教育部統計處(1999)。87學年度大專校院概況統計。教育部。
教育部統計處(2000)。88學年度大專校院概況統計。教育部。
許殷宏(1999)。師生互動策略探究。中等教育,50(6),62-79。
郭秀櫻(2004)。「教育研究」的批判教育研究:教研所碩士生的學習經驗〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學。
陳立慈(2020年,4月30日)。畢業即失業:我要考研究所繼續深造還是進入職場工作?。北商職涯電子報。https://rd.ntub.edu.tw/p/406-1005-77220,r1253.php?Lang=zh-tw
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。五南。
陳奎憙(2004)。教育社會學。三民。
彭貞華(2016)。台灣食品科學在職專班進修之探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中興大學。
游晴雯(2010)。碩士研究生入學動機、因應策略與學習滿意度之關係研究。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。臺北市立教育大學。
程振隆(2004年,8月23日)。大學高中化、研究所大學化。蘋果日報。https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/20040823/JENK2REZQMBAUNGAYRJCHELCMU/
黃小瑋(2006)。全國碩士生在生活壓力、因應策略與身心健康之探究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中山大學。
黃奕嘉(2021年,3月28日)。「學歷有用論」重返流行 頂大碩士班報考人數飆升。聯合新聞網。https://udn.com/news/story/6928/5349975
黃瑞琴(2008)。質的教育研究方法。心理。
楊淨涵(2009)。碩士生生活經驗之回溯性研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立成功大學。
楊朝祥(2002)。研究所學生破十萬的省思。國家政策論壇月刊,2(4),3-7。
葉於棋(2005)。教育研究所研究生學習經驗與相關問題陳顯之探究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學。
趙一鳴(2018)。在臺陸生的跨文化適應研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。東海大學。
歐用生(1989)。質的研究。師大書苑。
滕淑芬(2002)。新世紀人才門檻墊高-十萬研究生搶進窄門。光華雜誌,27(9),17-23。
蔡文榮、巫麗芳(2013)。越南籍學生在臺灣的大學適應議題之研究:以中興大學為例。中臺學報(人文社會卷),24(4),75-96。
蔡文榮、徐主愛(2013)。外籍學生在台灣的大學適應議題之研究:以中興大學之泰國學生為例。教育科學期刊,12(2),88-119。
蔡文榮、董家琳(2015)。馬來西亞學生來臺留學適應問題之個案研究。教育科學期刊,14(2),95-122。
魏玉嘉(2014)。大陸學位生來台求學動機與適應之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立暨南國際大學。
譚光鼎(2016)。教育社會學。學富文化。
Andersen, M. L., & Taylor, H. F. (2013). Sociology: The essentials. Wadsworth.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297-308.
Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The journal of higher education, 73(1), 94-122.
Becker, H. S. (1964). Personal change in adult life. Sociometry, 27(1), 40–53
Becker, H. S. (1993). How I learned what a crock was. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(1), 28-35.
Berger, P. L. (1963). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. Doubleday.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
Boden, D., Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2011). Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education. Higher Education, 62(6), 741-755.
Bucher, R., & Stelling, J. G. (1977). Role models and self-evaluation. In R. Bucher & J. G. Stelling (Eds.), Becoming professional (pp.147-176). Sage.
Carless, D., Jung, J., & Li, Y. (2024). Feedback as socialization in doctoral education Towards the enactment of authentic feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 49(3), 534-545.
Cooley, C. (1902). Human nature and the social order. Scribner.
Furlong, V. J. (1984). Interaction sets in the classroom: Towards a study of pupil knowledge. In M. Hammersley & P. Woods (Eds.), Life in school: The sociology of pupil culture (pp.145-160). Open University Press.
Galton, M. J., Simon, B., & Croll, P. (1980). Inside the primary classroom. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gardner, S. K. (2007). “I heard it through the grapevine”: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher education, 54, 723-740.
Gardner, S. K., Jansujwicz, J. S., Hutchins, K., Cline, B., & Levesque, V. (2014). Socialization to interdisciplinarity: Faculty and student perspectives. Higher Education, 67(3), 255-271.
Giddens, A., Duneier, M., Appelbaum, R. P., & Carr, D. S. (2018). Introduction to sociology. Norton.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
Golde, C. M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: Explaining first-year doctoral attrition. In M. S. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration (pp. 55–64). Jossey-Bass.
Griffin, K. A., Baker, V. L., O’Meara, K. A. (2020). Doing, caring, and being: “Good” mentoring and its role in the socialization of graduate students of color in STEM. In J. C. Weidman & L. DeAngelo (Eds.), Socialization in higher education and the early career: Theory, research and application (pp. 223-239). Springer.
Guillaume, R. O. (2021). Formal knowledge acquisition and socialization to educational leadership by program graduates: The intersection of social justice and the role of program faculty. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 16(2), 107-121.
Hargreaves, A. (1984). The significance of classroom coping strategies. In A. Hargreaves & P. Woods (Eds.), Classrooms and staffrooms: The sociology of teachers and teaching (pp. 64-85). Open University Press.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1967). Social relations in a secondary school. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hoffmann-Longtin, K., Brann, M., Ridley-Merriweather, K. E., & Bach, B. W. (2021). Rethinking graduate student socialization and identification: How the communication discipline can help. Communication Education, 70(1), 120-122.
Holley, K. A. (2020). Interdisciplinarity and doctoral education: Socialization, process, and outcomes. In J. C. Weidman & L. DeAngelo (Eds.), Socialization in higher education and the early career: Theory, research and application (pp. 269-284). Springer.
Jheng, Ying-Jie. (2015). The influence of private tutoring on middle-class students' use of time in formal schools in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 1-8.
Landis, J. R. (1992). Sociology concepts and characteristics. Wadsworth.
Levine, D. U., & Levine, R. F. (1996). Society and education (9th ed.). A Simon & Shuster Company.
LeVine, R. A. (1969). Culture, personality, and civilization: An evolutionary view. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of civilization theory and research (pp. 503–541). Rand McNally.
Marx, K. (1964). Karl Marx: Selected writings in sociology and social philosophy. (T. B. Bottomore, Trans.). McGraw-Hill. (Original work published 1844)
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Free.
Musgrave, P. W. (1972). The sociology of education. Methuen.
Musgrave, P. W. (1987). Socialising contexts: The subject in society. Allen and Unwin.
Rodriguez, S. L., Perez, R. J., & Schulz, J. M. (2022). How STEM lab settings influence graduate school socialization and climate for students of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 15(1), 58-72.
Rosen, B. C., & Bates, A. P. (1967). The structure of socialization in graduate school. Sociological Inquiry, 37(1), 71-84.
Scarth, J. (1987). Teacher strategies: A review and critique. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(3), 245-262.
Sherlock, B., & Morris, R. (1967). The evolution of the professional: A Paradigm. Sociological Inquiry, 37(1), 27-46.
Stark, J. S., Lowther, M., Hagerty, B., and Orczyk, C. (1986). A conceptual framework for the study of preservice professional programs in colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education, 57(3), 231–258.
Staton, A., & Darling, A. (1989). Socialization of teaching assistants. In J. Nyquist, R. Abbott, & D. Wulff (Eds.), Teaching assistant training in the 1990s. New directions for teaching and learning, no. 39 (pp. 15–22). Jossey-Bass.
Sullivan, T. J. (1995). Sociology: Concepts and applications for a diverse world. Vango Books.
Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. A. A. Knopf.
Turner, C. S. V., & Thompson, J. R. (1993). Socializing women doctoral students: Minority and majority experiences. The Review of Higher Education, 16(3), 355–370.
Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage?. Jossey- Bass. Springer
Weng, T. H. (2020). On becoming a doctoral student: Chinese doctoral students’ socialization of capital and habitus in academia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41(4), 555-573.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. Columbia University Press.
Woods, P. (1978). Negotiating the demands of schoolwork. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10(4), 309-327
Woods, P. (1979). The divided school. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Woods, P. (1980). Strategies in teaching and learning. In P. Woods (Ed.), Teacher strategies: Exploration in the sociology of the school (pp.20-27). Croom Helm..
Woods, P. (2012). The development of pupil strategies. In P. Woods (Ed.), Pupil strategies: Explorations in the sociology of the school (pp.11-28). Routledge.

無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
QR CODE