處於科技進步、競爭激烈的智慧型手機市場中，智慧型手機唯有朝多元化功能發展與設計，才能在市場上獨領風騷。本研究旨在了解青壯族群(20~40歲)對智慧型手機功能使用情形與其對功能創新之需求，以宏達電(HTC)、蘋果(Apple)、三星(Samsung)之旗鑑機型的功能分析彙整，結合TRIZ-39工程參數轉化智慧型手機功能開發設計的意涵，據以發展本研究之顧客調查問卷，並採校園發放問卷方式進行，獲得有效問卷108份，經應用SPSS 17.0 軟體進行描述統計分析結果，再經國內具研發Apple-iPhone、Motorola、Nokia、Samsung、Intel等行動通訊廠家之七位資深研發工程師，進行TRIZ-39工程參數之專家調查問卷，以分析智慧型手機現存功能創新之可行性建議。本研究之實證過程，應用TRIZ理論有助於智慧型手機研發工程師著手滿足顧客對功能的創新需求，針對創新需求依TRIZ-40創新原則，提供研發人員創新思維的方向。基此，本研究獲致結果如下：
一、青壯族群使用智慧型手機功能，不因廠牌而有明顯不同，且以觸控螢幕和應用程式為主要功能，相較語音輸入和視訊通話的需求較弱。
二、青壯族群對智慧型手機功能之創新需求以電池、照相品質、觸控螢幕靈敏度為最高。
三、青壯族群對智慧型手機功能之創新品質以通話清晰度、觸控螢幕的反應速度、外觀造形設計為最高。
四、符應顧客對智慧型手機功能之創新需求之建議：(一)電池容量可採用鋰聚合物電池，以發揮更大電池容量與電池效能。(二)照相品質可藉由增加鏡頭的數量與結構設計著手改善，使其拍出照片近乎數位相機的品質。(三)觸控螢幕靈敏度可採用內嵌式觸控技術(in cell touch)，觸控螢幕將更輕、更薄、靈敏度更高。

With the highly progressing technology and competition, smart phones should have to develop and design the diversification of functional to play the leading role in the market. This study aimed to understand the functional innovation based on the usage and the demand of smart phones consumers by the prime group (20 to 40 years old), the functions of smart phones were summarized from the fashion types of HTC, Apple and Samsung flagship. A TRIZ-based questionnaire was developed from the functions of smart phones transferred and identified by seven senior practitioners who have worked in mobile manufacturers. It was used to collect the data from the consumer perspectives of the higher education campuses and retrieved 108 valid statistically analyzed with SPSS 17.0 software. The results of this study listed:
1. The function of smart phones by the prime group used is not significantly different between the brands. The touch screen and the application program are the most useful function and the highest demand improvement, while the degree of the voice input and video calls is comparatively low need improvement.
2. The main needs of smart phone innovative features from the prime group are batteries, photographic quality, touch screen sensitivity.
3. The highest needs of innovative quality of the prime group of smart phone features are call clarity, speed of response of the touch screen, the appearance of form design.
4. The recommendations of the innovation needs of the smart phone features are: (1) Battery: lithium polymer batteries can be used to play a larger battery capacity and battery performance. (2) Photographic quality: improvement by increasing the number of lens and structural design to proceed near digital camera quality of photos. (3) The touch screen sensitivity: embedded touch technology can be used (in cell touch) to make touch screen lighter, thinner, higher sensitivity.

一、中文部分
王金酩(2008)。組織文化、創新人格特質與自我調整學習對突破式創新績效之研究。彰化市：國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系博士論文。
白滌清、陳巧青 (2004)。運用TRIZ創新原則探討旅行業服務屬性與矛盾現象之研究。收錄於第二屆創新與創造力研討會論文集，1110-1121頁，臺北市：國立政治大學。
朱晏樟(2003)。整合 TRIZ 與功能分析之設計方法研究。臺南市：國立成功大學機械工程學系碩士論文。
李紀萱(2011)。以智慧型手機為基礎之幼兒關懷系統設計與建置。臺中：亞洲大學數位媒體設計學系碩士論文。
林芸蔓(2010)。基於萃智的電腦輔助之修剪流程與工具。新竹市：國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系碩士論文。
陳以明、吳繪華(2007)。以顧客導向之TRIZ方法於產品創新設計。品質學報，14(4)，457-477頁。
陳宏益(2007)。結合系統化創新方法(TRIZ)與品管歷程(QC Story)建構問題解決流程。新竹市：國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班工業工程與管理組碩士論文。
陳佳宏(2011)。基於功能屬性之通用問題與解答模式：自動辨識解答之發明原則和趨勢。新竹市：國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系博士論文。
張旭華、呂鑌洧(2009)。運用TRIZ-based方法於創新服務品質之設計—以保險業為例。品質學報，16(3)，179-193頁。
曾柏霖、黃士滔(2007)。整合TRIZ 矛盾矩陣與QFD 關係矩陣探討手機功能概念。工程科技與教育學刊，4(1)，13-41頁。
黃祝娟(2011)。電子支票使用之認知與動機研究。南投縣：國立暨南國際大學經營管理在職專班碩士論文。
黃鈺婷(2010)。以功能屬性關係辨識相關技術演化趨勢。新竹市：國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系碩士論文。
經濟部技術處(2008)。2015年台灣重要產業技術發展藍圖I。臺北市：經濟部技術處。
劉怡君(2010)。運用TRIZ改善智慧型手機之應用軟體與其功能之顧客抱怨。花蓮：國立東華大學國際企業學系碩士班碩士論文。
衛南陽（2001）。新顧客滿意學。臺北：商兆文化。
鄭景鴻(2008)。應用創新構思問題解決法(TRIZ)降低研發專案管理之衝突矛盾-以智慧型手機研發專案為例。臺北市：國立臺北科技大學工業工程與管理系EMBA班碩士論文。
蕭詠今(2007)。TRIZ創意40錦囊妙計。臺北： 建速個人工作室。
蘇乃顯(2009)。以TRIZ探討家庭自動化技術發展之趨勢。新竹市：國立交通大學管理學院在職專班科技管理組碩士論文。
蘇玉娙(2009)。顧客對智慧型手機偏好之探討。新竹市：國立交通大學管理科學在職專班碩士論文。
詹曜丞(2007)。下世代可攜式電子產品的創新方案探究。臺北市：臺北科技大學光電與平面顯示器產業研發碩士專班碩士論文。
饒岩剛(2011)。男性臉部護膚保養品消費行為研究。新竹市：國立交通大學管理科學碩士論文。
Christensen, C. M. 創新的兩難，臺北：商周出版，吳凱林譯（2007）。
Kaplan Stan, TRIZ發明問題解決理論，臺北：宇河文化出版，姜台林編譯(2008)。

二、英文部分
Afuah, A. (2003). Innovation management：strategies, implementation and profits. Oxford University Press, New York.
Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability： findings from Sweden. The Journal of Marketing, 53-66.
Berdie, D. R. (1989). Reassessing the value of high response rates to mail surveys. Marketing Research, 1(3), 52-64.
Betz, F. (1987). Managing technology： competing through new ventures, innovation, and corporate research. Prentice-Hall.
Cardozo, R. N. (1965). An experimental study of customer effort, expectation, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 244-249.
CHATTERJI, DEB. (1996). Management of technology change. R&D Management, 26(2), 182-183.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). A better way to innovation. Harvard Business Review, 81( 7 ) , 1 2 - 1 4 .
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M.E. (2003). The innovator's solution：creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Press.
Cumming, B. S. (1998). Innovation overview and future challenges. European journal of innovation management, 1(1), 21-29.
Czepiel, J. A., & Rosenberg, L. J. (1976). Consumer satisfaction：toward an integrative framework. Graduate School of Business Administration, New York University.
DeVellis, R. F. (2011). Scale development：theory and applications (Vol. 26). Sage Publications, Inc.
Domb, E. (2000). Managing creativity for project success. Proceedings of the 7th Project Leadership Conference, June 2000.
Druker, P. (1995). Innovation and entrepreneurship–practice and principles. Esevier：Oxford.
Fonvielle, W. (1997). How to know what customers really want. Training and Development, 51(9), 40-44.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation：the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly, 9-30.
Holtshouse, D. (1998). Knowledge research issues. California management review, 40, 277-280.
Khalil, T. M. (2000). Management of technology： the key to competitiveness and wealth creation. McGraw-Hill Science, Engineering & Mathematics.
Kim, M. K., Park, M. C., & Jeong, D. H. (2004). The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication services. Telecommunications Policy, 28(2), 145-160.
Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Kuo, M. S., & Liang, G. S. (2011). Combining VIKOR with GRA techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1304-1312.
Mann, D. (2000). Application of TRIZ tools in a non-technical problem context. TRIZ-journal, August issue.
Marquish, DG. (1982). The anatomy of successful innovation. Winthrop Publishes, Cambridge.
Moore, G. A. (1999). Crossing the Chasm. In 1991 by HarperCollins Publishers. Oxford：Capstone Publishing Limited.
Moore, G. A. (1991). The product adoption curve in crossing the chasm, marketing and selling technology products to mainstream customers. New York：HarperCollins.
Saxe, R., & Weitz, B.A. (1982). The SOCO scale：a measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 343-351.
Schilling, M.A. (2008). Strategic management of technological innovation. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2003). The theory of economic development. Joseph Alois Schumpeter, 61-116.
Singh, J. (1991). Understanding the structure of consumers’ satisfaction evaluations of service delivery. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 223-244.
Strong Jr, E. K. (1925). Theories of selling. Journal of applied psychology, 9(1), 75.
Terninko, J., & Zusman, A. B. Zlotin (1998). Systematic Innovation：An Introduction to TRIZ. New York：St. Lucie Press.
Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for innovation. California management review, 27(3).
Utterback, J. M. (1994). Innovation and Industrial Evolution Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston, MA：Harvard Business University Press.
Van de Ven, A.H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 590-607.
Veryzer Jr, R.W. (1998). Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(4), 304-321.

三、網站資料
Aggarwal, A., Kumar, S., & Sikor, T. (2008). TOYOTrizzed：how the celebrated TOYOTA production system is a TRIZ derivative. Retrived from：http://www.scribd.com/doc/5544270/aggarwal-kumar-sikortoyotrizzed-how-the-toyota-production-system-is-a-triz-derivative
Mann, D., Poon, J., & Driver, M. (2006). Case studies from a breakthrough innovation product design programme for local industries. Retrived from：http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2007/12/03/
HTC官方網站，2011/08/21，取自 http：//www.htc.com/tw/
Apple官方網站，2011/08/21，取自 http：//www.apple.com/
SAMSUNG官方網站，2011/08/21，取自http：//www.samsung.com/tw/
楊欣霖(2011)。In-Stat：2015年全球智慧型手機App下載產值將達290億美金。2011/07/28，取自：數位時代。
http：//www.bnext.com.tw/focus/view/cid/103/id/19504
楊心貝、王元元(2011)。工研院電子報。第 10002期，出報日：2011/02/20。2011/09/20，取自：工業技術研究院。
http：//edm.itri.org.tw/enews/epaper/10002/a07.htm.
嚴蘭欣(2011)。第二季台灣手機出貨量197萬支功能型首度低於百萬。2011/09/15，取自：電子工程專輯。
http：//www.eettaiwan.com/ART_8800651419_617723_NT_6317e0cd. htm.
Jeff Bertolucci(2011)。10 Things Killed by the Smartphone。
2011/11/1，取自： PCWorld 網站。http：//www.pcworld.com/article/225372/10_things_killed_by_the_smartphone.html.
John Carey(2012)。降低觸控面板厚度In-cell實現行動裝置輕薄體驗。2012/05/26，取自：新電子網站。
http：//www.mem.com.tw/article_content.asp?sn=1202030001&page=2
TRIZ 萃思(創意問題解決)。http：//www.dyu.edu.tw/~msung/Research/Creativity/TRIZ/TRIZ_tree/TRIZ_index.htm.
行動智庫(2011)。延長Android手機電池壽命九招。2012/05/21，取自http：//www.smartmobix.com.tw/node/380
黃共鈿(2007)。鋰聚合物電池。2012/05/20，取自：數位時代。http：//www.digitimes.com.tw/tw/dt/n/shwnws.asp?CnlID=10&cat=25&id=0000073254_B822US3WSK47ZKB52DP6V&ct=2
鋰離子電池Li-ion與鋰聚合物電池Li-Polymer比較。2012/05/20，取自： 數位蘋果網。
http：//www.fuji.com.tw/shownews.asp?RecordNo=1943