簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 王淑寬
Wang, Shu-Kuan
論文名稱： 高中教師對〈十二年國民基本教育英語文課課程綱要〉高中學習階段表現條目的看法
Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items in the 12-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English
指導教授： 程玉秀
Cheng, Yuh-Show
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年： 2020
畢業學年度： 108
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 200
中文關鍵詞： 高中英语 、十二年國民基本教育 、英語課程綱要 、學習表現條目
英文關鍵詞： Senior High School English, the 12-year Basic Education, English Curriculum Guidelines, Learning Performance Items
DOI URL： http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001631
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：123  下載：47 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 《十二年國民基本教育英語文課程綱要》自2019年實施。因為教師在教育政策成功實施上扮演重要的角色，了解教師對於新課綱的看法極為重要。因此，本研究針於高中教師對《十二年國民基本教育英語文課程綱要》中的核心元素－學習表現條目的看法進行問卷調查。
    一共有207名高中英语教師參與問卷調查研究。教師在五點量表問卷中的各項學習表現條目，分別圈選其重要性以及可行性的程度。問卷調查中設計了四題開放式問題以探討教師對學習表現條目想法、實踐上的困難和挑戰，以及他們對新課綱的建議。在本項研究中，研究者使用了描述性統計、t檢定、ANOVA以分析教師對於每項學習表現條目重要性和可行性的看法，分析教師教學經驗和學校所在區域對於學習表現條目的重要性和可行性之影響。開放式問題所得的質性資料則採用了文本分析法分析。
    研究結果顯示，教師普遍認為各學習表現條目的重要性高於其可行性。有不同教學經驗和來自不同學校所在區域的教師對某些學習表現條目的看法有明顯差異。教師在開放式問題裡的回應顯示他們遍認為《十二年國民基本教育英語文課程綱要》中的表現條目非常詳細，但他們認為課堂授課時間不足(新課綱授課時數縮減)、工作量過多、學生英文程度低、缺乏學習動機、城鄉差距以及以考試為導向的學習氛圍都可能阻礙新課綱的實行。再者，教師建議有關當局在推行新課綱的時候應支持教師專業發展，如提供符合新課綱理念的教學方法、課程設計和評量相關的工作坊或研習。除此之外，教師也認為有關當局應提供包含所有學習表現條目的教材。而至於對高中英語教師的建議，他們鼓勵所有教師合作進行共同備課。根據本研究發現，研究者對有關當局、高中英語教師和未来的研究者提供具體建議。

    The 12-Year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English was launched in 2019. As teachers play a key role in successful implementation of educational policies, it is important to understand their perceptions of the new Curriculum Guidelines. Thus, the present study conducted a survey to investigate teachers’ perceptions of the core element of the Curriculum Guidelines: the learning performance items.
    A total of 207 senior high school English teachers participated in the survey. Teachers assigned a perceived importance values as well as feasibility values to each learning performance item on a five-point Likert scale. Four open-ended questions were designed to explore teachers’ opinions of the learning performance items, difficulties and challenges of implementing the items, and their recommendations for the 2019 Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and ANOVA were used to analyze teachers’ perceived importance and feasibility of the learning performance items as well as the effects of years of teaching experience and school location on their perceived importance and feasibility of the learning performance items. Text analysis procedures were taken as the means to analyze teachers’ responses to the open-ended questions.
    Results of the present study show that teachers generally assigned significantly higher scores to the importance of the learning performance items than to their feasibility. Teachers with different teaching experience and from different school locations differ significantly in their perceptions of certain learning performance items. Teachers’ responses to the open-ended questions showed that they generally considered the learning performance items of the 2019 Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English to be comprehensive; however, they thought insufficient classroom instruction time, unreasonable workloads, students’ low English proficiency and lack of motivation, the urban-rural gap, and the examination-oriented atmosphere in Taiwan might impede the implementation of the new Curriculum Guidelines. Furthermore, teachers suggested that the authorities concerned should support teachers’ professional development in implementing the new Curriculum Guidelines by offering workshops or training programs on teaching methods, course design, and assessments in consistent with the Guidelines. Since textbooks are still the dominant instructional materials, teachers also saw the need for the authorities concerned to offer teaching materials incorporating all the learning performance items. As for teachers themselves, they encourage all teachers to prepare lessons collaboratively. Based on the findings of the present study, the researcher provided suggestions to the authorities concerned, senior high school English teachers, and future researchers.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i CHINESE ABSTRACT ii ABSTRACT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES vii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Research Background 1 Significance of the Study 7 Research Questions 8 Organization of the Thesis 9 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 10 The General Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education 10 The 12-Year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English 13 Factors Influencing Curriculum Implementation 18 CHAPTER THREE METHOD 30 Participants 30 Instruments 33 Data Collection Procedures 33 Data Analysis Procedures 34 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 35 Questionnaire Results 35 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Listening 35 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Speaking 38 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Reading 41 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Writing 44 Teachers’ Perception of the Learning Performance Items for Integrated Skills 47 Teachers’ Perception of the Learning Performance Items for Interest in and Attitude Toward Learning English 51 Teachers’ Perception of the Learning Performance Items for Methods and Strategies in Learning English 55 Teachers’ Perception of the Learning Performance Items for Cultural Understanding 59 Teachers’ Perception of the Learning Performance Items for Assessment of Logical Thinking, Judgement, and Creativity 63 Teachers’ Perception of the Learning Performance Items on Different Learning Categories 68 How Teachers’ Background Information Affects Their Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items 69 How Years of Teaching Experience Affects Teachers’ Perceived Importance of Learning Performance Items on Different Categories 70 How Years of Teaching Experience Affects Teachers’ Perceived Feasibility of Learning Performance Items on Different Categories 85 How School Location Affects Teachers’ Perceived Importance of Learning Performance Items on Different Categories 99 How School Location Affects Teachers’ Perceived Feasibility of Learning Performance Items on Different Categories 107 Open-Ended Question Results 116 Research Question 2.1: What are teachers’ general impression of the learning performance items? 116 Research Question 2.2: What problems or difficulties do teachers foresee arising during the realization of the learning goals which accompany the learning performance items? 118 Research Question 2.3: What recommendations do teachers have concerning the learning performance items? 120 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 124 Discussion of Major Findings 125 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Importance and Feasibility of Learning Performance Items 125 Teachers’ Opinions of the Learning Performance Items 133 Implications of the Present Study 135 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 137 References 138 Appendix A 146 Appendix B 161 Appendix C 174

    References
    Chinese References
    洪詠善、范信賢（2015）。同行：走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。新北市：國家教育研究院。
    施玉惠（1998）。高中英文科新課程標準的特色。英語教學，22(3)，43-47。
    施玉惠（2001）。溝通式教學法：針對九年一貫英語新課程。英語教學，25(3)，5-21。
    張武昌、楊承淑、葉錫南、游毓玲、陳秋蘭、林于仙、林欣誼、吳俊穎、黃琮軒（2013）。十二年國民基本教育領域綱要內容之前導研究－子計畫二：十二年國民基本教育外國語文領域綱要內容之前導研究。臺北市：國家教育研究院。
    教育部（2008）。九十九年普通高級中學英文科課程綱要。
    教育部（2011）。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫。
    教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程發展指引。
    教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程發展建議書。
    教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。
    教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域－英語文。
    國家教育研究院（2015）。核心素養發展手冊。
    國家教育研究院（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域－英語文課程手冊。
    程玉秀、葉錫南、蘇順發（2011）。九十九年「普通高級中學英文科課程綱要」之規劃、實施與預期結果：教師觀點。英語教學，35，91-137。
    葉信成（2011）。溝通式教學法融入英語課程對國中學生英語口語能力表現之影響。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所：碩士論文。
    葉錫南（2008）。高中英文科新課程綱要之修訂理念與特色。教育研究月刊，166，25-32。
    蔡清田（2012）。課程發展與設計的關鍵DNA：核心素養。臺北市：高等教育。
    簡茂發、洪冬桂、區雅倫、夏蕙蘭、劉澄桂、舒琮慧、管美蓉、潘莉瑩、姚霞玲（2007）。大學入學考試中心命題研究與測驗發展。教育研究與發展期刊，3，1-28。
    李坤崇 (2010)。高中課程99課綱與95暫綱之分析。教育資料與研究雙月刊，92，1-24。

    English References
    Ahmad, D. (2014). Understanding the 2013 curriculum of English teaching through the teachers' and policymakers' perspectives. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Educational Development (IJERED), 2(4), 6-15.
    Allen, L. Q. (2002). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and the standards for foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annuals, 35, 518-529.
    Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106-107.
    Altrichter, H. (2005). Curriculum implementation–limiting and facilitating factors. In P. Nentwig, & D. Waddington (Eds.), Making it relevant: context based learning of science (pp. 35-62). Münster Waxmann.
    Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
    A Rahman, N. H. (2014, June). From curriculum reform to classroom practice: An evaluation of the English primary curriculum in Malaysia [Doctoral dissertation, University of York].
    Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krahtwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: cognitive domain. Longmans Green.
    Chaffee, J. (1992). Teaching critical thinking across the curriculum. In N. M. Michelli, & M. Weinstein (Eds.), Critical thinking: Implications for teaching and teachers (pp. 121-131). Institute for Critical Thinking, Montclair State.
    Chang, L. Y. (2001). Communicative language teaching: Senior high school English teachers' beliefs and practices [Unpublished Master’s thesis, Tamkang University].
    Chen, C. L. (2012). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the competence indicators in national curriculum guidelines for senior high school English [Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University].
    Chen, H. L. S., & Huang, H. Y. (2017). Advancing 21st century competencies in Taiwan. Asia Society Center for Global Education.
    Cheng, Y., & Yeh, H. (2019). Developing thinking skills in English literacy instruction in Taiwanese secondary schools: Teachers’ perspectives. In B. Reynolds, & M. Teng (Eds.), English literacy instruction for Chinese speakers (pp. 159-173). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Chuang, Y. R. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of the learning performance items in the 12-year basic education curriculum guidelines for junior high school English [Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University].
    Feldman, R. S. (1997). Essentials of understanding psychology. The McGraw Hill Company.
    Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
    Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 136-148.
    Ghanizadeh, A., & Heydarnejad, T. (2015). A cross-contextual analysis of Iranian EFL teachers' attitudes and perceptions of critical thinking. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2015.1138.
    Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204, 291-295.
    Gorsuch, G. J. (2000). EFL educational policies and educational cultures: Influences on teachers' approval of communicative activities. TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 675-710.
    Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.
    Haney, J. J., Lumpe, A. T., Czerniak, C. M., & Egan, V. (2002). From beliefs to actions: The beliefs and actions of teachers implementing change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 171-187.
    Huang, Y. P. (2015). Communicative language teaching in Taiwan: Teachers’ perceptions and practices [Unpublished Master’s thesis, Ming Chuan University].
    Hung, Y. P. (2015). Senior high school English teachers' beliefs towards communicative language teaching and their classroom practice [Unpublished Master’s thesis, Ming Chuan University].
    Hwang, J. J., & Lee, Y. T. (2017). 5 Theoretical trends for curriculum and teaching in Taiwan. Theorizing Teaching and Learning in Asia and Europe: A Conversation between Chinese Curriculum and European Didactics, 75.
    Johnson, R. K. (1989). A decision-making framework for the coherent language curriculum. The Second Language Curriculum, 1-23.
    Kabilan, M. K. (2000). Creative and critical thinking in language classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(6). http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Kabilan-CriticalThinking.
    Lee, K. (2003). The relationship of school year, sex and proficiency on the use of learning strategies in learning English. Asian EFL Journal, 5(4), 1-36.
    Liao, W. W. (2003). Senior high school English teachers' beliefs towards communicative language teaching and their classroom practice [Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University].
    Liaw, M. L. (2007). Content-based reading and writing for critical thinking skills in EFL context. English Teaching and Learning, 31(2), 45-87.
    Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking: What it can be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38-43.
    Littlewood, W. (2013). Developing a context-sensitive pedagogy for communicative oriented language teaching. English Teaching, 68, 3-25.
    Moore, B. N., & Parker, R. (1986). Critical thinking. Mayfield Publishing Company.
    Nguyen, H. T. M. (2011). Primary English language education policy in Vietnam: Insights from implementation. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 225-249.
    Nosratinia, M., & Zaker, A. (2013). Autonomous learning and critical thinking: Inspecting the association among EFL learners [Paper presentation]. The First National Conference on Teaching English, Literature, and Translation (NCTLT), Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
    O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
    Orafi, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37(2).
    Popping, R. (2015). Analyzing open-ended questions by means of text analysis procedures. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 128, 23-39.
    Prapaisit de Segovia, L., & Hardison, D. M. (2009). Implementing education reform: EFL teachers’ perspectives. ELT Journal, 63(2), 154-162.
    Rabionet, S. E. (2011). How I learned to design and conduct semi-structured interviews: an ongoing and continuous journey. The Qualitative Report, 16(2), 563-566.
    Rahimi, M., Riazi, A., & Saif, S. (2008). An investigation into the factors affecting the use of language learning strategies by Persian EFL learners. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguists, 11(2), 31-60.
    Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: language planning and policy and the ELF professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 401-427.
    Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
    Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). The creative cognition approach. Bradford.
    Stenhouse, L. (2008). Defining the curriculum problem. In N. Norris (Ed.), Curriculum and the teacher (pp. 25-28). Routledge.
    Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: a practical guide for novice researcher. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754-760.
    Wang, H. (2008). Language policy implementation: A look at teachers; perceptions. Asian EFL Journal, 30, 1-38.
    Wang, R. J. (2008). The theoretical and practical study of communicative approach in Southern Taiwan junior high schools: Based on professors’, teachers’, and students’ perspectives [Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Pingtung Institute of Commerce].
    Waters, A., & Vilches, M. L. C. (2008). Factors affecting ELT reforms: the case of the Philippines basic education curriculum. RELC Journal, 39, 5-24.
    Yan, C. (2012). ‘We can only change in a small way’: A study of secondary English teachers’ implementation of curriculum reform in China. Journal of Educational Change, 13(4), 431-447.
    Yang, Y. C. (2009). A study of elementary school English teachers’ beliefs and practices in communicative language teaching [Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education].
    Yook, C. M. (2010). Korean teachers’ beliefs about English language education and their impact on the Ministry of Education-initiated reforms [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University].
    Zare, P. (2012). Language learning strategies among EFL/ESL learners: A review of literature. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 162-169.
    Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2013). The relationship between reading comprehension and reading strategy use among Malaysian ESL learners. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(13), 187-193.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE