簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張秀薇
Chang, Hsiu-Wei
論文名稱: 製作視覺資訊圖對於中學生英文寫作想法發展的影響
Effects of Creating Infographics on High School Students' Idea Development in English Writing
指導教授: 王宏均
Wang, Hung-Chun
口試委員: 曾俊傑
Tseng, Jun-Jie
許麗媛
Hsu, Li-Yuan
王宏均
Wang, Hung-Chun
口試日期: 2022/07/28
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系英語教學碩士在職專班
Department of English_In-service Teacher Master's Program of Teaching English as A Second Language
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 138
中文關鍵詞: 多模態教學視覺資訊圖英文寫作教學想法發展
英文關鍵詞: multimodality, infographics, English writing instruction, idea development
研究方法: 準實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201255
論文種類: 代替論文:專業實務報告(專業實務類)
相關次數: 點閱:115下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 科技的發展增加了教育現場融入多元學習刺激的可能性,視覺資訊圖 (infographics)作為教學工具在近來的教育趨勢裡得到許多關注。在視覺資訊圖 融入學習的研究中,許多為探討其對學習成就的影響,然而,其融合於英語寫 作教學的研究佔極少數,其對英語寫作想法影響的研究更少之又少。本研究旨 在探討視覺資訊圖對於中學生英文寫作中想法發展的影響,以及學生對於視覺 資訊圖融入於英文寫作課的看法。本研究受試者為北台灣 75 位高三學生,採量 化與質化兼具的準實驗研究法,在四週的寫作課程中,控制組接受傳統引導式 寫作教學法,實驗組接受視覺資訊圖融入寫作教學的訓練,並於後測後填寫認 知問卷。

    本研究主要發現如下:視覺資訊圖對學生寫作時的想法發展有顯著的影響 (一)實驗組的平均想法數增加;(二)實驗組在想法品質的表現上明顯優於 控制組;(三)實驗組的想法明顯較控制組更契合題目;(四)從問卷結果發 現,多數實驗組學生對視覺資訊圖運用於英文寫作課有正向的看法。學生認同 製作視覺資訊圖有助於增加想法數量及增進想法品質,且對寫作表現有所影 響。此外,根據學生的回饋,視覺資訊圖涵括組織想法、釐清思緒、刺激點子 與協助評估寫作內容等功能。

    綜上所述,本研究認為在寫作前製作視覺資訊圖能有效促進中學生想法數量的增加、提高想法品質以及提升寫作內容與作文題目的關聯性,學生在製作資訊圖表的歷程中能產出更多契合題目的想法。視覺資訊圖有助於發展寫作中解決問題的技巧與提高英文寫作課參與的程度。本研究根據研現提出相應的建議,以供未來相關研究之參考。

    The development of technology has made the stimuli in the educational settings various and diverse. Infographics-integrated instruction has gained more and more attention in the recent educational trend. In the scholarly works related to infographics, a majority of them investigated how this tool affects learners’ academic achievement. However, few of them aimed to explore its effects on EFL writing, especially in the area of idea development. By using both qualitative and quantitative methods, this study intended to investigate the effects of infographics on students’ idea development in English writing, and further explored students’ perceptions towards infographics-creating activity in English writing course. This study adopted quasi-experimental design. A total of seventy-five high school students forming the experiment group (n=37) and the control group (n=38) participated in the study. Different writing instructions lasting for four weeks were given to the control and the experimental group. The control group received the writing instruction that focused on structure and writing conventions, while the experimental group’s writing class incorporated the infographics-creating activity. After the treatment, the experiment group needed to fill in a perception questionnaire.

    The results showed that creating infographics had positive effects on students’ idea development: (1) the experiment group’s idea quantity in the posttest was found more than that in their pretest; (2) the experiment group’s idea quality was found significantly better than that of the control group; (3) the quality of ideas in terms of “relevance” was found significantly better than that of the control group; (4) the experiment group’s perception toward integrating infographics-creating in English writing classes were positive. In general, the students agreed infographics-creating boosted their ideas and it had positive impact on their writing performance. It was reported that infographics helped students organize ideas, clarify thoughts, stimulate ideas and evaluate ideas.

    In conclusion, infographics-creating could successfully enhance high school students’ idea development. From a process-based perspective, infographics-creating seemed to have encouraged students’ divergent thinking ability and have facilitated their thinking process. From a product-based perspective, infographics-creating also seemed to have increased the quantity and quality of students’ ideas, and have reinforced the relevance between the produced contents and the writing topic. Based on the above findings, some suggestions for future studies in relation to integrating infographics into EFL writing class were discussed.

    CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Background and Motivation 1 Purpose of the Study 6 Significance of the Study 7 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 9 L2 Writing 9 Aspects of L2 Writing Performance 9 Process of L2 Writing 12 Idea Generation 16 Idea Evaluation 21 Infographics 23 An Introduction to Infographics 23 Multimodality and Visual Aids 26 Review on the Use of Infographics as Instructional Tools 28 Relationship between Infographics Creating and L2 Writing Composing 32 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 37 Participants and Setting 37 Infographics-Integrated Writing Instruction 38 Teaching Procedure 38 Infographics Platform: Canva 40 A Planning Sheet for Infographics-Creating 41 Research Instruments 42 English Writing Tasks 42 The Questionnaire on Creating Infographics in English Writing 44 Data Collection Procedure 47 Data Analysis 49 Procedures for Evaluating Idea Quantity and Idea Quality 50 Counting Idea Quantity 50 Assessing Idea Quality 52 Statistical Analyses 56 Questionnaires 57 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 59 Performances on Idea Quantity 59 Summary of the Students’ Performances on Idea Quantity 63 Performances on Idea Quality 64 Summary of the Students’ Performances on Idea Quality 75 Students’ Perceptions towards Infographics-Creating Activity 76 Results of Students’ Responses to the Closed-Ended Items 76 Results of Students’ Responses to the Open-Ended Questions 81 The Impact of Infographics-Creating on Idea Development 82 The Impact of Infographics-Creating on Overall English Writing 88 The Affordances of Infographics-Creating on English Writing 91 Difficulties in Creating Infographics for English Writings 94 Summary of the Students’ Perceptions towards Infographics-Creating Activity 96 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 98 Development of the Students’ Performances on Idea Quantity 98 Development of the Students’ Performances on Idea Quality 100 Students’ Perceptions toward Infographics-Creating in the English Writing Classes 103 The Impact of Infographics-Creating on Idea Development 103 The Affordances of Infographics-Creating in English Writing 104 The Difficulties of Infographics-Creating in English Writing 105 Pedagogical Implications and Suggestions 106 Limitations and Future Directions 109 REFERENCES 112 Appendix A Rubrics for Students to Evaluate their Infographics 126 Appendix B Infographics-Creating Worksheet 127 Appendix C Brainstorming Worksheet (Chinese Version) 129 Appendix D Brainstorming Worksheet (English Version) 130 Appendix E Questionnaire on Creating Infographics (Chinese Version) 131 Appendix F Questionnaire on Creating Infographics (English Version) 133 Appendix G Scoring Rubrics for Idea Quality 136 Appendix H Consent Form for the Experimental Group 137 Appendix I Consent Form for the Control Group 138

    財團法人語言訓練測驗中心(2016年)。中級預試考題。全民英檢網。https://www.gept.org.tw/exam_intro/down02.asp
    財團法人大學入學考試中心基金會(2021年)。110學年度學科能力測驗統計圖表:英文科非選擇題分數人數統計表。大學入學考試中心。https://www.ceec.edu.tw/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0J018604485538810196&sid=0L055368691889545285
    財團法人大學入學考試中心基金會(2020年)。109學年度學科能力測驗統計圖表:英文科非選擇題分數人數統計表。大學入學考試中心。https://www.ceec.edu.tw/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0J018604485538810196&sid=0K055300358381913513
    財團法人大學入學考試中心基金會(2019年)。108學年度學科能力測驗統計圖表:英文科非選擇題分數人數統計表。大學入學考試中心。https://www.ceec.edu.tw/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0J018604485538810196&sid=0J100599167817531498
    財團法人大學入學考試中心基金會(2019年)。107年起施測之學科能力測驗暨指定科目考試國文考科(含國寫)、英文考科考試說明公告。大學入學考試中心。https://www.ceec.edu.tw/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0J018585845010094026&sid=0J052602649957008833
    Abilock, D., & Williams, C. (2014). Recipe for an Infographic. Knowledge Quest, 43(2), 46-55.
    Alrwele, N. S. (2017). Effects of infographics on student achievement and students’ perceptions of the impacts of infographics. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6(3), 104-117.
    Antonova, A. (2016). Building sophisticated infographics as effective knowledge visualization and knowledge sharing tool. Rhetoric and Communication e-Journal, 25, 1-21.
    Arefi, M. (1997). The relationship between first and second language writing skills for Iranian students in Sydney: An application of the Interdependence Hypothesis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Western Sydney.
