簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林雪娥
Hsueh-o Lin
論文名稱: 漢語對話言談中的引述結構
Reported speech in Mandarin conversational discourse
指導教授: 黃宣範
Huang, Shuan-Fan
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
畢業學年度: 87
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 198
中文關鍵詞: 引述結構直接引述間接引述言談功能話語框架思想框架虛化語用推論
英文關鍵詞: reported speech, direct speech, indirect speech, discourse function, speech frame, thought frame, grammaticalization, pragmatic inferencing
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:140下載:34
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 漢語對話言談中的引述結構
    摘要
    引述結構意指當前說話者(current speaker)重述或評論原先說話者(original speaker)的話語, 並明確指出原先說話者是誰. 引述結構通常分類成直接引述與間接引述. 本研究的語料約四個半小時, 含二十一個對話. 論文中探討引述結構在漢語對話言談中的形式與功能, 並探究話語框架(speech frame), 思想框架(thought frame), 因說者與聽者之互動而虛化的現象.
    能顯示立場轉變的語言形式, 包括指示詞(deixis), 虛詞(particle), 聲韻(prosody), 語言轉換(code-switching)等. 其中, 主要指示詞(primary deixis), 即代名詞(pronominal), 和言談虛詞(discourse particle), 感嘆詞(interjection), 呼喚詞(vocative), 及語言轉換(code-switching), 皆能有效的分辨直接引述或間接引述. 語料分析結果顯示, 直接引述與間接引述的分布相當平均: 41.51% vs. 40.43%. 但在 "3?#34?#34 與 "@媒" 兩個語料中, 直接引述顯然比間接引述更常用: 125 vs. 67. 將兩語料除外, 則間接引述幾乎是直接引述的兩倍: 121 vs. 68. 這顯示大部分的人在大部分的時候, 都使用間接引述. 即使將引述結構分類成 "W立", "W白", 與 "" 引述, 獨立間接引述仍比獨立直接引述多得多: 163 vs. 98. 因此, 根據我的語料, 在漢語對話言談中, 間接引述是普遍的, 無標的(unmarked)引述結構.
    引述結構的言談功能可分成篇章結構(textual)與社會互動(socio-interactional)兩個層次來探討. 在篇章結構的層次, 引述結構, 無論何種形式, 可用來引介或結束話題, 形成對比, 提供證據, 或只是報導曾發生過的言語行為, 或證實或澄清先前的話語. 其中, 提供證據是引述結構最典型的功能. 通常藉由引述第三者, 說話者可以與此第三者結盟, 而又不必受到立即查詢的威脅. 但在社會互動的層次, 說話者是利用直接引述讓聽者能專注並主動參與對話, 是利用直接引述中聲音暗中滲透(covert infiltration of voice)的特點, 來表達情緒或態度. 直接引述能讓說話者扮演原先說話者的角色, 而有戲劇性的展現, 進而演出互動的意義, 表演本身就已顯現直接引述在當前語境的特出性. 因此, 直接引述能執行間接引述所不能的情感功能.
    根據斷代的語料, 可觀察出話語框架 "睇?#34 "A說", 因說者與聽者的互動, 而顯現出虛化的現象. "睇?#34 基本上是引介自我引述, 其主要目的是宣稱自己的意見, 同時與該引述保持距離. 接著藉由轉喻推論(metonymic inferencing), 話語引述蛻變成思想(引述). 有時, "睇?#34 是言談行為(speech act) 的具體呈現, 其主要目的是引起聽者的注意. 說話者使用 "睇?#34 來宣稱自己的意見, 但當使用 "A說" 時, 說話者是在要求證實或認同. 有時 "A說" 中, "?#34 的語意成份{說}也漸漸消失. 經由語用推論(pragmatic inferencing), "A說" 甚至能引介表讓步的條件子句. 語用推論也讓 "A說" 虛化成一篇章虛詞, 以尋求合著關係(coauthorship).
    思想引述(reported thought)與話語引述有很多相同之處. 兩者在句型結構上都有報導子句(reporting clause)與被報導子句(reported clause). 兩者皆有直接引述與間接引述. 但兩者仍有顯著的差異. 首先, 直接思想引述比間接思想引述普遍. 而且思想引述大部份都是以第一人稱為其思想來源. 高頻率的第一人稱想者(first person thinker)導致 "矬控o" "皕Q" 的虛化現象. "矬控o" "皕Q" 已虛化成一篇章框架(discourse framer), 標示一篇章單位的開始, 並且連慣互動的對話篇章.
    總之, 引述結構的形式與功能, 告訴我們為什麼在對話中要使用引述結構, 以及直接引述與間接引述如何不同, 而話語框架與思想框架的虛化現象, 告訴我們語用如何塑造文法.

