本研究旨在探討使用運算列式應用軟體教學對提升國中腦性麻痺學生數學學習能力的成效。研究對象為三位國中八至九年級腦性麻痺學生，進行十次教學介入。透過教師運用列式輔助應用軟體 Mod Math 進行教學及評量活動，以提升學生二位數以上整數乘法運算能力，並希望藉此替代書寫困難而產生的計算問題。
本研究採用單一受試研究法之跨受試多基線實驗設計。自變項為研究者自編的運算列式應用軟體教學方案，依變項則為學生經過教學方案後，在學習二位數以上乘法運算的立即成效及保留成效。研究結果顯示，使用運算列式應用軟體教學介入能有效提升腦性麻痺學生的運算正確率，且具有保留效果；但對於縮短運算時間不具有立即成效，但具有保留成效。整體學習成效獲得學生、家長及教師的社會效度支持。

This study explores the effectiveness of using computation-based software to enhance mathematical learning in junior high school students with cerebral palsy. Three 8th and 9th grade students with cerebral palsy participated in ten teaching sessions using Mod Math software. The intervention aimed to improve their ability to perform multiplication with two-digit and larger integers and address calculation issues caused by writing difficulties.
Employing a single-subject multiple-baseline design, the study assessed the impact of the self-developed software teaching program. The independent variable was the teaching program, while the dependent variables were the immediate and retained effects on multiplication performance. Results showed that the intervention significantly improved calculation accuracy and had a retention effect, though it did not immediately reduce calculation time. The overall learning outcomes received positive feedback from students, parents, and teachers.

一、中文部分
中華民國立法院 (1993)。民國82年修正特殊教育法施行細則。https://www.ly.gov.tw/LyLaws/lgfile.ashx?id=23514&type=txt
中華民國立法院 (2023)。特殊教育法全文。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0030031
中華民國腦性麻痺協會。(2022) 。關於腦性麻痺。https://www.cerebralpalsy.org.tw/cp-about-cp/
王華沛（1997）。特殊教育輔助科技。心理。
甘敏郁、佘永吉 (2017)。臺北市國中階段肢體障礙及腦性麻痺學生自我概念與生活適應之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，33， 1-28。
吳亭芳、陳明聰（1991）。特殊教育資源教師手冊。行政院教育委員會特殊教育中心。
李玟慧. (2021). 數位化圖示策略對國中學習障礙學生整數加減的學習成效（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
李淑玲（2012）。虛擬實境體感互動遊戲對腦性麻痺幼童數數教學之行動研究.。臺中教育大學學報，26(2) ，25-49.
杜正治（2006）。單一受試研究法。心理。
林冠坊（2018）。互動遊戲方案對提升腦性麻痺學生動作表現之成效（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學。
康琳茹（2005）。虛擬實境對腦性麻痺兒童伸取行為之訓練療效（未出版之碩士論文）。國立陽明大學。
教育部(2019) 。 國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要：數學領域綱要。https://www.ntpc.edu.tw/app/home/announcement/item/36372/
教育部. (2013) 。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定辦法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080065
教育部統計處 (2022)。特殊教育統計年報。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News_Content.aspx?n=7ECE9FC9C6FE163B&sms=ABF7CFA00B4A6275&s=91A0F76E25A8A71
連文宏、洪儷瑜（2017）。數學學障與數學合併閱讀障礙國中生計算能力表現之特徵及其差異分析。臺灣數學教育期刊，4(1)，35-62。
陳明聰、卓惠玲、曾華芳、簡竹君、王心頤、鄭蘭琪（2007 ）。協助就讀普通班重度麻痺學生使用電腦參與學習活動。特殊教育季刊，104，14-21。
陳俊嘉（2022）。自製輔助科技設備介入對腦性麻痺兒童在上肢動作的強化成效（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學。
陳威任（2016）。Arduino互動裝置對介入腦性麻痺兒童肢體動作表現成效（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學。
陳科含（2021）。腦性麻痺學生在三種新興電腦點選設備操作表現之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學。
陳淑華（2013）。Wii 遙控器及互動遊戲介入重度腦性麻痺孩童上肢動作訓練成效研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學。
登琬婷（2015）。電腦輸入輔具介入對極重度腦性麻痺學生影響之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺東大學。
鈕文英、吳裕益 (2011)。單一個案研究方法與論文寫作。弘葉文化。
黃翔靖（2022）。遊戲式學習融入輔助溝通教學方案對腦性麻痺學童溝通行為之成效（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
楊雅婷（2022）。使用擴增實境運動App改善技術型高中腦性麻痺學生動作表現之成效（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北科技大學。
趙若婷（2014）。輔助溝通系統對增進國小腦性麻痺學童溝通能力之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學。
劉夢如（2013）。數學學習障礙學童應用 Strike up 遊戲學習整數四則運算之成效研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學。
蔡凱帆（2019）。互動式教學輔具設計與開發-以腦性麻痺兒童為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立成功大學。
黎慧欣（1996）。國民教育階段教師與學生家長對融合教育的認知與調查結果（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
聯合國（2006）。身心障礙者權利公約。https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-.pdf
謝協君（2010）。親子玩具活動對腦性麻痺幼兒動作發展的影響。特殊教育研究學刊，35（2），81-101。

二、 英文部分
Adams, J. W., & Hitch, G. J. (1997). Working memory and children’s mental addition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67, 21–38.
Anthony, L., Kim, Y., & Findlater, L. (2013). Analyzing user-generated youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1223-1232.
Barteletti, F., Guidetti, L., & Chiricozzi, F. R. (2017). Mathematical abilities in individuals with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 59(9), 894-904.
Behnamghader, M., Khaleghi, A., Izadpanah, P., & Rahmani, F. (2021). Using gamification based on mobile platform in therapeutic interventions for children with dyslexia. In Internet of Things, Infrastructures and Mobile Applications: Proceedings of the 13th IMCL Conference 13 (pp. 814-824). Springer International Publishing.
Bhakta, B. B., Hart, A., & Pandyan, A. D. (2004). Musculoskeletal aspects of cerebral palsy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 75(3), 362-367.bridge University Press.
Brossart, D. F. (2006). Coping styles of adolescents with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 23(2), 89-97.
Carlesimo, G., Galloni, F. Bonanni, R. & Sabbadini, M. (2005). Verbal short-term memory in individuals with congenital articulatory disorders: New empirical data and review of the literature. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(2), 81-91.
Carlson, G., Uvebrant, P., Hugdahl, K., Arvidsson, J., Wikland, L., & von Wendt, L. (1994). Verbal and non-verbal function of children with right- versus left-hemiplegic cerebral palsy of pre- and perinatal origin. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 36, 503–512.
Cook, A. M., & Hussey, S. M. (2008). Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 45(6), 975-988.
Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2014). Assistive technologies-e-book: principles and practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Cooper, J. O. (1982). Applied behavior analysis in education. Theory into practice, 21(2), 114-118.
Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Enhanced problem translation and short-term memory: Components of mathematical talent. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 420.
Deal, L. J., & Wismer, M. G. (2010). NCTM principles and standards for mathematically talented students. Gifted Child Today, 33(3), 55-65.
Frampton, I., Yude, C., & Goodman, R. (1998). The prevalence and correlates of specific learning difficulties in a representative sample of children with hemiplegia. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(1), 39-51.
Geary, D. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 345.
Geary, D. C., Hamson, C. O., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236–263.
Gordon, A. M., & Duff, S. V. (1999). Fingertip forces during object manipulation in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. I: Anticipatory scaling. Developmental medicine and child. Neurology, 41(3), 166-175.
Jarl, G., & Lundqvist, L. O. (2020). An alternative perspective on assistive technology: The person–environment–tool (PET) model. Assistive Technology, 32(1), 47-53.
Jenks, K. m., Moor, J. D., .d.m, E. c, & Lieshout, V. (2009). Arithmetic Difficulties in Children with Cerebral Palsy Are Related to Executive Function and Working Memory. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(7), 824–833.
Kirk, S. A., Gallagher, J. J., & Anastasiow, N. J. (2003). Educating exceptional children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. (2015). Cerebral Palsy: Hope Through Research [Online]. https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/patient-caregiver-education/hope-through-research/cerebral-palsy-hope-through-research
Obersteiner, A., Moll, G., Reiss, K., & Pant, H. A. (2015). Whole number arithmetic—competency models and individual development. Paper delivered at ICMI Study, 23,235-242.
Olney, S.J., & Wright, M.J. (2000). Cerebral Palsy. In S.K. Campbell(Ed.), Physical therapy for children. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Rooijen, M., Verhoeven, L., Steenbergen, B., (2011). Early numeracy in cerebral palsy: review and future research. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 53, 202–209.
Rosenbaum, P., Paneth, N., Leviton, A., Goldstein, M., Bax, M., Damiano, D., Dan, B., Jacobsson, B., & A. Committee, I. P. (2000). A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. Supplement, 109, 8-14.
Schenker, R., Coster, W. J., & Parush, S. (2005). Neuroimpairments, activity performance, and participation in children with cerebral palsy mainstreamed in elementary schools. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47, 808–814.
Scherer, K. R. (2004). Feelings integrate the central representation of appraisal-driven response organization in emotion. In A. S. R. Manstead, N. H. Frijda, & A. H. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium. Cam-bridge University Press.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (2004).
United Cerebral Palsy Association. (1996). Cerebral palsy: Fact sheet. https://www.ucp.org/resource/cerebral-palsy-fact-sheet/
Watts, E. H., O’Brian, M., & Wojcik, B. W. (2004). Four models of assistive technology consideration: How do they compare to recommended educational assessment practices? Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(1), 43-56.
WHO(2001).ICF Checklist Version 2.1a, Clinician Form for International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Young, L. C. (1941). On randomness in ordered sequences. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12(3), 293-300.
Zabala, J. (1997). SETT Framework: Critical Areas to Consider When Making Assistive Technology Decisions. http://www.joyzabala.com/uploads/3/9/5/5/3955586/sett_framework.pdf