根據行政院農業委員會林務局的研究報告顯示，臺灣的森林面積達到219.7萬公頃，覆蓋率更達到60.71％的高度。政府在2019年10月21日的「向山致敬」宣佈會上，詳細說明國家山林解禁政策的內容與安排，並以「開放山林」、「資訊透明」、「便民服務」、「教育普及」及「明確責任」這五項政策主軸去推動和開放山林，讓更多人走進山林。此政策促進山林解禁，讓更多人能夠走進自然環境中，但與此同時自然環境也同樣承受經濟開發和環境破壞的壓力。因此，圍繞人與自然的關係，如何與自然共存成為一個重要的議題。
研究者認為環境價值觀、環境信念、環境行為存在關聯性。人們在山林中的行為很大程度反映出人對自然的認識。在正確的觀念引導下，可以有效降低人類與山林的衝突，讓人與自然能和諧共存、減少衝突，達到永續發展的雙贏局面。因此，為有效地在未來推動山野教育-無痕山林環境教育，本研究深入了解登山客基於不同山野教育下的個人規範和主觀規範，並使用價值信念規範（value-belief-norm, VBN）理論，分析如何有效落實保護山林環境，並找出達到此目標的主要的影響因素。本研究自2021年8月至同年10月，以社群網站等方式，共發放616份，有效問卷500份 （佔81.1%）、無效問卷116份（佔19%），研究之結論顯示，接受調查的訪談對象在年齡高者、教育程度高者，對於無痕山林七大行動準則較為認同，但是和登山年資無涉。無痕山林在臺灣至今已經實施了15年。研究者將以問卷調查或訪談的方式探討無痕山林的觀念對登山客的登山行為的影響。再進一步依研究之結果，利用數據論證無痕山林概念在山野教育中的重要性，建議政府應該對於青年登山者強化無痕山林之觀念建立。

The forest area in Taiwan is about 2.197 million hectares, and the forest coverage rate is accounted for 60.71% in the entire island nation of Taiwan. Regarding to gain rich natural resources, with the proposed project of boosting mountain tourism, the Taiwan government put forward the policy with "open forest", "information transparency", "convenience services", "universal education", and "clear responsibilities" in the press conference of "Salute the mountains" on November 21, 2019. This policy promotes to boost mountain tourism, allowing more people to get closer to the natural environment. In the meantime, natural environment, however, is also enduring the pressure of the economic development and environmental destruction by human beings. Therefore, how to coexist with nature is becoming one of the crucial issues around the relationships between human being and nature.
I believe that there is a relationship between environmental value, environmental belief, environmental behavior, and behaviors of human being in natural identities which is greatly related to their conceptions of nature in reflexivity. Under the guidance of the correct concept, I assume that humans can effectively reduce the conflicts with nature, as well as to achieve a win-win situation of harmonious coexistence between human, nature, and their sustainable development in lives. In order to encourage mountain education- LNT effectively in the future, my research has been focused on the mountaineers with personal norm and subjective norm based on different mountainous education they accepted. I have also tried to use VBN theory to analyze how to protect the natural environment in a better way to find the main factors which could be helpful toward my research goals to achieve the results. In this study, a total of 616 questionnaires were distributed through websites in social networking, including 500 valid questionnaires (81.1%) and 116 invalid questionnaires (19%). The conclusions of this study represents that the interviewees’ response to be turned a trend toward agreeing with the seven criteria at the LNT with a higher age and a higher education level. However, they have represented nothing to do with the seniority of mountaineering. Leave No Trace, LNT, has been in operation in Taiwan for above 15 years. I then explored the influence of the concept of LNT the behavior of mountaineers through questionnaires and interviews. The final results I demonstrated the importance of LNT in mountain education based on the data to be collected, suggesting that the government should strengthen the concept of LNT for young mountaineers to secure the entire natural value in forests.

中文文獻
方偉達(2017)。期刊論文寫作與發表。臺北市：五南出版社。
方偉達(2018)。人文社科研究方法。臺北市：五南出版社。
方偉達(2019) 環境教育：理論、實務與案例。五南圖書出版社。412頁。
吳崇旗（2009）。無痕山林(LNT)準則融入登山教育課程對環境態度之影響研究。體育學報，42 卷 1 期，69-82 頁。
吳崇旗、王偉琴、周靈山(2009)。建構無痕山林準則爲架構之戶外環境行爲量表。休閒產業管理學刊，2(1)，14-27。
吳崇旗(2011)。無痕山林宣導方案之執行與成效。大專體育學刊，13(1)，32-43。
周儒(2013)：《自然是最好的學校－臺灣環境教育實踐》。上海，上海科學技術出版社。
林震岩（2007）。多變量分析：SPSS的操作與應用。台北：智勝文化。
邱皓政（2006）。量化研究法（二）統計原理與分析技術：SPSS中文視窗版操作實務詳析。台北：雙葉書廊。
邱皓政（2010）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS（PASW）資料分析範例解析（第五版）。台北：五南。
邱皓政（2019）。量化研究法（一）研究設計與資料分析（二版）。台北：雙葉書廊
張春興(1986)。心理學。東華書局
曾鈺琪(2011)。戶外環境教育之教學資源運用-以國家公園系統為例。環境教育師資培育研習工作坊：校外教學與校園環境教學論文集。臺北市：國立臺灣師範 大學師資培訓處。
無痕山林運動執行委員會(2007)。無痕山林教育宣導手冊。臺北市：農業委員會林務局。
黃茂在、曾鈺琪(2015)。戶外教育的意涵與教育價值，黃茂在、曾鈺琪(主編)。8-25頁
臺灣山林悠遊網。檢索於2021年11月30日
取自https://recreation.forest.gov.tw/Topic/LNT
臺灣行政院農業委員會-林務局網。全島森林地林型面積（截至2020年2月11日）檢索於2021年7月20日。取自https://www.forest.gov.tw/0001472
臺灣國家公園網。無痕運動（LNT）檢索於2021年7月20日。取自https://np.cpami.gov.tw/%E7%9F%A5%E8%AD%98%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92/%E7%84%A1%E7%97%95%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95-lnt.html
英文文獻
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1973). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 41-57.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I., & M. Fishbein. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoreti- cal analysis and review of empirical. Research Psychological Bulletin 84(5):888-918.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103,411-423.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 76-94.
Bjerke, T., Thrane, C., & Kleiven J. (2006). Outdoor recreation interests and environmental attitudes in Norway. Managing Leisure, 11, 116-128.
Brick, C., & G. J. Lewis. (2014). Unearthing the "Green" Personality. Environment and Behavior 48(5):635-658.
Bricker, K.S., & Kerstetter, D.L. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An explory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences, 22, 233-257.
Bryan, H. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen. Journal of Leisure Research, 9, 174-187.
Bryan, H. (2000). Recreation specialization revisted. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 18-21.
Choi, S., Loomis, D.K., & Ditton, R.B. (1994). Effect of social group, activity, and specialization on recreation substitution decisions. Leisure Sciences, 16, 143-159.
Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology 41：417-440.
Ditton, R.B., Loomis, D.K., & Choi, S. (1992). Recreation specialization: Re-coneceptualization from a social worlds perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(1), 33-51.
Donnelly, M.P., Vaske, J.J., & Graefe A.R. (1986). Degree and range of recreation specialization toward a typology of boating related activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 18(2), 81-95.
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 425-442.
Dyck, C., Schneider, I., Thompson, M., & Virden, R. (2003). Specialization among mountaineers and its relationship to environmental attitudes. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 21(2), 44-62.
Fraj, E., & Martinez, E. (2006). Influence of personality on ecological consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 5(3):167-181.
Giglinto, J. (2000). Leave No Trace. New York State. Conservationist, 54(6), 16.
Harmon, W. (1997). Leave No Trace: Minimum Impact Outdoor Recreation. Helena, MT: Falcon.
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986-1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18:1-8
Jones, C. D., Hollenhorst, S., & Tino, G. (2003). Relationships Between Climbing Specialization, Leave No Trace Ethics and Visual Impacts: An Empirical Study in Rock Canyon Park, Utah. Journal of Experiential Education, 25(3), 348.
Kaiser, F.G., Wöelfing, S. & Fuhrer, U. (1999) Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1-19.
Kelly, J.R., & Godbey, G.. (1992). Chapter 18 specialization and serious leisure. In The Sociology of Leisure, (pp.243-249). PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
Kuentzel, W.F., & Heberlein, T.A. (1992). Does specialization affect behavioral choices and quality judgments among hunters? Leisure Sciences, 14, 211-226.
Kuentzel, W.F., & McDonald, C.D. (1992). Different effects of past experience, commitment, and lifestyle dimensions on river use specialization. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 269-287.
Little, B.R. (1976). Specialization and the varieties of environmental experience: Empirical studies within the personality paradigm. In S.wapner, S.Cohen, & B.Kaplan (Eds.). Experiencing the environment, (pp.81-116). New York: Plenum Press.
Marion, J. L., & Reid, S. E. (2001). Development of the U.S. leave no trace program: A historical perspective. Boulder, CO: Leave No Trace Inc.
Marion, J. L., & Reid, S. E. (2007). Minimizing Visitor Impacts to Protected Areas: The Efficacy of Low Impact Education Programmes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(1), 5-27.
McFarlane, B.L. (1994). Specialization and motivations of birdwatchers. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 22, 361-370.
McGivney, A. (2003). Leave no trace: A guide to the new wilderness etiquette. The Mountaineers Books, WA.
McIntyre, N., & Pigram, J.J. (1992). Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle-based campers. Leisure Sciences, 14, 3-15.
Miller, C.A., & Graefe, A.R. (2000). Degree and range of specialization across related hunting activities. Leisure Sciences, 22, 195-204.
Moore, R. L., & Drive, B. L. (2005). Introduction to Outdoor Recreation: Providing and Managing Natural Resource Based Opportunities. PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
NOLS, (2005). National Ourdoor Leadership School. Date: 2005/02/10, from: http://www.nols.edu.
Nord, M., Luloff, A. E., & Bridge, J. C. (1998). The Association of Forest Recreation with Environmentalism. Environment and Behavior, 30(2),235-246.
Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor Activities as a Basis for Environmental Responsibility. Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), p32-36.
Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70-93
Schreyer, R., & Beaulieu, J.T. (1986). Attribute preferences for wildland recreation settings. Journal of Leisure Research, 18(4), 231-247.
Schreyer, R., Lime, D. W., & Williams, D. R. (1984). Characterizing the influence of past experience on recreation behavior. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 34-50.
Shumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, Mahwah, NJ: Lawewence Erlbaum Associates.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmental concern. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-97.
Tarrant, M. A., & Green, G. T. (1999). Outdoor recreation and the predictive validity of environmental attitudes. Leisure sciences, 21, 17-30.
Teisl, M. F., & O’Brien, K. (2003). Who cares and who acts? Outdoor recreationists exhibit different levels of environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 35(4), 506-522.
Thapa, B., Graefe, A. R., & Meyer, L. A. (2005). Moderator and mediator effects of scuba diving specialization on marine-based environmental knowledge-behavior contingency. Journal of Environmental Education, 37(1), 53-67.
Thapa, B., Graefe, A. R., & Meyer, L. A. (2006). Specialization and marine Based environmental behaviors among scuba divers. Journal of Leisure Research, 38(4), 601-615.
Virden, R.J., & Schreyer R. (1988). Recreation specialization as an indicator of environmental preference. Environment and Behavior, 20(6), 721-739.
Wellman, J.D., Reggenbuck, J.W., & Smith, A.C. (1982). Recreation specialization and norms of depreciative behavior among canoeists. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(4), 323-340.
Willams, D.R., Patterson, M.E., Roggenbuck, J.W., & Watson, A.E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14, 29-46.
Williams, D.R., & Huffman, M.G. (1986). Recreation specialization as a factor in backcountry trail choice. In R Lucas (Ed.), Proceedings of the national wilderness research conference: Current research, (Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-212, pp. 339-344). Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.