    Baaijen, V. M., & Galbraith, D. (2018). Discovery through writing: Relationships with writing processes and text quality. Cognition and Instruction, 36(3), 199-223.
    Berkenkotter, C. (1982). Writing and problem solving. Language Connections: Writing and Reading across the Curriculum, 33-44.
    Bloom, B. S., Krathwohl, D. R., and Masia, B. B. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longman.
    Bo ̈rner, W. (1989). Planen und Problemlo ̈sen im fremdsprachlichen Schreibprozeß: Einige empirische Befunde [Planning and problem solving in the foreign language writing process: some empirical results]. In U. Klenk, K.-H. Ko ̈rner, & W. Thu ̈mmel, Variatio linguarum. Festschrift zum 60. Geburts- tag von Gustav Ineichen (pp. 43–62). Steiner.
    Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A.M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 1-36. http://doi:10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_1
    Brill, J.M., Kim, D., Branch, R.M. (2007). Visual literacy defined: the results of a Delphi study – can IVLA (operationally) define visual literacy? Journal of Visual Literacy, 27(1), 47-60.
    Chen, Y. M. (2002). The problems of university EFL writing in Taiwan. The Korea TESOL Journal, 5(1), 59-79.
    Chulvi, V., Mulet, E., Chakrabarti, A., Lopez-Mesa, B., González-Cruz, C. (2012). Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods. Journal of Engineering Design 23(4). 241-269.
    Connor, U., & Mbaye, A. (2002). Discourse approaches to writing assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 263-278.
    Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164-195.
    Davidson, R. (2014). Using infographics in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 81(3), 34.
    Davis, M., & Quinn, D. (2013). Visualizing text: The new literacy of infographics. Reading Today, 31(3), 16-18.
    Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497.
    Douglas, L. D., Jillian, M. H., Thomas, L. R., & Eric, L. S. (2006). Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: constructs and scales for idea evaluation1. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(10), 646.
    Duncum, P. (2004). Visual culture isn't just visual: Multiliteracy, multimodality and meaning. Studies in Art Education, 45(3), 252-264.
    Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2016). Getting graphic about infographics: design lessons learned from popular infographics. Journal of Visual Literacy, 35(1), 42-59.
    Finke, R. A., Ward, T. M., and Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. MIT Press.
    Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1977). Problem-solving strategies and the writing process. College English, 39(4), 449-461.
    Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
    Fogal, G. G., & Verspoor, M. H. (2020). Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development (Vol. 54). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Franchi, F. (2012). On visual storytelling and new languages in journalism [Video Podcast]. Vimeo. http://vimeo.com/35951116
    Gail, T. E., & Pat, J. D. (2018). Teaching Writing: Balancing Process and Product. Pearson Education, Inc.
    Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: conceptual processes in text production (pp.139–160). Amsterdam University Press.
    Galbraith, D. (2009). Writing as discovery. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2(6), 26.
    Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56(4), 591-605.
    Guilford, J. P. (1956). The Structure of Intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267-293.
    Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64(2), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048280
    Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
    Hall, C. (1987). Revision strategies in L1 and L2 writing task: A case study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of New Mexico.
    Harun, H., Shaari, N., & Othman, A. (2018, March 18-19). Infographic as a tool to Facilitate Teaching and Learning. [Paper presentation]. SMMTC Postgraduate Symposium 2018. Serlangor, Malaysia.
    Harris, K.R., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Brookes.
    Hayes, J. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2014). Cognitive processes in writing: A framework. In B. Arfe, J. Dockrell, & V. W. Berninger (Eds.), Writing development in children with hearing loss, dyslexia, or oral language problems (pp. 3-15). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199827282.003.0001.
    Herman, A., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2011). The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 13.
    Herring, S. R., Jones, B. R., & Bailey, B. P. (2009). Idea generation techniques among creative professionals. In System sciences, 2009. HICSS’09. 42nd Hawaii international conference (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
    Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 465-483.
    Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461-473.
    Howes, G., & Stevenson, K. (2013). How can designing infographics in response to an economic problem promote boys’ creativity. Retrieved August 3, 2022, from Retrieved from https://www.theibsc.org/uploaded/IBSC/Action_Reseach/AR_2012- 13/Howes_Stevenson_FinalReport.pdf
    Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing (Cambridge Language Education), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi:10.1017/CBO9780511667251
    İslamoğlu, H., Ay, O., İliç, U., Mercimek, B., Dönmez, P., Kuzu, A., & Odabaşı, F. (2015). Infographics: A new competency area for teacher candidates. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 32-39.
    Kalargiros, E. M., & Manning, M. R. (2015). Divergent thinking and brainstorming in perspective: Implications for organization change and innovation. In Research in Organizational Change and Development (pp. 293-327). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http://doi:10.1108/S0897-301620150000023007
    Kharbach, M. (2012). Ways to Teach Using Infographics. Educational Technology and Mobile Learning. Retrieve February 23, 2022, from http://www.educatorstechnology.com/2013/02/ways-to-teach-using-infographics.html.
    Kibar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2014, October 20-23). A new approach to equip students with visual literacy skills: Use of infographics in education [Powerpoint]. In European Conference on Information Literacy, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
    Kibar, P. N., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). Searching for visual literacy: Secondary school students are creating infographics. In European Conference on Information Literacy (pp. 241-251). Springer, Cham.
    Kim, M., Tian, Y., & Crossley, S. A. (2021). Exploring the relationships among cognitive and linguistic resources, writing processes, and written products in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100824.
    Kos, B. A., & Sims, E. (2014). Infographics: The new 5-paragraph essay. Rocky Mountain Celebration of Women in Computing, 23.
    Krauss, J. (2012) Infographics: More than words can say. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(5), 10-14. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ982831.pdf
    Krum, R. (2014). Cool infographics: Effective communication with data visualization and design: John Wiley & Sons.
    Kudrowitz, B. M., & Wallace, D. (2013). Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. Journal of Engineering Design, 24(2), 120-139.
    Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 261–84.
    Lamb, G., Polman, J. L., Newman, A., & Smith, C. G. (2014). Science News Infographics. Science Teacher, 81(3), 25-30.
    Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590-619.
    Lin, C., Hong, J., Hwang, M., & Lin, Y. (2006). A Study of the applicability of Idea Generation Techniques. In Ponencia presentada a the American Creativity Association International Conference.
    Lindstrom, J. H. (2007). Determining appropriate accommodations for postsecondary students with reading and written expression disorders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(4), 229-236.
    Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present, and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308.
    Lyra, K. T., Isotani, S., Reis, R. C., Marques, L. B., Pedro, L. Z., Jaques, P. A., & Bitencourt, I. I. (2016, July). Infographics or graphics+ text: Which material is best for robust learning?. In 2016 ieee 16th international conference on advanced learning technologies (icalt) (pp. 366-370). IEEE.
    Lee, Y. H. (2020). Using Infographics to Enhance Quality Talk in a Freshman English Class [Unpublished master thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University. https://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/thesis/detail/2a36107d5e508ac8a1a694b53af0956e/
    Maamuujav, U., Krishnan, J., & Collins, P. (2020). The utility of infographics in L2 writing classes: A practical strategy to scaffold writing development. TESOL Journal, 11(2), e484.
    Martix, S., & Hodson, J. (2014). Teaching with infographics: practising new digital competencies and visual literacies. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 4(2), 17-27
    Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 41, 31-48.
    McLeod, S. (1987). Some thoughts about feelings: The affective domain and the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 38(4), 426-435.
    Meacham, M. (2015, August). Use infographics to enhance training. TD Magazine, 76-77.
    Mendenhall, S., & Summers, S. (2015). Designing research: Using infographics to teach design thinking in composition. Journal of Global Literacies. Technologies and Emerging Pedagogies, 3(1), 359-371.
    Metros, S. E. (2008). The educator's role in preparing visually literate learners. Theory into Practice, 47(2), 102-109.
    Michalko, M. (2006). Thinkertoys : a handbook of creative-thinking techniques. Ten Speed Press.
    Ministry of Education. (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for Elementary School, Junior High and General Senior High Schools: Subject of English in the Domain of Language. Ministry of Education.
    Moragne e Silva, M. (1988). A Study of Composing in a First and a Second Language. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 1(2), 132-151.
    Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.
    Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 3-23.
    Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter‐Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91-122.
    Mumford, M. D., Todd, E. M., Higgs, C., & Elliott, S. (2018). The skills needed to think creatively: Within-process and cross-process skills. In Individual creativity in the workplace (pp. 129-152). Academic Press.
    Murray, D. (1972). Teach writing as a process not product. The Leaflet, 71(3), 11-14.
    Murray, Donald M. (1984). Write to learn. Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
    Naparin, H., & Saad, A. B. (2017). Infographics in education: Review on infographics design. The International Journal of Multimedia & Its Applications (IJMA), 9(4), 5.
    Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 3477.
    O’Brien, T. (2004). Writing in a foreign language: Teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 37(1), 1-28.
    Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination (1st ed.). Scribner.
    Osborn, A. F. (1979). Applied imagination (3rd ed.). Scribner.
    Ozdamli, F., & Ozdal, H. (2018). Developing an instructional design for the design of infographics and the evaluation of infographic usage in teaching based on teacher and student opinions. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1197-1219.
    Paulus, P. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea‐generating groups. Applied Psychology, 49(2), 237-262.
    Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(1), 7889.
    Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 76-87.
    Polio, C. G. (2001). Second language development in writing: measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity by Kate Wolfe-Quintero, Shunji Inagaki, and Hae-Young Kim. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 423-425.
    Purdy, J. P. (2014). What can design thinking offer writing studies? College Composition and Communication, 65(4), 612-641.
    Rief, L. (2006). What’s right with writing. Voices from the Middle, 13(4), 32–39.
    Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge University Press.
    Rumelhart, D. E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L., & Hinton, G. E., & the PDP Research Group (Eds.) (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition (Vol. II). Bradford Books.
    Runco, M. A. (2014). Cognition and Creativity. Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice (2nd Edition). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-06920-7
    Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66-75.
    Runco, M. A., & Sakamoto, S. O. (1999). Experimental studies in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 62–92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Saddler, B. (2006). Increasing story writing ability through self-regulated strategy development: Effects on young writers with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29 (4), 291–305.
    Said-Metwaly, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Approaches to measuring creativity: A systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 4(2), 238-275.
    Salim, M. S., Saad, M. N., & Nor, B. M. (2021, August). Comparative Study of Low-Cost Tools to Create Effective Educational Infographics Content. In 2021 11th IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE) (pp. 23-28). IEEE.
    Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(1), 1-22.
    Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677.
    Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Sage.
    Silverstein, D., Samuel, P., & DeCarlo, N., (2008). The innovator’ s toolkit: 50+ techniques for predictable and sustainable organic growth. Wiley.
    Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 475-494.
    Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language learning, 49(1), 93-120.
    Smiciklas, M. (2012). The power of infographics: Using pictures to communicate and connect with your audience. Que Publishing.
    Smith, G. F. (1998). Idea‐generation techniques: A formulary of active ingredients. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(2), 107-134.
    Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). Cognitive processes in creative contexts. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach (pp. 1-8). MA: The MIT Press.
    Souder, W. E., & Ziegler, R. W. (1977). A review of creativity and problem solving techniques. Research Management, 20(4), 34-42.
    Spivey, N. N., & King, J. R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 7-26.
    Sturm, J., & Koppenhaver, D. A. (2000). Supporting writing development in adolescents with developmental disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(2), 73-92.
    Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685-718.
    Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking?. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23-47.
    Thompson, C. M. (2015). Creating “visual legacies”: Infographics as a means of interpreting and sharing research. Communication Teacher, 29(2), 91-101.
    Ting, A. (2011). A Study on Taiwanese High School EFL Learners’ Literacy Performance. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 2(3), 416-423.
    Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 67-80). Guilford Press.
    Utami, Y., & Djamdjuri, D. S. (2021, December). Students’ motivation in writing class using of Canva: students’ perception. In Bogor English Student And Teacher (BEST) Conference, 15(2), (pp. 153-159). http://doi.org/10.32832/english.v15i2.5536
    Vanichvasin, P. (2013). Enhancing the quality of learning through the use of infographics as visual communication tool and learning tool. In Proceedings of ICQA 2013 international conference on QA culture: Cooperation or competition (pp. 135-142).
    Vincent, A. H., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163–178.
    Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 145-180.
    Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge University Press.
    Westwood, P. S. (2008). What teachers need to know about reading and writing difficulties. Aust Council for Ed Research.
    Yang, C. D. (2014). Constructive Feedback in L2 Writing with Chinese High School Students in Taiwan. [Master’s Thesis, University of San Francisco]. https://repository.usfca.edu/thes/102
    Yang, H. C., & Plakans, L. (2012). Second language writers’ strategy use and performance on an integrated reading‐listening‐writing task. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 80-103.
    Yavuz-Erkan, D. & İflazoğlu-Saban, A. (2011). Writing performance relative to writing apprehension, self-efficacy in writing, and attitudes towards writing: A correlational study in Turkish tertiary-level EFL. Asian EFL Journal, 13(1), 164-192. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/PDF/March-2011.pdf
    Yundayani, A., Susilawati, S., & Chairunnisa, C. (2019). Investigating the effect of Canva on students’ writing skills. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 169-176.
    Zayan, M. (2015). Create compelling infographics. The Quill; Indianapolis, 103(1), 31.
    Zimmermann, R. (2000). L2 writing: Subprocesses, a model of formulating and empirical findings. Learning and Instruction, 10(1), 73-99.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE