本研究以團隊凝聚力為主軸，探討合球男、女選手在比賽前、後團隊凝聚力表現的差異；以及比賽後運動表現與滿意度及團隊凝聚力三者之間相關性比較。
研究受試對象為國內四支大專甲組合球校隊，男選手33名、女選手36名。進行量表測試之時間，為九十一學年度大專盃合球錦標賽之比賽前、比賽後二個階段，研究工具採用盧素娥（民84），所修訂的「團隊情境量表」，資料蒐集完成，以混合設計二因子變異數分析及皮爾森積差相關進行資料處理，研究結果經分析討論，得到以下的發現：（一）合球選手團隊凝聚力的表現，比賽後優於比賽前；女選手與男選手在團隊凝聚力表現沒有差異；（二）合球選手工作凝聚力的表現，比賽後優於比賽前；女選手與男選手在工作凝聚力表現沒有差異；（三）合球選手社會凝聚力的表現，比賽前、後表現沒有差異；男、女選手之間表現也沒有差異；（四）合球選手運動表現與滿意度之間有正相關，而團隊凝聚力與運動表現、滿意度兩者皆無相關性。

This study has been mainly focused on team cohesion. The difference between the male and female korfball players’ team cohesion performances before the game and after the game has been investigated. A correlation has been conducted among team cohesion, post-game performance and satisfaction as well.
The target subjects included 33 male and 36 female level-A korfball players, from four different universities. The questionnaires were administered before and after the 2003 College Cup Korfball Championship. The Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ), revised by Su-Zr Lu, (1995) has been adopted to collect data. ‘Pearson product-moment correlation’ and ‘mixed design two-way ANOVA’ have been implemented to analyze the collected data.
The result reveals that, (1) The korfball players’ post-game team cohesion performance is better than pre-game; there is no significant team cohesion difference between the male and female players. (2) The korfball players performed better task cohesion after the game than before the game; there is no significant task cohesion difference between the male and female players. (3) The korfball players performed no significant social cohesion difference before the game and after the game, no difference between male and female players, either. (4) There is a positive correlation between korfball plays’ performance and their satisfaction, but no such relationship between team cohesion and performance, nor between team cohesion and satisfaction.

一、中文部分
丁興祥、李美枝、陳皎眉編著。（民78）。社會心理學。台北：國立空中大學。
中華民國合球協會（民90）。國際合球規則。台北市：中華民國合球協會。
李秀穗（民90）。運動團隊凝聚力。大專體育，52期，130-137。
林正常、蔡崇濱、劉立宇、林政東、吳忠芳等譯（民90）。運動訓練法。台北縣：藝軒圖書。
吳慧卿（民90）。選手知覺教練領導行為、團隊衝突、團隊凝聚力及滿意度關係之實證研究。國立台灣師範大學研究所博士論文。
邱玉惠（民90）。運動員心理技能量表之編製。國立體育學院研究所碩士論文。
陳祐正編（民87）。簡明合球。台北市：中華民國合球協會。
陳其昌（民82）。排球教練領導行為對團隊凝聚力的影響暨驗證運動情境領導理論之研究。國立體育學院研究所碩士論文。
張志成（民85）。運動團隊凝聚力之探討。大專體育，28期，111-117。
張志成（民86）。自我效能和集體效能與團隊凝聚力的相關研究，暨不同凝聚力組型輸贏歸因之探討。國立體育學院研究所碩士論文。
黃金柱（民75）。運動團隊凝聚的探討。中華體育季刊，2期，57-63。
黃國儀（民90）。兩性教育：揭開男女神秘的面紗。台北縣：啟英文化。
黃寶雀（民90）。團隊凝聚力對運動團隊的影響。大專體育，53期，92-98。
曾華源、劉曉春等譯（民89）。社會心理學。台北市：洪葉文化。
盧俊宏（民83）。運動心理學。台北市：師大書苑。
盧素娥（民84）。大專籃球選手的知覺運動動機氣候與團隊凝聚力之相關
研究。國立體育學院研究所碩士論文。
蔡秋豪（民85）。運動表現與高中女子籃球隊團隊凝聚力之關係研究。體育學報，21，219-229。
謝天德（民87）。國小教師工作投入、團體凝聚力與社會閒散關係之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所論文集，第3集，113-149。
蔣憶德、陳淑滿、葉志仙（民90）。教練領導行為與團隊凝聚力之相關研究。體育學報，30，195-206。
二、英文部分
Backx, F., Boer, R. D., Crum, B., Dirksen, W., Emmerik, R., Keizer, F., Lof, R., Rodenburg, K., & Troost, F. (1994). Korfball, an Insight. Bunnik, The Netherlands: KNKV.
Barwarley, L, R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1988). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and group resistance to disruption. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 10, 199-213.
Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in Sport Group: interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.
Carron, A. V., & Ball, J. R. (1977). Cause efficient characteristics of cohesiveness and participation motivation in intercollegiate ice hockey. International Review of Sport Sociology, 12, 49-60.
Carron, A. V., Colman, M. M., & Wheeler, J. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 168-188.
Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985) The development of assess cohesion in sport team: the group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (3rd ed.) New York: Academic Press.
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1963). Social pressures in informal groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gruber, J. L., & Gray, G. (1981). Factors patterns of variables influencing cohesiveness at various levels of basketball competition. Research Quarterly for Sport Exercise and Sport, 52, 19-30.
Kirk, R. E. (1995) Experimental design: Procedures for the behavior science (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Books/Cole.
Kozub, S. A., & McDonnell, J. F. (2000). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in rugby teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23, 120-129.
Landers, D. M., Wilkinson, M. O., Hatfield, B. D., & Barber, H. (1982). Causality and the cohesion-performance relationship. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 170-183.
Lenk, H. (1969). Top performance despite internal conflict: An antithesis to a functional proposition. In Loy, J. W., & Kenyan, G. S. (Eds.), Sport, culture and society: A reader on the sociology of sport. New York: Macmillan.
Martens, R., & Peterson, J. A. (1971). Group cohesiveness as a determinant of success and member satisfaction in team performance. International Review of Sport Sociology, 6, 49-61.
Nixon, H. L. (1977). `Cohesiveness` and team success: A theoretical reformulation. Review of Sport and Leisure, 2, 36-57.
Ruder, M. K., & Gill, D. L. (1982) Immediate Effects of Win-Loss on Perceptions of Cohesion in Intramural and Intercollegiate Volleyball Teams Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 227-234.
Spink, K. S. (1990). Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball team. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 12, 301-311.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. (1999). Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology. (2nd ed) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetic.
Williams, J. M., & Hacker, C. M. (1982). Causal relationships among cohesion, satisfaction, and performance in women intercollegiate field hockey teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 324-337.
Yukelson, D., Weinberg, R., & Jackson, A. (1984). A multidimensional group cohesion instrument for intercollegiate basketball teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 103-117.