簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳漪柔
Chen, Yi-Rou
論文名稱: 投擲沙包活動訓練對中風患者動作與認知表現效益
The Effect of Bean-Bag Activity Training on Motor & Cognition Performance in Patient with Stroke
指導教授: 陳貞夙
Chen, Jen-Suh
口試委員: 陳貞夙
Chen, Jen-Suh
孟令夫
Meng, Ling-Fu
曾國維
Tseng, Kuo-Wei
口試日期: 2022/07/19
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 復健諮商研究所
Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Counseling
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 85
中文關鍵詞: 腦中風動作失能動作能力任務導向活動認知
英文關鍵詞: stroke, motor disorder, motor ability, task-oriented activities, cognition
研究方法: 短期效果追蹤前-後測實驗設計
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201704
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:100下載:15
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中風是全球發生率高的疾病,常伴隨動作與認知失能,進而影響日常生活功能表現。隨著醫療進步,發展出多元保守治療手法來提升病患的能力,降低疾病所帶來的功能性影響。為了有效將病患習得能力類化至日常生活,中風患者在臨床治療手法上強調任務導向功能性訓練。多項研究證實,任務導向模式訓練有助於提升病患的動作表現。其中投擲沙包活動訓練是臨床上常使用的任務導向訓練活動,屬於全身性動態活動,藉由任務的引導,誘發病患全身性感覺、動作協調;而有研究顯示動作訓練過程中,腦部的血流量會跟隨著運動的強度增加,有助於改善、維持及提升認知功能。然而相關效益研究較少,其臨床效益假設需要實證研究的證實。
    本研究採取短期效果追蹤前-後測實驗設計(Pretest-posttest short-term follow-up study),於臺北地區醫院、復健科診所徵求符合研究條件,且自願參與的中風患者共計21位,分別為實驗組11位;對照組10位。納入條件包括(1)腦中風診斷、病程超過6個月(含6個月)(2)布朗斯壯動作恢復層級(Brunnstrom Stage of Motor Recovery,BSMR)上、下肢動作層級達3以上、(3)改良式艾許沃斯氏量表(Modified Ashworth Scale,MAS)層級上下肢爲2以下、(4)簡易智能量表(Mini-Mental State Examination,MMSE)得分達24分以上、(5)可獨立行走(6)年齡為30~80歲及。符合條件且同意參與研究者會記錄個人基本資料、醫療相關紀錄,並以動作及認知方面能力做為結果參數。
    動作能力使用的工具包含傅格梅爾動作評估量表(Fugl-meyer Assessment,FMA)(上肢與下肢動作分數)、積木與盒子測驗(Box and Block Test,BBT)(一分鐘內健側與患側手移動的積木數量)、伯格氏平衡量表(Berg Balance Scale,BBS)(總分56分)、計時起身-行走測驗(Timed-up and Go Test,TUG)(由座椅起立往前走三公尺轉身回到座椅坐下所需秒數)、功能性伸臂測驗(Functional Reach Test,FRT)(健側手臂最大前伸距離公分)、靜態站姿下壓力中心(Center of Pressure,COP)晃動量;認知能力使用工具為褚氏注意力測驗(Chu’s Attention Test,CAT)(10分鐘完成的題數及錯誤數)、刪除測驗(Cancellation Test,CT)(包含形狀刪除測驗CST與數字刪除測驗CNT完成的時間及錯誤數)及彩色路徑描繪測驗(Color Trails Test,CTT)版本1和2(測驗所需時間與干擾值)。
    所有的參與者前測完成,讓研究抽籤分為實驗組或對照組。實驗組接受投擲沙包活動訓練30分鐘、患側下肢訓練10分鐘及患側上肢訓練20分鐘;對照組接受站立桌訓練30分鐘、患側下肢訓練10分鐘及患側上肢訓練20分鐘,兩組在患側上下肢訓練皆以肌肉張力正常化、動作協調性與神經肌肉功能整合為主。每位接受每週2次、每次介入60分鐘並持續12週的治療訓練。於研究開始前1週、研究介入第6週及第12週進行成效評量與追蹤。
    資料分析以 SPSS 23.0套裝統計軟體進行統計分析,以描述性統計呈現兩組個案之特性。以卡方(Chi-square)檢定兩組之性別、教育程度、修正版艾許沃斯氏量表、布朗斯壯動作恢復上下肢層級在兩組是否配對;以t-test檢定兩組之平均年齡、身高、體重、中風時間與簡易智能量表是否配對。兩組訓練之成效差異,以雙因子變異數分析(Two way ANOVA)進行檢定,組間因子是組別、組內因子是測驗時間,同時計算效果值。
