本研究旨在探討青少年的家族主義認知，及個人背景與家庭變項之影響。研究採問卷調查法，採葉明華與楊國樞（1997）的「家族主義量表－認知層次」，選擇青少年階段之高中和高職學生為對象，以「分層」的方式，非隨機取得有效樣本數603份。主要研究發現如下：
1.本研究之青少年過半皆沒有宗教的信仰，並且父母多為已婚同住，
屬於低社經地位的家庭。
2.青少年對家族主義認知程度傾向有點同意，其中以「團結和諧」此
一面向的認同程度最高，意指個人願意接受維持家庭團結、和諧的
重要性；其次分別為「興盛家道」、「繁延家族」。
3.「性別」、「學校類別」、「父母婚姻狀況」對於家族主義認知有
顯著的預測力。男性、高職學生並且父母同住在一起之青少年，家
族主義的認知程度傾向較高。
4.本研究測量的個人背景因素皆對家族主義認知有顯著影響；在家庭
變項中，唯父母婚姻狀況對青少年家族主義認知有顯著影響。
最後，根據研究結果，分別針對青少年、父母、學校以及未來研究四方面提出具體建議。

The purpose of this study is to explore the attitude to the familism of adolescents, and discuss the effect of demographic variables. A questionnaire survey was conducted on senior and vocational high school students in Taiwan. Looked into the research done by Yang and Yeh (1997) and adopted its questionnaire “Chinese Familism－Cognitive Component” for measuring the attitude to the familism of senior and vocational high school students. The effective samples which were acquired through stratified sampling for non-random are 603. The major findings are presented as follows：
1.More than fifty percent of the study samples are
unreligious. Additionally, over half of the sample comes
from low social economic status family, and approximately
ninety percent of the study sample reflected their
parents were married and lived together.
2.The senior and vocational high school students were
little inclined to agree the familism. The respondents
believe the “ beliefs in Solidarity and Harmony ” the
most. That means they must accept and maintain the
importance of solidarity and harmony in family. Followed
by the “Family Prosperity” and “Lineage Prolongation
and Expansion”
3.On the whole, “gender”、“school type” and “parents”
marriage status” had significant effect on the familism.
In other words, men held more high familism than the
women; The vocational high school students held more high
familism than the senior high school students.
Furthermore, students live with parents together were a
strong and positive predictor of the familism.
4.In this study, the individual variables effect on
adolescents familism were significant. On the other hand,
Only parents’ marriage status of the family variables
were more important predictors.
According to the findings, suggestions for adolescents, parents, schools and future researches are addressed.

中文部分
任桂滿（2007）。國小教師家庭價值觀之研究。嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義市。
朱瑞玲、章英華（2001）。「華人社會的家庭倫理與家人互動：文化及社會的變遷效果」。中央研究院經濟研究所、國科會社會科學研究中心主辦，『華人家庭動態資料庫學術研討會』，臺北市。
吳明玨（2005）。我國家庭教育法制化後之發展。社教雙月刊，127，24-30。
吳秋雯（1996）。手足變項、父母教養態度與子女手足攻擊行為之相關研究。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。未出版，臺北市。
李亦園（1978）。信仰與文化。臺北市：巨流。
李炳全、陳燦銳（2009）。大學生的家族主義與生活滿意度等的相關研究。肇慶學院學報，30（4），64-68。
林生傳（2003）。教育研究法。臺北市：心理。
林如萍（2003）。我國家庭教育發展之展望—知識體系之建構。家政教育學報，5，121-154。
林清江（1981）。教育社會學新論。臺北市：五南。
邱皓政（2001）。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市：五南。
施良方（1996）。第十三章 班度拉社會學習理論。載於學習理論：學者心理學的理論與原理（頁371-393）。高雄市：麗文。
洪緹芸（2004）。台灣地區民眾的個人主義、家族主義與集體主義價值取向及其變遷。南華大學教育社會學研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
