本研究以關係行銷的觀點，並採用「關係承諾-信任」理論的架構，探討國內進口生鮮蔬果供應鏈成員，對於合作意願的影響因素。雖然進口生鮮蔬果供應鏈成員合作的機制與運作品質，關乎穩定國內市場生鮮蔬果需求與確保食品安全，但過往文獻卻較少有此方面的研究。因此本研究以批發商為主體，透過實證研究，除了探討生鮮蔬果供應鏈成員的合作機制，也提供關係行銷領域後續學術研究的文獻參考。
本研究的研究結果顯示，北部地區的批發商對進口商的信任、關係承諾與合作意願，相較南區呈顯著負向影響。另外，北部地區批發商對合作關係十年以下的進口商，相較合作二十年以上的批發商也呈顯著負向影響。經由階層迴歸分析的進一步檢定分析，信心利益與共享價值對信任有顯著正向影響，社交利益與信任則對關係承諾有顯著正向影響，信任與關係承諾則對合作意願有顯著正向影響。本研究的結論基本符合關係行銷的「關係承諾-信任」理論，即關係承諾與信任是重要的研究變數，顯著正向影響合作意願。

This study is from perspective of relationship marketing. And apply the framework of "commitment-trust" theory of relationship marketing to explore cooperative intention influencing mechanism between fruits and vegetables supply chain members. Although the mechanism and operational quality of cooperation in fresh produce supply chain is critical due to it is related to food security and food safety, there have been few studies about this topic in the past. Therefore, we focus on distributors in the wholesale market as subject in this study. Not only investigate cooperative intention influencing mechanism between fruits and vegetables supply chain members, but also provide the reference for the further study related relationship marketing.
The data analyzed results of this study showed that compared southern region, distributors in northern region have a significant negative correlation on the trust, commitment and cooperate intention with importers. In addition compared southern region, distributors in the northern region also have a significant negative correlation on importers who have a cooperative experience less than 10 years. Through the further statistical test of hierarchical regression analysis, confidence benefit and shared value have a significant positive correlation on trust. Social benefit and trust have a significant positive correlation on relationship commitment. And trust and relationship commitment have a significant positive correlation on cooperative intention. The conclusion of this study is basically in accord with the "commitment-trust" theory of relationship marketing. That is, trust and relationship commitment are key variables, which have significantly positive correlation on cooperative intentions.

一、 中文部分
1. 朱鴻鈞, & 許嘉伊.(2013). 農業建立國際品牌的典範－紐西蘭奇異果行銷公司ZESPRI案例分析. 臺灣經濟研究月刊,36(3),頁 30-37.
2. 李仁耀, 張呈徽, & 林啟淵. (2012). 國內飼料玉米專業進口商的合作與競爭. 應用經濟論叢(92), 頁 1-22.
3. 林啟淵, 張呈徽, & 李仁耀. (2011). 台灣飼料玉米進口商管控進口量之研究. 農業經濟叢刊,17(1), 頁 77-107.
4. 徐敏記, &何嘉浩. (2018). 世界農產供應地－美國加州採後處理貯運技術導入. 國際農業科技新知(80), 頁 8-11.
5. 陳宜君, & 張國益. (2014). 農藥殘留標準對國際貿易影響的探討－不同農藥的敏感度分析. 農林學報,63(4), 頁 235-245.
6. 曾景瀚, 雷立芬, 官俊榮, & 黃聖茹. (2017). 臺北市消費者於傳統市場購買意願之研究. 農業經濟叢刊,23(1), 頁 45-74.
7. 雷立芬. (2021). 從食品安全談消費者自主管理的迫切性. 消費者報導雜誌(479期), 頁 2-3.
8. 劉興榮. (2009). 農產品顧客關係管理與策略. 花蓮區農業專訊(68), 頁 21-24.
9. 蔡坤宏, & 謝昇紘. (2005). “信任－關係承諾”理論之實證研究－以海運承攬運送業為例 [The Empirical Study of Trust-Relationship Commitment Theory: The Case of Freight Forwarder]. 行銷評論,2(3), 頁 277-311.

二、英文部分
1. Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of marketing, 54(1) , 42-58.
2. Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services—growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 23(4), 236-245.
3. Chou, S., and Chen, C. W. (2018) "The Influences of relational benefits on repurchase intention in service contexts: The roles of gratitude, trust and commitment", Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 33(5), 680-692.
4. Chou, S., Chen, C. W., & Kuo, Y. T. (2018). Flexibility, collaboration and relationship quality in the logistics service industry: An empirical study. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(3), 555-570.
5. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
6. Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2009). Customer relationship management: a strategic perspective. Journal of business market management, 3(1), 7-27.
7. Gwinner, K. P., Gremler, D. D., & Bitner, M. J. (1998). Relational benefits in services industries: the customer’s perspective. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 26(2), 101-114.
8. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002). Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: An integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. . Journal of service research, 4(3), 230-247.
9. Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of marketing research, 29(3), 314-328.
10. Morgan, R. M., and Hunt, S.D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of marketing, 58(3), , 20-38.
11. Mukherjee, A., & Nath, P. (2003). A model of trust in online relationship banking. International journal of bank marketing.
12. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An Overview of Psychological Measurement. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: A Handbook (pp. 97-146). Springer US.
13. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. In Managing sustainable business, 323-346.
14. Thomas, M. J. (2000). Commentary: Princely thoughts on Machiavelli, marketing and management. European Journal of Marketing.