Basic Search / Detailed Display

Author: 鍾琁郁
Hsuan-Yu Chung
Thesis Title: 關鍵字法對國中學習障礙學生英語字彙學習成效之研究
The Effects of the Keyword Method on English Vocabulary Learning for Junior High School Students with Learning Disabilities
Advisor: 杞昭安
Chi, Chao-An
Degree: 碩士
Master
Department: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
Thesis Publication Year: 2014
Academic Year: 103
Language: 中文
Number of pages: 189
Keywords (in Chinese): 英語字彙學習成效單一受試學習障礙學生關鍵字法
Keywords (in English): effects on English vocabulary learning, single subject research, learning disabilities, the keyword method
Thesis Type: Academic thesis/ dissertation
Reference times: Clicks: 591Downloads: 41
Share:
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report
  • 本研究旨在探討關鍵字法對國中學習障礙學生英語字彙學習成效的影響。研究對象為三位國中學習障礙學生,並採單一受試研究法中的跨受試多探試設計來進行教學處理。本研究之自變項為關鍵字法,依變項則為英語字彙之字義、認字與讀音的學習成效。
    本研究之實驗處理有三階段,分別為基線期、處理期與維持期,研究過程以研究者自編之「英語字彙之字義、認字與讀音測驗」及「英語字彙之字義、認字與讀音保留測驗」為工具進行資料蒐集,並將所蒐集的資料利用視覺分析並搭配C統計之方式進行分析。
    本研究的結論如下:
    一、 關鍵字法對國中學習障礙學生英語字彙字義能力具有立即成效。
    二、 關鍵字法對國中學習障礙學生英語字彙字義能力具有維持成效。
    三、 關鍵字法對國中學習障礙學生英語字彙認字能力具有立即成效。
    四、 關鍵字法對國中學習障礙學生英語字彙認字能力具有維持成效。
    五、 關鍵字法對國中學習障礙學生英語字彙讀音能力具有立即成效。
    六、 關鍵字法對國中學習障礙學生英語字彙讀音能力具有維持成效。
    根據上述研究結論,提供相關建議,以做為未來教學與研究之參考。

    The purpose of the study is to explore how the keyword method enhances English vocabulary learning for junior high school students with learning disabilities. The subjects of this study were three junior high school students with learning disabilities. This study employed the multiple-probe technique across subjects, a variation of the multiple-baseline designs. The independent variable of this research is the keyword method, whereas the dependent variables are the outcomes of students’ learning of English vocabulary’s definition, recognition, and pronunciation.
    The experiment was divided into three phases, respectively the baseline period, the treatment period, and the maintenance period. The English vocabulary’s definition, recognition, and pronunciation attainment test and the English vocabulary’s definition, recognition, and pronunciation retention test developed by the researcher were used as data collection tools in the study. The data were analyzed using visual analysis and Cochran’s C test. The results of the study are as follows:
    1. The keyword method has immediate effects on students’ English vocabu- lary defining skills.
    2. The keyword method has retained effects on students’ English vocabula- ry defining skills.
    3. The keyword method has immediate effects on students’ English vocabu- lary recognition skills.
    4. The keyword method has retained effects on students’ English vocabula- ry recognition skills.
    5. The keyword method has immediate effects on students’ English vocabu- lary pronunciation skills.
    6. The keyword method has retained effects on students’ English vocabula- ry pronunciation skills.
    Based on the above results, suggestions were then proposed for teaching and future researches.

