本研究旨在探討國中小資優資源班學生班級歸屬感及其內在各層面之現況與差異情形。
研究者以自編之「班級歸屬感量表」為研究工具，以中部與北部縣市445位資優資源班學生為研究對象，以瞭解不同學生教育階段、性別與地區之資優生班級歸屬感的差異情形。量表施測所得之資料以描述性統計、t考驗與單因子多變量變異數分析進行統計分析。研究結果如下：
1.國中小資優生對於班級歸屬感傾向於正面。
2.國中小資優生在不同班別的歸屬感層面有顯著差異，在「教師歸屬感」層面，資優資源班優於普通班；在「同儕歸屬感」層面，普通班優於資優資源班。
3.不同教育階段資優生對「資優資源班」與「普通班」歸屬感達顯著水準，且國中資優生高於國小資優生。
4.不同性別優生對「資優資源班」與「普通班」歸屬感達顯著水準，且女資優生高於男資優生。
5.不同地區資優生對「資優資源班」歸屬感達顯著水準，且中部資優生高於北部資優生。
6.資優生因背景變項之不同而影響對資優資源班各層面之感受。
7.資優生不因背景變項之不同而影響其對普通班各層面之歸屬感受。

最後，根據上述之研究結果做進一步的討論，並提出實務及研究上之建議做為參考。

The purposes of this study were to investigate the situation and differences of the sense of belonging and its internal aspect between different class in junior high school and elementary school gifted students.
Questionnaire survey was adopted in this study, and“ Sense of Belonging to Class Scale ”was designed by the researcher.The sample was composed by 445 gifted students from northern and central Taiwan and they are all in gifted resources room program. Descriptive statistics, t-test and one-way MANOVA were the main statistical analysis methods used for the data analysis. The results of this study were as followed:

1.The sense of belonging to class among junior high school and elementary school gifted students was positive.
2.There are significant differences on all aspects of the sense of belonging between gifted resource room and regular class. On the aspect of “ Teacher's sense of belonging ”, the feeling to gifted resource room were superior to the regular class； on the aspect of“ Peer's sense of belonging ”, the feeling to regular class were superior to the gifted resource room.
3.There were significant differences between gifted resource room and regular class on the sense of belonging in different education stages. And junior high school gifted were surpassed elementary school gifted.
4.There were significant differences between gifted resource room and regular class on the sense of belonging in different gender. And female gifted were surpassed male gifted.
5.There were significant differences between gifted resource room and regular class on the sense of belonging in different areas. And the gifted in central Taiwan were surpassed those in northern Taiwan.
6.All aspects of the sense of belonging to gifted resource room were different depending on personal background variables.
7.All aspects of the sense of belonging to regular class were no different depending on personal background variables.
According to the results and limitations of this study, some recommendations to research and practical suggestion were made.

一、中文部分

毛連塭(1995)。資優教育─課程與教學。台北：五南。
王文秀(1988)。孩子的友誼世界。台北：時報文化。
王木榮(2002)。再論一般智能優異學生教育安置的問題。載於國立台中師院特教中心主編：特殊教育論文集(頁1-8)。
王保進(2006)。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北：心理。
王振德(1996)。國民中小學資優教育課程與教學實況調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊，14，207-227。
王振德(2006)。資優教育的幾個論題與趨勢。教育研究月刊，143，19-28。
石文宜、王鍾和(2005)。從「師生互動關係量表」的發展談師生互動關係與學生偏差行為之關係。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
吳明隆(2008)。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。台北：知城。
吳欣怡(1999)。青少年自我尊重模式之驗證。國立台灣師範大學心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
吳武典(1979)。國小班級氣氛的因素分析與追蹤研究。師大教育心理學報，12，135-156。
吳武典(2001)。資優學生的適應類型與心理輔導。測驗與輔導，166，3481-3484。
吳武典(2006)。我國資優教育的發展與展望。資優教育，100，3-20。
吳武典、陳美芳、蔡崇建(1985)。國中資優學生的個人特質、學習環境與教育效果之探討。特殊教育研究學刊，1，277-312。
吳臻姿(2003)。從形塑安全感、隸屬感的課室氣氛到提昇國中生的自尊之行動研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
李弘善(譯)(2000)。自主的課堂(Ridly, D. S., & Walther, B.著：Creating responsible learners)。台北：遠流。
李坤崇(1994a)。教師需求強度量表之編製報告。測驗年刊，41，173-189。
李坤崇(1994b)。國小教師心理需求困擾及其相關因素研究。臺南師範學院學報，30，31-66。
李坤崇(1998a)。國小教師心理需求與因應策略之概念模式驗證研究。教育與心理研究，21，173-198。
李坤崇(1998b)。大學生心理需求困擾之訪談研究。成功大學學報，33，179-207。
李建興(1985)。社會團體工作。台北：五南。
李郁文(1998)。團體動力學。台北：桂冠圖書。
李桂蘭(1994)。幼兒生活與輔導：從馬斯洛人類需求階層論談起。幼兒教育年刊，7，15-28。
李珮瑄(2004)。國中生同儕互動心理需求及其與人際互動相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
周泰萱(1994)。資優學生學習環境之探究。資優季刊，52，24-28。
林心茹(譯)(2000)。培養反思力(Paris, S. G., & Ayres, L. R.著：Becoming reflective students and teacher)。台北：遠流。
林月盛(1998)。資源教室方案的現況與改進。特殊教育季刊，67，27-29。
林妙華(2003)。資優生過度激動特質與友伴關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
林秀靜(1998)。淺談資優生的學習需求。資優教育季刊，68，16-21。
林淑玲(2002)。普通班教師如何協助班級中的特殊兒童：一個國小低年級教師的經驗分享。國教之聲，34(3)，34-37。
林翠湄(譯)(1995)。社會與人格發展(D. R. Shaffer著：Social and personal development)。台北：心理。
邱美華(1996)。青少年的同儕關係(下)。父母親月刊，138，31-40。
侯禎塘(2003)。中部地區的資優教育實施近況與展望─台中市、台中縣、南投縣、彰化縣的資優教育初探。載於國立台中師院特教中心主編：特殊教育論文集(頁17-40)。
孫允寬(譯)(1996)。自尊心(Branden, N.著：The six pillars of self-esteem)。台北：遠流。
高翠霞(1987)。「資賦優異」，這個品牌的價位？資優教育季刊，22，23-26。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學─三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華。
張春興(1998)。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華。
張煌熙(1993)。班級環境品質的改善。載於黃政傑主編：班級經營─理念與策略(33-42頁)。台北：師大書苑。
莊雪芳、鄭湧涇(2003)。國中學生對生物學的態度與學習環境之研究。科學教育學刊，11(2)，171-194。
郭生玉(1996)。心理與教育研究法。台北：精華書局。
郭為藩(1992)。從人文主義觀點談資優教育。資優教育季刊，42，1-6。
郭靜姿(1986)。集中式資優生、分散性資優生及前段班學生之心理適應分析與比較。特殊教育研究學刊，2，251-263。
郭靜姿(2000)。談資優學生的特殊適應問題與輔導。資優教育季刊，75，1-6。
陳玉珍(2001)。營造優質的斑及情境─教室佈置面面觀。國教之友，52(4)，15-16。
陳建汝(2003)。小欣的秘密花園：一位特殊高智商資優生的生活經驗。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳昭儀(2000)。優秀國小資優教育教師教學生涯之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，19，327-346。
陳美芳(1996)。資優學生身心特質與評量。教育資料集刊，21，13-26。
曾建章(1996)。國中資優學生與普通學生之他人期望與壓力感受及成就動機之比較。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，彰化市。
游韻靜(2006)。台北市國民中學教師角色認同與組織公民行為關係之研究。私立輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
程煒庭(2007)。國小資優生師生關係與性別之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
黃麗萍(2003)。班級隸屬感促進方案對國中生之自尊、社交技巧及班級氣氛之影響。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
楊榮祥(1997)。中學科學教室環境影響之本質與其影響因素。台北市：國科會微縮小組。
溫儀詩(2007)。國民小學校長服務領導與教師歸屬感關係之研究。私立輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
葉憲峻(2004)。引導孩子度過生澀的童年─班級經營的理念與策略。國教輔導，43(6)，6-10。
葉懿萱(2007)。台北市兩所國中學生同儕情感關係、學業成就與自尊關係之縱貫性研究。國立台灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
廖佳紅(2004)。資源班學生學習困擾與輔導。師說，178，59-60。
蔡玉瑟(1995)。國小低成就資優兒童之學習困擾行為歸因調查研究。八十四學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集，4，411-446。
蔡典謨(2003)。高智商低成就，學校出了什麼問題？資優教育季刊，88，30-36。
鄭方媛(2005)。國中生自尊現況及其相關因素研究~以台北市某國中為例。國立台灣師範大學衛生教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
鄭惠玲(2005)。班級歸屬感訓練課程對國小高年級學童之環境、導師、同儕與自我歸屬感之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
謝汶伶(2003)。國小師生衝突因素及其因應方式之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，屏東市。
聶筱秋、胡中凡、唐筱雯、葉冠伶等譯(2003)。環境心理學。台北：桂冠。
蘇麗美(2005)。問題為中心之教學策略對數學學習成效與教室環境知覺之影響。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。

二、 英文部分

Adams, G. R., ＆ Crane, P. (1980). An assessment of parents’ and teachers’ expectations of preschool children’s social preference for attractive or unattractive children and adults. Child Development, 51, 224-231.
Albert, L. (1991). Cooperative discipline. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Baker, J. A., Bridger, R., & Evans, K. (1998). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Quarterly, 43(1), 5-15.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1447-1460.
Booker, C. K. (2004). Exploring school belongingness and academic in African American adolecents. Curriculum and teaching dialogue, 6(2), 131-143.
Buhrmester, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1990). Anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 165-195.
Bull, S., & Solity, J. (1987). Classroom management. New York: Croom Helm.
Burnett, G., & Walz, G. (1994). Gangs in the school (Rep. No. EDO-CG-94-28). Greensboro, NC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Student Services.
Clark, B. (1983). Growing up gifted. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.
Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school. New York: MacMillan.
Cline, S., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Diverse populations of gifted children: Meeting their needs in the regular classroom and beyond. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1991). Unfair expectations: A pilot study of middle school students’ comparisons of gifted and regular classes. Journal for the Education of the gifted, 15(1), 56-63.
Cohen, R., Duncan, M., & Cohen, S. L. (1994). Classroom peer relations of children participating in a pull-out enrichment program. Gifted Children Quarterly, 38(1), 33-47.
Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. (1992). Middle school survay report: Impact on gifted students (Rep. No. R206A00596). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EC301759).
Combs, A. (1989). A theory of therapy: Guidelines for counseling practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cross, T. L., Coleman, L. J., & Stewart, R. (1993). The social cognition of gifted adolescence: An exploration of the stigma of giftedness paradigm. Roeper Review, 16, 37-40.
Cross, T. L., Coleman, L. J., & Terharr-Yonkers, M. (1991). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: Managing the stigma of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15(1), 44-55.
Davis, G. A. & Rimm S. B. (2004). Education of Gifted and Talented. (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Delisle, J. R. (1986). Death with honors: Suicide among gifted adolescents. Journal of Couseling and Development, 64, 558-560.
Edwards, D. (1995). The school counselor’s role in helping teachers and students. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 29, 191-197.
Feldhusen, J. F. & Dai, D. Y. (1998). Gifted students’ attitudes and perceptions of the gifted label, special programs, and peer relations. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9(1), 15-20.
Finn, J. D. (1989a). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.
Finn, J. D. (1989b). Expectations and the educational environment. Review of Educational Research, 42(3), 387-410.
Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendship, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235-284.
Gonzalez, R., & Padilla, A. M. (1997). The academic resilience of Mexican American high school student. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19, 301-317.
Goodenow, C. (1991).The sence of belonging and its relationships to academic motivation among pre- and early adolescence students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago.
Greenspon, T. S. (1998). The gifted self: Its role in development and emotional health. Roeper Review, 30(3), 162-167.
Gross, M. U. M. (1998). The “ Me” behind the mask: Intellectually gifted students and the search for identity. Roeper Review, 20(3), 167-173.
Heller, K. & Feldhusen, J. (1986). Identifying and nurturing the gifted. New York: Hans Huber.
Hershey, M. & Oliver, E. (1988). The effects of the label gifted on students identified for special programs. Roeper Review, 11, 1-2.
Hobbs, N. (1975). The futures of children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Huryn, J. S. (1986). Giftedness as deviance: A test of interaction theories. Deviant Behavior, 7, 175-186.
Kagan, D. (1990). How schools alienate students at risk: A model for examining proximal classroom variables. Education Psychologist, 25, 105-125.
Kerr, B., Colangelo, N., & Gaeth, J. (1988). Gifted adolescents’ attitudes toward their giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly , 32(2), 245-247. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ382044)
Kester, V. M. (1994). Factors that affect African-American students’ bonding to middle school. Elementary School Journal, 95, 63-73.