    Abstract

    Reported speech is speech within speech, i.e. a current speaker repeats or comments on a speech of an original speaker and mentions the source speaker overtly. Reported speech is usually classified into direct speech and indirect speech. My data last about four hours and a half. In this dissertation, I have explored the forms and functions of reported speech in Mandarin conversational discourse, and investigated the grammaticalization or semantic weakening of the speech frames wo shuo 'I say' and ni shuo 'you say' and the thought frames wo juede 'I feel, I think' and wo xiang 'I think,' because of the interaction between the speaker and the hearer in conversation.
    Linguistic devices that signal the transposition from the current perspective to the original perspective includes deixis, particles, prosody, code-switching, etc. Among the indexical devices identified, the primary deixis, i.e. pronominals, discourse particles, interjections, vocatives, and code-switching are effective indicators of whether a reported speech is direct or indirect. Analysis of my data shows that direct speech and indirect speech are fairly evenly distributed: 41.51% vs. 40.43%. Yet in Gossip and Matchmaking, direct speech is clearly preferred over indirect speech: 125 vs. 67. Not counting these two conversations, the number of indirect speech is nearly twice the number of direct speech: 121 vs. 68, which means that a majority of speakers use indirect speech most of the time. Even when reported speech is classified into isolated, monologic, and dialogic reported speech, the instances of isolated indirect speech still far outnumber those of isolated direct speech: 163 vs. 98. Thus based on my data, indirect speech is the preferred, unmarked form of reported speech in Mandarin conversational discourse.
    The functions of reported speech are explored at the textual and socio-interactional levels. At the textual level, reported speech, in whichever form, functions to introduce or conclude a topic, to contrast with a prior claim, to provide evidence for a previous claim, to report a previous speech event only, and to confirm or clarify a previous utterance. Among them, providing evidence is the prototypical function of reported speech. Usually by quoting a third party, the speaker is able to enter into alliance with this third party who is not available for scrutiny at least for now. But at the socio-interactional level, it is direct speech that is used to involve the addressee to participate actively, to show emotions or attitudes toward a person through covert infiltration of voice into the quotation. Direct speech enables the speaker to play the role of the original speaker such that the speaker can dramatize his presentation and act out the interactive meaning. The acting indicates the markedness of direct speech in light of the current context. So direct speech performs special affective functions in a way that indirect speech cannot.
    Based on the synchronic data, the speech frames wo shuo and ni shuo are detected to be undergoing grammaticalization or semantic weakening owing to the interaction between the speaker and the hearer. Wo shuo typically introduces a self-quotation. I quote myself to assert my opinion but at the same time distance myself from impact caused by the quoted speech. Then through metonymic inferencing, reported speech turns into (reported) thought. Sometimes wo shuo is an overt realization of the speech act of saying, whose primary function is to get the addressee's attention. The speaker uses wo shuo to assert his opinion, but when he uses ni shuo as the speech frame, he is asking for confirmation or recognition. Like wo shuo, the sense of saying of shuo in some cases of ni shuo has also faded away. Ni shuo has developed to introduce a concessive conditional clause through pragmatic inferencing. Pragmatic inferencing also works on the grammaticalization of ni shuo into a discourse particle seeking coauthorship.
    Reported thought has a lot in common with reported speech. They both are syntactically encoded with a framing clause and a framed clause. Both speech and thought can be reported in direct and indirect forms. But there are significant differences between the two. First of all, direct thought is preferred over indirect thought. And most reported thoughts couple with the first person thinkers. The high frequency of first person thinker has contributed to semantic weakening of wo juede and wo xiang, which have been grammaticalized into a discourse framer, marking the beginning of a discourse unit, usually a turn, and organizing the interactive discourse coherently.
    To sum up, the forms and functions of reported speech tell us why reported speech is used in conversation and how direct speech is different from indirect speech. The grammaticalization or semantic weakening of the speech frames wo shuo and ni shuo and the thought frames wo juede and wo xiang tell us that language use is shaping grammar, i.e. grammar is emergent.

    Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………….i Abstract…………………………………………………….……………iii List of Abbreviations……………………………………………………viii Transcription Notations…………………………………………………..ix List of Tables………………………………………………..……………x List of Diagrams…………………………………………………………..xi Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1. Motivation and Goal…………………………………………………1 1.2 Definition of Reported Speech………………………………………..1 1.3 Previous Studies of Reported Speech…………………………………4 1.3.1 Structural Analyses……..…………………………..……………5 1.3.2 Pragmatic Analyses………..……………………………………..9 1.3.3 Conversational Analyses……..…………………………..……..12 1.3.4 Theories of Reported Speech…………………………...…..…..14 1.4 Previous Studies of Mandarin Reported Speech………………..……17 1.5 Data………………………………………………………………….19 Chapter 2 Linguistic Devices 2.1 Introduction……………………………………………………….....24 2.2 The Syntactic Structure and the Verbal System…………………..…..26 2.3 Deixis Systems………………………..……………………………..28 2.3.1 Pronominals………..…………………..…………………...….28 2.3.2 Demonstratives……..….……………………………………….34 2.3.3 Temporals and Locatives……..……………………….………..38 2.4 Discourse Particles……………………….………………….………41 2.4.1 Initial Particles……..………………………………….………..42 2.4.2 Final Particles…………………………………………...……...46 2.4.3 Problematic Cases………………………………………………50 2.5 Prosodic Features……………………………………………..……..53 2.6 Code-Switching…………………………………………………….57 2.7 Others…………………………………………………………….…59 2.8 The Unmarkedness of Indirect Speech……………………………...65 Chapter 3 Discourse Functions of Reported Speech 3.1 Introduction………………………………………………………….69 3.2 Textual Functions of Reported Speech…………………..…………..70 3.2.1 Isolated Reported Speech………………………………………..72 3.2.2 Monologic Reported Speech……..…………..………………….87 3.2.3 Dialogic Reported Speech……………………………………….91 3.2.4 Conclusion…………..……………………………………….…97 3.3 Functions of the Speech Frame……………………………………....99 3.4 Socio-Interactional Functions of Reported Speech…………………..109 3.4.1 Epistomological Considerations……..…………………..……..110 3.4.2 Expressive Functions…………………………………………..114 3.4.2.1 Involvement……..……………………….……….……..114 3.4.2.2 Affect…………………..……………….…………….…121 3.4.2.3 Assessment…………..……………………….…………..123 3.4.2.4 Face……………………………….……………………..127 3.4.2.5 Others………………………………………………..…..134 3.4.2.6 Conclusion…………………………………..………..…135 3.5 Implications……………………………………………………….136 Chapter 4 Grammaticalization of the Speech Frames 4.1 Introduction……………………………………………………….138 4.2 Wo Shuo 'I Say'…………………………………………………...139 4.3 Ni Shuo 'You Say'………………………………………………….151 4.4 Conclusion………………………………………………………...163 Chapter 5 Reported Thought 5.1 Introduction……………………………………………………….166 5.2 Juede 'Feel'………………………………………………………..168 5.3 Xiang 'Think'……………………………………………..………176 5.4 Kan 'See'…………………………………………………………...182 5.5 Conclusion………………………………………………………….184 Chapter 6 Conclusion 6.1 Conclusion…………………………………………………………..185 6.2 Implications…………………………………………………………190 References………………………………………………………………192

    References

    Alvarez-Caccamo, Celso. 1996. "The Power of Reflexive Language(s): Code Displacement in Reported Speech." Journal of Pragmatics. 25: 33-59.

    Andrews, Edna and Yishai Tobin (eds.). 1996. Toward a Calculus of Meaning: Studies in Markedness, Distinctive Features and Deixis. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Aoki, Haruo. 1986. "Evidentials in Japanese." In Chafe & Nichols (eds.). pp. 223-238.

    Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Bamgbose, Ayo. 1986. "Reported Speech in Yoruba." In Coulmas (ed.). pp. 77-97.

    Banfield, Ann. 1973. "Narrative Style and the Grammar of Direct and Indirect Speech." Foundations of Language. 10: 1-39.

    -----. 1993. "Where Epistemology, Style, and Grammar Meet Literary History: The Development of Represented Speech and Thought." In Lucy, J. A. (ed.). pp.339-364.

    Baynham, Mike. 1996. "Direct Speech: What's It Doing in Non-Narrative Discourse?" Journal of Pragmatics. 25: 61-81.

    Besnier, Niko. 1993. "Reported Speech and Affect on Nukulaelae Atoll." In Hill, Jane H. & Judith T. Irvine (eds.). pp. 161-181.

    Biq, Yung-o. 1991. "The Multiple Uses of the Second Person Singular Pronoun Ni in Conversational Mandarin." Journal of Pragmatics. 16: 307-321.

    Boogaart, Ronny. 1996. "Tense and Temporal Ordering in English and Dutch Indirect Speech." In Janssen & Wurff (eds.). pp. 213-235.

    Brown, P. and S. Levinson. 1978. "Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena." In Goody, E. (ed.). Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: CUP. pp. 56-311.

    Buttny, Richard. 1997. "Reported Speech in Talking Race on Campus." Human Communication Research. 23: 477-506.

    Bybee, Joan. 1996. "The Role of Repetition in Grammaticalization: Can in English." In Janda, Richard & Brian Joseph (eds.). Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Cate, A. P. ten. 1996. "Modality of Verb Forms in German Reported Speech." In Janssen & Wurff (eds.). pp. 189-211.

    Chafe, Wallace. 1986. "Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing." In Chafe & Nichols (eds.). pp. 261-272.

    Chafe, Wallace and Johanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epitemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. "Quotations as Demonstrations." Language. 66: 764-805.

    Collins, James. 1987. "Reported Speech in Navajo Myth-Narratives." In Verschueren, Jef (ed.). pp. 69-84.

    Comrie, B. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: CUP.

    -----. 1986. "Tense in Indirect Speech." Folia Linguistica. 20: 265-296.

    Coulmas, Florian (ed.). 1986. Direct and Indirect Speech. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Coulmas, Florian. 1986a. "Reported Speech: Some General Issues." In Coulmas (ed.). pp. 1-28.

    -----. 1986b. "Direct and Indirect Speech in Japanese." In Coulmas (ed.). pp. 161-178.

    Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. To appear. "Coherent Voicing: On Prosody in Conversational Reported Speech." In Bublitz, W. and U. Lenk (eds.). Coherence. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Dancygier, Barbara and Eve Sweetser. 1996. "Conditionals, Distancing, and Alternative Spaces." In Goldberg, Adele E. (ed.). Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Standford: CSLI Publications. pp. 83-98.

    Davidson, Donald. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Declerck, Renaat. 1990. "Sequence of Tenses in English." Folia Linguistica. 24: 513-544.

    Declerck, Renaat and Kazuhiko Tanaka. 1996. "Constraints on Tense Choice in Reported Speech." Studia Linguistica. 50: 283-301.

    Du Bois, John W. 1986. "Self-Evidence and Ritual Speech." In Chafe & Nichols (eds.). pp. 313-336.

    Du Bois, John W., S. Schuetze-Coburn, S. Cumming, and D. Paolino. 1993. "Outline of Discourse Transcription." In Edwards, Jane A. and Martin D. Lampert (eds.). Talking Data. pp. 45-89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Duranti, A. and C. Goodwin. 1992. "Rethinking Context: An Introduction." In Durante, A. and C. Goodwin (eds.). Rethinking Context. Cambridge: CUP. pp. 1-42.

    Ebert, Karen. 1986. "Reported Speech in Some Languages of Nepal." In Coulmas (ed.). pp. 145-159.

    Fennell, Barbara A. 1996. "Markers of Association and Distance in German Reported Speech." In Andrews, Edna & Yishai Tobin (eds.). pp. 291-305.

    Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1991. "The De Dicto Domain in Language." In Traugott & Heine (eds.). Vol 1. pp. 219-252.

    Glock, Naomi. 1986. "The Use of Reported Speech in Saramaccan Discourse." In Huttar, George & Kenneth Gregerson (eds.). Pragmatics in Non-Western Perspective. pp. 35-61. The Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.

    Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Pheladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Goodwin, C. and M. H. Goodwin. 1987. "Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments." IPRA Papers in Pragmatics. 1: 1-54.

    Gumperz, John J. and Stephen C. Levinson (eds.). 1996. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: CUP

    Hagenaar, Elly. 1996. "Free Indirect Speech in Chinese." In Janssen & Wurff (eds.). pp. 290-298.

    Haiman, John. 1978. "Conditionals Are Topics." Language. 54: 564-589.

    Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Baltimore: Edward Arnold Ltd.

    Hanks, William F. 1996. "Language Form and Communicative Practices." In Gumperz & Levinson (eds.). pp. 232-270.