    第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題…………………………………………………………6 第三節 名詞釋義………………………………………………………………………………7 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………………………9 第一節 學習障礙學生外語學習與相關概念………………………………9 第二節 關鍵字法………………………………………………………………………………21 第三節 關鍵字法在英語字彙學習的相關研究……………………………34 第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………………………………45 第一節 研究設計…………………………………………………………………………………45 第二節 研究對象…………………………………………………………………………………51 第三節 研究工具…………………………………………………………………………………58 第四節 研究程序…………………………………………………………………………………63 第五節 資料處理與分析…………………………………………………………………………67 第四章 結果與討論…………………………………………………………………………………71 第一節 英語字彙之字義評量分析…………………………………………………71 第二節 英語字彙之認字評量分析…………………………………………………86 第三節 英語字彙之讀音評量分析…………………………………………………100 第四節 綜合討論………………………………………………………………………………114 第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………………………117 第一節 結論………………………………………………………………………………………117 第二節 建議………………………………………………………………………………………120 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………………………………………127 附錄……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………137 附錄一 關鍵字法教學家長同意書………………………………………………………137 附錄二 英文認字測驗使用同意書……………………………………………………………138 附錄三 關鍵字法教學英語字彙學習進度表……………………………………………139 附錄四 關鍵字法英語字彙教學教案設計……………………………………………140 附錄五 關鍵字法英語字彙教學學習單…………………………………………………175 附錄六 關鍵字法英語字彙教學作業單…………………………………………………177 附錄七 英語字彙字義、認字與讀音教學前測驗…………………………………179 附錄八 英語字彙字義、認字與讀音測驗………………………………………………181 附錄九 英語字彙字義、認字與讀音保留測驗………………………………………183 附錄十 英語字彙字義、認字與讀音教學前測驗得分紀錄紙……………185 附錄十一 英語字彙字義、認字與讀音測驗得分記錄紙…………………………186 附錄十二 英語字彙字義、認字與讀音保留測驗得分記錄紙………………189

    王暄晴 (2013):關鍵字教學法對國小五年級學童英語字彙辨認與保留成效之研究。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教育學系(未出版)。
    何聿芳 (2011):關鍵字記憶法對國中生的英文單字學習成效之探討。國
    立雲林科技大學應用外語系(未出版)。
    杜正治 (2006):單一受試研究法。臺北:心理。
    身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法 (2013):中華民國102年9月2日臺
    教學 (四) 字第1020125519B號令發布。
    林芝寧 (2005):關鍵字學習策略對台灣高中生英語字彙學習成效之研
    究。國立高雄師範大學英語學系(未出版)。
    林芳憶、鄭錦桂 (2008):融合「關鍵字學習法」及「字母拼讀法」之
    教學對於國小五年級學童學習英語單字之影響。英語教學,32(3),
    71-114。
    林家慧、黃秀霜、陳惠萍、侯靖紋 (2009):國中學生英文認字錯誤組型
    分析之研究。課程與教學季刊,12(2),223-250。
    邱上真 (2007):特殊教育導論-帶好班上每位學生。臺北市:心理。
    邱惠姿 (2008):聲韻處理能力對閱讀障礙學生英語學習成效之影響。國
    小特殊教育,46,95-101。
    周台傑 (2010):學習障礙。載於許天威、徐享良、張勝成主編:新
    特殊教育通論 (133-158頁)。臺北︰五南。
    洪儷瑜、張世慧、洪雅惠、孔淑萱、詹氏宜、梁碧明、胡永崇、吳訓生
    等 (譯) (2012):學習障礙與其他障礙之學習困難 (N. Lerner, & B.
    John著:Learning Disabilities and Related Mild Disabilities, 12e)。臺
    北:華騰文化。(原著出版於2012)
    胡永崇 (2000):學習障礙者之教育。載於王文科主編:特殊教育導
    論 (347-390頁)。臺北:心理。
    徐嘉聰 (2008):關鍵字教學法應用於國小學童英語字彙學習之研究。臺
    北市立教育大學英語教學系(未出版)。
    財團法人科技輔具文教基金會 (1999):溝通學習圖形庫。
    許月貴 (2003):九年一貫英語課程的字母與字彙教學。中等教育,
    54(6),18-37。
    張家燕 (2013):字母拼讀法結合記憶策略對國中學習障礙學生英文字彙
    學習之成效。國立臺南大學特殊教育學系(未出版)。
    教育部 (2000):國民中小學九年一貫90年暫行綱要。國民教育社群網,
    2013年8月,取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_90.php
    教育部 (2005):國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要-英語總綱。國民教育社群
    網,2013年8月,取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_92.php
    教育部 (2008):國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要-語文領域。國民教育社群
    網,2013年8月,取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php
    教育部 (2011):高級中等以下學校特殊教育課程發展共同原則及課程綱
    要總綱(2-3頁)。臺北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
    教育部 (2013): 102學年度一般學校身心障礙類安置班別學生統計。教
    育部特殊教育通報網。2013年11月,取自
    https://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/frame_print.asp?filename=stuA_city_All_cls_ABCE/stuA_city_All_cls_ABCE_20131021.asp.
    教育部 (2013):102學年度一般學校各縣市特教類別學生數統計 (身
    障)。教育部特殊教育通報網。2013年11月,取自https://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/frame_print.asp?filename=stuA_city_All_spckind_ABCE/stuA_city_All_spckind_ABCE_20131021.asp.
    陳烜之 (2007):認知心理學。臺北:五南。
    黃柏華、洪儷瑜 (2007):國中讀寫障礙學生在英文讀寫字能力表現之相
    關研究。特殊教育研究學刊,32(3),39-62。
    葉杏珠 (2007):英語字彙記憶策略融入字母拼讀法之實驗教學研究。國
    立臺南大學教育學系(未出版)。
    臺北市 (2002):臺北市國民小學英語課程暫行綱要。臺北市教育局,2013
    年8月,取自http://www.edunet.taipei.gov.tw
    鄭麗玉 (1995):認知心理學-理論與應用。臺北:五南。
    簡彤紋 (2012):關鍵字教學法對國小五年級學童英語字彙學習之效益:
    以新北市某國小為例。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教育學習(未出
    版)。
    羅方裴 (2009):關鍵字學習法對玄奘大學外文系大一學生英文字彙學習
    效果之研究。玄奘大學外國語文學系(未出版)。
    Alwell, M., Cobb, R. B., & Wolgemuth, J. R. (2008). The effects of interve- ntions on academic outcomes for youth with disabilities: A systematic review. Learning Disabilities Research&Practice, 23(1), 1-10.
    Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechniques in second-language learning.
    AmericanPsychologist, 30, 821-828.
    August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disa- bilities Research & Practice (Wiley-Blackwell), 1(20), 50-57.
    Avila, E., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword
    method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning, 46, 379-395.
    Barrera, M. (2006). Roles of definitional and assessment models in the iden- tification of new or second language learners of English for special edu- cation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 142-156.
    Bryant, D. P., Goodwin, M., Bryant, B. R., & Higgins, K. (2003). Vocabu- lary instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review of the reasearch. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(2), 117-128.
    Chang, B. Y. (2011). The roles of English language education in Asian cont- ex. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 191- 206.
    Cheng, C. K., & Lin, F. Y. (2008). The combined effects of keword method and phonics instroction on 5th graders' English vocabulary learning in taiwan. English Teaching &Learning, 32(3), 71-114.
    Condus, M. M., Marshall, K. J., & Miller, S. R. (1986). Effects of keyword mnemonicstrategy on vocabulary acquisition and maintenance by lear- ning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(10), 609-613.
    Denton, C. A., & Vaughn, S. (2008). Reading and writing intervention for older students with disabilities: Possibilities and challenges. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 61-62.
    Ebbers, S. M., & Denton, C. A. (2008). A root awakening: Vocabulary instruction for older students with reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 90-102.
    Foil, C. R., & Alber, S. R. (2002). Fun and effective ways to build your students' vocabulary. Intervention in School & Clinic, 37(3), 131-139.
    Fore III, C., Boon, R. T., & Lowrie, K. (2007). Vocabulary instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: A comparison of two instructional models. Learning Disabilities -- A Contemporary Journal, 5(2), 49-73.
    Garcia, S. B., & Tyler, B. J. (2010). Meeting the needs of English language learners with learning disabilities in the general curriculuam. Theory Into Practice, 49(2), 113-120.
    Grant, A., Gottardo, A., & Geva, E. (2011). Reading in English as a first or second language: The case of grade 3 Spanish, Portuguese, and English speakers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(2), 67-83.
    Gunning, T. G. (2000). Greating literacy instruction for all children. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Hall, C., Kent, S. C., McCulley, L., Davis, A., & Wanzek, J. (2013). A new look at mnemonics and graphic organizers in the secondary social stud- ies classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47-55.
    Ho, S. H., & Fong, K. M. (2005). Do chinese dyslexia children have difficu- lties learning English as a second language? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(6), 603-618.
    Huang, J. Y., Clarke, K., Milczarski, E., & Raby, C. (2011). The assessment of English language learners with learning disabilities: Issues, concerns, and Implications. Education, 131(4), 732-739.
