本研究探討重複策略中不同手法之運用，對廣告記憶與態度的影響。除討論重複次數多寡安排之影響外，並將變異性及時間間隔手法一併納入討論。不同於先前研究多半探討重複手法個別之主效果，本研究著重於重複手法之間的交互效果討論。

根據文獻探討，我們得知重複次數對記憶有正向助益，態度則會隨重複次數增加呈現倒U型關係。變異性對記憶與態度皆有正向助益，時間間隔對於記憶有正向助益，對態度則無任何影響。由以上，本研究預期三種重複手法對記憶共有四種交互效果存在，分別為：變異性與重複次數之間、變異性與時間間隔之間、重複次數與時間間隔之間，及變異性、重複次數與時間間隔之間的交互作用。對態度而言，則預期存在變異性與重複次數之間的交互效果。

本研究採取三因子組間設計，此三因子分別為重複次數、變異性及時間間隔，對應之應變數分別為整體記憶、廣告態度與品牌態度，又整體記憶以回想和辨識之加總進行衡量。

研究結果發現，除變異性與時間間隔對記憶之假說獲得部分支持外，大部分假說皆未獲得支持。研究並發現共變量對研究結果有不可忽視之影響，訊息處理難易度及產品涉入度對記憶及態度層面都有顯著影響。其中訊息處理難度愈高時，記憶及態度分別呈現愈差；產品涉入度愈高時，記憶及態度則呈現愈佳。本研究的學術及實務貢獻為對重複手法間之交互作用進行完整檢視討論，並對電視媒體廣告之播放規劃提出安排建議。

This study discussed the advertising effects among different repetition executions on memory and attitudes. Not only discussed the impact of repetition but also took variation and time lag into consideration. Unlike past studies considering main effects only, this study further concentrated on the interactions between them.

According to the literature review, we concluded that repetition has positive influence on memory and inverted-U relationships with attitudes. Variation has both positive effects on memory and attitudes. Time lag has positive effects on memory but not on attitudes. Above all, we expected four interactions on memory among three executions. They are between repetition and variation, repetition and time lag, variation and time lag, and all of them. For attitudes, we expected there is an interaction between repetition and variation.

The study adopts three factors between-subjects design, including the executions of repetition, variation, and time lag. Through the manipulation of the experiment, we can understand how these factors influence consumers’ memory, attitude toward the Ad (Ad), and attitude toward the brand (Abr). Besides, memory part is measured by the sum of recall and recognition.

Our findings are that except the hypothesis for the interactions between variation and time lag on memory, most hypotheses are not supported. We also find that covariates have significant impact in the result. Ease of processing and product involvement both have influences on memory and attitudes. The more difficult the processing, the inferior the memory and attitudes are. In the opposite, the more product involving, the better the memory and attitudes are. The contributions in the academic and practical fields are the fully discussion of the interactions between repetition executions and the suggestions for the media planning strategy.

中文部分
丁源宏（1999）：《不同媒介特性、廣告訴求與產品涉入度對廣告效果影響之探討－比較平面媒體與網際網路》。中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。

吳佳晉（1997）：《不同涉入型態、廣告背景、音樂配合度對廣告效果之影響》。台北：世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。

李秀英（1998）：《重複方式、間隔時間與插入項目型態對廣告記憶效果之影響》。台北：世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。

阮睿祥（2004）：《置入節目、置入方式與情節連結度對產品置入效果之影響：媒體內容涉入調和效果之探討》。台北：元智大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。

邱皓政（2002）：《量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析》。台北：五南。

姜佩德（2002）：《網路互動程度與訊息涉入度對商業網站廣告效果的影響》。台北：世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。

郭馨憶（2004）：《不同涉入程度下產品置入廣告效果之研究》。台北：台北大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。

英文部分
Adams, H. G.. (1916). Advertising and Its Mental Laws. New York: Macmillan.

Anand, P., & Sternthal, B. (1990). Ease of Message Processing as a Moderator of Repetition Effects in Advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(August), 345-353.

Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and Retrieval Processes in Free Recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97-123.

Appleton-knapp, S. L., Bjork, R. A., & Wickens, T. D. (2005). Examining the Spacing Effect in Advertising: Encoding Variability, Retrieval Processes, and Their Interaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(September), 266-276.

Belch, G. E. (1982). The Effects of Television Commercial Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(June), 56-65.

Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, Complexity, and Hedonic Value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(5A), 279-286.

Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a Memory Modifier. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 396-401). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval Practice and the Maintenance Knowledge. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Practical Aspects of Memory Ⅱ (pp. 123-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bower, G. H. (1972). Stimulus-Sampling Theory of Encoding Variability, In A. W. Martin and E. Martin (Eds.), Coding Process in Human Memory (pp. 85-123). Washington, DC: Winston.

Burke R. R., & Srull, T. K. (1988). Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(June), 55-68.

Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (1987). Effects of Variation in Message Execution on the Learning of Repeated Brand Information. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 173-176.

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of Message Repetition and Position on Cognitive Response, Recall, and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 97-109.

Calder, B. J., & Sternthal, B. (1980). Television Commercial Wearout: An Information Processing View. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(May), 173-186.

Chang. C. (2005). Ad and Brand Evaluations in a Competitive Processing Context: The Effects of Number of Attributes and Repetition Strategies. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 548-553.

Craig, C. S., Sternthal, B., & Leavitt, C. (1976). Advertising Wearout: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(November), 365-372.

Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of Learning and Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fennis, B. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2001). “Stayed tuned－we will be back right after these messages”: Need to Evaluate Moderates the Transfer of Irritation in Advertising, Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 15-25.

Ginter, J. L. (1974). An Experimental Investigation of Attitude Change and Choice of a New Brand. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(February), 30-37.

Glanzer, M., & Duarte, A. (1971). Repetition Between and Within Languages in Free Recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(December), 625-630.

Glenberg, A. M. (1976). Monotonic and Nonmonotonic Lag Effects in Paired-Associate and Recognition Memory Paradigms, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 1-16.

Gorn G.. J. & Goldberg, M. E. (1980). Children’s Response to Repetitive Television Commercials, Journal of Consumer Research, 6(March), 421-424.

Grass, R. C., Wallace, W. H. (1969). Satiation Effects of T. V. Commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 19, 45-57.

Haugtvedt, C. P., Schumann, D. W., Schneier, W. L., & Warren, W. L. (1994). Advertising Repetition and Variation Strategies: Implications for Understanding Attitude Strength. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(June), 176-189.

Heflin, D. T. A., & Haygood, R. C. (1985). Effects of Scheduling on Retention of Advertising Messages. Journal of Advertising, 14(2), 41-47,64.

Hintzman, D. L., & Stern, L. D. (1978). Contextual Variability and Memory for Frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(5), 539-549.

Holbrook, M. B., & Batra, R. (1987). Assessing the Role of Emotion as Mediators of Consumer Responses to Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(December), 404-420.

Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On Interpreting the Effects of Repetition: Solving a Problem versus Remembering Solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(December), 649-667.

Janiszewski, C., & Noel, H., & Sawyer, A. G. (2003). A Meta-Analysis of the Spacing Effect in Verbal Learning: Implications for Research on Advertising Repetition and Consumer Memory, Journal of Consumer Research, 30(June), 138-149.

Johnston, W. A., & Uhl, C.N. (1976). The Contributions of Encoding Effort and Variability to the Spacing Effect on Free Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(2), 153-160.

Keller, K. L. (1987). Memory Factors in Advertising: The Effect of Advertising Retrieval Cues on Brand Evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 316-333.

Keller, K. L. (1991). Cue Compatibility and Framing in Advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 42-57.

Kirmani, A. (1997). Advertising Repetition as a Signal for Quality: If It’s Advertised So Much, Something Must Be Wrong. Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 77-86.

Krugman, H. E. (1972). Why Three Exposures May Be Enough? Journal of Advertising Research, 12(November-December), 11-14.

Loken, B., & Hoverstad, R. (1985). Relationships Between Information Recall and Subsequent Attitudes: Some Exploratory Findings. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(2), 155-158.

McCullough, J. L., & Ostrom, T. (1974). Repetition of Highly Similar Messages and Attitude Change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(June), 395-397.

Melton, A. W. (1970). The Situation with Respect to the Spacing of Repetitions and Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(October), 596-606.

Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1977). Cognitive Effects of Advertising Repetition. Advances in Consumer Research, 4, 213-220.

Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as Information, Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729-754.

Pechmann, C. & Stewart, D. W. (1988). Advertising Repetition: A Critical Review of Wearin and Wearout, Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 11(1-2), 285-330.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue Involvement Can Increase or Decrease Persuasion by Enhancing Message Relevant Cognitive Responses, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915-1926.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69-81.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, New York: Springer.

Poffenberger, A. T. (1925). Psychology in Advertising. New York: Shaw.

Ray, M. L., & Sawyer, A. G. (1971). A Laboratory Technique for Estimating the Repetition Function for Advertising Media Models. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 20-29.

Rethans, A. J., Swasy, J. L., & Marks L. J. (1986). Effect of Television Commercial Repetition, Receiver Knowledge, and Commercial Length: A Test of the Two-Factor Model, Journal of Marketing Research, 23(February), 50-56.

Sawyer, A. G. (1981). Repetition Cognitive Response and Persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. Ostrom, & T. Brock (Eds.). Cognitive Responses in Persuasion (pp. 237-261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Sawyer, A. G., & Ward, S. (1979). Carry-Over Effects in Advertising Communication. In J. N. Sheth (Ed.). Research in Marketing, Vol.Ⅱ(pp.259-314). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.

Schumann, D. W., & Petty, R. E., & Clemons, S. D. (1990). Predicting the Effectiveness of Different Strategies of Advertising Variation: A Test of the Repetition-Variation Strategies Hypothesis, Journal of Consumer Research, 13(September), 192-202.

Shimp, T. A. (1981). Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice. Journal of Advertising, 10(2), 9-15,48.

Silk, A. J., & Vavra, J. G. (1974). The Influence of Advertising’s Affective Qualities on Consumer Response. In G. D. Hughes & M. L. Ray (Eds.). Buyer/Consumer Information Processing (pp.157-186). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina press.

Singh, S. N., & Mishra, S., & Bendapudi, N., & Linville, D. (1994). Enhancing Memory of Television Commercials Through Message Spacing, Journal of Marketing Research, 31(August), 384-392.

Stang, D. J. (1975). The Effects of Mere Exposure on Learning and Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 7-12.

Strong, E. C. (1977). The Spacing and Timing of advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 17(6), 25-31.

Tavassoli, N. T., Schultz, C. J., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (1995). Program Involvement: Are Moderate Levels Best for Ad Memory and Attitude toward the Ad? Journal of Advertising Research, 35(5), 61-72.

Thios, S. J., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1976). Effects of Repetition as a Function of Study-Phase Retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(5), 529-536.

Thorson, E., Reeves, B., & Schlruder, J. (1985). Message Complexity And Attention To Television, Communication Research, 12(4), 427-454.

Unnava, H. R., & Burnkrant, R. E. (1991). Effects of Repeating Varied Ad Executions on Brand Name Memory. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(November), 406-416.

Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2004). Detrimental Influence of Contextual Change on Spacing Effects in Free Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 796-800.

Wimmer, D. R., & Dominick, R. J. (1991). Mass Media Research: An Introduction. (5th ed.). CA: Wadsworth.

Winter, F. W. (1973). A Laboratory Experiment of Individual Attitude Response to Advertising Exposure. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(May), 130-140.

Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct, Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 53-62.

Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59-70.

Zielske, H. (1959). The Remembering and Forgetting of Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 23(January), 239-243.

Zimmerman, J. (1975). Free Recall after Self-Paced Study: A Test of the Attention Explanation of the Spacing Effect. American Journal of Psychology, 88(2), 277-291.