由馬庫色的生平看來，他一生中面臨了三次重大的轉捩點。第一次是第一次世界大戰以及德國革命的爆發，馬庫色被迫結束貴族式的學生生涯，投入軍旅，並開始接觸政治，研究馬克思主義。但是德國革命的失敗使他對政治失望，轉而產生分析現代社會的熱情。戰後他受到海德格的影響，決定回到大學從事學術研究。不過，海德格雖是驅使他研究的動力，但法西斯在德國掌權時，海德格的極右政治立場卻也使猶太裔的馬庫色不得不離開弗萊堡大學。幸而經由胡賽爾的居中引介，馬庫色成為法蘭克福社會研究所的成員，這是他人生的第二個轉捩點，因為在霍克海默和阿多諾等人的影響下，馬庫色重新燃起了對政治的熱情，也開始對心理學產生興趣。不過希特勒不久後便在德國取得政權，對於猶太人的迫害也越來越積極，於是，馬庫色與法蘭克福社會研究所成員只好輾轉移居美國，並在美國資本主義社會的衝擊下，對於「批判理論」有更進一步的發展。這是馬庫色人生的第三個轉捩點。他在移民美國之後，融合了黑格爾、馬克思與佛洛伊德的思想，提出了對先進工業社會以及傳統馬克思主義的批判。也使他以左派思想家的身分知名於學術界，並在60至70年代因學生運動而受到世人矚目。
馬庫色對當代先進工業社會的批判，主要針對先進工業社會藉由滿足人們的物質需求，降低或消除人們的不滿，使其同化於資本社會，而喪失革命的意識，這種情形尤其以美國社會最為嚴重。因此，他認為在以民主自由傳統自豪的美國社會中，人們無法自由地發展對社會的批判，無法自由、平等地與所有事實接觸，也無法平等地接受教育（尤指在1960年代前的美國社會）。如果要獲得自由，就必須革命，世界也才能達到達到正義與善的境界。此外，他一方面不願放棄工人階級為革命潛在主體的馬克思主義觀點，一方面也承認工人階級已經不具有革命意識，因此必須藉由邊緣團體來扮演「觸媒」的角色，這些「觸媒」包含了被壓迫的激進份子和國內的少數份子、女性，以及有創造力的公民等等。他所發表的《理性與革命》、《愛欲與文明》使他在談共色變的50年代成為左派思想家的代表人物；而他此時也在大學裡講授馬克思主義、批判美國社會，因此被稱為「校園的馬克思主義者」。左派的背景與對未來理想社會的描繪，這些都成為他日後在學生運動中被視為青年反叛哲學之父的重要基礎，甚至有人因此指稱馬庫色是煽動學生造反的危險份子。
不過，由60年代學生運動的興起與發展的複雜和缺乏計畫等情況看來，學生運動並不可能是某一個理論家策劃或影響下的結果。美國學運肇興於對黑人民權運動的支持；當學生認為其自由受到學校的干預時，他們便又將矛頭指向大學。緊接著，美國政府對於越戰的深入也成為學生反抗的對象。於是，黑人民權、校園改革與反越戰乃成為美國60年代學生運動的主要議題。但學生並沒有在這些議題上獲得滿足，於是他們的行動便由和平的抗爭轉為激進的暴力與革命。
從分析學生活動者背景的結果中可以看出，60年代的激進學生承襲了50年代末期「披頭世代」對既有社會的反思，他們不熱衷於物質生活的享樂，認為既有社會是虛偽、不人道、墮落的象徵；他們關心社會、人群，對藝術與哲學具有高度的興趣，而任何能對社會提出批判，能啟發他們心靈，又能描繪理想願景的思想，都可能獲得他們的青睞，成為他們共同的心靈養料。因此，卡謬思(Albert Camus)、孔司基(Noam Chomsky)、米勒(C. W. Miller)、沙特(J. P. Sartre)、蓋瓦拉(Che Guevara)、狄百瑞(Rbis Debra)、法農(Frantz Fanon)、古德曼(Paul Goodman)和馬庫色等人才會成為他們的英雄。
若是分析馬庫色之所以能獲得激進學生歡迎，甚至成為學生的精神導師的原因，可以歸納出四點：首先是他獨特的個人魅力，使他在教學或與學生接觸時，能吸引學生的注意力，進而說服學生相信他的理論。其次，馬庫色的教學方式和內容在當時的一般大學中也獨樹一幟，在吸引學生進入教室之後，又能令學生感到精神與知識的充實，因此有些他的學生，如安琪拉．戴薇絲，會從馬庫色在布蘭迪斯大學任教開始，追隨他到加州大學聖地牙哥分校。第三，馬庫色教學、演講所能造成的影響範圍雖然有限，但是他的著作如《愛欲與文明》、《單向度的人》等都有相當高的銷售量，雖然沒有確切的數據資料可以顯示有多少學生看過，甚至精讀過他的著作，但是由某些學運領袖，以及馬庫色的同事的描述中可以得知，這些著作的確是許多學運份子相當重要的理論來源。最後，大眾傳播媒體在提升和保持馬庫色在學運中領袖地位的形象上也扮演著關鍵性的角色，如果沒有大眾媒體，那麼馬庫色將始終只在學術界和學運中知名，同時也不會有棘手的馬庫色事件的發生。
但弔詭的是，從媒體的報導中也可以看出，在馬庫色事件之前，馬庫色鮮少親身參與任何與學生運動有直接關係的活動與組織，一般大眾對馬庫色其人也沒有太多印象，這個時期(1960-1967)的學運領袖比較具有理論基礎，也可能比較熟悉馬庫色的思想，因此，馬庫色的理論對此一時期的學生運動有較實質的影響。等到1968年馬庫色事件發生後，美國社會開始為馬庫色沸騰，但1967年以後的學運份子已經產生質變，他們並不熱衷於理論的研究，甚至在調整運動的路線時，顯現出對馬庫色的理論並不全然接受的態度，因此1968年以後，馬庫色的全國知名度雖然上升，但是卻只在大眾的印象上具有理論指導的地位，是真正的「精神導師」。
激進學生受到馬庫色的影響遠比外界所認定的為輕，此一論點還可以從雙方在理念上的異同處看出。首先，兩者在革命的目的上有相似的目標，學生運動的目的在於各種形式的自由，尤其是要能參與與自己生活相關的各項事務；馬庫色則是要解放人性，使其獨立於工業社會的壓抑之下，獲得批判與否定的能力，進而促使社會更加進步。其次在對理想社會的憧憬上，兩者都以革命的目的出發，勾勒出未來革命後社會的基本形態，是以得出類似的結果，不過馬庫色並不認為革命後必然產生理想的社會，他所抱持的態度較學生務實。
至於革命的主體由誰擔任，雙方的歧見更大。學生為加強自己從事革命運動的正當性，發展出「新工人階級理論」，以使自己成為革命的主體。馬庫色則堅持學生只能是革命的觸媒，先進工業社會中的工人階級雖然喪失了革命意識，但仍是革命的潛在主體。再者，馬庫色認為當代美國社會不具有革命的前景，因此否定了革命的可能性，他認為應該在學校裡培養批判和否定的意識，並且向社會大眾教育和宣導革命意識，盲目的從事暴力抗爭只會導致社會的不滿。這一點也與激進學生的觀點不同。學生認為革命的時機已至，他們除了以各種實際行動表達其訴求外，他們還必須爭取其他階級的認同，而且暴力的手段也是必要的。不過學生運動在理論上雖然注意到工人階級的重要性，卻始終無法獲得工人的支持，這凸顯出學生運動缺乏整體的規劃。
另外，60年代美國學生運動開始初期，馬庫色對於學運的態度較為保留，但一方面在他的理論中，原本就包含了以知識份子為培育革命理論及意識的溫床，而且用邊緣團體來當作革命的觸媒。學生就其本質而言是知識份子，學生運動的目的則是改變不合理的體制，這些都是馬庫色理念的呈現，因此馬庫色逐漸對學生運動表明支持的立場。不過，他也認為學生運動在本質上有致命的缺點，學生不能取代工人階級，他們甚至沒有爭取到工人階級的支持與參與，因此無法擺脫其少數團體的局勢；另一方面，學生運動在發展末期愈發激進，但不能體認當前的美國社會並不具有革命前景，他們激烈的策略無法獲得人民的認同，卻又不願修正自己的理論架構，因此在統治階級的壓抑下，終究難逃崩解的命運。
馬庫色本人並不承認自己是學生運動的精神導師，也不認為沒有他，學生就不會有如此激進的行為，他甚至懷疑有多少學生看過他的著作。誠如馬庫色所說，他與學運的關係僅是一次甜蜜的邂逅。各種資料都顯示出，馬庫色對於他與學生運動之間的關係的看法是正確的，但卻始終遭到忽視或誤解。
在本研究中，雖然對馬庫色與學生運動之關係加以釐清，但仍有許多未解的難題。如馬庫色與許多激進學生都出身於上層中產階級家庭，而且都是猶太人，其中除了「巧合」之外，是否隱含了更深層的意涵？馬庫色的理論和學生運動的訴求與行為的正當與否並非討論的重點，但卻也是另一個值得省思的問題。許多現今認為理所當然的思想與行為在剛開始時，都由少數人帶領，並且被大眾視為離經叛道。此外，馬庫色的思想中含有解放弱勢族群、人類與自然環境和平共存等信念，因此有人將婦女解放運動（尤其是性解放）、環保運動等與馬庫色相提並論，這些都是值得繼續深入探討的領域。

壹、中文部份
（一）專著