    Jitendra, A. K., Edwards, L. L., Sacks, & Gabriell (2004). What research says about vocabulary instruction for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70(3), 299-322.
    Limbos, M. M., & Geva, E. (2001). Accuracy of teacher assessments of sec- ond-language students at risk for reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(2), 136-151.
    Lipka, O., Siegel, L. S., & Vukovic, R. (2005). The literacy skills of English language learners in Canada. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 39-49.
    Mastropiere, M. A., Mushinski, B. J., & Scruggs, T. E. (1990). Teaching abs- tract vocabulary with the keyword method: effects on recall and compre- hension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(2), 92-107.
    Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1998). Enhancing school success with mnemonic strategies. Intervention in School & Clinic, 33(4), 201-208.
    Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Levin, J. R., Gaffney, J. & McLoone, B., (1985). Mnemonic vocabulary instruction for learning disabled adolesc- ents. Learning Disabilities Research, 2(1), 45-53.
    Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Terrill, M. C. (2004). SAT vocabulary instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Interven- tion in School and Clinic, 39(5), 288-294.
    McLoone, B. B., Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Zucker, S. F. (1986). Memory strategy instruction and training with learning disabled adoles- cents. Learning Disabilities Reasearch, 2(1), 45-53.
    Moore, D., & Smith, M. (2008). Reading instruction for students with learn- ing disabilities. Retrieved November, 2013, from http://www.ngsp.net/Portals/0/Downloads/HBNETDownloads/EDG_SpEd_Moore_Smith.pdf
    Mueller, T. G., & Carranza, F. D. (2006). A national survey of the education- al planning and language instruction practices for students with modera- te to severe disabilities who are English language learners. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(3), 242-254.
    Nguyen, H. T. (2012). General education and special education teachers coll- aborate to support English language learners with learning. Disabilities Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 127-152.
    Oyler, J. D. (2009). Verbal learning and memory fuctios in students with reading disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Arizona.
    Oyler, J. D., Obrzut, J. E., & Asbjornsen, A. E. (2012). Verbal learning and memory functions in adolescents with reading disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35(3), 184-195.
    Paivio, A. (2010). Dual coding theory and the mental lexicon. Mental Lexic- on, 5(2), 205-230.
    Polychroni, F., Economou, A., & Printezi, A. (2011). Verbal memory and semantic organization of children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 9(2), 27-44.
    Robin, L. S. (1997). Learning disabilities and foreign language learning. Retrieved November, 2013, from http://www.ldonline.org/article/Learning_Disabilities_and_Foreign_Language_Learn
    Schiff, R., & Calif, S. (2004). An academic intervention program for EFL university students with reading disabilities. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(2), 102-113.
    Scott, K. W., Bell, S. M., & McCallum, R. S. (2009). Relation of native-lan- guage reading and spelling abilities to attitudes toward learning a second language. Preventing School Failure, 54(1), 30-40.
    Seifert, K., & Espin, C. (2012). Improving reading of science text for secon- dary students with learning disabilities: Effects of text reading, vocabul- ary learning, and combined approaches to instruction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35(4), 236-247.
    Shapiro, A. M., & Waters, D. L. (2005). An investigation of the cognitive processes underlying the keyword method of foreign vocabulary learn- ing. Language Learning, 9(2), 129-146.
    Shen, Q. (2009). Globalization of English and English language policies in east Asia: A comparative perspective. Canadian Social Science, 5(3), 111-120.
    Tam, K. Y., Heward, W. L., & Heng, M. A. (2006). A reading instruction intervention program for English-language learners who are struggling readers. The Journal of Special Education, 40(2), 79-93.
    Uberti, H. Z., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropiere, M. A. (2003). Keyword make the difference! Mnemonic instruction in inclusive classroom. Council For Exceptional Children, 56-61.
    Veit, D. T., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1986). Extended mnemonic instruction with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 300-308.
    Wilkinson, C. Y., Ortiz, A. A., Robertson, P. M., & Kushner, M.I. (2006). English language learners with reading-related LD: Linking data from multiple sources to make eligibility determinations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 129-141.
    Wilson, G., Nash, M., & Earl, G. (2010). Supporting students with language learning difficulties in secondary schools through collaboration: The use of concept maps to investigate the impact on teachers' knowledge of vocabulary teaching. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26(2), 163-179.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE