簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 丁向文
Ting, Hsiang-Wen
論文名稱: 煉鋼產業綠色環境轉型策略之研究:以L個案公司為例
The Research on the Green Environment Transformation Strategy of Steelmaking Industry:Taking L Case Company as an Example
指導教授: 洪聰敏
Hung, Tsung-Min
口試委員: 洪聰敏
Hung, Tsung-Min
張育愷
Chang, Yu-Kai
洪巧菱
Hung, Chiao-Ling
口試日期: 2024/07/23
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 樂活產業高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班
Executive Master of Business Administration Program in Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 38
中文關鍵詞: 煉鋼產業綠色環境綠色轉型策略綠色治理轉型效果
英文關鍵詞: steelmaking industry, green environment, green transformation strategy, green governance, transformation effect
研究方法: 個案研究法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401917
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:125下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,隨著國內外煉鋼市場環境的持續惡化,國內煉鋼業面臨了越來越嚴酷的挑戰,如何促進煉鋼業的轉型升級,實現永續發展,是國內煉鋼製造業亟待解決的問題。"創新、協調、綠色、開放、共享"五大發展理念,可以保障國內煉鋼產業綠色環境的轉型。隨著環境問題的日益嚴重,人與自然的關係成為人類社會目前所面臨的最為重要的議題之一。單一主軸的綠色行動對環境治理問題的功能有限,綠色治理為一種新的治理觀念被提出來。綠色治理強調多元治理主軸的協同功能,而企業為綠色治理最為關鍵的行動者。煉鋼產業是經濟最為重要的基礎產業之一,同時也是高污染、高能源消耗的產業。近年來,煉鋼產業對能源消耗的比重有所降低,污染物排放量也得到控制,煉鋼產業的綠色治理已經取得明顯的效果。L個案煉鋼公司始建於民國六十五年,經過多年發展,現在已經發展成為電爐煉鋼、煉鐵、鑄造、鋼胚、軋鋼、鋼筋、屋頂型太陽光電系統、及其它煉鋼材料為一爐的煉鋼聯合企業。受到政府煉鋼產業結構的調整和國內經濟增速放緩的影響,產業的併購重組,使得競爭更加激烈,企業發展的壓力日益增大。本研究基於綠色環境治理的理念,選取L個案公司作為研究對象,分析公司綠色環境治理的整體流程以及在綠色環境治理過程之中可能會存在的問題。本研究從L個案公司綠色制度設計、製造工程專案、綠色技術創新三大構面,歸納L個案公司做綠色環境治理的措施,探討L個案公司綠色環境治理的發展過程之中可能出現的難題,並提出建議。本研究分析L個案公司綠色轉型的原因、綠色轉型的策略以及綠色轉型的效果。本研究從企業產業鏈更新、企業技術研發、節能環保投入這三方面著手,分析L個案公司進行綠色轉型的策略。並且從L個案公司製造的經營情況、L個案公司市場價值的表現以及L個案公司環保情況著手分析L個案公司綠色轉型的效果,並得出結論。L個案公司自從投入環保產業、開展環保業務開始綠色轉型以來,企業的各項指標證實,無論是在盈利能力方面、發展能力方面還是污染物排放情況方面都得到了好轉,呈現出L個案公司綠色轉型具有明顯的效果。

    In the recent years, with the continuous deterioration of the steelmaking market environment at home and abroad, the domestic steelmaking industry is facing more and more severe challenges. How to promote the transformation and upgrading the steelmaking industry and achieve sustainable development is an urgent problem for the domestic steelmaking industry. The five development concepts of "innovation, coordination, green, openness, and sharing" can guarantee the transformation of the green environment of the domestic steelmaking industry. With the increasingly serious environmental problems, the relationship between human and nature has become one of the most important issues in facing the human society. Green actions with a single axis have limited functions on environmental governance issues, and green governance has been proposed as a new governance concept. Green governance emphasizes the collaborative function of multiple governance axes, and enterprises are the most critical actors in green governance. The steelmaking industry is one of the most important basic industries in the economy, and it is also an industry with high pollution and high energy consumption. In the recent years, the proportion of energy consumption in the steelmaking industry has been reduced, and the discharge of pollutants has also been controlled. The green governance of the steelmaking industry has achieved obvious results. L case steelmaking company was founded in the 1976. After years of development, it has developed into a collection of steel billets, electric furnace steel making, ironmaking, steelmaking, casting, steel rolling, steel bars, roof-type solar photovoltaic systems, and other steelmaking now. The steel material is a steelmaking joint enterprise with one furnace. Affected by the adjustment of the government's steelmaking industry structure and the slowdown of domestic economic growth, the industry's mergers and acquisitions have made competition more intense and the pressure on enterprise development is increasing.Based on the concept of green environmental governance, this study selects the L case company as the research object to analyze the overall process of the company's green environmental governance and possible problems in the process of green environmental governance. This research summarizes the green environmental governance measures of the L case company from the three aspects of the L case company’s green system design, manufacturing engineering project, and green technology innovation, and discusses the possible problems that may arise in the development process of the L case company’s green environment governance. and make suggestions.This study analyzes the reasons for the green transformation of L case company, the strategy of green transformation and the effect of green transformation. This study starts from the three aspects of the enterprise industrial chain renewal, enterprise technology research and development, and the investment in the energy conservation and environmental protection, and analyzes the green transformation strategy of L case company. And start to analyze the effect of the green transformation of the L case company from the operating conditions of the L case company, the performance of the market value of the L case company, and the environmental protection situation of the L case company, and draw a conclusion. Since case company L has invested in the environmental protection industry and carried out environmental protection business and started its green transformation, various indicators of the company have confirmed that it has improved in terms of profitability, development ability and pollutant discharge, showing that the case company of case L is green. The transformation has obvious effects.

    第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究目的 3 第貳章、文獻探討 6 第一節 煉鋼業的製造流程 6 第二節 國外的相關研究 7 第三節 策略轉型理論 10 第四節 煉鋼產業綠色環境治理之研究 11 第五節 企業綠色治理效果評價的研究 11 第六節 文獻評論 12 第參章 研究方法 13 第一節 研究流程 13 第二節 文獻探討法 13 第三節 個案分析法 14 第肆章 研究結果與討論 16 第一節 企業發展策略 16 第二節 L個案公司綠色轉型的原因 16 第三節 L個案公司綠色轉型的策略 17 第四節 L個案公司綠色治理的措施 19 第五節 L個案公司綠色轉型的效果 22 第六節 L個案公司綠色治理效果的評價 24 第七節 L個案公司綠色治理未來發展的難點 25 第伍章 結論與建議 27 第一節 結論 27 第二節 建議 28 第三節 未來研究的建議 34 參考文獻 35 一 中文文獻 35 二 英文文獻 36

    王新東、田京雷、宋程遠(2018)。大型鋼鐵企業綠色製造創新實踐與展望,鋼鐵,53(02):1-9。
    王燕、王煦、趙淩雲(2016)。鋼鐵企業環境績效評價指標體系研究:基於生態文明的視角,生態經濟,32(10):46-50。
    何楓、祝麗雲、馬棟棟、薑維(2015)。中國鋼鐵企業綠色技術效率研究,中國工業經濟,(07): 84-98。
    汪濤、王銨(2014)。中國鋼鐵企業商業模式綠色轉型探析,管理全球,(10): 180-181。
    李健、劉帥(2019)。鋼鐵產業綠色經濟效益測評:以寶鋼為例,軟科學, 33(07): 94-98。
    李曉萍、張億軍、江飛濤(2019)。綠色產業政策:理論演進與中國實踐,財經研究,45(08): 4-27。
    李維安、徐建、薑廣省(2017)。綠色治理準則:實現人與自然的包容性發展, 南開管理評論,20(05) 23-28。
    李維安、張耀偉、鄭敏娜、李曉琳、崔光耀、李惠(2019)。中國上市公司綠色治理及其評價研究,管理世界,35(05): 126-133,160。
    李維安(2016)。綠色治理:超越國別的治理觀,南開管理評論,19(06):1。
    李靜、倪冬雪(2015)。中國工業綠色製造與治理效率研究:基於兩階段SBM網路模型和全域Malmquist方法,產業經濟研究,(03):42-53。
    李健, 汪濤, 王燕, & 何楓. (2019). 煉鋼產業綠色經濟效益的研究. 《經濟研究》,48(2),234-256。
    武春友、郭玲玲、於驚濤(2017)。基於TOPSIS-灰色關聯分析的區域綠色增長系統評價模型及實證,管理評論,29(01):228-239。
    陳超凡(2016)。中國工業綠色全要素製造率及其影響因素:基於ML製造率指數及動態面板模型的實證研究,統計研究,33(03):53-62。
    劉耀彬、袁華錫、王喆(2017)。文化產業集聚對綠色經濟效率的影響:基於動態面板模型的實證分析,資源科學,39(04):747-755。
    Altenburg T, Rodrik D. (2017). Green industrial policy: Accelerating structural change towards wealthy green economies. Proceedings of green industrial policy. concept, policies, country experiences. 1-22
    Bhattacharyya, A., & Cummings, L. (2015). Measuring corporate environmental performance–stakeholder engagement evaluation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(5), 309-325.
    BureauS. (2017).INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC GEOCONFERENCE SGEM.
    Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management journal, 43(4), 663-680.
    Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, organizations and society, 33(4-5), 303-327.
    Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.69-110
    Dieng, B., & Pesqueux, Y. (2017). On'green governance'. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 20(1-2), 111-123.
    Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of management review, 20(4), 986-1014.
    Hasanbeigi, A., Morrow, W., Sathaye, J., Masanet, E., & Xu, T. (2013). A bottom-up model to estimate the energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials in the Chinese iron and steel industry. Energy, 50, 315-325.
    Hypothesis, P., Lanoie, P., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2007). Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Economics&Management Strategy, ,20(3):803-842.
    Ilinitch, A. Y., Soderstrom, N. S., & Thomas, T. E. (1998). Measuring corporate environmental performance. Journal of accounting and public policy, 17(4-5), 383-408.
    Kong, T., Feng, T., & Ye, C. (2016). Advanced manufacturing technologies and green innovation: The role of internal environmental collaboration. Sustainability, 8(10), 1056.
    Majernik, M. (2015). Sustainable manufacturing and green growth strategies: Development trends in the global steel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 16-22.
    Mousa, E., Wang, C., Riesbeck, J., & Larsson, M. (2016). Biomass applications in iron and steel industry: An overview of challenges and opportunities. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 65, 1247-1266.
    Pang, Y., Hu, L., & Li, H. (2011). Construction and evaluation of environment-friendly green supply chain in steel and iron manufacturing industry. Management & Engineering, 2, 1838-5745.
    Pardo, N., & Moya, J. A. (2013). Prospective scenarios on energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the European Iron & Steel industry. Energy, 54, 113-128.
    Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & society, 50(1), 189-223.
    Quader, M. A. (2015). Development of waste heat recovery and carbon capture and storage technologies in the iron and steel industry: A comprehensive overview. Energy, 89, 546-557.
    Quader, M. A., Ahmed, S., Dawal, S. Z., & Nukman, Y. (2016). Present needs, recent progress and future trends of energy-efficient Ultra-Low Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Steelmaking (ULCOS) program. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 537-549.
    Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management journal, 43(4), 681-697.
    Sonter, L. J., Barrett, D. J., Moran, C. J., & Soares-Filho, B. S. (2015). Carbon emissions due to deforestation for the production of charcoal used in Brazil’s steel industry. Nature Climate Change, 5(4), 359-363.
    Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford press.
    Zeng, S. X., Xu, X. D., Yin, H. T., & Tam, C. M. (2012). Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 309-321.
    World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.1-300
    World Commission on Environment and Development (1992). Declaration of Rio on Environment and Development 1-4
    World Commission on Environment and Development (2002). United Nations Millennium Declaration.1-4
    Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.25-80

    下載圖示
    QR CODE