    結果顯示,兩組在人口學特性方面兩組相當,在描述性統計分析結果顯示p值結果皆 > 0.05無顯著差異。在訓練成效上,兩組與時間交互檢驗結果得知,兩組在TUG(p = 0.022)、FRT(p = 0.01)及Berg(p = 0.034)達顯著差異(p < 0.05),而在其他變項皆無顯著差異。 效果量顯示FMA-U(ηp2 = 0.066)、BBTNH(ηp2 = 0.09)、TUG(ηp2 = 0.182)、FRT(ηp2 = 0.252)、BBS(ηp2 = 0.206)、CNM(ηp2 = 0.128)、CSM(ηp2 = 0.088)、BFSC(ηp2 = 0.096)、BFTC(ηp2 = 0.109)、HTC(ηp2 = 0.069)、RC(ηp2 = 0.078)皆達到中度以上的效果量。從組內效應檢定結果得知,實驗組(EG)在FMA-L(p = 0.008)、BBTH(p = 0.009)、BBTNH(p = < 0.001)、TUG(p = .007)、FRT(p = < .001)、BBS(p = < .001)、BFTC(p = .04)、CAT(p = 0.007)及CTT1(p = 0.044)皆 < 0.05有顯著差異;對照組(CG)在FMA-L(p = 0.002)、BBTH(p = 0.17)、BBTNH(p = 0.001)、BBS(p = 0.004)及BFTO(p = 0.03)皆 < 0.05有顯著差異。兩組於動作能力表現於6週與12週的訓練下,動作能力表現有進步;認知能力結果顯示,為期12週兩組訓練對於認知能力表現有提升的潛能。整體而言,兩組完成12週的訓練效果比參與6週有更多的進步幅度,而實驗組所參與的訓練相較於對照組在動作及認知能力上也有更顯著的提升。
    結論為參與投擲沙包活動及站立推拉箱訓練,在為期12週的訓練下,對中風患者在動作與認知能力有所助益,投擲沙包訓練對改善中風患者行走與姿勢控制能力的改善效果優於站立推拉箱訓練。

    Stroke is one of the diseases with high incidence in Taiwan. It often accompanies movement and cognition disorder , which affects the performance of daily activities. In clinical treatment, therapists use many novel techniques to promote motor function. Lots of studies suggested that task-oriented functional training improved and upgraded patient’s motor、cognition and daily function. Bean-Bag activity is a dynamic task- oriented activity often used in clinics. But there are few studies investigating its training effects. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the activity training on motor and daily life functions in patients with stroke.
    The study design is the Pre-and post-test design with short-term effect follow-up. Twenty one patients who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria was recruited. After the pre-study assessments, participants was assigned into experimental or control group randomly. The treatment program for participants in experimental group is bean-bag activity、lower extremity (L/E) training and ipsilateral upper extremity (U/E) training;the participants in control group participatetr routine occupational therapy program, include standing table training、L/E training and ipsilateral U/E training. Both groups received training twice a week、60 minutes for each session, and the treatment continued for 12 weeks. The demographic data, including the gender、education、MAS、Brunnstrom stage、ages、height、weight、onset time was collected. The outcome measures included Fugl-meyer assessment (FMA)、Box and block test (BBT)、Berg balance scale (BBS)、Timed up and go test (TUG)、Functional reaching test (FRT)、Center of pressure in static standing (COP)、Color trails test (CTT)、Cancellation test (CT) and Chu’s attention test (CAT). All participants will be evaluated one-week before and 6 weeks and 12 weeks after training.
    SPSS 23.0 software package was used for all statistical analysis. Descriptive analysis was used for comparison of the demographic characteristics of two groups. The gender、education、MAS and the Brunnstrom stage difference between the two groups was determined by Chi-square. T-Test verifiesd whether the ages、height、weight、onset time of the two groups were matched. The difference of between groups in outcome measure was analyzed with two- way analysis of variance (Two-way ANOVA). Between-group factor is Test time is within-group factor,and the effect size was calculated。
    The results showed that two groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics, and the results of the descriptive statistical analysis showed no significant difference( p > 0.05)。The results of group and test time interaction was as follows: the two groups were significantly different (p < 0.05) in TUG (p = 0.022)、FRT (p = 0.01) and BBS (p = 0.034) , and there were no significant differences in other variables. However, the effect size showsd FMA-U (ηp2 = 0.066)、BBTNH (ηp2 = 0.090)、TUG (ηp2 = 0.182)、FRT (ηp2 = 0.252)、BBS (ηp2 = 0.206)、CNM (ηp2 = 0.128)、CSM (ηp2 = 0.088)、BFSC (ηp2 = 0.096)、BFTC (ηp2 = 0.109)、HTC (ηp2 = 0.069)、RC (ηp2 = 0.078) all achieved moderate or high effect size levels. The results of the within-group effect test showed that the experimental group (EG) was significantly different in FMA-L (p = 0.008)、BBTH (p = 0.009)、BBTNH (p = < 0.001)、TUG (p = 0.007)、FRT (p= < 0.001)、BBS (p = < 0.001)、BFTC (p = 0.04)、CAT (p = 0.007) and CTT1 (p = 0.044) ; the control Group were significant different in in FMA-L (p = 0.002)、BBTNH (p = 0.001)、BBS (p = 0.004) and BFTO (p = 0.030).
    The motor performance of two groups improved after the training of 6 weeks and 12 weeks;the cognitive performance results showed that 12 weeks training in the two groups had the potential to improve cognitive performance. Overall, the training effects of two groups after 12 weeks of training progressed more than at 6 weeks. The training in experimental group resulted in more significant improvement in motor and cognitive than the training in control group.

    中文摘要 ................................................................................................. ⅱ 英文摘要 ................................................................................................. ⅴ 第一章 緒論 第一節、研究背景 ................................................................................... 1 第二節、研究目的 ................................................................................... 3 第三節、研究問題與假說 ........................................................................ 3 第四節、名詞釋義 ......................................................................,............ 4 第二章 文獻探討 第一節、腦中風的流行病學與病理機制 ................................................... 7 第二節、腦中風患者動作失能與認知失能表現 ............,.......................... 10 第三節、動作控制神經學與生物力學基礎 .............................................. 12 第四節、常用訓練與效益 ....................................................................... 13 第三章 研究方法 第一節、研究設計與架構 ....................................................................... 19 第二節、研究對象 .................................................................................. 20 第三節、研究流程與訓練方式 ................................................................ 21 第四節、研究工具 .................................................................................. 25 第五節、資料處理與統計分析 ................................................................ 34 第四章 研究結果 第一節、研究對象基本資料 .................................................................... 37 第二節、實驗組與對照組功能之前測 .............................................. 40 第三節、兩組測驗時間點的結果敘述與兩組交互作用結果 ..................... 41 第四節、投擲沙包訓練對動作功能的改變............................................... 50 第五節、投擲沙包訓練對認知功能的改變 .............................................. 53 第五章 討論 ............................................................................................ 65 參考文獻 ................................................................................................. 73 附錄 ........................................................................................................ 85

    Andersen, K. K., Olsen, T. S., Dehlendorff, C., & Kammersgaard, L. P. (2009). Hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes compared: stroke severity, mortality, and risk factors. Stroke, 40(6), 2068-2072.
    Army Individual Test Battery (1944) Manual of directions and scoring. War Department, Adjunct General's Office, Washington, DC.
    Berg, K., Wood-Dauphine, S., Williams, J. I., & Gayton, D. (1989). Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada, 41(6), 304-311.
    Berg, K. O., Wood-Dauphinee, S. L., Williams, J. I., & Maki, B. (1992). Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Canadian Journal of Public Health= Revue canadienne de sante publique, 83, S7-11.
    Blum, L., & Korner-Bitensky, N. (2008). Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Physical Therapy, 88(5), 559-566.
    Bohannon, R. W. (2007). Muscle strength and muscle training after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(1), 14-20.
    Brunnstrom, S. (1966). Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Physical Therapy, 46(4), 357-375.
    Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Faul, F. (2001). G*Power. Retrieved April 25th, 2012, from http://www.psycho.uniduesseldorf.de/aap/projects/gpower/
    Cacchio, A., De Blasis, E., De Blasis, V., Santilli, V., & Spacca, G. (2009). Mirror therapy in complex regional pain syndrome type 1 of the upper limb in stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23(8), 792-799.
    Cauraugh, J. H., & Summers, J. J. (2005). Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: Arehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Progress in Neurobiology, 75(5), 309-320.
    Chen, P. M., Kwong, P. W., Lai, C. K., & Ng, S. S. (2019). Comparison of bilateral and unilateral upper limb training in people with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 14(5), e0216357.
    Chern, J. S., Yang, S. W., & Wu, C. Y. (2006). Whole-body reaching as a measure of dynamic balance in patients with stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 85(3), 201-208.
    Choi, J.H., Kim, B.R., Han, E.Y., & Kim, S.M. (2015). The Effect of Dual-Task Training on Balance and Cognition in Patients With Subacute Post-Stroke. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39, 81 - 90.
    Combs, S. A., Dugan, E. L., Passmore, M., Riesner, C., Whipker, D., Yingling, E., & Curtis, A. B. (2010). Balance, balance confidence, and health-related quality of life in persons with chronic stroke after body weight–supported treadmill training. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(12), 1914-1919.
    Dawson, D. R., & Tanner-Cohen, C. (1997). Visual scanning patterns in an adult Chinese population: Preliminary normative data. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 17(4), 264-279.
    Dean, C. M., & Shepherd, R. B. (1997). Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 28(4), 722-728.
    Dean, C. M., Richards, C. L., & Malouin, F. (2000). Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(4), 409-417.
    Duncan, P. W., Studenski, S., Chandler, J., & Prescott, B. (1992). Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans. Journal of gerontology, 47(3), M93-M98.
    Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975).“Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric research, 12(3), 189-198.
    Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med, 7(1), 13-31.
    Grimm, R. J. (1983). Program disorders of movement. In J. E. Desrnedt (Ed.), Motor control mechanisms in health and disease (pp. 1-11). New York: Raven Press.
    Hafsteinsdóttir, T. B., Rensink, M., & Schuurmans, M. (2014). Clinimetric properties of the Timed Up and Go Test for patients with stroke: a systematic review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 21(3), 197-210.
    Haruyama, K., Kawakami, M., & Otsuka, T. (2017). Effect of Core Stability Training on Trunk Function, Standing Balance, and Mobility in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 31(3), 240-249.
    Hsiao, S. J., Pan, A. W., Chung, L., & Lu, S. T. (2000). The use of evaluation tools in mental health Occupational therapy: A national survey. Journal of Occupational Therapy Association, ROC, 18, 19-32.
    Hsiao, M. Y., Li, C. M., Lu, I. S., Lin, Y. H., Wang, T. G., & Han, D. S. (2018). An investigation of the use of the Kinect system as a measure of dynamic balance and forward reach in the elderly. Clinical Rehabilitation, 32(4), 473-482.
    Huang, H. C., & Wang, T. Y. (2009). Stimulus effects on cancellation task performance in children with and without dyslexia. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 539-545.
    Hu, H. H., Sheng, W. Y., Chu, F. L., Lan, C. F., & Chiang, B. N. (1992). Incidence of stroke in Taiwan. Stroke, 23(9), 1237-1241.
    Hung, Y. C., & Spingarn, A. (2018). Whole body organization during a symmetric bimanual pick up task for children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Gait & Posture, 64, 38-42.
    Ivey, F. M., Hafer-Macko, C. E., & Macko, R. F. (2008). Task-oriented treadmill exercise training in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45(2), 249.
    Jang, S. H., Kim, Y. H., Cho, S. H., Lee, J. H., Park, J. W., & Kwon, Y. H. (2003). Cortical reorganization induced by task-oriented training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients. Neuroreport, 14(1), 137-141.
    Jonsdottir, J., Cattaneo, D., Recalcati, M., Regola, A., Rabuffetti, M., Ferrarin, M., & Casiraghi, A. (2010). Task-oriented biofeedback to improve gait in individuals with chronic stroke: motor learning approach. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24(5), 478-485.
    Kahn, L. E., Zygman, M. L., Rymer, W. Z., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2006). Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 3(1), 12.
    Kang, T. W., Lee, J. H., & Cynn, H. S. (2016). Six-week Nordic treadmill training compared with treadmill training on balance, gait, and activities of daily living for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 25(4), 848-856.
    Kang, Y., Na, D. L., & Hahn, S. (1997). A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc, 15(2), 300.
    Katz-Leurer, M., Fisher, I., Neeb, M., Schwartz, I., & Carmeli, E. (2009). Reliability and validity of the modified functional reach test at the sub-acute stage post-stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(3), 243-248.
    Knott, M. (1966). Neuromuscular facilitation in the child with central nervous system deficit. Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, 7,721–724.
    Lee, P. S., Liu, C. H., Lin, H. Y., Chen, Y. L., Lu, W. S., & Hsieh, C. L. (2014). Test-retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of Chu. Taiwanese Society of Psychiatry, 28(1), iv+-46.
    Leroux, A., Pinet, H., & Nadeau, S. (2006). Task-oriented intervention in chronic stroke: changes in clinical and laboratory measures of balance and mobility. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 85(10), 820-830.
    Liaw, L. J., Hsieh, C. L., Lo, S. K., Chen, H. M., Lee, S., & Lin, J. H. (2008). The relative and absolute reliability of two balance performance measures in chronic stroke patients. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(9), 656-661.
    Liparulo, L., Zhang, Z., Panella, M., Gu, X., & Fang, Q. (2017). A novel fuzzy approach for automatic Brunnstrom stage classification using surface electromyography. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 55(8), 1367-1378.
    Lowery, N., Ragland, D., Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., & Moberg, P. J. (2004). Normative data for the symbol cancellation test in young healthy adults. Applied Neuropsychology, 11(4), 216-219.
    Lucas, S. J., Cotter, J. D., Brassard, P., & Bailey, D. M. (2015). High-intensity interval exercise and cerebrovascular health: curiosity, cause, and consequence. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 35(6), 902-911.
    Malouin, F., Pichard, L.E., Bonneau, C., Durand, A., & Corriveau, D.M. (1994). Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 75 11, 1206-12 .
    Mesulam, M. M. (Ed.). (1985). Contemporary neurology series, volume 26. Philadelphia: Davis.
    Mesulam, M. M. (2000). Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology. Oxford University Press.
    Naghdi, S., Nakhostin Ansari, N., Azarnia, S., & Kazemnejad, A. (2008). Interrater reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) for patients with wrist flexor muscle spasticity. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 24(5), 372-379.
    Ng, S. S., & Hui-Chan, C. W. (2005). The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(8), 1641-1647.
    Parker, V. M., Wade, D. T., & Langton Hewer, R. (1986). Loss of arm function after stroke: Measurement, frequency, and recovery. International Rehabilitation Medicine, 8(2), 69-73.
    Park, N. W., & Ingles, J. L. (2001). Effectiveness of attention rehabilitation after an acquired brain injury: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology, 15(2), 199.
    Phipps, S. C., & Roberts, P. S. (2006). Motor learning. In H. M. Pendleton & W. Schultz-Krohn (Eds.), Pedretti's occpational therapy: practice skills for physical dysfunction (pp. 791-800). United states: Mosby.
    Platz, T., Pinkowski, C., van Wijck, F., Kim, I. H., Di Bella, P., & Johnson, G. (2005). Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19(4), 404-411.
    Rothgangel, A. S., Morton, A., Van den Hout, J. W. E., & Beurskens, A. J. H. M. (2007). Mirror therapy in rehabilitation after stroke: effectiveness on upper limb functioning in chronic stroke patients. Neur Rehab, 13, 271-276.
    Sarri, M., Greenwood, R., Kalra, L., & Driver, J. (2009). Task-related modulation of visual neglect in cancellation tasks. Neuropsychologia, 47(1), 91-103.
    Sathian, K., Greenspan, A. I., & Wolf, S. L. (2000). Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 14(1), 73-76.
    Sawner, K. A., LaVigne, J. M., & Brunnstrom's. (1992). Brunnstrom’s movement therapy in hemiplegia: a neurophysiological approach. PA: Lippincott.
    Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of modern applied statistical methods, 8(2), 26.
    Stevenson, T. J. (2001). Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 47(1), 29-38.
    Stewart, K. C., Cauraugh, J. H., & Summers, J. J. (2006). Bilateral movement training and stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 244(1-2), 89-95.
    Summers, J. J., Kagerer, F. A., Garry, M. I., Hiraga, C. Y., Loftus, A., & Cauraugh, J. H. (2007). Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: a TMS study. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 252(1), 76-82.
    Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. (2007). Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
    Szturm, T., Peters, J. F., Otto, C., Kapadia, N., & Desai, A. (2008). Task-specific rehabilitation of finger-hand function using interactive computer gaming. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(11), 2213-2217.
    Thielman, G. T., Dean, C. M., & Gentile, A. M. (2004). Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(10), 1613-1618.
    Thieme, H., Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Behrens, J., & Dohle, C. (2012). Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (3).
    Voelcker-Rehage, C., Godde, B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2011). Cardiovascular and coordination training differentially improve cognitive performance and neural processing in older adults. Fronties in Human Neuroscience, 5, 26.
    Wade, D. T., & Hewer, R. L. (1987). Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 50(2), 177–182.
    Waller, S. M., & Prettyman, M. G. (2012). Arm training in standing also improves postural control in participants with chronic stroke. Gait & posture, 36(3), 419-424.
    Walshe, F. M. R. (1923). On certain tonic or postural reflexes in hemiplegia, with special reference to the so-called “associated movements.”. Brain, 46(1), 1-37.
    Woollacott, M. H., & Tang, F. T. (1997). Balance control during walking in the older adult: research and its implications. Physical Therapy, 77(6), 646–660.
    Yang, H. C., Lee, C. L., Lin, R., Hsu, M. J., Chen, C. H., Lin, J. H., & Lo, S. K. (2014). Effect of biofeedback cycling training on functional recovery and walking ability of lower extremity in patients with stroke. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 30(1), 35-42.
    Yang, Y. R., Wang, R. Y., Lin, K. H., Chu, M. Y., & Chan, R. C. (2006). Task-oriented progressive resistance strength training improves muscle strength and functional performance in individuals with stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20(10), 860-870.
    Yoo, C., & Park, J. (2015). Impact of task-oriented training on hand function and activities of daily living after stroke. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 27(8), 2529-2531.
    Zorowitz, R. D., Gross, E., & Polinski, D. M. (2002). The stroke survivor. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(13), 666-679.
    王順正 (1997)。運動技術分析-運動生物力學研究。高雄市:復文圖書。
    呂文賢、連雅慧、謝清麟 (2015)。原版柏格氏平衡量表與短版柏格氏平衡量表應用於亞急性中風病人之反應性比較。臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌,11(2),77-86。
    李佳宜、林克忠、吳菁宜、連倚南、許美慧 (2006)。改良式侷限誘發動作治療於輕中度腦中風患者之成效:運動學分析之研究。職能治療學會雜誌,24,25-35。
    李玲玉、何函儒 (2017)。多感官音樂活動促進多重障礙幼兒持續注意力與肢體動作之學習成效。特殊教育學報(45),25-54。
    林淑惠、黃瑞珍 (2018)。手腳協調訓練對腦中風病患之初步改善成效-個案報告。Journal of Health Management,16(1),13-22。
    周詩涵、吳菁疑、陳瓊玲、郭美英、呂東武 (2007)。左腦中風患者與健常人於雙手協調活動之運動學表現。臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌,3,1:30-40。
    吳唯平、王令儀 (2012)。運動與平衡。政大體育,(21),73-89。
    林嘉皇、黃奕清、劉燦宏、吳菁宜、王詩涵、黃百川 (2013) 。鏡像治療對慢性腦中風患者上肢動作功能之療效。臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌,9(1),28-40。
    林雙如、林靜兒 (2016)。注意力與動作表現。中華體育季刊30(3),221-228。林寶城 (2008)。運動生物力學。台中市:華格納企業。
    吳鑫漢 (2016)。偏癱病人運動控制問題與處理修訂初版。國家圖書館出版品預行編目資料。
    洪違憲、許弘昌 (2006)。目標物呈現對中風患者於站姿下伸臂動作表現及下肢平衡的影響。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
    莊國瑋、王榮俊、黃亭韶、陳克銘、于瑛輝、高木榮 (2008)。限制-誘發動作治療於中風病人復健之療效。北市醫學雜誌,5(1),1-14。
    祝旭東、王淳厚、謝清麟、陳美香、陳瓊玲 (1996)。布氏動作恢復量表之信度及同時效度研究。職能治療學會雜誌,14(1),1-12。
    曹汶龍 (2006)。缺血性腦中風的症狀與診斷。慈濟醫學雜誌,18(5_S),1-3。
    陳明輝、宋貞儀、黃欽聖、黃千瑀 (2014) 。職能與物理治療之評估共識: 以中風病人 [動作恢復] 與 [平衡] 為例。職能治療學會雜誌,32(2),247-268。
    陳惠瑜、林昭宏、鍾蝶起、陳宇光、何美瑤 (2018)。跑步機訓練對慢性期腦中風病人平衡和步行能力的成效。物理治療,43(1),1-9。
    陳聖雄、林裕晴、廖麗君、歐育如、楊育昇、張志仲 (2010)。兩種上之阻力訓練模式對慢性中風病人上肢動作功能療效之比較。職能治療學會雜誌,28(2),16-30。
    陳綉儀、湯佩芳、胡名霞 (2007)。中風病患任務導向治療模式臨床效果之系統性文獻回顧。物理治療,32(6),308-315。
    郭曉燕、花茂棽 (2015)。彩色路徑描繪測驗(中文版)。中國行為科學社。
    黃琬倩、楊婕淩、吳菁宜、林克忠 (2009)。不同雙側上肢訓練模式對中風復健成效之文獻回顧。 職能治療學會雜誌,2009,27,第2:P29-P48。
    張炳華、曾庭儀、劉美玉、李詠慧、葉守正 (2012)。中風後認知障礙與顱內血管阻塞之關聯性分析。澄清醫護管理雜誌,8(3),9-17。
    廖建彰、李采娟、林瑞雄、宋鴻樟 (2006)。2000年台灣腦中風發生率與盛行率的城鄉異。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,25,2006,3:223-230。
    劉冠佑, 陳培文, 吳錫修, & 吳信義. (2014)。植基於侷限誘發動作治療原理之復健系統開發. 福祉科技與服務管理學刊,2(1),71-82。
    鄭麗玉 (2006)。認知心理學:理論與應用。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    薛漪平等人 (2013)。生理疾病職能治療學。台北市:禾楓書局。
    魏慈慧、許瑋丹、吳菁宜、林克忠 (2007)。目標物距離與軀幹侷限對中風病患伸手及物動作表現的影響:運動學分析。職能治療學會雜誌,25(1),45-58。
    羅文琪、湯佩芳 (2000)。簡介傅格-梅爾評估量表及其在中風復健之應用。物
    理治療,25(4),239-250。
    羅敏文、巫怡慧、吳菁宜、林克忠 (2010)。漸進式阻力運動對中風病人療效之文獻回顧。臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌,6(2),100-110。
    蘇佳瑢、林克忠、盧時雨、吳菁宜 (2010)。現代任務導向中風復建途徑之文獻回顧。臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌,6(1),50-65。
    參考手冊:台大功能性測驗手冊,2005。
    台灣腦中風學會(2018)。腦中風之現況與流行病學特徵。檢自:
    https://www.stroke.org.tw/GoWeb2/include/index.php?Page=5-1&paper02=4156067525bc96c3a9ee9b
    衛福部國民健康署 (2022)。慢性疾病防治組,腦血管疾病。檢自:
    https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=213
    衛生福利部國民健康署(2020)。年度死因統計。檢自:
    https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-4626-56184-1.html
    蔡佩倫。以眼球追總儀器評估中風病患肢之視覺注意力-成果報告。國立成功大學。
    http://repository.ncku.edu.tw/retrieve/132630/7013311010-000002.pdf

    下載圖示
    QR CODE