本研究旨在瞭解學生的認知風格、遊戲興趣、競爭焦慮、校正準確度對數學遊戲學習成效，本研究目的有：
一、探究認知風格與數學學習成效之影響。
二、探究遊戲興趣與數學學習成效之相關。
三、探究競爭焦慮與數學學習成效之相關。
四、探究校正準確度與數學學習成效之相關。
五、探究遊戲興趣、競爭焦慮與校正準確度對數學學習成效的預測作用。
本研究採取單一群體實驗設計，自變項為「認知風格」、「遊戲興趣」、「競爭焦慮」、以及「校正準確度」，而依變項則為「數學學習成效」。本研究的研究對象為國小三年級學生，共計100名，所採用的資料分析方法包括敘述性統計分析、信度分析、獨立樣本t檢定、相關分析、時間序列分析、迴歸分析等統計方法。
研究結果顯示，認知風格對數學學習成效沒有差異；遊戲興趣與數學學習成效有顯著相關；競爭焦慮與數學學習成效有負向顯著相關；校正準確度與數學學習成效有顯著相關；遊戲興趣、競爭焦慮與校正準確度對數學學習成效有顯著預測作用。最後，本研究之研究結果，希望未來可作為教學發展之參考。
關鍵詞：認知風格、遊戲興趣、競爭焦慮、數學學習成效

This studyaims tounderstand the students'cognitive style,game interest, competitive anxiety andaccuracy of correctionon learning outcomes of mathematics, the purposesof this study are as following:
1. Explore the correlation between cognitive styles and learning outcomes of mathematics.
2. Explore the correlation between game interest and learning outcomes of mathematics.
3. Explore the correlation between competitive anxiety and learning outcomes of mathematics.
4. Explore the correlation between accuracy of correction and learning outcomes of mathematics.
5. Explore the prediction of competition anxiety, game interesting and accuracy of correctionon learning outcomes of mathematics.

This study adopts a single group experimental design, the independent variable are"cognitive style", "game interest", "competition anxiety" and "accuracy of correction", and the dependent variable is"learning outcomes of mathematics". The object of this study was third grade elementary school students,a total of 100, the analysis methods are include descriptive statistical analysis, reliability analysis, independent sample t-test, correlation analysis, time series analysis and regressionanalysis.

The results show that there is no significant difference between cognitive styles and learning outcomes of mathematics,there is significant correlation between game interest and learning outcomes of mathematics, there is significant correlation between competitive anxiety and learning outcomes of mathematics, there is significant correlation between accuracy of correction and learning outcomes of mathematics, there is significant prediction of competition anxiety, game interesting and accuracy of correction on learning outcomes of mathematics.Finally, hope the results can be used as reference on development of teaching.

一、中文部分
王財印、吳百祿、周新富（2009）。教學原理。台北：心理。
朱永方（2006）。認知風格在SCORM2004SN不同瀏覽順序對學習成效之研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立高雄師範大學資訊教育研究所，高雄。
何宜玲（2006）。影響高職電機電子群低收入學成績而高學業成就表現學生之因素探討－以台北市松山工農為例（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所，台北。
吳天助（2007）。嘉義地區高職學生資訊科學融入之學習興趣及學習滿意度關係之研究－以嘉義地區為例（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術研究所，彰化。
吳孟玲（2011）。影響國中生英語學業成就因素之探討－以彰化縣某國中為例（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立彰化師範大學商業教育研究所，彰化。
吳秋蓉（2007）。科學圖畫書對不同認知風格學生科學概念學習之研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所，高雄。
吳裕益（1987）。認知能力與認知型態個別差異現象之探討。教育學刊，7，51-98頁。
吳靜吉（1979）。場地獨立性的發展及其相關因素之研究。教育心理研究，3，118-140。。
呂劍英（2009）。國三學生的學習風格與自然科學習興趣之研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立台灣師範大學生命科學研究所，台北。
李玉婵（2011）。 學習興趣發展變化機制的縱向研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。寧波大學，中國大陸。
李旻華（2002）。高中學生之自我效能、成功期望、學習任務價值與課業學習動機調整策略之研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所，彰化。
李曜丞（2008）。多媒體導向教學及戶外實體教學對不同認知風格學生學習成效之分析。國立交通大學理學院碩士在職專班網路學習學程，新竹。
林清山（1990）。教育心理學¬--認知取向。台北：遠流。
林煜倫（2012）。探討數位遊戲對不同認知風格學習者與其推理能力之影響（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立台南大學數位學習科技學系碩士班，台南。
邱連煌（2007）。成就動機：理論、研究、策略與應用。台北：文景。
姜晶晶（2011）。小學生英語課堂情境興趣的结構及其向個人興趣的轉化（未出版碩士學位論文）。陝西師範大學，中國大陸。
洪榮昭（1995）。不同學習型態的學生在發現式學習CAI環境中的學習成效。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
洪榮昭、劉明洲（1997）。電腦輔助教學之設計原理與應用。台北：師大書苑有限公司。
康雅芳（2006）。國小五年級學童認知風格、數學態度與數學解題表現之關係研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。高雄師範大學教育學系碩士班，高雄。
張怡婷（2003）。個人認知風格、班級閱讀環境與國小高年級學童閱讀行為之相關研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所，屏東。
張春興（1988）。知之歷程與教之歷程：認知心理學的發展及其在教育上的應用。國立台灣師範大學教育心理學報，21，17-38。
張春興（1995）。教育心理學。台北：東華。
張春興（1997）。現代心理學。台北：東華。
張裕昌（2010）。不同認知風格七年級低成就學生在遺傳單元e-Learning補救教學中融入WATA策略之研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立彰化師範大學科學教育學系碩士班，彰化。
莊孟蓉（2009）。認知風格與思考風格對高中學生產品創意表現影響之研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立臺灣師範大學科技運用與人力資源發展研究所，台北。
許子凡、林品章（2008）。認知風格對不同資訊量的判讀效率與模式特徵-以AIGA圖形符號為例。設計學研究，11（1），87-105。
許瑋芷（2008）。數學表徵及數學自我效能對國小五年級學生樣是推理學習成效之影響（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所，台北。
許麗玲（2000）。認知風格在虛擬實境遠距學習遷移之影響（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士班，高雄。
許繼德（2002）。網路輔助教學對不同認知風格的國小學童在英語學習動機與成就之影響（未出版碩士學位論文）。屏東師範學院教育科技研究所，屏東。
郭上賓（2009）。探討國小五年級學童學習風格及學習動機與科學批判思考之相關（未出版碩士學位論文）。台北教育大學科學教育碩士班，台北。
郭俊賢、陳淑惠（1999）。多元智慧的教與學。台北：遠流。
陳文凱（2008）。認知風格及電腦經驗對行動學習成效之影響以社區導覽課程活動為例。國立台南大學數位學習科技系教學碩士班，台南。
陳木金（2009）。認知風格理論對有效學習策略的啟示。國立政治大學教學發展中心電子報，27。
陳宏漳（2007）。國小六年級學童認知風格、學習動機、學業成就與科學創造力之關係（未出版碩士學位論文）。高雄師範科學教育學系碩士班，高雄。
陳佩琪（2011）。電子白板互動式教學對不同認知風格國小學童英語學習結果之影響（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立中正大學教學專業發展數位學習碩士在職專班，嘉義。
彭文松（2005）。認知風格、學習風格與思考風格之區辨研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立新竹教育大學教育心理與諮商研究所，新竹。
趙珮晴、余民寧（2012）。自律學習策略與自我效能、學習興趣、學業成就的相關研究。教育研究集刊，58（3），1-32。
劉盈利（2010）。國小高年級學生認知風格、自我調整學習策略與學業成就關係之研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所，高雄。
劉意文（2010）。國中生自我調節效能、數學學習興趣與數學學習滿意度之相關研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
簡書峰（2011）。高中生數學學習興趣的調查與研究（未出版碩士學位論文）。河南大學，中國大陸。
二、西文部分
Abrahamsen, F. E., Roberts, G. C., & Pensgaard, A. M. (2008). Achievement goals and gender effects on multidimensional anxiety in national elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(4), 449-464.
Adam, J. J., Paas, F. G., Buekers, M. J., Wuyts, I. J., Spijkers, W. A., & Wallmeyer, P. (1999). Gender differences in choice reaction time: Evidence for differential strategies. Ergonomics, 42(2), 327-335.
Andresen, G., & Ahdell, R. (2002). Games simulation in corporate e-learning. Master Thesis of University of Illinois.
Bandura (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice- Hall Inc.
Boekaerts, M., & Boscolo, P. (2002). Interest in learning, learning to be Inte rested. Learning and Instruction, 12, 375-382.
Boekaerts, M., & Rozendaal, J. S. (2010). Using multiple calibration indices in order to capture the complex picture of what affects students’ accuracy of feeling of confidence. Learning and Instruction, 20, 372-382.
Bol, L., & Hacker, D. J. (2001). A comparison of the effects of practice tests and traditional review on performance and calibration. The Journal of Experi Mental Education, 69, 133-151.
Bol, L., Hacker, D. J., Walck, C. C., & Nunnery, J. A. (2012). The effects of individual orgroup guidelines on the calibration accuracy and achievement of high schoolbiology students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 80-287.
Chang, C. C., & Yang, F. Y. (2010). Exploring the cognitive loads of high school students as they learn concepts in web-based environments. Computers & Education, 55(2), 673-680.
Chiu, M. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2010). Relations of mathematics self-concept and itscalibration with mathematics achievement: cultural differences among fifteenyear-olds in 34 countries. Learning and Instruction, 20, 2-17.
Clark, C., & Yinger, R. J. (1979). Teachers’ thinking. In P. L. Peterson, & H. J.
Walbert (Eds), Research on teaching. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Davis, J. K. (1991). Educational implications of field dependence-independence. In S. Wapner & J. Demck (Eds.), Field dependence–independence: Cognitive style across the lifespan (pp. 149-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Eysenck, M.W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336-353.
Eysenck, M.W., Payne, S., & Derakshan, N. (2005). Trait anxiety, visuospatial processing, and working memory. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 1214-1228.
Games-to-Teach Team (2003). Design principles of next-generation digital gaming for education. Educational Technology, 43(5), 17-33.
Geiger, J. F., & Litwiller, R. M. (2005). Spatial working memory and gender differences in science. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(1), 49-57.
Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2012). Promoting learnings kills in under graduate students.In J. R. Kirby, & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher's perspective: The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 309-339). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 191-209.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (1992). The present state of interest research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 433-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hong, J. C., & Liu, M. C. (2003). A study on thinking strategy between experts and novices of computer games. Computer in Human Behavior, 19(2), 245-258.
Karahanna, E., & Limayem, M. (2000). E-mail and v-mail usage: Generalizing across technologies. Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 49-66.
Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 196-209.
Killi, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 13-24.
Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using metacognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(4), 800-810.
Klassen, R. M. (2002). A question of calibration: A review of the self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 88-102.
Koriat, A. (2012). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119, 80-113.
Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383-409.
Lamey, A., Hollenstein, T., Lewis, M. D., & Granic, I. (2004). GridWare (Version 1.1). Retrieved from http://statespacegrids.org/
Lee, C. H. M., Cheng, Y. W., Rai, S., & Depickere, A. (2005). What affect student cognitive style in the development of hypermedia learning system? Computers & Education, 45, 1-19.
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slavic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306-334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Loon, M. H., Bruin, A. B., Gog, T., & Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Activation of inaccurate prior knowledge affects primary-school students’ metacognitive judgments and calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 15-25.
Lowrie, T., & Jorgensen, R. (2011). Gender differences in students’ mathematics game playing. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2244-2248.
Lucas, K., & Sherry, J. L. (2004). Sex differences in video game play: A communication-based explanation. Communication Research, 31, 499-523.
Maki, R. (1998). Metacomprehension of text: Influence of absolute confidence level on bias and accuracy. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 38, 223-248.
Martens, R., Vealey, R. S., & Burton, D. (1990). Competitive anxiety in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Messick, S. (1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In S.Messick (Ed.), Individuality in learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Messick, S. (1993). The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Mitchell, M. (1992). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424-436.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect”. Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 7-28.
Pask, G. (1976). Style and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128-148.
Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibrationdan extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 3-31.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Reardon, L. B., & Moore, D. M. (1988). The effect of organization strategy and cognitive styles on learning from complex instructional visuals. International Journal of Instructional Media, 15, 353-363.
Reiff, J. (1996). At-risk middle level students or field dependent learners. Clearing House, 69, 231-234.
Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone, & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: Controversies and new directions (pp.373-404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Riding, R. J., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies. London: David Fulton.
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles -an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
Sadler-Smith, E. (1996). Learning styles and instructional design. Innovations in Education and Training International, 33, 185-193.
Salvador, A., & Costa, R. (2009). Coping with competition: Neuroendocrine responses and cognitive variables. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(2), 160-170.
Saracho, O. N. (1998). Research directions for cognitive style and ducation. Journal of Educational Research, 29, 287-290.
Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: a review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52.
Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211-224.
Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spielberger, C. D. (1966). Theory and research on anxiety. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior (pp. 3-22). New York: Academic Press.
Spielberger, C. D. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.). Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (pp. 24–54). New York: Academic Press.
Stone, N. J. (2000). Exploring the relationship between calibration and selfregulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 437-475.
Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66-73.
Vaquero, E., Cardoso, M. J., Vazquez, M., & Gomez, C. M. (2004). Gender differences in event-related potentials during visual-spatial attention. International Journal of Neuroscience, 114(4), 541-557.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Thought and Language. Cambridge, Mass:The M.I.T. Press.
Weller, H. G., Repman, J., & Rooze, G. E. (1994). The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive style in hypermedia based instruction: Implications for design of HBI. Computers in the Schools, 10, 401-420.
Whyte, M. M., Karolick, D. M., Nielsen, M. C., Elder, G. D. H., & Hawley, W. T. (1995). Cognitive styles and feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 195-203.
Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173-187.
Winne, P. H. (2004). Students’ calibration of knowledge and learning processes: Implications for designing powerful software learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 466-488.
Winne, P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15-32). New York, NY: Routledge.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration ofself-reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 551-572.
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.
Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. PaloAlto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-39). SanDiego: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. NY: Routledge.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Tsikalas, K. E. (2005). Can computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) be used as self-regulatory tools to enhance learning? Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 267-271.