學習華語有關的問題並非僅在泰國發生，而是全球性的教育議題。因此本研究設計基於「你猜我答」的華語學習遊戲作為教材，共有30名學生參與。學生們在完成「你猜我答」遊戲之後進行問卷調查。資料經過Pearson相關分析、t檢定。研究結果顯示基於「你猜我答」的華語學習遊戲興趣及遊戲的學習價值皆有正面的效果，而在遊戲上隨著練習次數的增加，也不會產生高度的學習焦慮。另外研究也發現，使用「你猜我答」遊戲教學，沒有因為學生的性別、母語背景、居住地等，出現顯著差異。這代表該遊戲，在語言中心學習華語作為第二語言的情境下，是個良好教學的方式。 因此，本研究建議泰國的華文教師可以參考使用「你猜我答」方法來教授華語。

The problems associated with learning Chinese as a foreign language are not peculiar to Thailand but a global challenge. The present study adapted and designed teaching Chinese materials based on Charade. 30 students were selected to play “Charade”, questionnaire was conducted after the game. Data were tested by Pearson correlation coefficient correlation, t-test. Using the game “Charade” in Chinese Language learning, there is positive result in both the learning interest and learning value. Furthermore, with increase session and practice, there is no high level of learning anxiety. In a Chinese Language Center setting, the study also shows no significant difference in the student’s learning ability, regardless of gender, native language or residency, indicating Charade is a good approach to teach Mandarin for secondary language learning. The study therefore recommends that Chinese teachers in Thailand to use Charade approach to teaching fundamental level of Chinese Learning.

中文文獻
王文宜、陳宥宜、戴育宏、吳志銘 (2017)。體育課介入不同教師自主支持環境對學童體育課情境動機之差異。臺灣運動教育學報，12(1)，39-55。
吳清山（2000）。班級經營。臺北市：心理。
王嬿惠、黃聖哲(2020)。專業英文詞彙遊戲式語言學習。臺灣教育評論月刊，9（12），61-68。
辛怡璇(2018)。澎湖縣九年級生背景變項對英語學習成就影響之研究：英語學習焦慮為中介變項。臺北市立大學學報，51(1)，1-33。
江雅芬、陳振明(2018)。玩遊戲學語文-談桌遊融入特殊教育語文教學。雲嘉特教，27，56-68。
林淑惠、黃韞臻(2009)。大專院校學生英語學習現況與學習環境之分析。台中教育大學學報，23(1)，153-173。
洪木蘭(2017)。幼兒『玩』文字~~幼兒在中文識字教學活動的學習歷程。台東縣：國立台東大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文。
洪美玉(2012)。臺南市國小高年級學生英語學習焦慮、英語學習動機與英語學習策略之研究。教育研究論壇，3(2)，49-67。
洪榮昭、何雅娟、葉建宏、吳宇豐、戴凱欣（2020）。空間能力評量系統：圖學表現、遊戲興趣、遊戲焦慮及持續遊玩意願之相關研究。中等教育，71（1），30-52。
洪榮昭、詹瓊華（2018）。共變推理遊戲：遊戲自我效能與後設認知影響遊戲中的焦慮、興趣及表現之研究。教育科學研究期刊，63（3），131-162。
姚杏仙(2007)。初中英文遊戲法詞彙教學初探。教法探討，24-25。
唐豔文(2001)。英文課堂的遊戲學習。雁北師範學院學報。17(1)，79-80。
徐莞雲、陳筱瑀（2008）。焦慮的概念分析。志為護理，7（3），65-70。
陳宜徽(2018)。兒童華語教學活動遊戲設計研究─以美國學童為例。高雄市：文藻外語大學碩士論文。
許芷瑋、李芃娟(2018)。應用桌上遊戲教學對國小智能障礙學生功能性詞彙之學習成效。國立臺南大學特殊教育學系特殊教育與復健學報，34，49-74。
陳玫穎（1993）。智能不足學生功能性詞彙教學之設計。特教園丁，9(2)，16-20。
黃淑如(2008)。國中學生英語焦慮與因應策略之研究。彰化縣：國立彰化師範大學碩士論文。
黃明月、洪榮昭、譚華德、葉建宏、葉貞妮、郝永崴（印製中）。數位遊戲式之泰語學習：語言焦慮、自我效能對於情意表現因素及學習價值之相關分析。數位學習科技期刊。
張于忻(2008)。華語文遊戲設計與實施。中原華語文學報。2，113-133。
葉聯娟(2007)。德語詞彙多元教學模式。臺德學刊。13，237-259。
葉聯娟(2008)。教學法對學生德語詞彙學習行為的影響。臺德學刊，15，22-55。
維基百科(2021)。桌上遊戲。線上檢索日期：2021 年3 月28 日。網址：https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charades
詹宏凰 (2009)。技職院校二技成人學生英語的學習策略、學習焦慮與學習成效關係之研究。高雄市：國立高雄師範大學碩士論文。
鄧巧如(2008)。「遊戲中學習」-7~12歲兒童華語遊戲教學之活動設計。台北市：國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文。
鄭瑞洲、洪振方、黃台珠(2011)。情境興趣—制式與非正式課程科學學習的交會點。科學教育月刊，340，2-10。
鄭瑞洲、洪振方、黃臺珠(2013)。採用多元教學策略的非制式奈米課程對國中生情境興趣之促進。教育實踐與研究，26(2)，1-28。
譚華德、洪榮昭、葉建宏、郝永崴、葉貞妮（印製中）。體感式遊戲介入泰文課程：泰文學習態度、語言焦慮、遊戲心流、測驗焦慮、語序自信心提升之關係。教育科學研究期刊。
英文文獻
Acquah, E. O., & Katz, H. T. (2020). Digital game-based L2 learning outcomes for primary through high-school students: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 143, 103667
Ahn, B. T., & Harley, J. M. (2020). Facial expressions when learning with a queer history app: Application of the control value theory of achievement emotions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1563-1576.
Akcaoglu, M., Rosenberg, J. M., Ranellucci, J., & Schwarz, C. V. (2018). Outcomes from a self-generated utility value intervention on fifth and sixth-grade students’ value and interest in science. International Journal of Educational Research, 87, 67-77.
Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56(11), 851-864
Bergin, D. A. (2016). Social influences on interest. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 7–22.
Bishop, S. J. (2007). Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: an integrative account. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 307-316.
C., Durik, A. M., Patel, L., Lovejoy, C. M., & Valentiner, D. (2013). Performanceapproach goal effects on achievement under low versus high challenge conditions. Learning and Instruction, 23, 60–68.
Carleton, R. N. (2016). Into the unknown: A review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 39, 30-43.
Charsky, D., & Ressler, W. (2011). “Games are made for fun”: Lessons on the effects of concept maps in the classroom use of computer games. Computers & Education, 56(3), 604-615.
Chen, A., & Wang, Y. (2017). The role of interest in physical education: A review of research evidence. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36, 313-322.
Chen, C. H., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2019). The roles of engagement and competition on learner’s performance and motivation in game-based science learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 1003-1024.
Chen, J.A., Tutwiler, M.S., Metcalf, S.J., Kamarainen, A., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2016). A multi-user virtual environment to support students' self-efficacy and interest in science: A latent growth model analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 11-22.
Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University connections. London, UK: Routledge.
Colliver, Y., & Veraksa, N. (2019). The aim of the game: A pedagogical tool to support young children's learning through play. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 296-310.
Corruble, V., & Ganascia, J. G. (1997). Induction and the discovery of the causes of scurvy: A computational reconstruction. Artificial Intelligence, 91, 205-223.
Corsaro, W. (2011). The sociology of childhood (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Czibor, E., Claussen, J., & van Praag, M. (2019). Women in a men’s world: Risk taking in an online card game community. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 158, 62-89.
de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2002). Quality of book-reading matters. An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 145-155.
de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2004). The efficacy of electronic books in fostering kindergarten children’s emergent story understanding. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 378-393.
Dohn, N. B., Madsen, P. T., & Malte, H. (2009). The situational interest of undergraduate students in zoo physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 33(3), 196-
Dourda, K., Bratitsis, T., Griva, E., & Papadopoulou, P. (2013). Combining game based learning with content and language integrated learning approaches: A case study utilizing QR codes and Google Earth in a geography-based game. In C. V. de Carvalho, & P. Escudeiro (Eds.), European conference on games based learning (pp. 130-139). Reading, UK: Academic Conferences International Limited.
Durik, A. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). One size fits some: Instructional enhancements to promote interests. In A. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 49–62). Washington, DC: AERA Press
Durik, A. M., Shechter, O. G., Noh, M., Rozek, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). What if I can’t? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 104-118.
Durik, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How personal interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 597-610.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132.
Emerson, A., Cloude, E. B., Azevedo, R., & Lester, J. (2020). Multimodal learning analytics for game‐based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1505-1526.
Faiola, A., Newlon, C., Pfaff, M., & Smyslova, O. (2013). Correlating the effects of flow and telepresence in virtual worlds: Enhancing our understanding of user behavior in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1113-1121.
Flowerday, T., & Shell, D. F. (2015). Disentangling the effects of interest and choice on learning, engagement, and attitude. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 134-140.
Frederickson, J. J., Messina, I., & Grecucci, A. (2018). Dysregulated anxiety and dysregulating defenses: Toward an emotion regulation informed dynamic psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2054.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K. A. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development: What do children need to flourish (pp. 305-321). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
Fryer, L. K., Thompson, A., Nakao, K., Howarth, M., & Gallacher, A. (2020). Supporting self-efficacy beliefs and interest as educational inputs and outcomes: Framing AI and Human partnered task experiences. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, 101850.
Ganascia, J. G. (1991). Deriving the learning bias from rule properties. In J. E. Hayes, D. Michie, & E. Tyugu, (Eds.), Machine intelligence (Vol.12, pp.151-168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Geerling, D., Butner, J., Fraughton, T., Sinclair, S., Zachary, J., & Sansone, C. (2020). The dynamic association of interest and confusion: The potential for moderation by utility value and gender. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(3), 407-430.
Guise, V., Chambers, M., Conradi, E., Kavia, S., & Välimäki, M. (2012). Development, implementation and initial evaluation of narrative virtual patients for use in vocational mental health nurse training. Nurse Education Today, 32, 683-689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.009878
Guo, J. H., & Wu, H. L, (2003). Taiwan, the status of implementation of social welfare: From single-parent family perspective analysis. Hwa Kang Journal of Social Science, 17, 117-141.
Hall-Phillips, A., Park, J., Chung, T. L., Anaza, N. A., & Rathod, S. R. (2016). I (heart) social ventures: Identification and social media engagement. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 484-491.
Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E. B. C., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170-179.
Hartley, C. A., & Phelps, E. A. (2012). Anxiety and decision-making. Biological Psychiatry, 72(2), 113-118.
Hecht, C. A., Grande, M. R., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2020). The role of utility value in promoting interest development. Motivation Science. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/mot0000182
Heinrich, C., Pennington, R.R., & Kuiper, R. (2012). Virtual case studies in the classroom improve student knowledge. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(8), 353-361.
Heit, E., & Rotello, C. (2010). Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 805.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2010). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2010). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127.
Hong, J. C., Hsiao, H. S., Chen, P. H., Lu, C. C., Tai, K. H., Tsai, C. R. (2021). Critical attitude and ability associated with students' self-confidence and attitude toward "predict-observe-explain" online science inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 166, 104172.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, M. C., & Ho, H. Y. (2014). Using a “prediction-observation- explanation” inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their internet cognitive failure. Computers & Education, 72, 110-120.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, M. C., Ho, H. Y., & Chen, Y. L. (2014). Using a "prediction-observation- explanation" inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their internet cognitive failure. Computers & Education, 72, 110-120.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, Y. T., Lin, P. H., & Chen, Y. L. (2016). The role of pre-game learning attitude in the prediction to competitive anxiety, perceived utility of pre-game learning of game, and gameplay interest. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 239-251.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Szeto, E., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (in press). Undergraduate science students’ scientist-practitioner gap: The role of epistemic curiosity and cognitive flexibility. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Kuo, Y. C. (2016). Crystallized intelligence affects hedonic and epistemic values to continue playing a game with saliency-based design. Computers & Education, 95, 75-84.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Lin, P. C. (2015). Self-efficacy relevant to competitive anxiety and gameplay interest in the one-on-one competition setting. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(5), 791-807.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Lin, P. H. (2019). Improving cognitive certitude with calibration mediated by cognitive anxiety, online learning self-efficacy and interest in learning Chinese pronunciation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 597-615.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Lin, P. H. (2021). The effects of intrinsic cognitive load and gameplay interest on flow experience reflecting performance progress in a Chinese remote association game, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 358-378. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1614068
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2017). An exploration of students’ science learning interest related to their cognitive anxiety, cognitive load, self-confidence and learning progress: Using inquiry-based learning with an iPad. Research in Science Education, 47, 1193-1212.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., Kuo, Y. C., & Lin, P. C. (2017). Confusion affects gameplay. Learning and Individual Differences, 59, 119-126.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., Lin. P. H., & Lin, P. C. (2020). Learning progress in a Chinese order of stroke game: The effects of intrinsic cognitive load and gameplay interest mediated by flow experience. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 842-862.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Lu, C. H., Cheng, C.L., Lee, Y. C., & Lin, C. L. (2009). Playfulness-based design in educational games: A perspective on an evolutionary contest game. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 15-35.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M.Y., Cheng, C. L., Lee, C. K., & Chang, S. Y. (2009). Assessing the educational values of digital games. Journal of Computer-assisted Learning, 25(5), 423-437.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M.Y., Lu, C.H., Cheng, C. L., Lee, Y.C., & Lin, C.L. (2009). Playfulness-based design in educational games: A perspective on an evolutionary contest game. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 15-35.
Hong, J. C., Lin, M. P., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Kuo, Y. C. (2015). Comparing animated and static modes in educational gameplay on user interest, performance and gameplay anxiety. Computers & Education, 88, 109-118.
Hong, J. C., Tai, K. H., & Ye, J. H. (2019). Playing a Chinese Remote Associated Game: The correlation among flow, self-efficacy, collective self-esteem, and competitive anxiety. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2720-2735.
Hong, J. C., Tai, K. H., Hwang, M. Y., & Kuo, Y. C. (2016). Internet cognitive failure affects learning progress as mediated by cognitive anxiety and flow while playing a Chinese antonym synonym game with interacting verbal-analytical and motor-control. Computers & Education, 100, 32-44.
Hong, J. C., Wu, Ching-Lin, Tseng, Chien-Chih, & Chen, Hsueh-Chih (2020). Implicit and explicit problem-solving process during Chinese Radical Assembly Game. Creativity Research Journal, 32(4), 412-480.
Huang, N. T., Chiu, L.C., & Hong, J. C. (2016). Relationship amongst students’ problem-solving attitude, perceived value, behavioral attitude, and intention to participate in a science and technology contest. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 14, 1419-1435.
Huizenga, J. C., Ten Dam, G. T. M., Voogt, J. M., & Admiraal, W. F. (2017). Teacher perceptions of the value of game-based learning in secondary education. Computers & Education, 110, 105-115.
Hulleman, C. S., Kosovich, J. J., Barron, K. E., & Daniel, D. B. (2017). Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 387-404.
Hung, H. T., Yang, J. C., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., & Wang, C. C. (2018). A scoping review of research on digital game-based language learning. Computers & Education, 126, 89-104.
Hwang, M. Y., Hong, J. C., Ye, J. H., Wu, Y. F., Tai, K. H., & Kiu, M. C. (2019). Practicing abductive reasoning: The correlations between cognitive factors and learning effects. Computers & Education, 138, 33-45.
Immordino-Yang, M.H. (2015). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience (The Norton Series on the Social Neuroscience of Education) WW Norton & Company.
Juh, C. C., Lu, C. C., & Hong, J. C. (2020). A study of the relationship among self-efficacy, help-seeking behaviors and intention of continue participation in the "Insect Feeding Game". International Journal of Information and Education Technology,10(5), 367-371.
Karpov, Y. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
Keller, J. (2008). An integrative theory of motivation, volition, and performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 6, 79-104.
Kim, D. & Perdue, R. R. (2013). The effects of cognitive, affective, and sensory attributes on hotel choice. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 246-257.
Kim, D. & Perdue, R. R. (2013). The effects of cognitive, affective, and sensory attributes on hotel choice. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 246-257.
Kim, J., & Gorman, J. (2005). The psychobiology of anxiety. Clinical Neuroscience Research, 4(5-6), 335-347.
King, R. B., Cai, Y., & Du, H. (2020). Societal‐level utility value strengthens the relationship between student‐level utility value and achievement: A person‐culture fit perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Klebanov, B. B., Priniski, S., Burstein, J., Gyawali, B., Harackiewicz, J., & Thoman, D. (2018). Utility-value score: A case study in system generalization for writing analytics. The Journal of Writing Analytics, 2, 314.
Koivisto, J. M., Multisilta, J., Niemi, H., Katajisto, J., & Eriksson, E. (2016). Learning by playing: A cross-sectional descriptive study of nursing students' experiences of learning clinical reasoning. Nurse Education Today, 45, 22-28.
Kosovich, J. J., Hulleman, C. S., Phelps, J., & Lee, M. (2019). Improving algebra success with a utility-value intervention. Journal of Developmental Education, 42(2), 2-10.
Lassiter, D., &. Goodma, N. D, (2015). How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics. Cognition, 136, 123-134.
Law, K. M., Lee, V. C., & Yu, Y. T. (2010). Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Computers & Education, 55(1), 218-228.
Liebendörfer, M., & Schukajlow, S. (2020). Quality matters: How reflecting on the utility value of mathematics affects future teachers’ interest. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(2), 199-218.
Lillard, A. S., Lerner, M. D., Hopkins, E. J., Dore, R. A., Smith, E. D., & Palmquist, C. M. (2013). The impact of pretend play on children's development: A review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 1-34.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Messersmith, E. E. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of situational interest. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 591–614.
Liskin-Gasparro, J. (1982). ETS oral proficiency testing manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Liu, E. Z. F., & Chen, P. K. (2013). The effect of game-based learning on students’ learning performance in science learning-A case of “conveyance go”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1044-1051.
Mayer, R. E. (2015). On the need for research evidence to guide the design of computer games for learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 349-353.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
McHale, S. M., Blocklin, M. K., Walter, K. N., Davis, K. D., Almeida, D. M., & Klein, L. C. (2012). The role of daily activities in youths' stress physiology. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(6), 623-628.
McIntyre, M. M., Gundlach, J. L., & Graziano, W. G. (2021). Liking guides learning: The role of interest in memory for STEM topics. Learning and Individual Differences, 85, 101960.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.
Morony, S., Kleitman, S., Lee, Y. P., & Stankov, L. (2013). Predicting achievement: Confidence vs self-efficacy, anxiety, and self-concept in Confucian and European countries. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 79-96.
Nazarova, M., & Galiullina, E. (2016). Game-based learning in teaching English. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 20, 8-12.
Nebel, S., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. (2015). From duels to classroom competition: Social competition and learning in educational videogames within different group sizes. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 384-398.
Ngoc, N., Hong, J. C., & Chen, M. L. (in press). Relationship between students’ hands-on making self-efficacy, perceived value, cooperative attitude and competition preparedness in joining an iSTEAM Contest. Research in Science & Technological Education.
Palmer, D., Dixon, J., & Archer, J. (2017). Using situational interest to enhance individual interest and science-related behaviors. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 731-753.
Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A.C., Steingut, R.R., Trimble, S.S., & Pituch, K.A. (2016). Daily interest, engagement, and autonomy support in the high school science classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 180-194
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.
Peterson, M. (2016). The use of massively multiplayer online role-playing games in CALL: An analysis of research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(7), 1181-1194.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149-183). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258-283.
Plass, J. L., O’Keefe, P., Homer, B. D., Case, J., Hayward, E. O., Stein, M., et al. (2013). The impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1050-1066.
Pranoto, H., & Panggabean, F. M. (2019). Increase the interest in learning by implementing augmented reality: Case studies studying rail transportation. Procedia Computer Science, 157, 506-513.
Rawendy, D., Ying, Y., Arifin, Y., & Rosalin, K. (2017). Design and development game Chinese language learning with gamification and using mnemonic method. Procedia Computer Science, 116, 61-67.
Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (pp. 373-404). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A.W.J.S. Eccles (Ed.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173-195). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Richards, C. (2011). In the thick of it: Interpreting children's play. Ethnography and Education, 6(3), 309-324.
Rocha, A. F. (1997). The brain as a symbol processing machine. Progress in Neurobiology, 53(2), 121-198.
Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2008) Using a computer animation to teach high school molecular biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 49-58.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 32, 37-50.
Rotgansa, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175-184.
Roure, C., & Pasco, D. (2018b). The impact of learning task design on students’ situational interest in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(1), 24-34.
Sandberg, A., Brostrom, S., Johansson, I., Frokjar, T., Kieferle, C., Seifert, A., ... Laan, M. (2017). Children's perspective on learning: An international study in Denmark, Estonia, Germany and Sweden. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(1), 71-81.
Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K.R. Wentzel, A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197-222). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schraw, G., Lehman, S. (2001) Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review 13, 23-52.
Senko, C., Durik, A. M., Patel, L., Lovejoy, C. M., & Valentiner, D. (2013). Performanceapproach goal effects on achievement under low versus high challenge conditions. Learning and Instruction, 23, 60–68.
Silvia, P. J., & Sanders, C. E. (2010). Why are smart people curious? Fluid intelligence, openness to experience, and interest. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 242-245.
Simonton, K. L., & Garn, A. C. (2020). Control-value theory of achievement emotions: A closer look at student value appraisals and enjoyment. Learning and Individual Differences, 81, 101910.
Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., de Miranda Coelho, J. A. P., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-11.
Soicher, R. N., & Becker-Blease, K. A. (in press). Utility value interventions: Why and how instructors should use them in college psychology courses. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000240
Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2019). Leadership styles and skills developed through game-based learning. Journal of Business Research, 94, 360-366.
Sparks, R. L., & Ganschow, L. (2007). Is the foreign language classroom anxiety scale measuring anxiety or language skills? Foreign Language Annals, 40(2), 260- 287.
Speilberger, C. D. (1966). Theory and research on anxiety. In C. D. Speilberger (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior (pp. 3-20). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Research, 35(8), 19-29.
Stephens, R. G., Dunn, J. C., Hayes, B. K., & Kalish, M. L. (2020). A test of two processes: The effect of training on deductive and inductive reasoning. Cognition, 199, 104223.
Stevenson, C. E., Heiser, W. J., & Resing, W. C.M. (2013). Working memory as a moderator of training and transfer of analogical reasoning in children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 159-169.
Stewart, S. H., Taylor, S., Jang, K. L., Cox, B. J., Watt, M. C., Fedoroff, I. C., & Borger, S. C. (2001). Causal modeling of relations among learning history, anxiety sensitivity, and panic attacks. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39(4), 443-456.
Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 1- 44
Sung, H. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2013). A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning performance in science courses. Computers & Education, 63, 43-51.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yang, J. M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68-84.
Sweller, J. (2015). Working memory, long-term memory, and instructional design. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 360-367.
Tanaka, A., & Murayama, K. (2014). Within-person analyses of situational interest and boredom: Interactions between task-specific perceptions and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1122–1134.
Tertoolen, A., Geldens, J., Van Oers, B., & Popeijus, H. (2017). Young children about school: Whose voices do we hear? International Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(3), 250.
Theobald, M., Danby, S., Einarsdottir, J., Bourne, J., Jones, D., Ross, S., ... Carter-Jones, C. (2015). Children's perspectives of play and learning for educational practice. Education Sciences, 5(4), 345.
Thompson, C. G., & von Gillern, S. (2020). Video-game based instruction for vocabulary acquisition with English language learners: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 30, 100332.
Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., & Wind, A. P. (2014). Game-based learning. In Spector, J. M., M. David Merrill, Elen, J., Bishop, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 485-503). New York, NY: Springer.
Tsai, Y.L., & Tsai, C.C. (2018). Digital game-based second-language vocabulary learning and conditions of research designs: A meta-analysis study. Computers & Education, 125, 345-357.
Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Lombaerts, K., Philipsen, B., & Tondeur, J. (2018). Students' motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 33-40.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Voprosy Psikhologii, 6, 1-18.
Wen, J. M., Lin, C., & Liu, E. Z. F. (2019). Integrating educational board game in Chinese learning environment to enhance students' learning performance and flow experience. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 9(4), 31-43.
Westera, W. (2015). Games are motivating, aren't they? Disputing the arguments for digital game-based learning. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(2), 3-17.
Wu, T. T. (2018). Improving the effectiveness of English vocabulary review by integrating ARCS with mobile game‐based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 315-323.
Xie, Z. (2009). The current situation and Countermeasures of Mandarin Education in Northern Thailand under the “Belt& Road” Initiative, Atlantis press, 58, 397.
Yang, J. C., Lin, M. Y. D., & Chen, S. Y. (2018). Effects of anxiety levels on learning performance and gaming performance in digital game‐based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 324-334.
Ye, J. H., Watthanapas, N., & Wu, Y. F. (2020). Applying Kahoot in Thai language and culture curriculum: Analysis of the relationship among online cognitive failure, flow experience, gameplay anxiety and learning performance. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(8), 563-572.