簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李喻安
LI, YU-AN
論文名稱: 融入科技內容教學知識與教師主導觀課於職前華語教師發展線上教學知能之研究
A Study of Integrating TPACK and TDO on Online Teaching Competencies Development of Chinese Pre-service Teachers
指導教授: 張瓅勻
Chang, Li-Yun
口試委員: 楊秉煌
Yang, Ping-Huang
黃博聖
Huang, Po-Sheng
張瓅勻
Chang, Li-Yun
口試日期: 2022/06/24
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 華語文教學系
Department of Chinese as a Second Language
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 110
中文關鍵詞: 科技內容教學知識教師主導觀課遠距教學職前教師
英文關鍵詞: Chinese pre-service teachers, Distant teaching, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), Teacher-driven observation (TDO)
研究方法: 內容分析法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201455
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:128下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著科技的發展與普及,資訊通信科技的成熟使得線上教學漸趨蓬勃,甚至成為近幾年的主流教學模式。如何將科技融入課堂並提升教學效能,已成為現今教師專業成長的重要議題。為了提升教學品質與學生學習成效,《十二年國民基本教育課程綱要》要求每位教師每學年應至少公開授課一次,進行教學觀察與專業回饋。然而,目前國內針對華語職前教師培訓的研究中,較少針對教學觀察進行對於職前教師教學知能發展之探究。因此,本研究以科技內容教學知識(Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge,TPACK)作為框架,探討教師主導觀課(Teacher-Driven Observation,TDO)對職前線上華語教師教學專業知能的影響。
    本研究採混合設計,研究對象為42位華語職前教師,使用問卷蒐集量化和質化資料進行分析:量化數據以描述統計及推論統計處理;質化資料以TPACK架構編碼、轉化成量化數據,再進行推論統計分析。研究結果顯示華語職前教師較關注教學知能(PK)與教學內容知能(PCK)相關的教學議題,而職前教師的關注重點也反映在教學表現的自我評估中,認為PK與PCK的教學技能進步最多。在TDO各階段,觀課階段對於提升職前教師的線上教學技能之影響最為顯著;研究亦發現TPACK和TDO之間有顯著的交互作用,職前教師TPACK知能的發展會隨著TDO「說課—觀課—議課—反思」不同階段的推進,逐漸於議課階段聚焦,再於反思階段擴展。此外,在不同階段中,職前教師主要關注的TPACK知能仍是PK與PCK,科技相關知能的發展較不顯著。
    綜上所述,本研究整體結果顯示TDO有助於華語職前教師提升教學專業知能,特別是教學相關的知能。希冀透過本研究的結果,提供後續線上華語師資培育的另一個切入點,使培育課程之規劃更加豐富多元。

    With the rapid development and popularization of technology, online teaching is flourishing due to the maturity of information and communications technology, even growing into a popular instruction mode in recent years. Integrating technology into education became an important issue for teacher professional development. To promote teachers’ teaching quality and students' learning efficiency, the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education promulgated by the Ministry of Education (MOE), Taiwan, required each teacher to give at least one lesson study per year to do classroom observation and exchange professional feedback. However, less domestic research focuses on how classroom observation impacted pre-service teachers in developing their teaching competencies in Chinese pre-service teachers’ training. Therefore, this study aims to explore the influence of Teacher-driven observation (TDO) on Chinese pre-service teachers’ professional competencies developing with the Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework.
    This study adopted a mixed-method approach and used questionnaires to collect quantitative and qualitative data from 42 Chinese pre-service teachers. The quantitative data were processed with descriptive and inferential statistics; the qualitative data were coded into numbers with the TPACK framework for inferential statistics. The results indicated that the Chinese pre-service teachers paid closer attention to the teaching issues regarding PK and PCK. Meanwhile, their focuses were also reflected in self-efficacy assessments of personal growth; the pre-service teachers thought they progressed more on PK and PCK. Regarding TDO, pre-service teachers’ ratings were significantly higher in the observation stage than in the pre-meeting and debriefing stages. Moreover, there was a significant interaction between TPACK and TDO. The development of these pre-service teachers' TPACK competencies changed along with different stages of TDO. Their attention to various aspects of the TPACK framework gradually focused on the debriefing stage, and then expanded in the reflection stage. Meanwhile, they generally focused more on PK and PCK across different stages of TDO, compared with other aspects of the TPACK framework.
    In summary, these findings suggested that TDO facilitated the pre-service teachers’ development of teaching capabilities, especially on pedagogy-related competencies. The implications of this study provide online Chinese teacher training programs with a novel perspective from previous studies and further enrich the diversity of training program design.

    謝誌 i 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目次 vi 表次 viii 圖次 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 5 第三節 名詞釋義 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 線上華語職前教師專業發展 9 第二節 科技內容教學知識之研究現況 19 第三節 教師主導教學觀察之內涵 32 第三章 研究方法 41 第一節 研究對象 41 第二節 研究流程 42 第三節 研究工具 45 第四節 資料處理與數據分析 50 第四章 研究結果 55 第一節 職前教師關注的教學焦點 55 第二節 職前教師教學表現成長自我評估 57 第三節 TDO對職前教師專業知能發展的影響程度 64 第四節 TPACK 在 TDO 3+1 部曲四個階段的差異 66 第五章 討論與建議 75 第一節 研究結果討論 75 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 89 參考文獻 95 附錄 107 附錄一、觀課焦點調查問卷 107 附錄二、TDO 三部曲問卷 108 附錄三、線上教學整體反思問卷 109

    一、中文文獻
    2016-2020資訊教育總藍圖(2016年5月11日)。
    Trent E. Kaufman, Emily Dolci Grimm(2019)。透明的教師:以同儕蒐集資料精進教學(賴光真等譯)。臺北:五南圖書。(原著出版於2013年)
    十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱(2014年11月28日)。
    中華民國教師專業素養指引 - 師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課程基準(2020年5月4日)。
    王金國(2019)。讓「議課」發揮其預期功能。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(1),205-211。
    王添淼(2015)。國際漢語教師專業發展現狀及其對策。東北師大學報,2期,229-231。
    王勝忠(2019)。108課綱施行後教師公開授課的新取向。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(11),178-183。
    王琦(2020)。國際漢語職前教師的TPACK、技術態度、技術整合自我效能關係研究。西北師大學報,57(5),127-135。
    王慧娟(2008)。華語教師應有的專業素養—專訪美國威斯康辛大學陳雅芬。語象,74期,2-4。
    王學松(2009)。漢語國際教育師資應具備的文化知識和文化素養-以漢語國際教育碩士專業學位學生培養為例。中原華語文學報,4期,1-11。
    申育誠(2019)。淺談日本公開授課類型。師友雙月刊,616期,47-51。
    何淑貞、張孝裕、陳立芬、舒兆民、蔡雅薰、賴明德(2014)。華語文教學導論。臺北市:三民書局。
    吳俊憲(2013)。教師專業發展:評鑑、社群與議題。臺北:五南圖書。
    宋如瑜(2012)。華語教師的教學語言研究——以師資培育為導向。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學博士論文(未出版)。
    李泉(2021)。教學經驗:漢語教師專業發展務實而重要的取向。語言教學與研究,3期,10-21。
    李瑄(2022)。華語教師「機器人輔助語言學習」培育之行動研究:以機器人輔助華語正音教學為例。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學博士論文(未出版)。
    李麗(2003)。對外漢語教學中文學作品導讀的三種詮釋技術。雲南師範大學學報,1(3),17-20。
    林翠雲(2015)。華語同步教學四方互動設計線上帶領策略探析--以美國維吉尼亞大學同步課程之教學設計示例。應華學報,16期,39-60。
    林遠澤(2015)。從洪堡特語言哲學傳統論在漢語中的漢字思維。漢學研究,33(2),7-48。
    侯惠澤(2022)。不管實體、遠距切換,學習動機才是關鍵!4張圖看懂怎麼混成教學。翻轉教育。取自:https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/006732
    姜顏岐(2021)。線上對外漢語教育事業的機遇與挑戰。教育教學,12(3),154-155。
    眀月(2021)。職前對外漢語教師TPACK現狀調查研究——以冀遼兩省三所院校為例。河北省:河北大學碩士論文(未出版)。
    師友雙月刊編輯部(2019)。新課綱下的公開授課。師友雙月刊,616期,0-1。
    郝曉梅(2005)。對外漢語教師應具備的知識素養與能力。北京教育,7期,71-72。
    高熏芳、陳美娟(2002)。國小專家教師專業知能形成歷程要件之研究。國立臺北師範學院學報,15期,527-556。
    張民杰、賴光真(2019)。以TDO公開授課提升教師專業發展。師友雙月刊,616期,5-16。
    連育仁(2011)。資訊融入華語教學模式與成效(上)。取自https://www.huayuworld.org/oldindex/wpcourse/100_course/05/05_lienyujen.pdf
    連崇佑(2020)。華語文混成式教學職前教師培訓課程規劃。臺東縣:國立臺東大學碩士論文(未出版)。
    陳世佳、楊正誠(2005)。教育實習實施同儕觀察對實習教師教師效能感之影響。課程與教學,8(1),111-124。
    陳夢雨、胡茶娟(2020)。漢語國際教育碩士TPACK 能力現狀研究——基於第二屆研究生漢語教學微課大賽的問卷調查數據分析。海外英語,14期,115-117。
    游燕楓(2016)。師資培育生數學領域科技學科教學知覺量表發展。臺中市:國立臺中教育大學碩士論文(未出版)。
    舒兆民(2016)。華語文教學。臺北市:新學林。
    黃心瑜(2020)。國小教師專業學習社群推行教師主導教學觀察(TDO)公開授課之個案研究。臺中市:國立臺中教育大學碩士論文(未出版)。
    黃昭勳(2019)。「打開教室,看見專業」-教師公開授課之我見。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(7),107-111。
    楊惠棟(2014)。漢語國籍傳播視角下優秀對外漢語教師素養探究。高教探索,10期,201。
    楊鋒(2020)。漢語國際教育碩士(MTCSOL)留學生中文教學的信息技術應用能力調查與研究——以重慶市五所高校為例。四川省:西南科技大學碩士論文(未出版)。
    靳孟搖(2021)。國際漢語教師信息化教學能力研究。遼寧省:遼寧大學碩士論文(未出版)。
    趙安婷(2019)。從TPACK觀點探討臺灣華語文教學系所數位技能培養之現況。臺北市:中國文化大學碩士論文(未出版)。
    趙李霞(2021)。簡論對外漢語教師應具備的綜合素質。山西青年,4期,126-127。
    劉世雄(2017)。臺灣國中教師對共同備課、公開觀課與集體議課的實施目的、關注內容以及專業成長知覺之研究。當代教育研究季刊,25(2),43-76。
    劉穎(2010)。合格的對外漢語教師應具備的知識和能力。師資建設,38期,18。
    蔡江坪、李丹薇(2020)。TPACK架構下科技工具的有效應用——以美國羅德島大學中文領航項目二年級教學為例。國際漢語教育,5(4),25-34。
    蔡沐恩(2021)。同步遠距教學對華語職前教師科技教學知能發展研究。桃園縣:中國文化大學碩士論文(未出版)。
    蔡政宏、謝文惠(2011)。科技內容教學知識(TPACK)理論架構對教師專業發展之啟示。取自:https://eb1.hcc.edu.tw/edu/data/page/20150418100103018.pdf
    蔡雅薰、洪榮昭、余信賢(2019)。「國際華語教師學科教學知識問卷」之編製與教師教學能力素養落差分析。測驗學刊,66(4),403-428。
    鄭琇仁(2015)。TPACK華語師資培訓成效之研究。高雄師大學報:人文與藝術類,38期,95-122。
    賴光真、張民杰(2019)。授課教師主導的教學觀察(TDO)與公開授課的分析比較。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(6),73-80。
    鍾念紋、蕭佩姍(2016)。從教學觀察發展脈絡淺談國內教學觀察實施現況。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(1),204-210。
    藍偉瑩(2017)。三部曲─共備、觀課與授課。CASEdu。取自:https://case.ntu.edu.tw/CASEDU/?p=9933
    顏國樑(2017)。國民中小學教師實施公開授課的做法、困境及因應策略。新竹縣教育研究集刊,17期,1-18。
    羅亭雅(2014)。華語教師線上同步教學能力研究。臺東縣:國立臺東大學碩士論文(未出版)。

    二、英文文獻
    Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281-300.
    Alam, J., Aamir, S. M., & Shahzad, S. (2020). Continuous Professional Development of Secondary School Teachers through Peer Observation: Implications for Policy & Practice. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, 1(1), 56-75.
    Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist?. Applied linguistics, 14(2), 115-129.
    Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55(6), 735-752.
    Cai, W. (2016, July). TPACK: A new dimension to Chinese as a second language teacher training. Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2016), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (Vol. 53, pp. 460-465).
    Centre for Teaching Support & Innovation. (2017). Peer observation of teaching: Effective practices. Toronto, ON: Centre for Teaching Support & Innovation, University of Toronto.
    Chai, C. S., Chin, C. K., Koh, J. H. L., & Tan, C. L. (2013). Exploring Singaporean Chinese language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and its relationship to the teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 657-666.
    CHEN, W., & TAN, J. S. (2019, November). Scaffolding computer-supported collaborative lesson design: A spiral model. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computers in Education. Taiwan: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education (pp. 165-171).
    Cheng, H. J. (2018). A TL-TPACK model on CSL pre-service teachers' competencies of online instruction. In Teacher Training and Professional Development: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 280-308). IGI Global.
    Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17–31.
    Compton, L. K. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: A look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73-99.
    Department of Education and Training Melbourne. (2018). Peer observation, Feedback and Reflection: A Practical Guide for Teachers. Victoria. Department of Education and Training.
    DeVellis, R.F. (1991). Scale development. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage publications.
    Drummond, A., & Sweeney, T. (2017). Can an objective measure of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) supplement existing TPACK measures? British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 928–939.
    Gilbert, L. (2005). What Helps Beginning Teachers?. Educational leadership, 62(8), 36-39.
    Goh L.I., Koh J.H.L. (2016). The use of a corpus-based tool to support teachers’ assessment design: An examination through the lens of TPACK. In Educational Technologies: Challenges, Applications and Learning Outcomes. (pp.143-162). Nova Science Publishers.
    Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953-1960.
    Greene, M. D., & Jones, W. M. (2020). Analyzing Contextual Levels and Applications of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in English as a Second Language Subject Area. Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 75-88.
    Guichon, N. (2009). Training future language teachers to develop online tutors’ competence through reflective analysis. ReCALL, 21(2), 166–185.
    Guo, Y., Wang, W., & Li, H. (2019). Chinese Language Teacher Professional Growth: A Case Study. Chinese Language Teaching Methodology and Technology, 2(2), 65–76.
    Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311–326.
    Harris, B. M. (1986). Developmental Teacher Evaluation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Harris, J., Phillips, M., Koehler, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2017). TPCK/TPACK research and development: Past, present, and future directions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 1-8.
    Hsu, C. H., Lan, Y. J., & Tseng, M. F. (2021). A Preliminary Study of Pre-Service Teachers’ Development and Reflections on Online Teaching. In Expanding Global Horizons Through Technology Enhanced Language Learning (pp. 163-175). Springer, Singapore.
    Iakovou, M. (2020). Classroom observation in second language classrooms: Bridging the gap between theory and practice for pre-service and in-service teachers of Greek as an L2. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3(2), 15-36.
    ICT in education. (n.d.). UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/themes/ict-educatio.
    Juan, C. F., Chang, K. E., & Liang, J. C. (2019, November). Exploring the relationships among teaching Chinese as a second language teachers' teaching beliefs, perceptions of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and teaching self-efficacy. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computers in Education. Taiwan: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education (pp. 509-513).
    Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Cunard, A., & Turrou, A. C. (2016). Getting inside rehearsals: Insights from teacher educators to support work on complex practice. Journal of teacher education, 67(1), 18-31.
    Kharade, K., & Peese, H. (2014). Problem-based learning: A promising pathway for empowering pre-service teachers for ICT-mediated language teaching. Policy Futures in Education, 12(2), 262-272.
    Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. ICT integrated teacher education: A resource book, 1-8.
    Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
    Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers' lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887-899.
    Kohut, G. F., Burnap, C., & Mario Yon, ond G. (2007). Peer Observation of Teaching: Perceptions of the Observer and the Observed. College Teaching, 55(1), 19–25.
    Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134.
    Lan, Y.-J., Chang, K.-E., & Chen, N.-S. (2012). CoCAR: An online synchronous training model for empowering ICT capacity of teachers of Chinese as a foreign language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1020-1038.
    Lee, L. W., Mohamed, A. R., & Altamimi, A. A. (2015). Design, development, and evaluation of an automated e-learning tutorial system to instruct pre-service special educators in the Malay Braille code. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,24(3), 481–494.
    Lenkaitis, C. A. (2020). Technology as a mediating tool: videoconferencing, L2 learning, and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 483-509.
    Lin, C. H., Liu, H., & Hu, Y. (2017). Technology and the education of Chinese-language teachers: Where are we now. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 8(1), 1-15.
    Lindstrom, D., Jones, G., Thompson, M., & Hertlein, J. (2021). Developing preservice teacher conceptions of effective teachers using classroom scenarios to practice difficult conversations. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(12), 21-34.
    Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
    McCann, T. M., & Johannessen, L. R. (2004). Why do new teachers cry?. The clearing house: a journal of educational strategies, issues and ideas, 77(4), 138-145.
    Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
    Moore, M. G. (1989). Three Types of Interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7.
    Murphy, E., Rodríguez‐Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583-591.
    Nichols, J. D., & Soe, K. (2013). An analysis of preservice teacher responses to participation in a literacy program for new immigrant children. Multicultural Perspectives, 15(4), 220-226.
    Öz, H. (2015). Assessing pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. International Education Studies, 8(5), 119–130.
    Qiu, C. A., He, H. X., Chen, G. L., & Xiong, M. X. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge in mainland China: A survey of teachers of Chinese as a second language. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25.
    Robbins, P.C. (1991). How to plan and implement a peer coaching program. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED337881.pdf
    Sang G., Dong Y., Chai C.S., Zhou Y. (2013). Development of the Chinese pre-service teachers' Technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Workshop Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2013. (pp.291-297)
    Sang, G., Tondeur, J., Chai, C. S., & Dong, Y. (2016). Validation and profile of Chinese pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 49-65.
    Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115. 106586.
    Shandomo, H. M. (2010). The role of critical reflection in teacher education. School-University Partnerships, 4(1), 101-113.
    Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
    Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In Evaluation models (pp. 117-141). Springer, Dordrecht.
    Technology In Our Life Today and How It Has Changed. (2022, June 8) AgingInPlace. https://aginginplace.org/technology-in-our-life-today-and-how-it-has-changed/
    Toh Y., Wong L.H., Chai C.S., Lee J.Y.L., Ng J.P.S. (2013). Complex interaction between Technology, Pedagogy and Content Knowledge: A case study in Chinese language classroom. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2013. (pp.865-875)
    Tseng, C. C. (2018). An analysis of Chinese practice teachers’ online teaching and its impact on teacher training in a global context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 15, 206-213.
    Tseng, J. J. (2016). Developing an instrument for assessing technological pedagogical content knowledge as perceived by EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 302-315.
    Tseng, J. J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2020). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-24.
    Tseng, J. J., Cheng, Y. S., & Yeh, H. N. (2019). How pre-service English teachers enact TPACK in the context of web-conferencing teaching: A design thinking approach. Computers & Education, 128, 171-182.
    Tseng, M. F., Sun, Y., & Lan, Y. J. (2020). A study of online synchronous immersive communication in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 11(2), 1-23.
    Turgut, Y. (2017). Tracing preservice English language teachers’ perceived TPACK in sophomore, junior, and senior levels. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1368612.
    Wang, W., & Feng, L. (2019). Technology standards for Chinese language teacher education. TPACK: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, 256-272.
    Wong, L. H., Chai, C. S., KING, R. B., Zhang, X., & Aw, G. P. (2014, November). Unpacking the researcher-teacher co-design process of a seamless language learning environment with the TPACK framework. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2014. (pp.886 - 895)
    Wong, L. H., Chai, C. S., Zhang, X., & King, R. B. (2014). Employing the TPACK framework for researcher-teacher co-design of a mobile-assisted seamless language learning environment. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 31-42.
    Xiong, X. B., Ching Sing, C., Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2020). Exploring the relationship between Chinese pre-service teachers’ epistemic beliefs and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Studies, 1-22.
    Yanguas, I., & Bergin, T. (2018). Focus on form in task-based L2 oral computer-mediated communication. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 65-81.
    Zhang, S. (2012). Literacy Study of TCFL Teacher Competencies. Humaniora, 3(1), 326-331.
    Zhu, S., & Yu, L. (2018, October). Study on TCSOL pre-service teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge in China mainland. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (pp. 189-194).

    三、影音資源
    AITSL. (2015, September 29). Introducing Classroom Observation. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/naOAnpEIdSc
    AITSL. (2015, July 2). Classroom Observation Strategies: Instructional Coaching. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/hu20BVKV61c
    AITSL. (2015, September 29). Classroom Observation Strategies: Instructional Rounds. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/aOtzYoR3gxA
    AITSL. (2015, September 29). Classroom Observation Strategies: Learning Walks. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/pjxg6-fxW2Q
    AITSL. (2015, September 29). Classroom Observation Strategies: Lesson Study. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Vv0HJ-ftOAU
    AITSL. (2015, September 29). Classroom Observation Strategies: Peer Observation. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/c_W6tb35r3M
    AITSL. (2015, September 29). Classroom Observation Strategies: Videos of Practice. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/RInOlEdY47Y

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2027/09/11
    QR CODE