Anderson, Perry. Considerations on Western Marxism. 文貫中、魏章玲譯，《西方馬克思主義探討》。 臺北：桂冠 圖書股份有限公司，1990年。
Bottomore, Tom. The Frankfurt School.廖仁義譯，《法蘭克福學派》。臺北：桂冠 圖書股份有限公司，1998年。
Burner, David. Making History with the '60. 許綬南譯，《 60年代》。 臺北：麥田出版股份有限公司，1998年。
Flacks, Richard.Youth and Social Change.區紀勇譯，《青年與社會變遷》。 臺北: 巨流圖書公司，1975年。
Jay, Martin. The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923-1950.善世聯譯，《法蘭克福學派史(1623-1950)》。 廣東： 廣東人民出版社，1996年。
Lind, Peter. Marcuse and Freedom.關向光譯，《馬庫色的自由理論》。 臺北: 遠流出版事業股份有限公司，1994年。
Macintyre, Alasdaiv. H. Marcuse. 邵一誕譯，《馬庫色》。臺北：桂冠 圖書股份有限公司，1992年。
Yinger, J. Milton. Countercultures: The Promise and Peril of a World Turned Upside Down. 高丙中、張林譯，《反文化：亂世的希望與危險》， 臺北: 桂冠圖書股份有限公司，1995年。
南方朔，《另一種英雄：反體制的思想與人物》。臺北：久大文化股份有限公司。1991年。
南方朔，《憤怒之愛：六○年代美國學生運動》。臺北：久大文化股份有限公司，1991年。
馬庫色編，《論當代社會的攻擊性——新左派論當代工業社會》。臺北：南方叢書出版社，1987年。
馬驥雄主編，《戰後美國教育研究》。江西: 江西教育出版社，1991年。
高宣揚，《新馬克思主義導引》。台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司，1991年。
莊錫昌，《二十世紀的美國文化》。臺北：淑馨出版社，1996年。
陳學明，《馬孤哲的新馬克思主義》。臺北： 森大圖書有限公司，1991年。
喬安妮．格蘭特編著，《美國黑人鬥爭史—1619年至今的歷史、文獻與分析》。北京：中國社會科學出版社，1987年。
劉少杰，《馬庫色：批判與重建》。 臺北: 唐山出版社，1993年。
（二）期刊與學位論文
Fender, Lewis.李念虎譯， 〈世代衝突與學生運動〉。《 大學雜誌》 ，第49期，1972年1月。
Footlick, J. K..王杏慶譯，〈美國大學動亂之析判〉。《大學雜誌》，第32期，1970年8月。
余剛，〈六○年代的最後一場好戲：芝加哥八君子〉。《 當代》， 第2期，1966年。
昭明，〈美國大學動亂與學生運動趨向〉。 《時代批評 》，第31卷，第 1、2期，1970年9月。
徐鍵，〈馬庫色的革命理論與學生運動關係研究〉。臺北: 政治作戰學院政治研究所碩士論文，未刊稿，1988年。
洪鐮德，〈 新馬克思主義與當代人文思潮以及社會學說的互動〉。《 中山社會科學學報》， 第8卷 第1期，1994年春季。
張炳玉，〈馬庫色的革命理論與學生運動〉。《 共黨問題研究》 第14卷，第8期，1988年。
陳墇津，〈馬克思巴黎手稿的出版〉。《東亞季刊》，第16卷，第2期，1984年10月。
蔡發林，〈美國六○年代學生運動〉。 臺北： 國立政治大學政治研究所畢業論文，未刊搞，1988年。
貳、英文部份
I. Books by Herbert Marcuse
1941
Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory (New York: Oxford University Press1 1941). First published as a paperbook in 1986 by Routledge & Kegan Paul.
1955
Eros and Civilization (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966). First edition published in 1955.
1964
One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. 2nd ed. (Boston: Beacon Press, 1994). First edition published in 1964.
1965
A Critique of Pure Tolerance with Barrington Moore and Robert Paul Wolff (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969). First edition published in 1965.
1969
An Essay on Liberation (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969).
1972
Counterrevolution and Revolt (Boston: Beacon Press, 1972).
Revolution or Reform? A Confrontation. A debate with Karl Popper. trans. by Michael Aylward and A. T. Ferguson. (Chicago: New University Press, 1976). Original German language edition published in 1972.
From Luther to Popper. trans. by Joris De Bres. (London: Verso, 1972).
1978
The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics (Boston: Beacon Press, 1978). Original German language edition published in 1977.
II. Articles, Interviews and Prefaces by Herbert Marcuse
1958
Preface to Raya Dunayevskaya, Marxism and Freendom (New York: Bookman, 1958), pp. 7-12. Omitted from Later editions.
1966
"Ethics and Revolution," in Ethics and Society: Original Essays on Contemporary Moral Problems, ed. by Richard T. De George (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc, 1966), 133-147. A 1964 Lecture delivered at the University of Kansas.
1967
"The Responsibility of Sciety," in The Responsibility of Power: Historical Essays in Hornor of Hajo Holborn, eds. by Leonard Krieger and Fritz Stern (Garden City, New Yokr: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1967): 439-444. Revised text of a lecture presenteD at the University of California, Los Angeles in July 1966.
"The Question of Revolution," New Left Review 45 (September-October 1967): 3-7.
1968
"Democracy Has/Hasn't a Future......A Present," New York Times Magazine, May 26, 1968, pp. 30-31; 98-104.
"Marcuse Defines His New Left Line," New York Times Magazine, October 27 1968, pp. 29-109.
1969
"On Revolution," in Student Power: Problems, Diagnosis, Action, eds. by Alexander Cockburn and Robbin Blackburn. (Maryland: Peguin Books Ltd, 1970), pp. 367-372. An Interview by Gther Busch.
"Re-Examination of the Concept of Revolution," New Left Review 56 (July-August 1969): 27-34.
"Student Protest is Next to Society Itself," New York Times Magazine, May 4, 1969, p. 137.
1971
"Conversation with Sam Keen and John Raser," Psychology Today 4, 9 (February 1971): 35-40; 60-66.
"A Reply to Lucien Goldmann," Partisan Review 38, 4 (1971-1972): 397-400.
1972
"Art as Form of Reality," New Left Review 74 (July-August 1972): 51-58. 1969 talk presented at a conference sponsored by the Gugenheim Museum in New York.
"Art and Revolution," Partisan Review 39, 2 (Spring 1972): 174-187.
"Can Communism be Liberal? Hebert Marcuse v. Raymond Aron," New Statesman, 23 (June 1972): 860-861.
1977
"Murder is not a Political Weapon," New German Critique 12 (Fall 1977): 7-8.
1978
"Some Social Implications of Modern Technology,?in The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, ed. by Andrew Arato and Eike Gebhatdt (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978), pp. 138-162. Original published in Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 2, 4 (1941-42): 564-565.
"On Science and Phenomenology," in The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, ed. by Andrew Arato and Eike Gebhatdt (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978), pp.466-476. Address prensented at the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, February 13, 1964.
"Theory and Politics: A Discussion With Herbert Marcuse, Jgan Habermas, Heinz Lubsz and Telman Spengler," Telos 38 (Winter 1978-1979): 124-153. Orginal published in Gesprhe mit Herbert Marcuse (1978), pp. 9-62. English trans. by Leslie Adelson, Susan Hegger, Betty Sun and Herbert Wienryb.
1979
"The Failure of the New Left,?New German Critique 18 (Fall 1979): 3-11.
1981
"On the Aesthetic Dimension: A Conversation with Herbert Marcuse," Contemporary Literature 22, 4 (Fall 1981): 416-424. A 1978 Interview with Larry Hartwick.
1982
"Interview with Bryan Magee, 'Marcuse and the Frankfurt School,'?in Men of Ideas: Some Creators of Contemporary Philosophy, ed. Brayn Magee (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982), pp. 43-55. Published transcript of a BBC television interview.
1988
"Heidegger's Politics: An Interview With Frederick Olafson," in Marcuse: Critical Theory and the Promise of Utopia, eds. Robert Pippin, Andrew Feenberg and Charles P. Webel (London: Bergin & Garvey Publishers Inc., 1988), pp. 95-104. Interview taken from the transcript of a film taken at a conference on the philosophy of Martin Heidegger, sponsored by the Department of Philosophy, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, May 4, 1974.
III. Documents and Memoirs by Students and Eyewitnesses
Camejo, Peter. "How to Make a Revolution in the U.S." in On Revolution, edited by William Lutz and Harry Brent (Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishersd, Inc., 1971), pp. 206-217.
Davison, Carl. "The New Radicals in the Multiversity: An Analysis and Strategy for the Student Movement," in On Revolution, edited by William Lutz and Harry Brent (Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishersd, Inc., 1971), pp. 298-315.
Domhoff, William G.. "How to Commit Revolution in Corporate America," in On Revolution, edited by William Lutz and Harry Brent (Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishersd, Inc., 1971), pp. 186-205.
Johnson, Lyndon B. "Why We are in Vietnam," in A History of Our Time: Readings on Postwar America, edited by William H. Chafe and Harvard Sitkoff (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 297-302. Originally Titled "Peace Without Conquest," an address at John Hopkins University, April 6, 1965.
Karin Ashley, Bill Ayers, Bernardine Doum, John Jacobs, Jeff Jones, Gerry Long, Howie Machtinger, Jim Mellen, Terry Robbins, Mark Rudd and Steve Tappis. "You Don't Need a Weatherman to Know Which Way the Wind Blows," in A History of Our Time: Readings on Postwar America, edited by William H. Chafe and Harvard Sitkoff , (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 351-354.
Klonsky, Mike. "Toward a Revolutionary Youth Movement," in The University Crisis Reader, edited by Immanuel Wallerstein and Paul Starr, (New York: Random House, 1971), pp. 258-260.
Lasky, Melvin J. "Revolution Diary.?Encounter 31, 2 (1968): 81-92.
Leaflet by Protest Distributed during the Student Strike at San Francisco State College, ca. October-November 1968. "On Violence," in The University Crisis Reader, edited by Immanuel Wallerstein and Paul Starr, (New York: Random House, 1971), pp. 7-9.
McGill William J.. The Year of the Monkey (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1982).
Oglesby, Carl. "Notes on a Decade Ready for the Dustbin," in The University Crisis Reader, edited by Immanuel Wallerstein and Paul Starr, (New York: Rondom House, 1971), pp. 300-320.
-----------------. "The Revolted," in On Revolution, edited by William Lutz and Harry Brent (Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishersd, Inc., 1971), pp. 54-65.
Rudd, Mark. "Columbia," in The University Crisis Reader, V. II, Confrontation and Counterattack, edited by Immanuel and Paul Starr, (New York: Random House, 1971), pp. 177-197.
................... "Events and Issues of the Columbia Revolt," in The University and Revolution, edited by Gary Weaver and James H. Weaver, (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1969), pp. 133-140.
................... "We Want Revolution," in On Revolution, edited by William Lutz and Harry Brent, (Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishersd, Inc., 1971), pp. 319-322.
Rustin, Bayard. "The New Radicalism: Round III," Partisan Review 32, 4 (Fall 1965): 526-542.
Savio, Mario. "An End to History," inOn Revolution, edited by William Lutz and Harry Brent, (Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishersd, Inc., 1971), pp. 316-318.
SDS. "The Port Huron Statement (1962)," in Democracy is in the Streets: From Port Huron to the Siege of Chicago, edited by James Miller, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987), pp. 329-374.
SNCC. "Student Nonviolent Coordinatiog Committee Statement of Purpose,' in Student Protest, 1960-1970: An Analysis of the Issues and Speeches. Revised Edition with a Comprehensive Bibliography, Donald E. Phillips, (Lanham: University Press of America, Inc., 1985), pp. 242-243.
William Leise, John Davis, and Erica Sherover. "Marcuse as Teacher.?in The Critical Spirit: Essays in Honor of Herbert Marcuse, edited by Jr. Kurt H. Wolf and Barrington Moore, (Boston: Beacon Press, 1968), pp. 421-425.
Widener, Alice. Teachers of Destruvtion: Their Plans for a Socialist: An Eyewitness Account, (Washington, D. C. : The Citizens Evaluation Institute, 1971).
IV. Newspaper and Newsmagazine
New York Times
1954: August.
1960: February - March.
1961: May
1965: April.
1966: February.
1967: April - November.
1968: April - October.
1969: February.
1970: March - July.
1971: March
1979: July.
Newsweek
"Battle of Vietnam Day," Newsweek,October 25, 1965, pp. 98.
"Campus '65," Newsweek, March 22, 1965., pp. 29-49.
"The Demostrators: Why?," Newsweek, November 1, 1965, pp. 25-26; 31-34.
Time
"Why Those Students are Protesting," Time, May 3, 1968, pp. 18-26.
The Nation
"The Columbia: Onus of Violence," The Nation, October 28. 1968, p. 420.
"The Legion vs. Marcuse," The Nation, October 28, 1968, p. 421.
V. On-line information
Kovacevic, Filip. (May5, 1999). Herbert Marcuse'sHome Page [On-line]. Available: http://www.missori.edu/~tapscifk/dolcevital.html
University of Viginia, Special Collection Department, (November 11, 1998). The Psychedelic '60s [On-Line]. Avaliable: http:// www.lib.virginia.edu/exhibits/sixties/index.html
VI. Secondary Works
Antonio, Emile. "Marcuse and Weatherman," New York Times, December 12, 1977, p. 34.
Blackey, Robert and Payton, Clifford. Revolution and Revolutionary Ideal (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman Publishing Company Inc., 1976).
Breines, Wini. Community and Organization in the New Left, 1962-1968: the Great Refusal (New Brunswich and London: Rutgers University Press, 1989).
Brookeman, Christopher. American Culture and Society Since the 1930s (London: Macmillan, 1984).
Cantor, Milton. The Divided Left: American Radicalism, 1900-1975 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1978).
Chafe, William H. The Unfinished Journey: America Since World War II. 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991).
Clarkin, Tomas. "The Civil Right Movement.?in Events that Changed American in the Twentieth Century, edited by John E. Finfling and Frank W. Thackeray (London: The Greenwood Press, 1996).
Bacciocco, Jr., Edward J. The New Left in America: Reform to Revolution (California: Stanford Univ., Hoover Institution Press, 1974).
Brandon, Harry. "Of Herbert Marcusand Anarchy," New York Times, November 28, 1977, p. 30.
Feuer, Lewis S.. The Conflict of Generation: The Character and Significance of Student Movements (New York: Basic Book, 1969).
Flug, Michael. "Organized Labor and the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s: The Case of the Maryland Freedom Union," Labor History 31, 3 (Summer 1990): 322-346.
Gitlin, Todd. The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1980).
Hack, Andrew. "Philosohpy of the New Left," New York Times Book Review, March 10, 1968, Ⅶ, p. 1.
Hall, Laurence and Associates. New Colleges for New Students. (San francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1974).
Handlin, Oscar Handlin and Mary F. The American College and American Culture: Socailization as a Function of Higher Education (New York: Mc Graw-Hall Book Company, 1970).
Harding, Vicent. "So Much History, So Much Future: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Secind Coming of America.?in A History of Our Time: Readings on Postwar America, edited by William H. Cafe and Harvard Sitkoff (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991).
Held, David. Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1980).
Jay, Martin. The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Reaeach 1923-1950 (Boston．Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, 1973).
Katz, Barry. Herbert Marcuse and the Art of Liberation (London: Verso Editions and NLB, 1972).
..................."Praxis and Politics: Toward an Intellectual Biography of Herbert Marcuse [1898-1979]," New German Critique 18 (Fall 1979): 12-23.
Kellner, Douglas. Herbert Marcuse and the Crisis of Marxism (Berkeley．Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984).
Keniston, Kenneth. The Uncommitted: Alienated Youth in American Society (New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1965).
Ladd, Jr., Everett Carll and Lipset, Seymour Martin. The Divided Academy: Professors and Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1975).
Lasky, Melvin J.. "The Ideas of '68: A Retrospective on the 20th Anniversary Celebrations of 'the Student Revolt'," Encounter 71 (November 1988): 3-18.
Levy, Peter B. "The New Left and Labor: The Early Years (1960-1963)," Labor History 31, 3 (Summer 1990): 294-321.
Lichter, Stanley Rothman and S. Robert. Roots of Radicalism: Jews, Christians, and the New Left (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1982).
Lipset, Seymour Martin. "American Student Activism.?in Student Politics and Higher Education in the United States: A Select Bibliography, edited by Philip G. Altbach, (Cambridge, Mass.: Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, 1968), pp. 1-14. Also in The University and Revolution, edited by Gary R. Weaver and James H. Weaver, (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1969), pp. 19-42.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. "The Possible Effects of Students Activism on International Politics," in Students in Revolt, edited by Seymour Martin Lipset and Philip G. Altbach, (Boston: Beacon Press, 1970): 495-521.
Lipshires, Sidney. Herbert Marcue: from Marx to Freud and Beyond (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1974).
Mandel, Ernst. "Where is America Going?" New Left Review 54 (March-April 1969): 3-15.
Matusow, Allen J. The Unraveling of America: A History of Liberation in the 1960s (New York: Harper & Row, 1984).
............................. "Rise and Fall of a Counterculture," in A History of Our Time: Readings on Postwar America, edited by William H. Chafe and Harvard Sitkoff, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 378-392.
Mead, Margaret. Culture and Commitment (New York: National History Press, 1970).
Miller, James. Democracy is in the Streets: From Port Huron to the Siege of Chicago (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987).
Neiman, Greg Calvert and Carol. A Disrupted History: The New Left and the New Capitalism (New York: Random House, 1971).
Oglesby, Carl. The New Left Reader (New york: Grove Press, 1969).
Peteron, Richard E. "The Student Left In American Heigher Education," in Stidents in Revolt, edited by Seymour Martin Lipset and Philip G. Altbach, (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969), pp. 202-234.
Philips, Donald E. Student Protest, 1960-1970: An Analysis of the Issues and Speeches, Revised Edition with a Comprensive Bibliography (New Yor: university Press of America, Inc., 1985).
Pippin, Robert, Feenberg, Andrew and Webel, Charles P.. ed. Marcuse: Critical Theory and the Promise of Utopia. (London: Macmillan Education LTD, 1988).
Reich, Charles A. The Greening of American (New York: Random House, 1970).
Robinson, Paul A. The Freud Left: Wilhelm Reich, Geza Roheim, Herbert Marcuse (New York: Harper & Row, 1969).
Rudy, Willis. The Campus and a Nation in Crisis: From the American Revolution to Vietnam (New Jersey: Associater University Press, Inc., 1996).
Sale, Kirk J.. "Ted Gold: Education for Violence," in Styles of Political Action in America, edited by Robert Paul Wolff, (New York: Random House, 1972), pp. 178-28.
Sargent, Laman Tower. New Left Thought: An Introduction (Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press, 1972).
Schoolman, Morton. The Imaginary Witness: The Critical Theory of Herbert Marcuse (New York: The Free Press, 1980).
The Carnegie Commission on Hogher Education. Dissent and Disruption: Proposals for Consideration by the Campus (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1971).
Triesman, "The Impermanent Stronghold," New Left Review 53 (January-February 1969): 33-35.
Woodis, Jack. New Theories of Revolution: A Commentary on the Views of Frantz Fanon, Ris Debray and Herbert Marcuse (New York: International Publishers, 1972).
Young, Nigel. An Infantile Disorder? The Crisis and Decline of the New Left (Colorado: Westview Press, 1977).
Wiatr, Jerzy J.. "Herbert Marcuse: Philosopher of a Lost Radicalism," Science & Society 34 (Fall 1970): 319-330.
Winder, Alvin E.. Adolescence: Contemporary Studies (New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1974).