本論文採量化方法，以問卷調查探討國會法案助理的立法資訊行為及使用圖會圖書館情形與各項服務滿意程度。期望藉由此研究，掌握國會法案助理在立法資訊行為上的特徵，瞭解國會圖書館現行服務是否符合使用者的真正資訊需求，以提供館方在擬定各項政策及規劃服務時的建議和參考，增進服務品質。茲將本研究之發現分述如下。
在國會法案助理之資訊需求方面，本研究發現國會法案助理需要經常尋找並閱讀工作相關資料，且其資訊需求與解決工作問題的相關度很高。
在國會法案助理資訊搜尋行為方面的研究發現如下：（一）圖會圖書館網站及搜尋引擎是國會法案助理獲得工作資料的主要管道；（二）上網搜尋和人際關係管道是國會法案助理在院內找不到資料時的重要資訊管道；（三）國會法案助理最常利用的資訊來源包括預決算報告書、法案追蹤、立法研究報告及法律制定的紀錄；（四）影響國會法案助理資訊搜尋之因素包括：1.資訊太多，沒時間閱讀，或找到資訊不適用是在尋找資訊時常會面臨的問題；2.資料只能在院內使用，無法在家中查詢或使用是助理覺得困擾之處。
在國會法案助理資訊使用行為方面的研究發現如下：（一）國會法案助理尋求工作相關資訊以資訊品質為主要考慮的因素；（二）評估資訊的價值以資訊來源的可靠程度為主。
國會法案助理背景特性對其資訊行為的影響有：（一）國會法案助理的背景特性在資訊需求面向沒有顯著的影響。（二）助理年齡、所屬委員參加委員會及學科背景對資訊來源面向有顯著影響。（三）在資訊察覺面向，只有助理年資和選擇資訊考慮因素產生關聯。
在國會法案助理使用國會圖書館情形方面的研究發現如下：（一）半數以上的人幾乎每天都會使用圖書館相關資源；（二）最多國會法案助理訂閱的RSS及資訊快遞是最新通過議案；（三）新聞知識管理系統是國會圖書館網站中使用率最高的資訊系統；（四）使用國會圖書館資源沒有困難，但不清楚圖書館資源及服務的人亦很多；（五）圖書期刊自助借還系統是讀者對圖書館服務滿意度最高的項目；滿意度最低的則是沒有舒適的閱覽座位。
根據研究結果，歸納出幾項建議如下：一、定期進行使用者需求調查；二、加強國會圖書館資訊服務行銷推廣；三、強化國會圖書館網站互動機制；四、建立網路資源檢索技巧教學；五、建立館際合作；六、改善圖書館硬體設備。

The study adopted quantitative methods to investigate the legislative information behavior of congressional legislative assistants and service satisfaction as well as use scenario of Parliamentary Library by questionnaire. The purpose of this study is to grasp the legislative information behavior of congressional legislative assistants and understand whether the existing services of Parliamentary Library could correspond to the real information needs of users in order to provide the suggestion and reference for Parliamentary Library when they prepare policies and plan services in order to enhance service quality. The findings of this study are as follows.
For the information needs of Congressional legislative assistants, the study found they needed to look for and read job-related information frequently. The relationship between the information needs and solving problems was high.
The information seeking behavior of congressional legislative assistants are as follows:
1. The main channels of obtaining job-related information are the website of Parliamentary Library and search engines.
2. The important information channels are Internet search and interpersonal relationships when they cannot find the information in the Legislative Yuan.
3. The most use of a variety of sources information includes assessment report of general budget and general financial statement of central government, bill tracking, legislative research reports, and records of law-making.
4. The influence factors of information search include: 1. information too much, no time to read, or found the information which can not apply to the problem often met; 2. information can only be used in office and unable to query or use at home that bothered them.
The information use behaviors of Congressional legislative assistants are as follows:
1. Information quality is the primary consideration factor.
2. The reliability of the sources of information is the primary factor to assess the value of information.
The influences of Congressional legislative assistants’ background to information behavior are as follows：
1. There is no significant from the information needs aspects.
2. The assistants’ age, their legislators attending committee and disciplines have significant impact for sources of information.
3. There is relationship between assistants’ age and the consideration factor of information selection for awareness of information.
For the use scenario of Parliamentary Library for the Congressional legislative assistants is as follows:
1. More than half of the Congressional legislative assistants almost daily use library-related resources.
2. The current law in force is the most subscribed information through RSS and e-paper.
3. The News Knowledge Management System is the largest using rate among the website of Parliamentary Library.
4. There are no problems for Congressional legislative assistants to use library resources but a portion of them are not clear to the library resources and services.
5. The most satisfaction service for Congressional legislative assistants is the self-service system for books and periodicals. On the other hand, the lowest satisfaction service for them is the lack of comfortable reading seats.
The suggestions from the study results are as follows: First, to survey the users needs periodically; Second, to strengthen the information service marketing and promotion of Parliamentary Library; Third, to strengthen the website interaction mechanism of Parliamentary Library; Fourth, to establish the training of Internet resources search skills; Fifth, to establish interlibrary cooperation; Sixth; to improve the library hardware.

Belkin, N. J. (1978). Information Concepts for Information Science. Journal of Documentation, 34(10), 55-85.
Byström K., & Järvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 31(2), 191-213.
Cummings, F. (1976). Capitol Hill manual. Washington: Bureau of National Affairs.
Dervin, B. & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. American Society for Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.
Grover, Robert. (1993). A proposed model for diagnosing information needs. School Library Media Quarterly 21(2), 98.
Hewins, E.T., (1990). Information needs and uses studies. American Society for Information Science and Technology, 25, 145-164.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1988). Perceptions of the information search process in libraries: A study of changes from high school through college. Information Processing & Management, 24(4), 419-427.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1989). The information search process of high-middle-and low-achieving high school seniors. School Library Media Quarterly, 17(4), 224-228.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 339-355.
Lancaster, W. (1995). Needs, demands and motivations in the use of sources of information。資訊傳播與圖書館學，1(3)，3-19.
Leckie, G., Pettigrew, K., & Sylvain, C. (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professional: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professional, and lawyers. Library quarterly, 66(2), pp. 161-193.
Mick, C. K., Lindsey, G. N. and Callahan, D. (1980) Toward usable user studies. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 31(5), 347.
Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology(ARIST), 35, 43-78.
Ranganathan, S. R. (1957). Five laws of library science. Bouthay: Asia publishing House.
Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29, 178-194.
Taylor, R. S. (1986). Value-added processes in information systems. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing.
Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt, (Eds.), Progress in Communication Science. (pp217-254) N.J.: Ablex Publishing.
Wang, P. (1999). Methodologies and methods for use behavioral research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 53-89.
Wilson, T. D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. The Journal of Documentation. 37(1), 3-15.
Wilson, T. D. (1997). Information behavior: An interdisciplinary perspective. Information Processing & Management, 33(4), 551-572.
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Information Science, 3(2), 49-55.
Wilson, T. D. (2007). Evolution in information behavior modeling: Wilson's model. In, K. Fisher, S. Erdelez & L. McKechnie, (Eds.). Theories of Information Bbehavior, (pp. 31-36). Medford, NJ: Information Today. [Slightly revised and updated October 2007]. Retrieved March 11, 2010, form http://InformationR.net/tdw/publ/papers/2005SIGUSE.html
Wilson, T. D.(1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.
石育平(2006)。半導體晶圓代工產業工程師資訊行為研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立交通大學資訊學院碩士在職專班數位圖書資訊組，新竹市。
立法院國會圖書館網站。上網日期：2010年6月8日，檢自http://npl.ly.gov.tw/do/www/homePage
田倩惠(2007)。國會助理立法資訊尋求行為之研究。臺灣大學圖書資訊研究所，碩士論文。
甘霖(2003)。立法委員個人助理之研究。中國文化大學政治學研究所，碩士論文。
田麗虹(2001)。國會助理：工作手冊。臺北市：新自然主義。
李婷媛(2006)。研究機構工程師資訊行為及其在資訊服務應用之探討。臺灣大學圖書資訊研究所，碩士論文。
林珊如(1992)。企業資訊與商情服務：如何有效蒐集運用工商資訊資源。臺北市：文華。
林珊如、許禎芸(2008）。從國內碩士論文探討資訊行為相關研究。圖書資訊學研究，3(1)，51-74。
林彩鳳(2007)。國防科技人員資訊尋求行為之研究－以中山科學研究院航空研究所為例。中興大學圖書資訊學研究所，碩士論文。
林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市：東華。
林嘉敏(2005)。司法官對法律文獻資訊之資訊行為探究。臺灣師範大學社會教育學系，碩士論文。
吳明隆(2009)。SPSS操作與應用：問卷統計分析實務。臺北市：五南。
徐莉芬(2007)。積體電路(IC)設計公司人員之資訊行為研究。臺灣師範大學社會教育學系，碩士論文。
國家圖書館輔導組(2009)。國家圖書館年鑑。臺北市：國家圖書館
張正為(1992)。世界各重要國家國會圖書館之現狀及對立法者影響之研究。書苑，13，104-121。
張芳全(2008)。問卷就是要這樣編。臺北市：心理。
張新華(1991)。資訊學概論。臺北市：臺灣商務。
陳淞山(1994)。國會制度解讀。臺北市：月旦。
陳淑貞(2004)。我國國會助理專業能力分析之研究。臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系，碩士論文。
陳麗玲(2006)。國家圖書館政府資訊服務。研考雙月刊，30(3)，74-85。
傅雅秀(1997)。資訊尋求的理論與實證研究。圖書與資訊學刊，20，13-28。
曾淑賢(2001)。兒童資訊需、資訊素養及資訊尋求行為。臺北市：文華。
曾濟群(2001)。國會立法與程序。臺北市：台灣書店。
黃炳中(2002)。從網際網路索探立法院立法資訊。國會月刊，30(7)，64-86。
楊曉雯(1994)。淺析資訊特性及讀者的資訊需求。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館館訊，16，25-29。
楊曉雯(1998)。科學家資訊搜尋行為的探討。圖書與資訊學刊，25，24-43。
葉乃靜(2005)。多元文化下的資訊行為研究。臺北市：文華。
蔡墩銘(1996)。從立法院與行政院的互動關係探討國會助理功能與其角色。臺北市：行政院研考會。
賴鼎銘(1993)。圖書館學的哲學。臺北市：文華。
賴鼎銘、黃慕萱、吳美美、林珊如(2001)。圖書資訊學概論。台北縣：空中大學發行。
謝焰盛(1994)。從資訊需求與使用研究之多重典範衝突談讀者需求導向對圖書館的影響。圖書與資訊學刊，10，39-40。
羅傳賢(1993)。立法程序。臺北縣：龍文。
顧敏(2005)。從傳統到數位圖書館。臺北市：文華。