本研究旨在探討新手團體領導者在協同領導關係中的隱而未說經驗，試圖探索其協同領導的互動過程中未曾說出口的內容與背後的考量為何。本研究以立意取樣方式邀請六名正在修習團體諮商課程的碩士層級新手團體領導者，兩人一組協同帶領9次、每次45分鐘之國中、小情緒團體，並於分組前，以及第2、5、9次團體結束後一週內進行約50分鐘的半結構式訪談，訪談結果根據紮根理論進行分析。結果顯示新手領導者主要的隱而未說主題有四種：「對協同領導關係的期待與需求」、「對他人的觀察與評價」、「對評價的疑惑與在乎」、「負向情緒」，較常出現的隱而未說主題是「對他人的觀察與評價」、「對協同領導關係的期待與需求」，以及「負向情緒」，隱而未說現象在團體中、後期急遽減少。隱而未說的考量則包含「較低的自信與能力懷疑」、「避免自己產生不自在的情緒」、「心力不足或較無表達的意義」、「避免關係產生誤會或變差」、「知覺負向的協同領導關係」，其中出現比例最高的考量為「避免關係產生誤會或變差」與「較低的自信與能力懷疑」。研究發現隱而未說經驗有兩種主要組型：（1）表達有關他人的評價會傾向評估關係，即考量對方是否能夠接納；（2）表達對他人的要求以及核對他人對自己的評價則傾向評估個人能力，即考量對想表達的意見有沒有信心，並且發現（1）無論關係品質為何，隱而未說現象均會出現；（2）在關係裡感到安全、支持與信任的程度與團體領導者之間隱而未說現象有明顯關聯。最後研究將針對上述協同領導雙方在不同訪談時期與不同組別間的隱而未說經驗進行討論，並據此提出研究貢獻與限制，以及未來研究和實務上的建議。

The current study was to explore nondisclosure of trainee counselors in group co-leadership, trying to investigate the details and the consideration behind it that were not expressed during the interaction process of co-leadership. This study utilized purposive sampling to invite six trainee counselors who were co-leading a nine-times, 45-minutes per period juvenile emotion regulation group to participate in a 50-minutes semi-structured interview before they divided into groups, and after the 2nd, 5th, 9th group while the trainee counselors were taking group counseling course.

The result of the interview was analyzed based on grounded theory, which indicated that there were 4 types in the nondisclosure topic: "expectation and needs of co-leader relationships", "observation and judgment toward others", "care about and doubt with others estimate", "negative emotion". The most common types are "observation and judgment toward others", "expectation and needs of co-leader relationships" and "negative emotion". The phenomenon of nondisclosure radically decreased. The consideration of nondisclosure included "lower confidence and competency concerns", "in order to prevent oneself from having uncomfortable emotion", "being unable and reluctant to express meaningless information", "in order to prevent the relationship from provoking misunderstanding or worsening", "negative perception of the relationship". The prominent consideration is "in order to prevent the relationship from provoking misunderstanding or worsening" and "lower confidence and competency concerns".

The research discovered that there were 2 main character of the nondisclosure experience: (a) to be inclined to evaluate relationship while trying to make comment about others; that is, to consider if others are able to accept the comments; (b) to be inclined to assess individual ability while trying to express his/her need and verify others' comment about oneself; that is, to contemplate if he/she is confident with the point of view that was meant to clarify. Moreover, the research indicated that: (a) the phenomenon of nondisclosure would still exist, no matter how the quality of the relationship is; (b) there are evident connection between the degree of feeling safe, supported and trusted in the relationship and the fact that there is phenomenon of nondisclosure between the co-leaders. Last but not the least, the research would discuss the nondisclosure experience of the co-leaders during different times of interview and different groups that are mentioned above, and it would bring up the limitations of the study that are provided in light of current findings, as well as the suggestion of the future research and practical advice.

一、中文部分
中華民國考選部（2013）：專門職業及技術人員高等考試心理師考試規則。取自http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/ExamLaws/wfrmExamLaws.aspx?kind=3&menu_id=320&laws_id=113
田菀鈞（2015）：新手諮商心理師帶領國中校園非自願團體之研究。國立清華大學教育心理與諮商學系碩士論文。
吳秀碧（2017）：團體諮商與治療：一個嶄新的人際－心理動力模式。台北市：五南。
沈慶鴻（2012）：督導關係中隱而未說現象之探索: 以家暴防治受督導社工為例。東吳社會工作學報，24，43–78。
林怡萱（2011）：實習諮商師在沙盤團體督導過程之隱而未說現象研究。國立嘉義大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文。
林淑君、王麗斐、謝珮玲（2012）：團體帶領者僵局經驗之初探性研究。教育心理學報，43（4），899–919。doi: 10.6251/BEP.20110516
洪莉竹、陳秉華（2005）：台灣諮商人員對西方諮商與華人文化信念衝突的轉化經驗。教育心理學報，37（1），79–98。
紐文英（2016）：質性研究方法與論文寫作。台北：雙葉書廊。
高淑清（2008）：質性研究的18堂課：首航初探之旅。高雄市：麗文文化。
許育光（2016）：非結構式諮商團體不同歷程階段成員氣氛知覺與自我揭露因素之相關探究。中華輔導與諮商學報，45，95–112。
許育光（2012）：碩士層級新手諮商師領導非結構諮商團體之經驗分析：個人議題映照與專業發展初探。輔導與諮商學報，34（2），23–44。
許育光（2013）：團體諮商與心理治療：多元場域應用實務。台北市：五南。
許哲修（2008）：準諮商員人際特質與團體諮商領導困境、督導需求之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系所碩士論文。
許韶玲（2004）：受督導者於督導過程中的隱而未說現象之探究。教育心理學報，36（2），109–125。doi:10.6251/BEP.20040811
許韶玲（2007）：為什麼受督導者隱而不說？中華輔導學報，21，167–200。
陳慧慈（2016）：協同領導者團體帶領歷程中知覺之衝突事件、因應策略與影響。國立臺中教育大學諮商與應用心理學系碩士班碩士論文。
黃光國（2009）：儒家關係主義：哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。台北市：心理出版社。
黃冠穎、李佩瑜、黃筱喬（2006）：新手團體諮商員的省思—以一個自我成長團體為例。輔導季刊，42（2），58–70。
黃筱蘋、黃囇莉（2012）：破冰之旅―虛性和諧友誼中的情緒分享及其影響。中華心理學刊，54（2），219–242。doi:10.6129/CJP.2012.5402.06
黃囇莉（2006）：人際和諧與衝突：本土化的理論與研究。台北市：揚智文化。
潘淑滿（2003）：質性研究：理論與應用。台北：心理出版社。
謝麗紅、林詠昌（2014）：團體諮商工作同盟量表編製研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，40，59–94。
謝麗紅、陳尚綾（2014）：新手領導者對青少年團體帶領經驗之分析研究。輔導與諮商學報，36（2），65–81。
王沂釗、蕭珺予、傅婉瑩譯（2014）：團體諮商：歷程與實務。台北：新加坡商聖智學習。Corey, M. S., Corey, G., & Corey, C. (2014). Groups: Process and practice. Singapore: Cengage Learning.
方紫薇、馬宗潔譯（2001）：團體心理治療的理論與實務。台北：桂冠。Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
吳芝儀、廖梅花譯（2001）：質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法。嘉義市：濤石文化。Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.
張芬芬譯（2005）：質性研究資料分析。台北：雙葉。Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M., 2005. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
程小蘋等譯（2007）：團體諮商：策略與技巧。台北：新加坡商聖智學習。Jacobs, E. E., Masson, R. L., & Harvil, R. L. (2006). Group counseling: Strategies and skills. Singapore: Cengage Learning Company.
鄧惠泉、湯華盛譯（2001）：團體心理治療。台北：五南。Vinogradov, S. & Yalom, I. D. (1989). Concise guide to group psychotherapy. Texas, TX: American Psychiatric Publishing.
藍佩嘉（2015）：質性個案研究：紮根理論與延伸個案法。載於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞（主編），社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法（63-94）。台北市：臺灣東華。
顏寧、黃詠光、吳欣隆譯（2009）：建構扎根理論。台北：五南。Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.

二、西文部分
Bernard, H. S., Drob, S, L., & Lifshutz, H. (1987). Compatibility between cotherapists: An empirical report. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 24(1), 96–104.
Brent, D. A., & Marine, E. (1982). Developmental aspects of the cotherapy relationship. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8(2), 69–75. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1982.tb01443.x
Bridbord, K., & DeLucia-Waack, J. (2011). Personality, leadership style, and theoretical orientation as predictors of group co-leadership satisfaction. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 36(3), 202–221. doi:10.1080/01933922.2011.578117
Clark, P., Hinton, W. J., & Grames, H. A. (2016). Therapists’ perspectives of the cotherapy experience in a training setting. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(2), 159–171. doi: 10.1007/s10591-015-9358-2
Dick, B., Lessler, K., & Whiteside, J. (1980). A developmental framework for cotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 30(3), 273–285.
Dugo, J. M. & Beck, A. P. (1991). Phases of co-therapy team development. In B. Roller, & V. Nelson (Eds.), The art of co-therapy: How therapists work together (pp. 155–188). New York, NY: Guilford.
Dugo, J. M., & Beck, A. P. (1997). Significance and complexity of early phases in the development of the co-therapy relationship. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(4), 294–305.
Fall, K. A., & Menendez, M. (2002). Seventy years of co-leadership: Where do we go from here? TCA Journal, 30(2), 24–33.
Fall, K. A., & Wejnert, T. J. (2005). Co-leader stages of development: An application of Tuckman and Jensen (1977). The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 30(4), 309-327. doi: 10.1080/01933920500186530
Gallogly, V., & Levine, B. (1979). Co-therapy. In B. Levine (Ed.), Group psychotherapy: Practice and development (pp. 296–305). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
Hendrix, C. C., Fournier, D. G., & Briggs, K. (2001). Impact of cotherapy teams on client outcomes and therapist training in marriage and family therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23(1), 63–82.
Huffman, D. D., & Fernando, D. M. (2012). Adapting the interpersonal process model of intimacy to enhance the co-leader relationship during training. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 37(2), 152–167. doi: 10.1080/01933922.2012.663863
Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The chinese-power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944-974. doi: 10.1086/228588
Kivlighan, D. M., London, K., & Miles, J. R. (2012). Are two heads better than one? The relationship between number of group leaders and group members, and group climate and group member benefit from therapy. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 16(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1037/a0026242
Kottler, J. A., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2010). Learning group leadership: An experiential approach. California, CA: SAGE.
Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251.
Luke, M., & Hackney, H. (2007). Group coleadership: A critical review. Counselor Education & Supervision, 46(4), 280–293. doi :10.1002/j.1556-6978.2007.tb00032.x
Lundin, W. H., & Aronov, B. M. (1952). The use of co-therapists in group psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16(1), 76–80.
MacLennan, B. W. (1965). Co-therapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 15(2), 154-166.
McMahon, N., & Links, P. S. (1984). Cotherapy: The need for positive pairing. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 29(5), 385–389.
Miles, J. R., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2008). Team cognition in group interventions: The relation between coleaders' shared mental models and group climate. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(3), 191–209.
Miles, J. R., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2010). Co-leader similarity and group climate in group interventions: Testing the co-leadership, team cognition-team diversity model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(2), 114–122.
Ohrt, J. H., Ener, E., Porter, J., & Young, T. L. (2014). Group leader reflections on their training and experience: Implications for group counselor educators and supervisors. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 39(2), 95–124. doi: 10.1080/01933922.2014.883004
Okech, J. E. A., & Kline, W. B. (2005). A qualitative exploration of group co-leader relationships. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 30(2), 173–190. doi: 10.1080/01933920590926048
Okech, J. E. A., & Kline, W. B. (2006). Competency concerns in group co-leader relationships. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 31(2), 165–180. doi: 10.1080/01933920500493829
Posthuma, B. W. (1991). Small groups in therapy settings: Process and leadership. Massachusetts, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck, D. F. Hay, S. E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes & B. M. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367–389). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Roller, B., & Nelson, V. (1991). The art of co-therapy: How therapist work together. New York, NY: Guilford.
Shelton, J. N., Trail, T. E., West, T. V., & Bergsieker, H. B. (2010). From strangers to friends: The interpersonal process model of intimacy in developing interracial friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(1), 71–90.
Sweeney, J. & Creaner, M. (2014). What's not being said? Recollections of nondisclosure in clinical supervision while in training. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 42(2), 211–224. doi: 10.1080/03069885.2013.872223
Winter, S. K. (1976). Developmental stages in the roles and concerns of group co-leaders. Small Group Behavior, 7(3), 349–362.