全球的科學教育不約而同的發展以探究學習為導向的課程目標。十二年國教課程綱要發布後，更確立了探究學習在台灣教育的地位。訓練學生將科學知識應用於日常生活中，也是培養科學素養不可缺少的重點之一。科學教科書作為教學過程的基本組成部分，有著至關重要的作用。本研究依據「十二年國民基本教育自然科學領域課程綱要」所規定的十一項實驗中選取「牛頓第二運動定律實驗」，針對台灣的兩版高中物理教材進行分析，以了解科學過程技能在教科書中應該如何體現，進而對台灣教科書提出討論與具體的建議，俾利教師作為教學參考，以及未來教科書作者及出版商判斷考量的依據，也有助於學生學習物理科學的方法。

Global science education is increasingly moving towards inquiry-based learning objectives. Following the release of the 12-Year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines, Taiwan has further solidified the status of inquiry learning within its educational framework. Training students to apply scientific knowledge in daily life is indispensable for cultivating scientific literacy. Science textbooks, as a fundamental component of the teaching process, play a crucial role in this endeavor. This study selects the "Newton's Second Law Experiment" from the 12-Year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines and analyzes two editions of high school physics textbooks in Taiwan. The aim is to understand how scientific process skills should be embodied in textbooks, thereby providing discussions and specific recommendations for Taiwanese textbooks. This will benefit teachers as instructional references and serve as considerations for future textbook authors and publishers, facilitating students' learning of physics.

中文部分：
[1]教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自： https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf
[2]教育部(2018年11月2日)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校：自然科學領域。https://bit.ly/3KXEh6r
[3]佘曉清、林煥祥（主編）（2017）‧PISA 2015臺灣學生的表現。臺北市：心理。

英文部分：
[1]Abruscato, J. (1995). Teaching children science: A discovery approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[2]Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2004). College students’ views of nature of sience. Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science, 25,389-425.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_18
[3]Andersen, K. (2020). Assessing task-orientation potential in primary science
textbooks: Toward a new approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57,
481-509. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21599
[4]Aldahmash, A. H., Mansour, N. S., Alshamrani, S. M., &Almohi, S. (2016). An analysis of activities in saudi arabian middle school science textbooks and workbooks for the inclusion of essential features of inquiry. Research in ScienceEducation, 46(6), 879-900. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-015-9485-7
[5]Aydın, A. (2013). Representation of Science Process Skills in The Chemistry Curricula for Grades 10, 11 And 12/Turkey. International Journal of Education and Practice, 1(5), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61/2013.1.5/61.5.51.63
[6]Adey, P.S. & Harlen , W. (1986) .A piagetian analysis of process skill test items, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 707-726. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230806
[7]Alonso, M. (1992).Problem solving vs. conceptual understanding.American Journal of Physics, 60 (9), 777–778. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17056
[8]Aziz, MajedS., Zain, & Ahmad Nurulazam Md.(2010). The Inclusion of Science Process Skills in Yemeni Secondary School Physics Textbooks. European Journal of Physics Education, 1(1),44-50 .https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1053817
[9]Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4%3C295::AID-TEA2%3E3.0.CO;22
[10]Arslan, A., Tekbıyık, A., & Ercan, O.(2012). Evaluation of Physics Textbooks According to Teacher Views. TURJE, 1(2), 1-13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292604833_Evaluation_of_Physics_Textbooks_According_to_Teacher_Views
[11]Aydogdu, B. (2015). The investigation of science process skills of science teachers in terms of some variables. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 582-594. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2097
[12]Babbie, E. (1998). The practice of social research(8th ed). Wadsworth Publishing Company.
[13]Baxter, L.M., & Kurt, M.J. (2001). When a hypothesis is not an educated guess. Science and Children, 38(7), 18-20.
[14]Beaumont-Walters, Y. & Soyibo, K. (2001). An analysis of high school students’performance on five integrated science process skills. Journal of Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2),133-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120087687
[15]Brotherton, P. N., & Preece, P. F. W. (1995). Science process skills: Their nature and interrelationships. Research in Science & Technological Education, 13(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514950130101
[16]Brewe, E. (2008). Modeling theory applied: Modeling instruction in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics 76(12),1155-1160. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2983148
[17]Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008).The many levels of inquiry.Science and Children. Science and Children, 46(2), 26-29.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ815766
[18]Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., &Fillman, D. A. (1991). A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning aids. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660281005.
[19]Chiappetta, E. L., &Fillman, D. A. (2007).Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (15), 1847–1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601159407
[20]Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86 (2), 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
[21]Carin, A. A., Bass, J. E., &Contant, T. L. (2005).Methods for teaching science as inquiry. Pearson Education.
[22]Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20157
[23]Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D, Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., … Weiner, S. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[24]Deya, Chakraborty & Gillian, Kidman.(2022).Inquiry Process Skills in Primary Science Textbooks:Authors and Publishers’Intentions.Research in Science Education,52,1419–1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09996-4
[25]Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76 (4), 543-547. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p543
[26]Dogan, O. K. (2021). Methodological? Or dialectical?: Reflections of scientific inquiry in biology textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(8), 1563-1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10120-7
[27]Eisner, E. W. (1987). Why the textbook influences curriculum. Curriculum Review, 26(3), 11–13.
[28]Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific observation: how children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 39–68. https://doi.org/10.3102/ 0034654308325899
[29]Ford, M., & Forman, E. (2006).Redefining literacy learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, (30),1–32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X030001001
[30]Fang, S.-C., Hsu, Y.-S., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, W.-H & Wu, H.-K., & Chen, C.-M. (2016). Investigating the effects of structured and guided inquiry on students’ development of conceptual knowledge and inquiry abilities: A case study in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 1945-1971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1220688
[31]Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., &Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 475– 499. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5%3C475::AID-TEA2%3E3.0.CO;2-O
[32]Gagné, R. M. The Psychological Bases of Science—a Process Approach. Washington DC: AAAS, 1965
[33]Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education.
[34]Giordan, A., & Vecchi, G. (1996). As Origens do Saber: das concepcoes dos aprendentes aos conceitos científicos. Porto Alegre: Artes Medicas https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=30289451-f152-4d32-8d61-65b84fb86ca6
[35]Harris, J., George, N. R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2018). Where will it go? How children and adults reason about force and motion. Cognitive Development, 45, 113–124. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.cogdev.2018.01.002
[36]Hirça, N. (2013). The Influence of Hands on Physics Experiments on Scientific Process Skills According to Prospective Teachers' Experiences.European Journal of Physics Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.20308/EJPE.35918
[37]Jones, M.G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., Tretter, T., Kubasko, D., Bokinsy, A & Taylor, R. & Superfine, R. (2003).Hands-on science : The impact of haptic experiences on attitudes and concepts. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Sceince Teaching Annual Meeting. Philadelphia. PA. https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2002.998971
[38]Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology. 3rd ed. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
[39]Kurniawati, A. (2021). Science process skills and its implementation in the process of science learning evaluation in schools. Journal of Science Education Research, 5(2), 16-20.
[40]Kleinman, G. (1965). Teacher’s questions and student understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3 (4), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660030410
[41]Kidman, G., & Casinader, N. (2017). Inquiry-based teaching and learning across disciplines: comparative theory and practice in schools. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53463-7
[42]Kuswanto(2017). Initial Skills Profile New Student Science Skills Process. Physics Education Year 2016/2017 .In Conduct Basic Physics Practicum 1 At Jambi University. Essay. University of Jambi: Jambi
[43]Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2011).Improving the science process skills ability of prospective science teachers using I diagrams. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v3i1.99
[44]Khishfe, R., &Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002).The influence of explicit reflective versus implicit inquiry oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036
[45]Kahveci, Ajda. (2010).Quantitative analysis of science and chemistry textbooks for indicators of reform: A complementary perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11)，1495–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903127649
[46]Lawson, A. E. (1985). A review of research on formal reasoning and science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(7), 569-617. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220702
[47]Lee, M.-H., Tsai, C.-C., & Chai, C.S. (2012).A comparative study of Taiwan, Singapore, and China preservice teachers’ epistemic beliefs. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, (21), 599–609. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259220023_A_Comparative_Study_of_Taiwan_Singapore_and_China_Preservice_Teachers'_Epistemic_Beliefs
[48]Livermore, A. H. (1964). The process approach of the AAAS commission on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(4), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020403
[49]Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S. & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (44), 1318-1347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20191
[50]Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning teachers and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education , 23(5), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690121307
[51]Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L & Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014).Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry – the views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125
[52]McGregor, D. (2007). Developing thinking, developing learning: A guide to thinking skills in education. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
[53]Machemer, P. & Crawford, P. (2007), “Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross disciplinary classroom”.Active Learning in Higher Education, (8), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074008
[54]Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask better questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (8), 854-870. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8%3C854::AID-TEA6%3E3.0.CO;2-5
[55]McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W.F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[56]Monhardt, L. & Monhardt, R. (2006).Creating a context for the learning of science process skills through picture books. Early Childhood Education Journal. 34(1), 67 – 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-006-0108-9
[57]Mutisya, S. M., Rotich, S., & Rotich, P. K. (2013). Conceptual Understanding of Science Process Skills and Gender Stereotyping : a Critical Component for Inquiry Teaching of Science in Kenya ’ S Primary Schools. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(3), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012055
[58]Montero-Pau, J., & Tuzón, P. (2017). Inquiry-based science education in primary school in Spain: Teachers’ practices. Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigacióny experienciasdidácticas,1. 2237- 2242.
[59]McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT (2nd ed.), Blackwell.
[60]Millar, R. (2009).Analysing practical activities to assess and improve effectiveness: The Practical Activity Analysis Inventory (PAAI). York: Centre for Innovation and Research in Science Education, Department of Educational Studies, University of York.
[61]National Research Council.(1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
[62]National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9596
[63]National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, Crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[64]Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Appendix F—Science and engineering practices in the next generation science standards. In Next generation science standards: For states, by states (pp. 48-78). The National Academies Press.
[65]Nikam, P.S. (2011). Using questioning strategy to enhance scientific process skills. Research Front, 1, 323-330.
[66]Nie, Y., Xiao, Y., Fritchman, J. C., Liu, Q., Han, J., Xiong, J., & Bao, L. (2019). Teaching towards knowledge integration in learning force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 41(16), 2271-2295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1672905
[67]Oliveira, A. W. (2010). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 422–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20345
[68]Oon, P. T., & Subramaniam, R. (2011). On the declining interest in physics among students—from the perspective of teachers. International journal of Science education, 33(5), 727-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.500338
[69]Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
[70]Ozgelen, S. (2012) Students’ Science Process Skills within a Cognitive Domain Framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a
[71]Padilla, M. J. (1990). The science process skills. Research matters—To the science teacher, No. 9004. Reston, VA: National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST).
[72]Piaget, J. (1966). Psychology of intelligence. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co.
[73]Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993).The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.3660300203
[74]Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Dieter Lenzen & Walberg-Henriksson, H. & Hemmo V (2007). Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Brussels: Directorate General for Research, Science, Economy and Society.
[75]Sílvia Ferreira., Leonor Saraiva(2021). Complexity of practical work in science curricula and textbooks: analysis of recontextualizing processes.Investigaçõesem Ensino de Ciências (IENCI), 26 (3),281 – 297. http://dx.doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2021v26n3p281
[76]Shahali, E.H., Halim, L., Treagust, D.F. & Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A.L. (2017). Primary school teachers’ understanding of science process skills in relation to their teaching qualifications and teaching experience. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 257-281. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-015-9500-z
[77]Sothayapetch, P., Lavonen, J., & Juuti, K. (2013). An analysis of science textbooks for grade 6: The electric circuit lesson. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.916a
[78]Shayer, M., & Adey, P. S. (1993).Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270309
[79]Sideri, A., & Skoumios, M. (2021).Science process skills in the Greek primary school science textbooks. Science Education International, 32(3), 231-236. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i3.6
[80]Suman, S. (2017). Developing science process skill for effective science learning. New Frontiers in Education, 50(2), 41-45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340668013_Developing_Science_Process_Skills_through_Mobile_Scientific_Inquiry
[81]Tilakaratne, C.T.K & Ekanayake, T.M.S. (2017). Achievement level of science process skills of junior secondary students: Based on a sample of grade six and seven students from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(9), 2089-2108.
[82]Trumper, R., & Gorsky, P. (1996). A cross-college age study about physics students’ conceptions of force in pre-service training for high school teachers. Physics Education, 31(4), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/31/4/021
[83]Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions asa teaching tool. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 77(7), 155. https://doi.org/10.5688%2Fajpe777155
[84]Turiman, P., Omar, J.&Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110- 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
[85]Tyler, R. W. (1942). General statement on evaluation. The Journal of Educational Research, 35(7), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1942.10881106
[86]Wells G, & Arauz RM.(2006). Dialogue in the classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 379–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
[87]Xiying, L., Liusu, W., Jiliang, S., & Jingying, W. (2019). A comparative study on scientific inquiry activities of Chinese science textbooks in high schools. Research in Science Education, 51, 407-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09902-z
[88]Yang, W., & Liu, E. (2016). Development and validation of an instrument for evaluating inquirybased tasks in science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 38(18),2688–2711. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1258499
[89]Yang, W.,Liu, C., & Liu, E. (2019) Content analysis of inquiry based tasks in high school biology textbooks in Mainland China, International Journal of Science Education, 41(6), 827-845. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1584418
[90]Yongjun, M., Tao, W., Jingying, W., Amber, L., & Rayne, C., & Xiaomei, Y. (2019). A comparative study on scientific inquiry activities of Chinese science textbooks in high schools. Research in Science Education, 51, 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09902-z
[91]Zion, M., & Sadeh, I. (2007).Curiosity and open inquiry learning. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656092
[92]Zeidan, A.H., & Jayosi, M.R. (2015). Science process skills and attitudes toward science among Palestinian secondary school students. World Journal of Education, 5(1), 13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wje.v5n1p13