    Haviland, John B. 1989. "'Sure, Sure': Evidence and Affect." Text. 9: 27-68.

    -----. 1996. "Projections, Transpositions, and Relativity." In Gumperz & Levinson (eds.). pp. 271- 323.

    Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hunnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

    Hickmann, Maya. 1993. "The Boundaries of Reported Speech in Narrative Discourse: Some Developmental Aspects." In Lucy (ed.). pp. 63-90.

    Hill, Jane H. and Judith T. Irvine (eds.). 1993. Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: CUP.

    Hirose, Yukio. 1995. "Direct and Indirect Speech as Quotations of Public and Private Expression." Lingua. 95: 223-238.

    Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. "Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation." Research on Language and Social Interaction. 29: 219-245.

    Hopper, Paul J. 1991. "On Some Principles of Grammaticization." In Traugott & Heine (eds.). Vol. 1. pp. 17-35.

    Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse." Language. 56: 251-299.

    Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.

    Huang, Shangfan. 1981. "On the (Almost Perfect) Identity of Speech and Thought: Evidence from Chinese Dialects." Proceedings of the 14th International Synposium on Chino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics. pp. 171-186.

    -----. 1994. "On the Analysis of Discourse Markers: A Methodological Criticism." The Proceedings of the 4th International Synposium on the Teaching of Mandarin. pp. 459-471.

    -----. 1998. (To appear.) "The Emergence of a Grammatical Category Definite Article in Spoken Chinese." Journal of Pragmatics.

    Janssen, Theo A.J.M. and Wim van der Wurff (eds.). 1996. Reported Speech: Forms and Functions of the Verb. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Janssen, Theo A.J.M. and Wim van der Wurff. 1996. "Introductory Remarks on Reported Speech and Thought." In Janssen & Wurff (eds.). pp. 1-12.

    Johnstone, Barbara. 1987. "'He Says ... So I Said': Verb Tense Alternation and Narrative Depictions of Authority in American English." Linguistics. 25: 33-52.

    Kuo, Sai-hua. 1992. "Hedge or Commitment: The Ambiguity of Wo Juede in Chinese Argumentative Discourse." A Paper Presented at the 37th Annual Conference of the International Linguistic Association, Washington, D.C.

    Kvavik, Karen H. 1986. "Characteristics of Direct and Reported Speech Prosody: Evidence from Spanish." In Coulmas (ed.). pp. 333-360.

    Landeweerd, Rita and Co Vet. 1996. "Tense in (Free) Indirect Discourse in French." In Janssen & Wurff (eds.). pp. 141-162.

    Larson, Mildred L. 1978. The Functions of Reported Speech in Discourse. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Inc.

    Laury, Ritva. 1996. "Conversational Use and Basic Meaning of Finnish Demonstratives." In Goldberg, A.E. (ed.). Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. CSLI Publications. Pp. 303-319.

    Lee, Benjamin. 1993. "Metalanguages and Subjectivities." In Lucy, J.A. (ed.). pp. 365-391.

    Leech, G. N. and M.H. Short. 1981. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. New York: Longman.

    Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.

    Li, Charles N. 1986. "Direct and Indirect Speech: A Functional Study." In Coulmas (ed.). pp. 29-46.

    Li, Charles N. and S. A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. University of California Press.

    -----. 1984. "Interrogativity in Mandarin." In Chisholm, W.S. Jr. (ed.). Interrogativity: A Colloquium on the Grammar, Typology, and Pragmatics of Questions in Seven Diverse Languages. Cleveland, Ohio. pp. 47-61.

    Liddicoat, Anthony J. 1997. "The Function of the Conditional in French Scientific Writing." Linguistics. 35: 767-780.

    Liu, Yuehua. 1986. " '說' '想' '看' 的一種特殊用法 (A Special Use of 'Shuo,' 'Xiang,' and 'Kan' in Dialogue.)" Zhongguo Yuwen. 192: 168-172.

    Lucy, John A. (ed.). 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.

    Lucy, John A. 1993a. "Reflexive Language and the Human Disciplines." In Lucy, J. A. (ed.). pp. 9-32.

    -----. 1993b. "Metapragmatic Presentationals: Reporting Speech with Quotatives in Yucatec Maya." In Lucy, J. A. (ed.). pp. 91-125.

    Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.

    Macaulay, Ronald K.S. 1987. "Polyphonic monologues: Quoted Direct Speech in Oral Narratives." IPrA Papers in Pragmatics. 1: 1-34.

