摘 要
本研究旨在了解國中身心障礙資源班教師對資訊科技融入教學的觀點以及實施現況。研究對象為任教於台灣地區不分類身心障礙資源班之教師，研究方法係以郵寄自編問卷方式，進行資料收集，回收之有效問卷為332份，有效問卷回收率達73.8%。採用描述性統計、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料處理與分析。本研究的主要發現如下：
一、國中資源班教師對資訊科技融入特教教學的觀點是正向的。
二、國中資源班教師實施資訊科技融入特教教學的情形尚可，其中，以「教學準備」部分最佳，「教學歷程」、「教學管理」次之，「教學評量」部分較不理想。
三、國中資源班教師對資訊科技融入特教教學的觀點，因教師的年齡與電腦操作能力不同而有所差異。年紀在25歲以下及電腦操作能力較高的教師，對資訊融入的特教教學的觀點較積極。
四、資源班教師在資訊融入教學實施情形，因教師的任教地區、年齡、資訊融入教學研習時數、每週使用電腦時間及電腦操作能力不同而有所差異。居住在北部地區、年齡在26-35歲、平均每週使用電腦時間在16小時以上，電腦操作能力較高的教師，其實施資訊融入特教教學的情形較佳。
五、學校的軟硬體資源設備越充足，行政支援越足夠，則教師的觀點及實施現況也越佳。
六、教師對資訊融入教學的觀點為預測實施現況的最有效變項，教師對資訊融入教學的觀點越正向，其實施情形也越佳。
七、所有相關變項可解釋國中資源班教師實施資訊科技融入教學現況的變異量達40%。
本研究根據研究結果，對相關教育單位及未來研究提出建議。

A Study of Teachers’ Perspective and Current Practices on Infusing Information Technology Into Special Education

The purpose of this study was to investigate perspective and current practice of teachers on the technology integration in junior-high-school resource room for disabilities. The research instrument was self-reported questionnaire with items in multiple-choice and Likert-scale format. A total of 332 teachers completed the questionnaire (with 73.8% rate of return). The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, and stepwise regression. The main findings of this study were as follows:

1. Most resource room teachers have positive perspectives in infusing information technology into special education.
2. The current practice was above the standard, teachers have higher usage of IT on teaching preparation, and less usage on teaching evaluation.
3. In terms of perspectives of teachers, there were significant differences among their backgrounds in “age” and “computer literacy”. There were also significant differences for “teaching area”, “age”, “in-service IT training hours in two years”, “usage hours of computer weekly”, and “computer literacy” in terms of current practice.
4. The hardware and software resources and administrative support of school environment had significant positive correlation with teachers’ s perspective and current practice.
5. The teacher’s perspective of IT integration had significant positive correlation with IT integration into special education, and was the best predictors toward IT infusion into special education.
6. The variances to predict the current practice of technology integration into special education were 40%.

Based upon the findings, the implications for practice as well as further studies were discussed.

