人們對名人的關注早已成為生活習慣之一，社群媒體的盛行使得大眾對名 人的討論能更加熱絡，甚至影響名人的生活及演藝生涯。近年，「取消文化」 (cancel culture)一詞成為網路流行詞彙用語，其意義為對不當言論或是違反社 會道德行為之公眾人物、名人等，利用社群媒體發起抵制與網路羞辱等行為， 達到取消之目的。取消的發生是透由大眾的言論構成的取消行動，經過主流媒 體再次建構取消事件，將議題的影響力擴大延伸，獲得更多人對此公眾人物及 名人劣跡行為之關注。因此，取消現象開始引發名人及各界人士，探討其存在 之利弊。本研究聚焦於 2020 年至 2021 年娛樂圈取消名人的相關新聞事件，以 臉書新聞粉絲專頁作為分析場域分析貼文及留言，利用 van Dijk 的論述分析， 探討社群媒體貼文對取消文化事件與人物的建構、留言者對取消行為的認知與 想像，以及留言論述背後濳藏的社會意義與意識型態。
本研究發現，社群媒體編輯掌握著對取消事件中，角色形象及事件樣貌的建構，貼文中則透過論述對話呈現社群成員的意識型態與社會現象。透過論述分析貼文及留言論述後，得出三個研究結論:(一)社群編輯能為取消事件注入的人物形象、話題性與偏見;(二)被取消者與受害者身分能根據人物原本形象，以及事件發展導致角色對調，且能由取消行為論述透露出社群成員的集體意識;(三)台灣存在兩項社會現象:第一，女性群體為弱勢群體，第二，台灣人對他者團體擁有高標準的道德觀意識型態。

People's interest in celebrities has long been a habit of life. Social media has made people to discuss celebrities more enthusiastically and even influence their lives and careers. In recent years, the term “cancel culture” has become a popular term on the Internet, defined as the use of social media to boycott and shame public figures and celebrities for inappropriate speech or socially immoral behavior. The cancel happens through the cancellation actions constituted by the public's opinions. The mainstream media reconstructs the cancel event, extending the influence of the issue and gaining more people's attention to the bad behavior of public figures and celebrities. Therefore, people start to explore the phenomenon of cancellation, and to attract celebrities and people from all walks of life to explore the pros and cons of its existence. This study focuses on the cancel news events related to the entertainment industry from 2020 to 2021. The Facebook news fan page was used as the analysis field to analyze the posts and comments, and van Dijk's discourse was used to explore the social media posts and comment user' construction of events and figures, and the social meanings and ideological patterns behind the message discourse.
This study found that social media editors are in control of the construction of characters and events in canceling events, while posts present the ideologies and social phenomena of community members through discursive dialogue. After analyzing the posts and comments discourses, three conclusions were drawn from the study: (1) Community editors can inject character imagery, topicality and bias into cancellation events; (2) The identity of the cancelled person and the victim can be switched according to the original image of the character and the development of the event, and the discourse of cancelling behavior can reveal the collective consciousness of the community members; (3) There are two social phenomena in Taiwan: first, the female group is a vulnerable group; second, Taiwanese have high moral and ideological standards for others group.

參考文獻
田暐瑋(2021 年 8 月 16 日)。葛仲珊去哪了?挺范范被圍譙消失 2 年現況曝光 認「過得很黑暗」。ETtoday 新聞雲。2021 年 8 月 16 日，取自: https://star.ettoday.net/news/2056705?from=fb_et_star&fbclid=IwAR16q-fv- 7O_KFRILILMuK6IGJP6BXBseclwZm00WccaDiHMwTZrBarWx28
吳姮憓、羅偉峰(2014)。「按讚、留言或分享」-探究影響臉書訊息反 應行 為意圖之前置因素。 行銷評論，11(2)，107-131.
吳修銘(2018)。注意力商人:他們如何操弄人心?揭密媒體、廣告、群眾的 角力戰。台北市:天下雜誌。
周應龍、魏楚陽(2018)。 高正義期待與低政治參與:從 Otfried Höffe 的正義 理論觀察臺灣的社會正義問題。民主與治理，5(2)，37-64。
東森新聞(民 109 年 7 月 11 日)。取消文化是什麼:你要知道的一個網絡新 詞。東森新聞。民 109 年 7 月 11 日，取自: https://news.ebc.net.tw/news/living/217889s
林永翰(2018)。新聞自由與司法獨立之衝突-以犯罪新聞報導之媒體公審現象 為核心。國立政治大學法律學系碩士論文，臺北市。取自臺灣博碩士論文 系統。
林奇秀(2011)。人肉搜索初探。圖書與資訊學刊，79，31-47。 林東泰(2019)。批判話語分析總論:理論架構、研究設計與實例解析。高雄
市:巨流。
林芳玫(1996)。《女性與媒體再現》。台北市:巨流圖書。
林淑芳(2018)。 社群媒體與政治公民參與:網路政治討論頻率與政治討論異 質性的中介角色。傳播與社會學刊，44， 25-48。
倪炎元 (2003)。《再現的政治:臺灣報紙對他者的論述分析》。 台北市: 韋 伯。
倪炎元 (2018)。《論述研究與傳播議題分析》。 台北市:五南。
倪炎元(2011)。 批判論述分析的脈絡建構策略: Teun A. van Dijk 與 Norman Fairclough 的比較。 傳播研究與實踐，1(2)， 83-97。
翁秀琪(2015)。《大眾傳播理論與實證》。台北:三民。 袁光鋒(2020)。「私人」話語如何成為公共議題?共情，再構與「底層」表
達。傳播與社會學刊，54，193-221。 崔凱(2020)。破圈:粉絲群體愛國主義網路行動的擴散歷程:基於對新浪微
博「飯圈女孩出征」的探討。國際新聞界，42，26-49。
張可婷譯(2010)。《對話、論述研究法與文件分析》。台北:韋伯。(原書: Rapley T. [2010]. Doing Conversation Discourse and Document Analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd. )
張劍(2011)。他者。外國文學，1，118。
張錦華(2011)。 從 van Dijk 操控論述觀點分析中國大陸省市採購團的新聞置
入及報導框架:以台灣四家報紙為例。中華傳播學刊，20， 65-93。
許國賢(2017)。民主社會裡的個人與他者。 行政暨政策學報，64，1-35。
郭奇、姚亞楠(2013)。 新聞報導 「標籤化」 現象探析。 中州大學學報， 30(4)，51-53。
陳良瑋、周保男(2015)。網路社群發言文化分析之個案研究。教育學誌， 34，53-79.
陳俊亦(2020)。演藝人員形象修護與社群媒體運用策略研究:以白百何事件 為例。世新大學口語傳播學系碩士論文，臺北市。取自臺灣博碩士論文系 統。
陳婉琪、張恒豪、黃樹仁(2016)。網絡社會運動時代的來臨?太陽花運動參 與者的人際連帶與社群媒體因素初探。 人文及社會科學集刊，28(4)，467- 501。
陳發昀(2020)。 社群媒體仇恨言論之研究-以同性婚姻為例。中華印刷科技年 報，227-234。
陳靜君、陶振超(2018)。 偏見同化效果:網路新聞不文明留言對態度極化的 影響。中華傳播學刊，33，137-179。
曾武清(2004)。 虛擬社群的集體記憶與儀式傳播: 一個關於 「龍魂不滅」 的初探性研究。資訊社會研究，6，199-234。
曾武清(2004)。虛擬社群的集體記憶與儀式傳播:一個關於「龍魂不滅」的 初探性研究。
童鈴雅(民 109 年 4 月 27 日)。鄧惠文「逆風發文」被砲轟到關臉書!國師唐 綺陽嘆:「一言不合就出征」才可怕。風傳媒。民 109 年 4 月 27 日，取 自:https://www.storm.mg/lifestyle/2571621
黃厚銘(2010)。 社會學中功能分析的目的論與循環論證問題。台灣社會研究 季刊，80， 237-286。
黃盈盈(2012)。名人劈腿新聞中的女性再現。國立臺灣大學社會科學院新聞 研究所碩士論文，臺北市。取自華藝線上圖書館。
黃斯佳(2019)。新媒體浪潮下的名人化 - 以 Facebook 及 YouTube 的網路名人 個案為例。中山大學行銷傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
黃靖惠(2011)。對美國《時代》台灣政黨輪替報導的批判論述分析:以 2000 年及 2008 年總統選舉為例。新聞學研究，106，49-98。
黃學碩(2018)。 2008 年總統大選前後報紙對周美青報導的論述分析:成員類 屬分析的觀點。新聞學研究，136， 135-184.
楊意菁(2008)。 網路民意的公共意涵:公衆、公共領域與溝通審議。中華傳 播學刊，14，115-167。
葉德蘭(2016)。良言傷人，六月亦寒:台灣反對同性婚姻網路言論探析。考 古人類學刊，86，69-110。
劉昌德(2020)。 小編新聞學:社群媒體與通訊軟體如何轉化新聞專業。 新聞 學研究，142，1-58。
劉慧雯 (2020)。從新聞到粉絲團:社群小編重構公共話語現象的初探研究。 傳播與社會學刊，54， 161-192。
蔡華儉(2003)。 內隱自尊效應及內隱自尊與外顯自尊的關係。 賴映潔、陳慧蓉、莊錦農(2017)。誰的他者-台灣報紙筆下的美國攻伊論述。
傳播與發展學報，34，134-162。
閻岩、周樹華(2014)。媒體偏見:客觀體現和主觀感知。傳播與社會學刊， 30，227-264。
蘇蘅(2018)。《傳播研究方法新論》。台北:雙葉書廊。

英文部分
Abell, J., & Stokoe, E. H. (2001). Broadcasting the royal role: constructing culturally situated identities in the princess Diana Panorama interview. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3).
Ahuja, N., & Kerketta, J. (2021). The omnipresence of cancel culture: A balanced contrast. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11,33-41.
Bhatti, Z. A., Arain, G. A., Yasin, H. M., Khan, M. A., & Akram, M. S. (2020). The role of integrated offline/online social activity and social identification in Facebook citizenship behaviour formation. Information Technology & People, (34)5,1419-1438.mmunity. Jurnal The Messenger, 10(1), 44-53.
Binns, A. (2012). Don’t feed the Trolls! Managing troublemakers in magazines' online communities. Journalism practice, 6(4), 547-562.
Blom, J. N., & Hansen, K. R. (2015). Click bait: Forward-reference as lure in online news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 87-100.
Bouvier, G. (2020). Racist call-outs and cancel culture on Twitter: the limitations of the platform’s ability to define issues of social justice. Discourse, Context & Media, 38. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100431
Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2021). What gets lost in Twitter ‘cancel culture’hashtags? Calling out racists reveals some limitations of social justice campaigns. Discourse &
Society, 32(3), 307-327.
Cashmore, E. (2006). Celebrity culture. Routledge.
Chih, W. H., Hsu, L. C., & Liou, D. K. (2017). Understanding virtual community members’ relationships from individual, group, and social influence perspectives. Industrial Management & Data Systems.
Clark, M.D. (2020). DRAG THEM: A brief etymology of so-called “cancel culture”. Communication and the Public, 5(3-4), 88-92.
Coles, B. A., & West, M. (2016). Trolling the trolls: online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 233- 244.
Copeland, L. (2014). Conceptualizing political consumerism: How citizenship norms differentiate boycotting from boycotting. Political studies, 62, 172-186.
Couldry, N., & Markham, T. (2007). Celebrity culture and public connection: bridge or chasm?. International journal of cultural studies, 10(4), 403-421.
da Silva, J. A. T. (2021). How to shape academic freedom in the digital age? Are the retractions of opinionated papers a prelude to “cancel culture” in
academia. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100035.
Dahlgren, P. (1995). Television and the public sphere: citizenship, democracy and the media. Sage.
Dawson, P. (2020). Hashtag narrative: emergent storytelling and affective publics in the digital age. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 1367877920921417.
Erzikova, E., & McLean, C. (2020). Drowning out the message together: Analysis of social media comments on a political sex scandal. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 9(1), 207-234.
Furedi, F. (2010). Celebrity culture. Society, 47(6), 493-497.
Gamson, J. (2001). Normal sins: Sex scandal narratives as institutional morality
tales. Social problems, 48(2), 185-205.
Gauker, C. (2012). Perception without propositions. Philosophical perspectives, 26,19-50.
Gbadamosi, A. (2020). Postmodernism, ethnicity, and celebrity culture in women’s symbolic consumption. International Journal of Market Research, 62(5), 561- 577.
Goldman, L. M. (2015). Trending now: the use of social media websites in public shaming punishments. Am. Crim. L. Rev., 52, 415.
Greene, B. (2021). Fanning the flames: narrative-baiting and flame-ups as a means of raising visibility in an over-saturated media market. Electronic journal of contemporary japanese studies,21 (1).
Greene, B. (2021). Fanning the flames: narrative-baiting and flame-ups as a means of raising visibility in an over-saturated media market. electronic journal of contemporary japanese studies.
Hammarlin, M. M. (2021). Media scandals, rumour and gossip: A study with an ear close to the ground. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(1), 90-106.
Harmer, E., & Lumsden, K. (2019b). Online othering: An introduction. In K. Lumsden & E. Harmer (Eds.), Online othering: Exploring digital violence and discrimination on the web (pp. 1–33). Palgrave Macmillan.
Heleta, E. V. (2021). Cancel culture: new internet ideology?
Holman, K. J. (2020). Can you come back from being cancelled? A case study of podcasting, cancel culture, and comedians during# MeToo.
Hsueh, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Malinen, S. (2015). “Leave your comment below”: Can biased online comments influence our own prejudicial attitudes and behaviors?. Human communication research, 41(4), 557-576.
Huang, J. C. (2021). Gender and celebrity scandals: A cross-cultural examination on celebrity endorsement. Journal of Promotion Management, 27(1), 133-150.
Johansson, S. (2008). Gossip, sport and pretty girls: what does “trivial” journalism mean to tabloid newspaper readers. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 402-413.
Kalmoe, N. P., Fuller, P. B., Santia, M., & Saha, P. (2022). Representation and Aggression in Digital Racial Conflict: Analyzing Public Comments during Live-Streamed News of Racial Justice Protests. Perspectives on Politics, 1-20.
Kecskes, I., & Zhang, F. (2009). Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: a socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(2), 331-355.
Kim, J. O. (2018). Korea's blacklist scandal: governmentality, culture, and creativity. Culture, Theory and Critique, 59(2), 81-93.
Koller, V. (2012). How to analyse collective identity in discourse: textual and 100
contextual parameters. Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines Journal, 5(2), 19-38.
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: looking back and ahead. Psychological bulletin, 85(5), 1030.
Madden, S., & Alt, R. A. (2021). Know her name: Open dialogue on social media as a form of innovative justice. Social Media+ Society, 7(1), 1-10.
March, E., & Marrington, J. (2019). A qualitative analysis of internet
trolling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(3), 192-197.
Masullo Chen, G. M. (2017). Online incivility and public debate: Nasty talk. Palgrave Macmillan.
Matheson, K., & Dursun, S. (2001). Social identity precursors to the hostile media phenomenon: partisan perceptions of coverage of the Bosnian conflict. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4(2), 116-125.
Moitra, A., Ahmed, S. I., & Chandra, P. (2021). Parsing the'Me'in# MeToo: sexual harassment, social media, and justice infrastructures. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1-34.
Mulyadi, U., & Fitriana, L. (2018). Hashtag (#) as message identity in virtual co Ng, E. (2020). No grand pronouncements here...: Reflections on cancel culture and
digital media participation. Television & New Media, 21(6), 621-627.
Norris, P. (2020). Closed minds? Is a ‘Cancel Culture’stifling academic freedom and intellectual debate in political science. Retrieved from https://www.hks.harvard.edu/research- insights/publications?f%5B0%5D=publication_types%3A121
Norris, P.(2021).Cancel culture: Myth or reality. Political Studies, 00323217211037023.
Orth, Z., Andipatin, M.,Mukumbang, F. C.,& van Wye, B.(2020). Applying Qualitative Methods to Investigate Social Actions for Justice Using Social Media: Illustrations From Facebook.Social Media + Society, 6(2),1-14.
Ott, BL. (2017). The age of twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement.
Critical Studies in Media Communication 34(1): 59-68.
Ouvrein, G., De Backer, C. J. S., & Vandebosch, H. (2018). Joining the clash or refusing to bash? bystanders’ reactions to online celebrity bashing. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 12(4), article 5.
Ouvrein, G., Pabian, S., Machimbarrena, J. M., De Backer, C. J., & Vandebosch, H. (2018). Online celebrity bashing: wrecking ball or good for you? adolescent girls’ attitudes toward the media and public bashing of Miley Cyrus and Selena Gomez. Communication Research Reports, 35(3), 261-271.
Paudel, L. N. (2018). Mediation in newspaper headlines: a critical discourse analysis. The Journal of University Grants Commission, 7(1), 106-119.
Pearson, D. H. (2021). Accountability, exile and social media: An analysis of contemporary online public shaming practices and" cancel culture".
Peeters, W., & Pretorius, M. (2020). Facebook or fail-book: Exploring “community” in a virtual community of practice. ReCALL, 32(3), 291-306.
Peeters, W., & Pretorius, M. (2020). Facebook or fail-book: exploring “community” in a virtual community of practice. ReCALL, 32(3), 291-306.
Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (1996). Discourse analysis. In Introducing psychological research (pp. 419-425). Palgrave, London.
Rapley, P., Passmore, A., & Phillips, M. (2003). Review of the psychometric properties of the diabetes self‐efficacy scale: Australian longitudinal study. Nursing & health sciences, 5(4), 289-297.
Ren, Y., Kraut, R.,& Kiesler, S.(2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 377-408.
Roden, J., & Saleem, M. (2021). White apathy and allyship in uncivil racial social media comments. Mass Communication and Society, 1-24.
Roden, J., & Saleem, M. (2021). White apathy and allyship in uncivil racial social media comments. Mass Communication and Society, 1-24.
Romano, M. (2021). Creating new discourses for new feminisms: A critical socio- cognitive approach. Language & Communication, 78, 88-99.
Roth-Cohen, O. (2021). Viral feminism:# MeToo networked expressions in feminist
Facebook groups. Feminist Media Studies, 1-17.
Salter, M. (2013). Justice and revenge in online counter-publics: emerging responses to sexual violence in the age of social media. Crime, Media, Culture, 9(3), 225- 242.
Schejter, A. M., & Tirosh, N. (2015). “Seek the meek, seek the just”: social media and social justice. Telecommunications policy, 39(9), 796-803.
Shenton, J. E. (2020). Divided we tweet: the social media poetics of public online shaming. Cultural Dynamics, 32(3), 170-195.
Smith, D. C., James, C. D., & Griffiths, M. A. (2021). Co‐brand partnerships making space for the next black girl: Backlash in social justice branding. Psychology & Marketing, 38(12), 2314-2326.
van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Discourse and communication: new approaches to the analysis of mass communication. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852141
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New York, London: Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Power and the news media. Political communication and action, 6(1), 9-36.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Critical discourse analysis. The handbook of discourse analysis, 349-371.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of political ideologies, 11(2), 115-140.
van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Discourse, power and access. In Texts and practices (pp. 93- 113). Routledge.
van Dijk, T.A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, New Jersey: University of Groningen
van Dijk, T.A. (2009) ‘News, Discourse, and Ideology’, in K. Wahl-Jorgensen and T. Hanitzsch (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies, pp. 191–204. New York: Routledge.
Velasco, J. C. (2020). You are cancelled: virtual collective consciousness and the emergence of cancel culture as ideological purging. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(5), 1-7.
Velasco, J. C. (2020). You are cancelled: virtual collective consciousness and the emergence of cancel culture as ideological purging. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(5), 1-7.
Wiese, J. (2020). Your fave is problematic: cancel culture und soziale
Medien (Bachelor's thesis, Hochschulbibliothek, Hochschule Merseburg).
Wodak, R., Cillia, R. d., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (2009). The discoursive construction of national identity.
Zahoor, A., Farid, A., & Hussain, M. S.(2020). Impact of social media on linguistic cognition of pakistani youth: Application of Dijk’s Socio-Cognitive Approach. International Review of Social Sciences, 8(10), 71-79.