簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 賀嘉潔
Ho, Chia Chieh
論文名稱: 不同性別國高中生對幽默影像廣告之評價與理解
Judgment and Comprehension of Humorous Commercial Films in Different Gender of Junior high and senior high school Students
指導教授: 伊彬
I, Bin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 設計學系
Department of Design
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 95
中文關鍵詞: 幽默廣告幽默理解幽默評價
英文關鍵詞: humorous advertisement, humorous comprehension, humorous judgment
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:177下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討不同性別之國中九年級以及高中二年級青少年對於情感機制、認知機制、社會機制三類幽默影像廣告的評價、理解程度等資訊。本研究採2(年齡)× 2(性別)×3(分類)實驗設計,要求參與者觀看三類幽默影像廣告並填寫結構式問卷。研究結果顯示:1. 幽默廣告的理解在年齡上產生差異:高中二年級對幽默廣告的理解程度均高於國中九年級,而女性理解程度亦高於男性;2. 幽默評價程度:在「情感機制」、「認知機制」與「社會機制」當中,女生比男生有更高的幽默評價,而國中九年級幽默評價高於高二;3. 三機制幽默廣告間:「情感機制」的幽默廣告理解最高,「認知機制」的幽默廣告理解最低;4. 三機制幽默廣告間:「情感機制」的幽默廣告評價最高,「認知機制」次之「社會機制」評價最末。

    This study aims at understanding the humor judgment and comprehension in different gender of adolescents (nine-grade) and (eleven-grade) on humorous advertisements, classified into affective, cognitive, and social types. The study controlled 2 variables, which are the “types of advertisements” and “questionnaire”.Through a 2(age)×2(gender)× 3(types)experiment, the participants were requested to watch the stimuli and respond to a structured questionnaire.(1) Humor comprehension: The rate of humorous comprehension in G-11 students is higher than G-9 students, and female is significantly higher than male (2) Humor judgment: In affective, cognitive and social types, female is significantly higher than male,and G-9 is higher than G-11. (3) Between three types, affective type has the highest rate in humor comprehension. Cognitive type has the lowest rate in humor comprehension. (4) Between three types, affective type has the highest rate in humor preferences; cognitive second and social type has the lowest rate in humor preferences. The results collected can be used as advertisement design reference data in future.

    摘要………………..……………………………………….……...…………I Abstract………………..……………………..……………………..………II 謝誌………………..………………..…………………..…..………..…III 目錄…………………………………………..……………………..…………IV 表目錄…………………………………………..…………………..….……VIII 圖目錄………………..………………………………………………..………IX 第一章 緒論………………..…………………………………..……………1 1.1研究背景與動機……………………………..….………….….………..1 1.2 研究目的……………………………………………..……………..……..2 1.3研究範圍與限制………………………………..….…………..……….….3 1.4研究流程…………………………………….………..…….….…………..4 第二章 文獻探討……………………………..…………….………..…….5 2.1 幽默………………………………….…………………..….……………..5 2.1.1 幽默的定義……………………………………………..………..……5 2.1.2 幽默產生的機制……………………………………….……..….……6 2.1.3 小結……………………………………….……………….……..……6 2.2 幽默廣告………………………………………………...…….……..……7 2.2.1 幽默廣告的定義………………………………...……...……..……7 2.2.2 幽默廣告的種類………………………………………….….…..……7 2.2.3 幽默廣告相關研究……………………………………..….…….……8 2.2.4 小結……………………………………….………….……..…..……10 2.3 幽默研究方法綜觀…………………………………………….…...……11 2.3.1 觀察法……………………………………….…….……….…...……11 2.3.2 晤談法……………………………………………..………..…..……11 2.3.3 自評法…………………………………...….……..……..…..……11 2.3.4 小結……………………………………...…….…..……..…..……13 2.4 性別角色…………………………………….………..…….…....……14 2.4.1 性別角色定義………………………………………..…….….…..…14 2.4.2 性別刻板印象……………………………….……….…….….…..…14 2.4.3 性別刻板印象形成基礎…………………………..……….….…..…15 2.4.4 性別刻板印象威脅…………………………………..…….….…..…15 2.4.5 性別角色發展理論…………………………….……….……..…..…16 2.4.6 性別與圖像……………………………………….……….…...…….18 2.4.7 小結………………………………………..……………….…...……19 2.5 認知……………….……………….…..………………………....……19 2.5.1 認知發展………………………….…..………………………...……19 2.5.2 性別認知發展理論…………………….…….……………..…..……19 2.5.3 認知與幽默發展………………………….…………….….…...……20 2.5.4 青少年認知發展理論…………………………...……….………..…21 2.5.5 小結……………….…………….…..……….……….….…...……22 2.6 幽默理解……………………………………………………………………22 2.6.1年齡、性別對幽默理解所造成的差異………………………………22 2.6.2 小結……………….…………….…..……….…………..…...……23 第三章 研究方法……………………………….…..……….…..…..………24 3.1先遣研究……………….…………….…..…………….…..….….……24 3.1.1 刺激物……………………………….…………………….…...……24 3.1.2 工具………………………………….…………………….…...……24 3.1.3 參與者……………………………….…………………….…...……24 3.1.4 先遣實驗流程……………………….……………………..…..……25 3.1.5 先遣研究結果……………………….……………………..…..……25 3.1.6 實驗修正項目……………………….……………………..…..……25 3.2實驗設計………………..……….…..……….………………...………26 3.3 參與者………………………….…..……….……..…….……….……26 3.4視覺刺激物…………………………….…..…….….………....………27 3.4.1視覺刺激物陳述…………………………………..………..…..…….29 3.5 研究變項與定義…………………………..……….…...….……….…35 3.6 研究工具與設備………………………...……….…...….……………35 3.7 指導語...…….………………………......……...….…..………36 3.8 實驗流程..……………………………………..…….....….…………36 第四章 研究結果分析…………………………….…..……….………………37 4.1 幽默理解…………………………………….…………….....…..……38 4.1.1 幽默理解之程度差異…………………………….……..….……..…39 4.1.1.1小結………………...….…….……...……….….…....……41 4.1.2.高難度幽默廣告理解之程度差異……...……….…..….....……42 4.1.2.1小結………………………………………..…….…....………45 4.1.3低難度幽默理解之程度差異…….………................…..…46 4.1.3.1小結……………………..…….………..………………..……48 4.2幽默評價……..…….…………….…….….…….…………….….…..49 4.2.1 幽默評價之程度差異..…………………..…………....…….…….50 4.2.1.1小結……………………..…….………….....…………...……53 4.2.2高難度幽默廣告評價之程度差異..…….…………………………....54 4.2.2.1小結……….……………….…………..………….....…..……56 4.2.3低難度幽默廣告評價之程度差異:……..…………..……….………57 4.2.3.1 小結……………………….……………..……......…………60 4.3 幽默廣告的理解與評價程度之間的係…….…..……….….….…….97 4.3.1「幽默理解─幽默評價」.…………...……………………..……..…97 4.3.1.1 小結………………………………………..…….………..…98 第五章 研究討論………………………………….……………...……...….61 5.1 年齡、性別造成幽默廣告理解的差異………………….…..…..…...61 5.2 幽默理解與幽默評價並無直接的相關…………………..…..…...….62 5.3 幽默廣告的評價趨勢…………………………………….…….….…….63 5.4 幽默廣告內容形式會影響幽默理解的判讀…………….…….….…….64 5.5 客觀式幽默理解與評價之實驗方式必要性……………..…...…..…65 第六章 結論與建議…………………….………….…….…………..….…..67 6.1 結論………………….…...…….……………………..….…..…….67 6.1.1 幽默理解程度特徵……….…………….……….……...…...…….67 6.1.2 幽默評價程度特徵…………………….…………..…....….….…68 6.1.3 幽默評價與理解程度間的關係………………………….…..…..…70 6.1.4 參與者對各機制-難度之幽默廣告的解讀…………………....….70 6.2 研究價值與後續研究.…….…....……………………..……..….…74 6.2.1 研究價值……….…………….….......….……...….…..….74 6.2.1 後續研究建議…………….……….…...…..……...…...…….74 參考文獻………………………………….…..……………………..…………77 附錄一………………………………….…..……………………..……………83 附錄二………………………………….…..……………………..……………88

    Alden, D. L., & Hoyer, W. D. (1993). An examination of cognitive factors related to humorousness in television advertising. Journal of Advertising, 22(2), 29-37.
    Bandura, A., (1977) . Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
    Batra, R.,& Stayman, D. M. (1990). The role of mood in advertising effectiveness . Journal of Consumer Research, 17(9), 203-214.
    Bawow, S. A.(1996)。兩性關係-性別刻板化與角色 〔Gender stereotypes and roles〕(劉秀娟、林明寬譯)。台北:揚智。
    Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
    Cupchik, G. C., & Gebotys, R. J. (1990). Interest and pleasure as dimensions of aesthetic response. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8(1), 1-14.
    Deckers, L.,& Kizer, P. A. (1975).A note on discrepancy and humor. Journal of Psychology, 86, 309-312.
    Decker, L., Jenkins, S., & Gladfelter, E. (1977). Incongruity versus tension relief: Hypotheses of humor. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 261-272.
    Fagot, B. I., &Leinbach, M. D. (1989). The young child’s gender schema:Environmental input, internal organization. Child Development, 60, 663-672.
    Firestien, R.L. (1990). Effects of creative problem solving training on communication behaviors in small groups. Small Group Research, 21(4), 507-521.
    Freud, A., (1966). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York, International Universities Press.
    Gerber, W. S., Routh, D. K. (1975). Humor response as related to violation of expectancies and to stimulus intensity in a weight judgement task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 673-674.
    Haugtvedt, C., & Petty, R. E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(8), 308-319.
    Howe, F. C. (1993). The child in the elementary school . Child Study Journal, 23(4), 227-363.
    Jones, J. (1970). Cognitive factors in the appreciation of humor: A theoretical and experimental analysis. Unpublished paper , Yale University.
    Keith, S. P. (1972). Early conceptions of humor: Varieties and issues . In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), bookname (pp. 111-111) . The psychology of humor. New York: Academic Press.
    Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). The cognitive unconscious . Science, 237, 1445-1452.
    LaFave, L. (1977). Ethnic humour: From paradoxes towards principles. In Antony J. Chapman & Hugh C. Foot (Eds.), It's a funny thing, humour (pp. 237-260). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    LaFrance, M., & Hecht, M. A. (1998). License or obligation to smile: The effect of power and sex on amount and type of smiling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1332-1342.
    Lammers, H. B., Liebowitz, L., Seymour, G. E., & Hennessy, J.E. (1983). Humor and cognitive responses to advertising stimuli: A trace consolidation approach.Journal of Business Research, 11(2), 173-185.
    Madden, T. J., & Weinberger, M. G. (1982). The effects of humor on attention in magazine advertising . Journal of Advertising, 11(3), 8-14.
    Martin, R.A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1313-1324.
    Martin, R.A., &Lefcourt, H. M. (1984). Situational humor response questionnaire: quantitative measure of sense of humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 145-155.
    Marx, D. M. , & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 28(9), 1183-1193.
    Masten, A.S. (1986). Humor, its origin and development. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
    Mandler, G. (1975). Mind and emotion. NY: Wiley.
    McGhee, P. E.(1971). Cognitive development and children’s comprehension of humor. Child Development, 42,123-138.
    McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humor, its origin and development. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
    McGhee, P. E., & Goldstein, J. H. (1983). Handbook of humor research: Vol. 1. Basic issue.New York: Springer Verlag.
    Nancanow, C., & Brace, I. (2000). Saying the "right thing": Coping with social desirability bias in marketing research. Bristol Business School Teaching and Research Review, 3, 1468-4578.
    Nerhardt, G. (1970). Humor and inclinations of humor: Emotional reactions to stimuli of different divergence from a range of expectancy. Scandinavian Journal ofPsychology, 11(3), 185-195.
    Niemann,Y. F. (2001). Stereotypes about chicanas and chicanos: implications for counseling. The Counseling Psychologist, 29(1), 55-90.
    Moir, A. & Jessel, D. (2006). 腦內乾坤[Bran sex](洪蘭譯)。台北:遠流。(原著出版於1995)
    Pakkenberg, B., Pelvig, D., Marner, L., Bundgaard, M. J., Gundersen, H. J., Nyengaard, J. R., &Regeur, L. (2003). Aging and the human neocortex. Experimental Gerontology, 38, 95-99.
    Pease, B., & Pease, A.(2000)。為什麼男人不聽,女人不看地圖?〔Why men don’t listen & women can’t read maps?〕(羅玲妃譯)。台北:平安文化。(原著出版於1998)
    Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children . New York: International Universities.
    Raskin, V . (1985) . Semantic mechanisms of humor . Boston: D. Reidel.
    Salyer, D. L., Lund, T. D., Fleming, D. E., Lephart, E. D., & Horvath, T. L. (2001). Sexual dimorphism and aromatase in the rat retina . Developmental Brain Research, 126, 131–136.
    Shaffer, D. R.(1995)。社會與人格發展(林翠湄譯)。台北:心理。(原著出版於1111)
    Shultz, T. R. (1972). The role of incongruity and resolution in children’s Appreciation of cartoon humor. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 13, 456-477.
    Smith, E. R.,&Mackie, D. M. (2001). 社會心理學 [Social psychology](莊耀嘉、王重鳴譯)。台北:桂冠。(原著出版於1996)
    Speck, P.S. (1987), On humor and humor in advertising, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.
    Speck, P.S. (1991). The humorousmessagetaxonomy: A framework for the study of humorous ads. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 13, 1-44.
    Spotts, H. E., Weinberger, M. G., & Parsons, A. L. (1997).Assessing the use and impact of humor on advertising effectiveness: A Contingency Approach.Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 17-32.
    Steele, C. M. &Aronson , J. (1995).Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 69(5), 797-811.
    Stewart, D. M., &Furse, D. H. (1986). Effective television advertising, lexington , MA: D.C. Heath and Company, Chicago.
    Suls, J. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. psychology of humor. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee(Eds.). New York: Academic.
    Svebak, S. (1974). Revised questionnaire on the sense of humor. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, 328-331.
    Weinberger, M. G., & Charles, S. G. (1992). The impact of humor in advertising: A review.Journal of Advertising, 21(4), 35-59.
    Weinberger, M.G., Spotts, H. E., Campbell, L.,& Parsons, A. L. (1995). The use and effect of humor in different advertising media . Journal of Advertising Research, 35 (May/June), 44-56.
    Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41-78.
    Wicker, F. W ., Barron, W. L. Ⅲ, & Willis, A.C. (1980) . Disparagement humor: Dispositions and resolutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 689-700.
    Wilson, C. P. (1979). Joke’s form, content, use and function. New York, London: Academic.
    Wilson, T. D. (1985). Strangers to ourselves: The origins and accuracy of beliefs about one's own mental states. In J. H. Harvey & G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution in contemporary psychology(pp. 9-36). NY: Academic.
    Zhang, Y., & Zinkhan, G. M. (1991). Humor in television advertising, in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 18, Rebecca H. Holman and Michael R. Solomon(Eds.). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 813-818.
    Zhang, Y. (1996). Responses to humorous advertising: The moderating effect of need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 15-32.
    Zigler, L ., & Gould. (1966). Congnitive process in the development of children’s appreciation of humor .Child Development,37,507-518.
    Zillman, D., & Cantor J. A. (1976).Dispositional theory of humor and mirth.humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications.In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.).London: Wiley.
    吳靜宜、陳學志、邱發忠、徐芝君(2007)。國中小學版幽默理解與幽默創造能力測驗之編製。應用心理研究,35,117-142。
    伊彬(2008)。插畫與電視廣告之實徵美學:世代間的美感和偏好。台北:華藝數位。
    伊彬、藍育婷(2011)不同性別之兒童與青少年對幽默廣告之欣賞與理解。崑山科技大學創意媒體學院視覺傳達系主辦:旁觀、參與、介入美學:科技媒體與文創產業之互動:2011第七屆國際視覺傳達設計研討會論文集 (pp. 273-2820)。台南:崑山科技大學。(ISBN:978-986-6448-45-4)
    邱發忠(1999)。幽默創造訓練之課程設計及效果評估研究。私立輔仁大學應用心理學研究所碩士論文。
    黃曬莉(2007)。性別歧視的多面性。性別向度與台灣社會(黃淑玲、游美惠編)。台北:巨流。
    陳皎眉、江漢聲、陳惠馨(1996)。性別認同與性別角色。兩性關係。台北:國立空中大學。
    陳皎眉、孫旻暐(2006)。從性別刻板印象威脅談學業表現上的性別差異。教育研究月刊。147,19-30。
    陳學志(1991)。幽默理解的認知歷程。未出版碩士論文,國立台灣大學心理研究所博士論文,台北。
    陳靜宜(1997)。國小五年級兒童性別、自我概念與人際關係相關之研究。傳習,15,1-20。
    張春興(1991)。認知心理學。台北:東華。
    張春興(1997)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
    張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
    蘇建文、林美珍、程小危、林惠雅、幸曼玲、陳李綢、吳敏而、柯華葳、陳淑美(2003)。發展心理學。台北:心理。
    潘麗玲(2003)。性別議題導論。台灣:高等教育。

    下載圖示
    QR CODE