參考文獻

尹玫君（民92）：自教育科技在教育上的應用探討資訊融入教學。國立台南師範學院初等教育學報，16，1-36。
王千倖（民87）：落實資訊教育-從教育學程中的資訊教育課程教學設計著手。視聽教育，34(4)，14-19。
王全世（民89）：資訊科技融入教學之意義與內涵。資訊與教育，80，23-31。
王莉婷（民91）：國民小學特殊教育教師資訊科技素養之研究---以桃園縣為例。國立花蓮師範學院特殊教育學系教學碩士論文，未出版。
王嘉德、陳光勳（民92）：影響台北市國小教師使用教室電腦相關因素之探討。國立台北師範學院學報，16(1)，67-104。
朱經明（民88）：多媒體與身心障礙兒童。特殊教育季刊，72，10-12。
邱志忠（民91）：國小教師運用資訊科技融入學科教學之教學策略研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
何榮桂（民91a）：資訊科技融入教學的意義與策略。資訊與教育，88，1-2。
何榮桂（民91b）：台灣資訊教育的現況與發展─兼論資訊科技融入教學，資訊與教育雜誌，87， 22-48。
林奇賢(民88)：向資訊科技借力。曉騰資訊報，第14期。
林育毅(民93)：高高屏地區國小特教教師運用電腦融入教學意願與困擾因素調查研究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
吳正己(民90)：從英代爾e教師計畫談資訊融入教學。資訊與教育，85，15-21。
吳亭芳、侯嘉怡、陳明聰（民89）：輔助性科技在特殊教育之應用。載於林寶貴(主編)，特殊教育理論與實務(頁595-650)。台北：心理。
吳曉華（民93）：桃園縣國中教師利用網路資源融入教學之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
李品蓓（民90）：電腦化教學對閱讀障礙學生識字成效之研究。花蓮師範學院特殊教育所教學碩士論文，未出版。
孟瑛如（民88）：資源教室方案—班級經營與補救教學。台北：五南。
高豫（民84）：電腦繪圖系統在特殊教育之應用。特教園丁，11(1)，1-8。
徐新逸、吳佩謹（民91）：資訊融入教學的現代意義與具體作為。教學科技與媒體，59，63-73。
徐新逸、林燕珍（民93）：中小學教師資訊融入教學發展模式及檢核工具之研究。教育研究集刊，50（1），175-203。
教育部（民86）：特殊教育法。台北：教育部。
教育部（民87）：特殊教育課程教材教法實施辦法。台北：教育部。
教育部（民89）：九年一貫課程與教學網站。九十三年九月二十日，取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/discuss/discuss2.php
教育部（民90）：中小學資訊教育總藍圖。
教育部（民93）：特殊教育統計年報。台北：教育部。
黃明裕（民91）：台南縣國小特教教師對使用電腦網路資源於教學上的態度調查研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃麗娟、王振德（民92）：身心障礙資源班實施指標之研究－以北區七縣市為例。特殊教育研究學刊，25，27-41。
張文嘉（民92）：學校環境與教師個人背景對資訊融入教學之影響研究－以南投縣國中為例。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育系碩士論文，未出版。
張英鵬（民84）：國立臺北師院輔導區國小啟智班使用個別化教育方案電腦軟體之成效及其相關研究。臺北師院學報，8，413-450。
張秀雯(民91)：國中特殊教育教師輔助性科技素養之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
張國恩（民88）：資訊科技融入各科教學之內涵與實施。資訊與教育，72，2-9。
張國恩（民91）：從學習科技的發展看資訊融入教學的內涵。北縣教育，41，16-25。
陳文秀(民89)：國民中學資源班學生數學科診斷測驗編制之研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育系碩士論文，未出版。
陳裕隆（民89）：電腦融入教學面臨的困難與挑戰。資訊與教育，77，29-35。
陳慶洋（民91）：國中資源班教師運用電腦融入教學必備能力之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
崔夢萍（民90）：國小教師電腦融入教學態度及其相關因素之研究。台北市立師範學院學報，32，169-194。
游惠美、孟瑛如（民87）：電腦輔助教學應用方式對國小低成就兒童注音符號補救教學成效之探討。特殊教育與復健學報，6，307-347。
蔡文煉（民84）：多媒體電腦輔助數學學障生減法學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
蔡佳茹（民91）：視覺障礙教育教師電腦素養研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
楊坤堂（民84）：學習障礙兒童。台北：五南。
溫嘉榮、吳明隆（民88）：新時代資訊教育的理論與實務應用。台北：松岡。
葉家睿（民90）：花蓮縣國民中學教師利用網路資源融入教學行為之研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
楊惠甄(民89)：台北市國民小學身心障礙資源班實施現況之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
潘浚琪（民89）：全球資訊網輕度智能障礙兒童數學輔助學習系統對國小輕度智能障礙兒童學習效果之研究。國立臺中師範學院數學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
廖遠光（民88）：國小教師對教學科技使用效果的態度之研究。教學科技與媒體，45，32-39。
鄒小蘭（民83）：特殊班電腦輔助教學應用實例與成效。特教園丁，9(4)，39-47。
劉家賓（民91）：國中教師應用資訊科技之實務與層級。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
蕭金慧（民90）：電腦輔助教學在輕度智障兒童認字學習之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
蘇琲雯（民90）：電腦融入教學對學習障礙兒童語句學習成效及其注意力行為之影響。國立台北師範學院特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
鐘樹椽(民84)：落實電腦於特殊兒童學習相關因素之探討。教學科技與媒體，24，3-11。
鐘樹椽、何素華、林菁（民84）：不同教學策略之電腦輔助教學在輕度智障兒童加減概念學習上之研究。嘉義師院學報，9，223-296。
謝琇玲、陳碧姬、郭閔然（民91）：由教師資訊素養談資訊融入教學之道。資訊與教育，92，87-95。
顏龍源（民89）：主題式的電腦融入課程概念。資訊與教育，80，32-39。Albion, P. A., & Ertmer, P. A. (2002). Beyond the foundations; The role of
vision and belief in teachers’ preparation for integration of technology. TechTrends, 46, 5, 34-38.
Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2001). School technology leadership: Incidence and impact. Report#6 from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing 1998 Survey. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information, Technology, and Organization at University of California, Irvine. [On-line] http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/findings.html
Atkins, N. E., & Vasu, E. S. (2000). Measuring knowledge of technology usage and stages of concern about computing: A study of middle school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 4, 279-302.
Behrmann, M., & Jerome, M. K. (2002). Assistive technology for student with mild disabilities: Update 2002 (ED 463595).
Becker, H. J. (1991). How computers are used in United States schools:
Basic data from 1989 I. E. A. Computers in Education Survey. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(4), 385-406.
Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ
from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 3., 291-322.
Budoff, M., Thormann, J., Gras, A. (1984). Microcomputers in special education. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Blackhurst, A. E. (2001). Designing technology professional development programs. In Woodward, J., & Cuban, L. (Ed.), Technology, curriculum and professional development: Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities (pp. 176-179). CA: Corwin Press.
Chiero, R. T. (1997).Teachers’ perspective on factors that affact computer use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 133-145.
Dambrot, E. H., Watkins-Malek, M. A., Silling, S. M., Marshall, R. S., & Garver, J. A. (1985). Correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 71-86.
Darter, C. L. et al. (1990). The impact of the computer on teaching of reading : A review of the literature (ED 326836).
Dias, L. B. (1999). Integrating technology：some things you should know. Learning & Leading with technology, 27(3), 10-13,21.
Dias, L. B. (2001). Technology Integration: Best Practices–Where Do Teachers Stand? [On-Line Available] http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/volume5/dias.html.
Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 3, 221-239.
Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Ronnkvist, A. M. (2002). Quality technolgoy support: What is it? who has it? And what difference does it make? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 3, 265-285.
Dupagne, M., & Krendl, K. A. (1992). Teachers’ attitudes toward computers: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24, 420-429.
Gardner, J. E., Wissick, C. A., Schweder W., & Canter, L. S. (2003). Enhancing interdisciplinary Instruction in general and special education. Remedial and Special Education, 24(3), 161-172.
Edburn, D. L. (2000). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(9), 1-23.
Edyburn, D. L., & Gardner, J, E. (1999). Integrating technology into special education teacher preparation programs: Creating shared visions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(2), 3-20.
Ertmer, P. A, Addison, P. A., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teacher’s beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 1, 54-71.
Fazio, B. B, & Polsgrove, L. (1989). An evaluation of the effects of training special educators to integrate microcomputer technology into math curricula. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10(2), 5-13.
Fisher, C., Dwyer, D.C., & Yocam, K. (EDs). (1996). Educaion and technology: Reflection on computing in classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2001). Access to the core curriculum: Critical ingredients for success. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 148-157.
Goldberg, B., & Richards, J. (1995). Leveraging technology for reform: Changing schools and communities into learning organizations. Educational technology, 35(5), 5-16.
Hadley, M., & Sheingold, K. (1993). Commonalities and distinctive patters in teachers’ integration of computers. American Journal of Education, 101, 261-315.
Hannaford, A. E. (1983). Microcomputers in special education : Some new opportunities, some old problems. The Computing Teacher, 10(2), 11-17.
Harrington, H. (1993). The essence of technology and the education of teachers. Journal of teacher Education, 44(1), 5-15.
Hauser, J., & Malouf, D. (1996). A federal perspective on special education technology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 504-511.
Higgins, K., Boone, R., & Lovitt, T. C. (1996). Hypertext support for remedial students and students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(4), 402-412.
Johnson, G. et al. (1987). Effects of instruction design variable on vocabulary accquistion of Ld students: a study using the hint and hunt I program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(4), 206-213.
Johansson, J. (1997). Technology in Education: A case for change (ED410740).
Jorde-bloom, P., & Ford, M. (1988). Factors influencing early childhood administrators’ decisions regarding the adoption of computer technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(1), 31-47.
Lancaster, P. E., & Lancaster, S., J., C. (2002). Integration, Access, & Preparation: A school of education’s effort to enhance a state’s technology program. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(4), 45-48.
Levine, T., & Donista-Schmidt, S.(1997). Commitment to learning: Effects of computer experience, confidence and attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 83-105.
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & Shafer, W. (1995). Evaluation of a writing instruction model that integrated a process approach, strategy instruction, and word processing. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 18, 278-291.
MacArthur, C. A., Pilato, V., Kercher, M., Peterson, D., Malouf, D., & Jamison, P. (1995). Mentoring: an approach to technology education for teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 46-62.
MacArthur, C. A. (2001). Technology implementation in special education: Understanding teachers’beliefs, plans, and decisions. In Woodward, J., & Cuban, L. (Ed.), Technology, curriculum and professional development: Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities (pp. 115-120). CA: Corwin Press.
MacArthur, C. A., Ferretti, R. P. Okolo, C. M., & Cavalier, A. R. (2001). Technology Applications for Students with Literacy Problems: A Critical Revies. The Elementary School Journal, 101(3), 273-301.
Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1994). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing
computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 2, 220-236.
Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Pairot, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). No Access, no use, no impact：Snapshot surveys of Educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 1, 15-27.
Nicklin, J. L. (1992). Teacher’s use of computers stressed by educational colleges. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 38, 43, 15-17.
Okolo, C. M., & Ferretti, R. P. (1998). Multimedia design projects in an inclusive social studies classroom: “Sometimes people argue with words instead of fists.” Teaching Exceptional Children, 31, 50-57.
Pagach, M. C., & Warger, C. L. (1996). Curriculum trends, special education, and reform: Refocusing the conversation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Puckett, K. S. (2004). Project ACCESS: Field testing an assistive technology toolkit for students with mild disabilities. Journal of special education technology, 19(2), 5-17.
Ravitz, J. L., Becker, H. J., & Wong, Y. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among U.S. Teachers. Report#4 from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing 1998 Survey. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information, Technology, and Organization at University of California, Irvine. [On-line] http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/findings.html
Rosegrant, T. (1985). Using the microcomputer as a tool for learning to read and write. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18(7), 113-115.
Rosen, L. D., & Weil, M. M. (1995). Computer availability, computer experience and technophbia among public school teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 9-31.
Technology counts ’99,(1999). Retrieved from http://ceoforum.org/reports.html on Dec. 31st, 2004.
Tyler-Wood, T. L., Putney, D. & Cass, M. A. (1997). Accessibility: The main factor influencing special education teachers’ perceived level of computer competence. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 13, 4, 20-24.
van Braak, J. (2001). Individual characteristics influencing teachers’ class use of computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25, 141-157.
Woodward, J., & Baxter, J. (1997). The effects of an innovative approach to mathematics on academically low achieving students in inclusive settings. Exceptional Children, 63, 373-388.
Woodward, J., & Rieth, H. (1997). An historical review of technology research in special education. Review of education research, 67, 503-536.
Zorfass, J. (1994). Supporting students with learning disabilities: Integrating technology into an I-Search Unit. Technology and Disability, 3(2), 129-136.