    Mayes, Patricia. 1990. "Quotation in Spoken English." Studies in Language. 14: 325-363.

    Maynard, Senko K. 1996. "Multivoicedness in Speech and Thought Representation: The Case of Self-Quotation in Japanese." Journal of Pragmatics. 25: 207-226.

    McGregor, William. 1994. "The Grammar of Reported Speech and Thought in Gooniyandi." Australian Journal of Linguistics. 14: 63-92.

    Moore, Robert E. 1993. "Performance Form and the Voices of Characters in Five Versions of the Wasco Coyote Cycle." In Lucy, J. A. (ed.). pp. 213-240.

    Munro, Pamela. 1982. "On the Transitivity of 'Say' Verbs." In Hopper, P.J. & S.A. Thompson (eds.). Studies in Transitivity. pp. 310-318. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 15. New York: Academic Press.

    Okamoto, Shigeko. 1995. "Pragmaticization of Meaning in Some Sentence-Final Particles in Japanese." In Shibatani, Masayoshi and Sandra Thompson (eds.). Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 219-246.

    Partee, Barbara Hall. 1973. "The Syntax and Semantics of Quotation." In Anderson, S. and P. Kiparsky (eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. pp. 410-418.

    Perridon, Harry. 1996. "Reported Speech in Swedish." In Janssen & Wurff (eds.). pp. 165-188.

    Romaine, Suzanne and Deborah Lange. 1991. "The Use of Like As a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought: A Case of Grammaticalization in Progress." American Speech. 66: 227-279.

    Romero Trillo, Jesus. 1997. "Your Attention, Please: Pragmatic Mechanisms to Obtain the Addressee's Attention in English and Spanish Conversations." Journal of Pragmatics. 28: 205-221.

    Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP.

    Shie, Chi-chang. 1991. A Discourse-Functional Analysis of Mandarin Sentence-Final Particles. MA Thesis. National Chengchi University.

    Simpson, Jane. 1989. "Book Reviews on Coulmas 1986." Journal of Pragmatics. 13: 119-122.

    Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP.

    Tannen, Deborah. 1986. "Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative." In Coulmas, F. (ed.). pp. 311-332.

    -----. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: CUP.

    Tao, Hongyin. 1996. Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse, and Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    -----. To appear. "The Grammar of Demonstratives in Mandarin Conversational Discourse: A Case Study." To appear in JCL.

    Thompson, Geoff. 1996. "Voices in the Text: Discourse Perspectives on Language Reports." Applied Linguistics. 17: 501-530.

    Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac. 1991. "A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English." In Traugott & Heine (eds.). Vol. 2. pp. 313-329.

    Tragott, Elizabeth C. 1985. "Conditional Markers." In Haiman, John (ed.). Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins. pp. 289-307.

    -----. 1989. "On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Language Change." Language. 65: 31-55.

    Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Bernd Heine (eds.). 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 1 & 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Ekkehard Konig. 1991. "The Semantics-Pragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited." In Traugott & Heine (eds.). Vol. 1. pp. 189-218.

    Turnbull, William and Karen L. Saxton. 1997. "Modal Expressions as Facework in Refusals to Comply with Requests: I Think I Should Say 'No' Right Now." Journal of Pragmatics. 27: 145-181.

    Urban, Greg. 1993. "The Represented Functions of Speech in Shokleng Myth." In Lucy (ed.). pp. 241-259.

    Verschueren, Jef (ed.). 1987. Linguistic Action: Some Empirical-Conceptual Studies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Voloshinov, V. N. [1929]1986. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Harvard University Press.

    Wierzbicka, Anna. 1974. "The Semantics of Direct and Indirect Discourse." Papers in Linguistics. 7: 267-307.

    -----. 1994. "Semantics and Epistemology: The Meaning of 'Evidentials' in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective." Language Sciences. 16: 81-137.

    Willett, Thomas. 1988. "A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticalization of Evidentiality." Studies in Language. 12 (1): 51-97.

    Wurff, Wim van der. 1996. "Sequence of Tenses in English and Bengali." In Janssen & Wurff (eds.). pp. 261-286.

    Yang, Mei-hui. 1992. Na in Chinese Spoken Discourse. MA Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.

    Zheng, Yuanhan. 1983. "Jiyanshi ji qi jiegou fenxi (Reported Speech and Its Structural Analysis)." Zhongguo Yuwen. 1983: (2) 87-92.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE