本研究主要目的在於探討國中補救教學學生與一般學生在知識信念、學習動機、行動控制與學習策略之比較研究。以桃園縣18所國中於102年度第四期有辦理補救教學的七、八、九年級的學生為研究參與者，分別為補救教學學生300位，一般學生311位為樣本。以問卷量表來測量國中生的知識信念、學習動機、行動控制及學習策略，以獨立樣本t檢定了解在補救教學學生與一般學生在這四個變項上的顯著差異情形，進而以結構方程模式來分析四者間的影響情形。
主要研究結果如下：補救教學學生和一般學生在十五個量表中，除了在學習動機中的態度、興趣量表及行為控制中的情意控制、情境控制等四個量表沒有顯著差異外，其餘的十一個量表，都有顯著差異。在結構模式的影響徑路上，則兩組學生的模式相同─知識信念會透過學習動機及行動策略來影響學習策略。最後，依據研究結果而提出相關的實務應用及建議。

The purpose of this research is to compare the differences between junior high school remedial and normal students in epistemological beliefs, academic motivation, action control, and learning strategies. The research participants in this study were the seventh, eighth, and ninth graders of the eighteen junior high schools in Taoyuan. 311 of the subjects were normal students and 300 attended the fourth section remedial courses in 2014. The questionnaires and scales were conducted to examine junior high school students’ epistemological beliefs, academic motivation, action control, and learning strategies. The independent-sample t-test was used to present the significant differences between remedial and normal students in these four variables in order to analyze the influences among the four variables by using structural equation modeling.
Results of this study showed that there was no significant difference between remedial and normal students’ attitudes and interests of academic motivation, affective and situational control of action control among the scales. Meanwhile, the significant difference existed in the other eleven scales. The influential paths of structural modeling of the two groups are similar ─ Epistemological beliefs may influence their learning strategies through academic motivation and action control. Finally, according to the research results, the related applications and suggestions are provided.

中文部分
王文科（1989）。教育心理學。台北：五南出版社。
行政院教育改革審議委員會（1996）。教育改革總諮議報告書。取自中央研究院網站：http://www.sinica.edu.tw/info/edu-reform/farea2/，2014年3月27日。
邱上真（1990）。學習策略教學的理論與實際。特殊教育復健學報，1，1-49
杜正治（1993）。補救教學的實施，學習輔導：學習心理學的應用。台北市：心理。
吳知賢（1990）。學習動機的研究— 成就動機、制制信念、 習得無助、歸因理論的文獻探討。國立台南師範學院初教育學報，3，277-326。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2006）。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北：五南出版社。
何旻穎（2011）。國小六年級學童科學學習動機、學習策略與學業成就之相關研究。國立屏東教育大學數理教育學系碩士論文。
林芳瑛（2013）。自我調整學習課程對國小中年級學童學習動機及學習自我效能之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
林紀慧（2001a）。國小學童知識信念的發展以及與學業成績知相關研究。台中師院學報，15，191-206。
林紀慧（2001）。知識學習信念與不同電腦繪圖型態的國小電腦數學學習成效研究。新竹師院學報，14 ，69-85 。
林清山、張春興（1988）。教育心理學。台北：東華。
胡金枝（1994）。國小資優生的學習動機、批判思考與其國語科學業成就之關係。國立台中師範學院初等教育學系碩士論文。
洪寶蓮（1990）。大學生學習與讀書策略量表之修訂及調查研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文。
涂金堂（1999）。後設認知理論之介紹。菁莪季刊，9（4），36-48。
唐淑華（2000）。以讀書之寮挑戰低成就學生知識信念的實驗研究。國立彰化師範
大學輔導學系碩士論文。
陳長春（1992）。加強補救教學的意義 。中縣文教，13，17-180。
陳萩卿（2004）。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證暨「調整知識信念的教學策略」對國中生學習歷程影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文。
程炳林（1991）。國民中小學生激勵的學習策略之相關研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文。
程炳林（1995）。自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文。
程炳林、林清山（2002）：學習歷程前決策與後決策階段中行動控制的中介角色。教育心理學報，34（1），43-60 。
教育部國語推行委員會（1994）。重編國語辭典修訂本。取自教育部終身教育司網站：http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/，103年4月1日。
郭宜君（1995）。嘉義市成人學習策略及其相關因素之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育學系碩士論文。
張春興（1988）。知之歷程與教之歷程：認知心理學的發展及其在教育上的應用。國立台灣師範大學教育心理學報，21，17-38。
張春興 （1996）。教育心理學。台北市：東華。
張景媛（1992）。自我調整、動機信念、選題策略與作業表現關係的研究暨自我調整訓練課程效果之評估。師大教育心理學報，25，201-243。
張基軍（2009）。小組討論式補救教學與傳統式補救教學差異之研究。高雄師範大學碩士論文。
張新仁（2001）。 實施補救教學之課程與教學設計。教育學刊，17，85-106。
張新仁（1989）。學習策略訓練之初探。教育文粹，18，86-94。
張新仁（2000）。補救教學面面觀。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育中心主辦「義務教
階段補救教學系統研究與實務研討會」發表之論文（高雄）。
張新仁、邱上真、李素慧 （2000）國中英語科學習困難學生之補救教學成效研究。國立高雄師範大學教育系主辦之「新世紀中小學課程改革與創新教學學術研討會」發表之論文〈高雄〉。
黃文鳳（2013）。知識信念影響學習動機與行為之研究－以臺北市高中職學生為例。玄奘大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
黃淑娟（2002）。原住民國中生的學習動機、學習策略與學業成就關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育教育研究所碩士論文。
楊淑晴（1991）。高中學生英文學習策略、學習類型與英文性向之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
劉佩雲（1998）。兒童自我調整學習之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文。
劉安倫（2004）。喚起弱勢學生學習之門─談低成就學生之補救教學。竹縣文教，29，48-51。
劉政宏、張景媛、許鼎延、張瓊文（2005）國小學生學習動機成分之分析及其對學習行為之影響。師大教育心理學報，37（2），173-196。
劉信雄（1992）。國小學生認知風格、學習策略、自我效能、與學業成就關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文。
鄭昭明（1987）。認知心理學。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
鄭勝耀（2009）。國小弱勢學童與課後輔導計畫轉變歷程之研究。國家教育研究院籌備處主辦「培養高素質現代國术與世界公术之教育規劃學術研討會」發表之論文（台中）。
蔡瓊華（2005）。高中學生知識信念、學習風格與學業成就之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
魏麗敏（1995）。後設認知學習理論與策略。學生輔導，38，52-61。
魏麗敏（1996）。影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文。
西文部分
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. NJ: Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
Bryson, M. (1993). School-based epistemologies: Exploring conceptions of how, what, and why student know. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 299-313.
Brophy, J. (1987). On motivating students. In D. Berliner & Rosenshine (eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 201-208). NY: Random House.
Buehl, M. M. & Alexander, P. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences among domain-specific epistemological belief clusters. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 697-726.
Cavallo, A. M. L., Rozman, M., Blickenstaff, J., & Walker, N. (2003). Learning, reasoning, motivation, and epistemological beliefs: Differing approaches in college science courses. Journal of college Science Teaching,33(3),18-23.
Corno, L.(1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 83-110). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Corno,L.(1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 14-22.
Corno,L.(1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influences, and practices. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and education applications (pp. 229-251). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd pp. 191-225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
82
Corno, L. (2004). Introduction to the special issue work habits and work styles: Volition in education. Teachers College Record, 106, 1669-1695.
Dweck, C. S., Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology.(Vol.4, pp. 643-691). New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
Dweck, C.S., Leggett, E.L.(1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Meta memory and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. in W. Patrick Dickson. (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills.(pp. 35-60). New York : Academic Press.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18,39-50.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wily.
Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal Epistemology as a Psychological and Education Construct: An Introduction. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 3-14). MAHWAH, nj: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hofer, B. K. (2004). Introduction: paradigmatic approaches to personal epistemoligy. Educational Psychologist,39,1-3.
Kardash, C. M., & Howell, K. L.(2000). Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-special beliefs on undergraduates’ cognitive and strtegic processing of dual-positional text. Journal of Educational Psychology,92,524-535.
83
Kardash, C. M., ＆ Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Epistemological beliefs and dispositions: Are we measuring the same construct ? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No, ED479164)
Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 101-128). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Kuhl, J. (1987). Action control: The maintenance of motivational states. In F. Halisch & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention, and volition (pp. 279-291). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Kuhl, J., & Kraska, K. (1989). Self-regulation and meta motivation: Computational mechanism, development, and assessment. In R. Kanfer, P. L. Ackerman & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Abilities, motivation, and methodology (pp. 32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S.(2002). The Reflective Judgment Model: Twenty years. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing(pp. 3-14). MAHWAH, nj: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mayer, R. E.(1987). Educational psychology:A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Meyer, W. U. (1987). Perceived ability and achievement-related behavior. In F. Hlisch & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention, and volition (pp. 73-86). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Oxford, R,L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House/Harper & Row.
Paris, S.G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K.K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader
84
contemporary. Educational Psychology, 8,293-316.
Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (1999). Student motivation and epistemological beliefs. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 78, 17-25.
Perry, W. G.J. (1970). Forms intellectual and ethical development in the college years: a scheme, Holt, NY: Rienhart & Winston.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. & McKeachie, W. J. (1989). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Michigan: National Center for research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning (NCRIPTAL). School of Education, The University Michigan.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Merrill.
Rotter,J.B.(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external Control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 609.
Schoenfeld, A. H.(1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic.
Schommer,M.(1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology,82,498-504.
Schommer,M.(1994).Synthesizing epistemological beliefs research: Tentative understangings and provocative confusions.Educational Psychology Review,
6,293-319.
Schommer-Aikins, M.(2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system.In B.K.Hofer & P.R.Pintrich (Eds),Personal epistemology:The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103-118). MAHWAH, nj: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85
Schommer-Aikins,M.(2004).Explanining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist,39,19-29.
Schommer, M.,Crouse, A.,&Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Beliving it is simple does not make it so. Educational Psychologist,384,435-443.
Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G, & Bajaj, A.(1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology,89,37-40.
Schommer, M., & Walker, K.(1995). Are epistemological beliefs similar scross domains Journal of Educational Psychology,87,424-432.
Schommer, M., & Dunnell, P. A. (1997). Epistemological beliefs of gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 19(3), 153-156.
Stipek, D. J. (1993). Motivation to learn : form theory to practice. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
Thomas, J. W., & Rohwer, J. W. (1986). Academic studying: The role of learning strategies. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 19-41.
Weiner, B.(1979).A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3-25.
Mayer, R. E. (2009).Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press.
Weiner, B.(1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
Weinstein, C. E.,& Mayer, R. E.(1986).The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 305-327) New York: Macmillian.
86
Zimmerman, B.J. & Martinez, P. M.(1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (3), 51-59.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845-862.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-pons, M. (1990). Students differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology,80(3), 284-290.