翁慧娟（1994）。個人取向、集體取向與心理健康的關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
高淑貴（1991）。家庭社會學。臺北市：黎明。
張春興（1999）。教育心理學。臺北市：東華。
教育部統計處（2010）。縣市別學生數。臺北市：教育部。
陳秉璋、陳信木（1990）。價值社會學。臺北市：桂冠。
陳芳茹、柯澍馨（1999）。中國傳統家庭觀念在代間差異之研究。生活科學學報，5，75-90。
彭懷真（1996）。婚姻與家庭。臺北市：巨流。
黃月美（1995）。單親兒童生活適應相關因素及團體輔導效果之研究。國立屏東師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
黃光國（1995）。知識與行動：中華文化傳統的社會心理學詮釋。臺北市：心理。
黃光國（1997）。儒家價值觀的現代轉化：理論分析與實徵研究。本土心理學研究，3，276-338。
黃拓榮（1997）：國中生父母管教方式、自我概念、失敗容忍力與偏差行為關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
黃迺毓（1995）。家庭類型。載於黃迺毓、黃馨慧、蘇雪玉、唐先梅、李淑娟，家庭概論。臺北市：國立空中大學。
黃琴雅（1992）。不同產序子女之生活適應、學業成就及對父母管教態度知覺差異之比較研究。中國文化大學家政學研究所，未出版，臺北市。
楊知勇（2000）。家族主義與中國文化。昆明：雲南大學出版社。
楊國樞（1981）。中國人的性格與行為：形成及蛻變。中華心理學刊，23（1），39-55。
楊國樞（1982）。心理學研究的中國化：層次與方向。刊於楊國樞、文崇一主編，社會及行為科學研究的中國化。臺北市：南港。
楊國樞（1993a）。中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點。刊於中國人的心理與行為：理念與方法篇（一九九二），楊國樞、余安邦主編 ，頁87-142。臺北市：桂冠。
楊國樞（1993b）。中國人的價值觀─社會科學觀點。臺北市：桂冠。
楊國樞、葉明華（2005）。家族主義與泛家族主義。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳，華人本土心理學（上）（頁249-292）。臺北市：遠流。
楊懋春（1988）。中國人的家族主義與國民性格。載於李亦園、楊國樞（主編），中國人的性格。臺北市：桂冠。
葉光輝、楊國樞（2008）。中國人的孝道：心理學的分析。臺北市 : 臺大出版中心。
葉明華、楊國樞（1997）。中國人的家族主義：概念分析與實徵研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，83，169-225。
齊力（2003）。個人主義、集體主義與家族主義：三角關係的概念格局。市師學報，2，115-145。
蔡勇美、伊慶春（1997）。中國家庭價值觀的持續與改變：台灣的例子。載於張苙雲、呂玉瑕、王甫昌主編，九○年代的台灣社會：社會變遷基本調查研究系列二。臺北市：中央研究院社會學研究所。
戴靜文（2002）。青少年不同背景變項、依附風格、知覺父母婚姻衝突與婚姻態度之相關研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義市。
謝秀芬（1997）。現代婦女的家庭價值觀與家庭期待之研究。東吳社會工作學報，3，1-46。

英文部分
Chao, R., & Tseng, V. (2002). Parenting of Asians. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed). Handbook of parenting: Vol. 4 Social conditions and applied parenting (2nd ed., pp. 59-93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coatsworth, P., McBride, B., & Kurtines, S. (2000). Eco developmental correlates of behavior problems in young Hispanic adolescents. Applied Development Science, 6, 126–146.
Colon, R. (1998). Causal relationships of familial influence and adolescents`s attitude toward substance use in the theory of planned behavior: A social impact model. Dissertation Abstract,59(5-B), 2382.
Coohey, C. (2001). The relationship between familism and child maltreatment in Latino and Anglo families. Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, 6(2), 130–142.
Cooper, C. R., Baker, H., Polichar, D., & Welsh, M. (1993). Values and communication of Chinese, European, Filipino, Mexican, and Vietnamese American adolescents with their families and friends. In S. Shulman & W. A. Collins (Eds.), The role of fathers in adolescent development: New Directions in Child Development (pp. 73–89). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Demo, D. H., & Acock, A. C. (1988). The impact of divorce on children. Journal of marriage and family, 50(3), 619-648.
Fuligni, A. J., Yip, T., & Tseng, V. (2002). The impact of family obligationon the daily behavior and psychological well-being of Chinese American dolescents. Child Development, 73, 306–318.