Kiesner, J., Cardinu, M., Poulin, F., & Bucci, M. (2002). Group identification in early adolescence: Its relation with peer adjustment and its moderator effect on peer influence. Child Development, 73, 196-208.
Kunc, N. (1992). The need to belong: Rediscovering Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. In R. Villa, J. Thousand, W. Stainback., & S. Stainback (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: An administrative guide to creating heterogeneous schools (pp. 25-40). York, PA: The Maple.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). Dynamics of personality organization. Psychology Review, 50, 514-558.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Millward, L. J., & Brewerton, P. M. (2000). Psychological contracts: Employee relations for the twenty- first century? International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 15, 1-61.
Moshe, Z. & Esther, J. S. (1999). Evaluating the effects of full-time vs part-time educational programs for the gifted：Affective outcomes and policy considerations. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22, 413-427.
Newman, B. M., Lohman, B. J., & Newman, P. R. (2007). Peer group membership and a sense of belonging: Their relationship to adolescent behavior problems. Adolescence, 42(166), 241-263.
Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review Educational of Research, 70, 323-367.
Painter, F. (1984). Living with a gifted child. London: Souvenir.
Passow, A. H. (1994a). The gifted and talented education. In T. Husen, & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 2045-2056). New York: Elsevier Science.
Passow, A. H. (1994b). Growing up gifted and talented: School, familys and communities. Gifted Education International, 10(1), 4-9.
Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 602-609.
Reasoner, R. W., & Dusa, G. S. (1991). Building self-esteem in secondary schools. California Cousulting Psychologists.
Robinson, A. (1987). Challenging talented youth. Arkansas: State Department of Education.
Robinson, A. (1990). Does that describe me? Adolescents’ acceptance of the gifted label. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 245-255.
Routt, M. L. (1996). Early experiences that foster connectedness. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 24, 17-21.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, H. (1995). Representative of relationship to teachers, parents and friends. Journal of adolescence, 14(3), 249-269.
Sanborn, M. P. (1979). Counseling and guidance needs of the gifted and talented. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development. WSSE Yearbook, Part 1, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sapon-Shevin, M. (1996). Including all students and their gifts within regular classroom. In W. Stainback & Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp. 69-80). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Schaffer, H. R. (1996). Social development. Boston, MA: Blackwell.
Schlosser, L. K. (1992). Teacher distance and student disengagement: School lives on the margin. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 128-140.
Schneider, B. H. (1987). The gifted child in peer group perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education, a critical analysis. New York: Teacher College Press.
Silverman, L. K. (1988). Affective curriculum for the gifted. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Silverman, L. K. (1993). Social development, leadership, and gender issues. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 291-327). Denver: Love Publications.
Swiatek, M. A. (1995). An empirical investigation of the social coping strategies used by gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(3), 154-161.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University.
Walz, G. R. & Bleuer, J. C. (1992). Student self-esteem: A vital element of school success. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED348633)
Wang, M. C., Haertal, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1998). Building educational resilience. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Wendel, F. C., Hoke, F. A., & Joekel, R. G. (1994). The search for success. Middle School Journal, 25(3), 48-50.
Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social support and adjustment in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of educational psychology, 90(4), 202-209.
Whitmore, J. R. (1998). Gifted children at risk for learning difficulties. Teaching Exceptional Children, 20(4), 10-14.
Williams, L. J., & Downing, J. E. (1998). Membership and belonging in inclusive classrooms: What do middle school students have to say? Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23(2), 98-110.
Xin Ma. (2003). Sense of belonging to school: Can schools make a different? The Journal of Education Research, 96, 340-349.
Ysseldyke, J. E. & Algozzine, B. (1995). Special Education: A practical approach for teachers. (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton.