本研究從社會網路分析（Social Network Analysis）角度研究台北市國中資訊組長之資訊科技實務分享網路及資訊科技融入教學諮詢網路。每一個網路有「獲得」及「回饋」兩個面向，從七個社會網路分析指標進行分析，包括密度、可達性、相互性、中心性、中介者角色、結構洞、子群組。
　　本研究訪談台北市39位國中資訊組長，使用UCINET 6及Pajek 1.19進行資料分析。結論如下：
1.資訊組長之資訊科技實務分享網路明顯大於資訊科技融入教學諮詢網路。
2.在資訊科技實務分享網路與資訊科技融入教學諮詢網路中，「獲得」網路明顯大於「回饋」網路。
3.資訊科技實務回饋網路密度越高，資訊組長學校任教年資越高。
4.教育網路中心於資訊科技實務分享網路與資訊科技融入教學諮詢網路中的中介功能不多。

The aim of this research is to analyze the technology practice-sharing networks and ICT integration-consulting networks of technology coordinators at junior high school in Taipei using Social Network Analysis. Each network has two dimensions – the receiving dimension and the giving dimension. Seven social network indexes, density, reachability, reciprocity, centrality, brokerage roles, structural holes and sub-groups were applied to understand the social networks among technology coordinators..
This research interviewed 39 technology coordinators of junior high school in Taipei. Data were analyzed by UCINET 6 and Pajek 1.19.
1.Technology practice-sharing network is obviously larger than ICT integration-consulting network in seven social network indexes.
2.Receiving network is larger than giving network in both technology practice-sharing network and ICT integration-consulting network.
3.The higher the technology practice-giving network density, the higher the school seniority of technology coordinators.
4.The local education network center did not play a significant brokerage role in both technology practice-sharing network and ICT integration-consulting network.

中文部分
王上元（2004）。開放源碼團隊溝通結構與團隊績效。國立中正大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。

王儒彬（2005）。台北市高中職資訊業務人員資訊技術能力自我評估與課程需求之研究。國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。

何榮桂（1998）。資訊教育基礎建設與中小學資訊化校園的藍圖。資訊與教育，68，1。

李書豪（2005）。宜蘭縣國中小學校數位落差之研究。佛光人文社會學院教育資訊學研究所碩士論文，未出版，宜蘭。

李毓聖（2007）。台北市國民小學資訊組長與系統管理師電腦之能之調查研究。國立台北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。

林佳瑩、蔡毓智（2006）。臺北地區小學教育資源分佈結構地位之探討－社會網路結構地位分析之應用。教育與社會研究，11，71-106。

林義凱（2005）。國民小學資訊組長角色壓力與工作滿意度關係之研究。國立台南大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南。

邱議德（2003）。以社會網路分析法評估工作團隊知識創造與分享。國立中正大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。

夏如春（2002）。國小課程使用資訊科技關鍵成功因素之探討－從資訊教師的觀點。國立中正大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。

徐振豐（2003）。國民中小學資訊組長資訊能力及相關因素探討以台中縣為例。彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。

高銓鴻（2005）。應用結構洞與小世界理論分析供應鍊資訊流通性之研究。國立中正大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。

教育部(2001)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖。台北：教育部。

陳立祥（1999）。我國資訊教育推動現況與展望。1999年台灣區網際網路研討會TANET’ 99。

陳志偉（2002）。台北市國民小學資訊教育實施策略之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。

陳榮德（2004）。組織內部社會網絡的行程與影響：社會資本觀點。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。

溫文正（2007）。高雄縣國小資訊教師工作滿意度與離職傾向之研究。國立台南大學科技發展與傳播研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南。

詹智傑（2001）。國中資訊組長工作現況調查。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。

劉守喬（2004）。國中小資訊負責人角色扮演、角色壓力與工作滿意之相關研究。國立交通大學理學院網路學習碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，新竹。

劉曉約（2001）。台灣地區國民中小學校園網路管理現況之調查研究。長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文。

蕭淑珍（2006）。國中資訊組長工作壓李與組織承諾關係之研究－以桃竹苗地區為例。銘傳大學教育研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，台北。

羅家德(2005)。清華社會學講義-社會網分析講義。社會科學文獻出版社。

英文部分
Barnes,J.A.(1954),“Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish”Human Relations7(1): 39-58.

Borgatti, S.P., “What Is Social Network Analysis?” 1998,
http://www.analytictech.com/networks/whatis.htm.

Brown, D. C. & Paul, N. (1998). The role and function of the computing coordinator in Western Australian Government Senior High Schools. Australian Educational Computing, 13(2), 20-27.

Burt R.(1992)Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 313 pages.

Carmichael, P., Fox, A., McCormick, R., Procter, R. & Honour, L., “Teachers’ networks in and out of school,” Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 2006, 217-234.

Constant, D. and Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S., “The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice,” Organization Science, 7(2), March 1996, 119-135.

Ehrich, L. C. (1994) Mentoring and networking for women educators. Women in Management Review,9(3), 4–11.

Evans-Andris. M. (1995). Barrier to computer integration: Microinteraction among computer coordinators and classroom teachers in elementary schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28 (1), 29-45.

Freeman, L. C. (1979).”Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification” Social Networks 1, 215-239.

Garton, L., Haythornthwaite C., and Wellman, B. “Studying Online Social Networks”, Journal of Comupter-Mediated Communication, 3(1), June 1997.

Granovetter, M.S., “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology 78, 1973, 1360-1380.

Hancock, V. E. (1990, March). Promoting secondary computer use? A coordinator is the key. Paper presented at the International Conference on Technology and Education, Brussels, Belgium.

Hanneman, R., Introduction to Social Network, 1998, Available: http://wizard.ucr.edu/~rhannema/networks/nettext.pdf.

Hanneman & Mark (2005). From: http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/

Haythornthwaite, C., “Online Personal Network: Size, Composition and Media Use Among Distance Leaners,” New Media and Society, 1996.

Hirsch, B., “Natural Support Systems and Coping With Major Life Changes,” American Journal of Community Psychology, 8(2), 1980, 159-172.

Hite, J. M.,Willams, E. J. & Baugh, S.C.,”Multiple networks of Public School Administrators: An Analysis of Network Content and Structure,” Leadereship in Education, 8(2), 2005, 91-122.

Kautz, H. and Selman, B. and Shah, M., ”The Hidden Web,” American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Summer 1997,27-35.

Kazdan, A.E., ”Encyclopedia of Psychology,” New York: Oxford University Press, 6, 2000, 350-351.

Lai, K. W., Trewern, A., & Pratt, K. (2002). Computer coordinators as change agents: Some New Zealand observations. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 539-551.

Lynch, W., Hobbs, B. & Hollanders, H. (1999). Dancing on quicksand: the role of the ICT coordinator in the primary school. Research in Educatioon, 62, 32-40.

Marcovitz, D. M. (2000). The roles of computer coordinators in supporting technology in schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 259-273.

Marsden, P. and Campbell, K.E., “Measuring Tie Strength,” Social Forces, 63, 1984, 482-501.

Moallem, M., & Micallef, S. (1997). Instructional technologists at public schools: A study of the role and effectiveness of technology resource teachers. In Proceedings of selected research and development presentations. Albuquerque, NM: National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 409 856)

Mullen, C. A. and Kochan, F. K. (2000) Creating a collaborative leadership network: An organic view of change. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(3), 183–200.

Nooy W. D., Mrvar, A. & Batagelj, V. (2004). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press.

Pajek . http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/

Pattison, P., Algebraic Models for Social Networks, Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Perlman, D. and Fehr, H., “The Development of Intimate Relationships,” Intimate Relationships, CA: Sage, 1987.

Penuel, W. R., Sussex, W., Korbak, C. & Hoadley, C., “Investigating the Potential of Using Social Networrk Analysis in Educational Evaluation,” American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 2006, 437

Ronnkvist, A., Dexter, S., & Anderson, R. (2000, June 22). Technology support: Its depth, breadth, and impact on America''''s schools: Teaching, learning, and computing 1998 survey, report # 5. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information, Technology, and Organizations at University of California, Irvine and the University of Minnesota. [On-line]. Available: http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/technology-support/ (June 28, 2002)

Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.

Strudler, N.B. (1996). The role of school-based technology coordinators as change agents in elementary school program: A follow-up study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(2), 234-257.

Strudler, N., Falba, C., Hearrington, D. (2001). The evolving role of school-based technology coordinators in elementary programs. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Chicago, IL. [On-line]. Available: http://confreg.uoregon.edu/necc2001/program/research_pdf/Strudler.pdf (June 28, 2002)

Sprague, D. & Dede, C. (1999). If I teach this way, am I doing my job? Constructivism in the classroom. Learning & Leading with Technology, 27 (1), 6-9, 16-17.

Tuire, P. & Erno, L. (2001). Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relations within an educational research community. A Finnish case. Higher Education, 42, 493-513.

UCINET. http://www.analytictech.com/ucinet/ucinet.htm

Wellman, B., “For a Social Network Analysis of Computer Networks: A Sociological Perspective on Collaborative Work and Virtual Community,” ACM, 1996.

Wellman, B., “Which Types of Ties and Networks Provide What Kinds of Social Support,” Advances in Group Processes, Volume 9, 1992, 207-235.

Wellman, B. and Wortley, S., “Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support,” American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 1990, 558-588.

Wellman, B. and Carrington, P. and Hall, P., “Networks as Personal Communities,” In Social Structures: A Network Approach, Cambridge University Press, 1988,
130-184.

Wiseman, J., “Friendship: Bonds and Binds in Voluntary Relationship,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, June 1990, 191-212.

Wohlstetter, P. and Smith, A. K. (2000) A different approach to systemic reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(7), 508–515.