Gaines, O. S., Marelich, D. W., Bledsoe, L.K., Steers, W.N., Henderson, C. M., Granrose, S.C., Barájas, L., Hicks, D., Lyde, M., Takahashi, Y., Yum, N., Ríos, I. D. & Garcia, F. B. (1997). Links Between Race/Ethnicity and Cultural Values as Mediated by Racial/Ethnic Identity and Moderated by Gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (6), 1460-1476.
Gil, A. G., Vega, W. A., & Dimas, J. (1994). Acculturative stress and personal adjustment among Hispanic adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 43–54.
Gil, A., Wagner, E., & Vega, W. (2000). Acculturation, familism and alcohol use among Latino adolescent males: Longitudinal relations. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 443-458.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Hardway, C. & Fuligni, A. J. (2006). Dimensions of family connectedness among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1246-1258.
Ho, D. (1996). Filial piety and its psychological consequences. In M. H. Bond (Ed), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp.155-165). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequence: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hurlock, E. B. (1974). Adolescent development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kim, U. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In U. Kim, H. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.) Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (pp19-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Klein, K., Forehand, R., Armistead, L., & Long, P. (1997). Delinquency during the transition to early adulthood：Family parenting predictors from early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,32(125)﹐61-80.
Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, P. W. (1970). Determing sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Lu, L. (2009). “I or we” Family socialization values in a national probability sample in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 145-150.
Lu, L., Gilmour, R. & Kao, S. F. (2001). Culture values and happiness: An east-west dialogue. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 477-493.
Lugo Steidel, A. G., & Contreras, J. M. (2003). A new familism scale for use with Latino populations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 25, 312-330.
Marsiglia, F. F., Parsai, M., & Kulis, S. (2009). Effects of familism and family cohesion on problem behaviors among adolescents in Mexican immigrant families in the southwest U.S. Journal of Ethnicity and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 18(3), 203-220.
Marsiglia, F. F., Miles, B. W., Dustman, P., Sills, S. (2002). Ties that protect: An ecological perspective on Latino/a urban pre-adolescent drug use. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 11, 191-220.
Mishra, R. C. (1994). Individualist and collectivist orientation across generations. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitçibasi, S-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism. Theory, method, and applications (pp. 225-238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Negy, C., & Woods, D. J. (1992). The importance of acculturation in understanding research with Hispanic Americans. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 14, 224-247.
Ovadia S. (2001). Race, class, and gender differences in high school seniors’ values: Applying intersection theory in empirical analysis. Social Science Quarterly, 82 (2), 340-357.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72.
Ponzetti, J. J. (2003). International encyclopedia of marriage and family. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The store of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ramirez, J. R., Crano, W. D., Quist, R., Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E. M., & Grandpre, J. (2004). Acculturation, familism, parental monitoring, and knowledge as predictors of marijuana and inhalant use in adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 3–11.
Romero, A. J., & Ruiz, M. (2007). Does familism lead to increased parental monitoring protective factors for coping with risky behaviors. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 143-154.
Romero, A. J., Robinson, T. N., Haydel, K. F., Mendoza, F., & Killen, J. (2004). Associations among familism, language preference, and education in Mexican-American mothers and their children. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 25(1), 34-40.
Schwartz, S. J., Montgomery, M. J., & Briones, E. (2006). The role of identity in acculturation among immigrant people: Theoretical propositions, empirical questions, and applied recommendations. Human Development, 49, 1-30.
Staples, R., & Mirande, A. (1980). Racial and cultural variations among American families: A decennial review of the literature on minority families, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42,887-992.
Steinberg, L. & Silk, J. S. (2002). Parenting adolescents. In M. H. Bmstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 1. Children and parenting (2nd ed., pp.103-133). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Steinberg, L., & Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841-851.
Umaña-Taylor, A., Alfaro, E., Bamaca, M., & Guimond, A. (2009). The central role of familial ethnic socialization in Latino adolescents' cultural orientation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 46-60.
Yang, K. S. (1981). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan: Further empirical evidence. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 159-170
Yeh, K. H., & Bedford, O. (2003). A test of the dual filial piety model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 215-228.