簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 嚴光輝
Yen, Kuang-Hui
論文名稱: 國中全盲生點字代數學習輔具之設計與使用成效評估
A Design of an Algebra Learning Device for Junior High School Students with Total Blindness
指導教授: 張千惠
Chang, Chien-Huey
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 復健諮商研究所
Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Counseling
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 120
中文關鍵詞: 視覺障礙聶美茲數學點字特殊教育視障教育代數學習
英文關鍵詞: visual impairment, Nemeth code, special education, special education for the visual impairment, algebra learning
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900810
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:214下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

  本研究旨在設計一套國中全盲生數學代數學習輔具「點字代數學習輔具」,並確認此學習輔具對全盲生代數學習的適用,故本研究目的為:(一)發展一套可讓一般明眼數學老師指導國中全盲生代數課程的「點字代數學習輔具」,以幫助盲生學習數學代數。(二)探究「點字代數學習輔具」對全盲生之可用性。
  本研究採質性研究取向。本研究從文獻探討、確認研究問題與研究目標後,建立三階段的研究流程。第一階段為「點字代數學習輔具」設計與運用,包括:說明代數學習輔具設計的概念與特色,及由研究者檢視本學習輔具在國中盲生代數課程的運用。第二階段由研究者立意取樣邀請一位盲生擔任研究參與者,觀察全盲者使用「點字代數學習輔具」是否能正確的摸讀與操作,本研究進行六次代數教學與評估,評估項目包括:(一)輔具操作性、(二)學習效果。第三階段以立意取樣方式邀請七位教師接受訪談,這七位教師為融合教育環境中盲生學習數學之相關的教師,包括視障巡迴教師、視障重點學校之視障資源班老師、一般國中資源班老師、特教助理員,及數學教師三位。研究者以自行設計的半結構式訪談大綱進行當面訪談,瞭解教師們對盲生運用「點字代數學習輔具」學習代數的看法。
  本研究的結論如下:本研究設計的「點字代數學習輔具」經由研究者檢視國中代數課程的運用,及透過盲生實際的操作,盲生能正確的排列出代數算式,對排列的代數式有短期記憶效果,本輔具能實際於代數課程使用。透過教師訪談,有下列結論:(一)本項輔具的功能是建構代數之概念;(二)可幫助盲生與明眼數學老師溝通互動;(三)可幫助一對一的指導,例如,課後由數學老師指導;(四)可協助中途失明的學生在數學點字尚不熟悉時,繼續學習代數;(五)可助盲生瞭解式子中的上下對齊或左右排列的對應關係;(六)可幫助盲生理解數學式,形成心理圖像與形成記憶。研究過程中亦發現:因數學點字的列式方式讓盲生缺乏記憶搜尋功能,而本輔具可幫助盲生創造數學式子之「心理圖像」,有助於理解算式及形成記憶,這是本輔具的另一貢獻。最後,本研究亦針對研究限制與未來研究提出建議。

This research was to design an algebra learning device for junior high school students with total blindness, which was called Blind Algebra Learning Device(BALD). It is to confirm that Blind Algebra Learning Device was suitable for blind students to learn algebra. The purpose of this study was as follows: (1) To develop BALD which can help math teachers with normal vision to teach the students with total blindness to learn algebra courses. (2) To explore whether the BALD can be used in students with total blindness.
This study was based on qualitative research methods. This study established a three-stage research process after reviewing the literature and identifying problems and research objectives. The first stage was to introduce the design and application of BALD. The description of the concept and characteristics of the design of BALD were included, and the researchers explored how to use BALD in algebra courses for junior high school students with total blindness. In the second stage, the researcher invited a blind student to be a research participant by purposive sampling. The purpose was to observe whether the blind student can use the BALD and operate it correctly in the 6 teaching sessions. The evaluation items used in the 6 teaching sessions included: (1) the device operation, and (2) the learning effect. In the third stage, seven teachers were interviewed by purposive sampling. The seven teachers used to teach blind students mathematics. The interviewees included four Special Education related teachers: An itinerant teacher assigned by the County/City Education Bureau, a resource room teacher in an elementary school, a resource room teacher in a general school, a paraprofessional for students with visual impairment. Also, three math teachers in the regular class were interviewed. The researcher conducted interviews with a semi-structured interview outline. The purpose was to understand the viewpoints of the above teachers on blind students using BALD to learn algebra.
The conclusions of this research were as follows: The researcher found that, by using the BALD designed in this study in algebra courses, and through the actual operation of a blind student, the blind student can use the BALD to correctly arrange algebraic formulas, and had short-term memory effects on the algebraic formulas. Therefore, BALD can be practically applied in algebra courses. By interviewing the seven teachers, this study had the following conclusions: The function of the BALD can help (1) to construct the concept of algebra; (2) can help blind students communicate with sighted math teacher; (3) can help one-on-one guidance, such as individual guidance by a math teacher after class; (4) can assist adventitious by blind students to learn algebra with BALD when the braille skills were not yet mastered; (5) can help the blind students to understand the correspondence between the upper and lower alignment or the left and right alignment in the algebraic formula; and (6) can help blind students to understand algebraic formula, form psychological images and form memories. One more point was discovered during the research: Mathematical braille forms can not help blind students develop memory search capabilities. However, this BALD can help blind students to create mathematical images, which helped them to understand formulas and form memories. Finally, we also stated some research limitations, and presented some suggestions for future studies.

第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 6 第三節 名詞解釋 7 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 國中數學代數學習的狀況 11 第二節 全盲學生數學學習的實際現況 15 第三節 盲生的觸覺學習與數學學習輔具 27 第三章 研究方法 31 第一節 研究設計與流程 31 第二節 「點字代數學習輔具」設計與運用 34 第三節 一位全盲生使用者對本學習輔具使用之評估 36 第四節 教師訪談 39 第五節 研究工具 43 第六節 研究信實度 47 第七節 研究倫理 49 第四章 研究結果與討論 51 第一節 「點字代數學習輔具」設計與運用結果 51 第二節 全盲生使用「點字代數學習輔具」操作測試之結果 84 第三節 教師對運用「點字代數學習輔具」的看法 94 第四節 綜合討論 99 第五章 結論與建議 103 第一節 結論 103 第二節 建議 107 第三節 研究限制與未來展望 111 參考文獻 113 附錄 118 附錄一「點字代數學習輔具」全盲者使用評估表 118 附錄二 研究同意書 119 附錄三 「點字代數學習輔具」訪談大綱 120

王文科、王智弘(2010)。執的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29-50。
王亦榮(2004)。盲生數學學習困擾因素之研究。2004視障教育國際學術研討會會議手冊暨論文集,10-1-13。台南:國立台南大學視障教育與重建中心。
王惠川、吳建志、邱上真、詹士宜(1995)。解題歷程導向教學對國小四年級數學科低成就學生解題表現之成效研究。特殊教育復健學報,4,75-108。
王雅慧(2005)。談科技輔具在特殊教育教學應用的障礙因素。南投文教,23,99-101。
吳武典、王華沛(1999)。加強身心障礙者輔助科技建設。特殊教育季刊,72,1-9。
杞昭安(1998)。視覺障礙學生圖形認知發展測驗之編製初探。特殊教育與復健學報,6,125-152。
林光賢、郭汾派(1989)。國中生文字符號概念發展之研究。中華民國第五屆科學教育學術研討論文彙編,177-206頁。
洪有情(2002)。青少年代數運算概念發展研究。國科會專題研究計劃報告。
袁媛(1992)。國中一年級學生的文字符號概念與代數文字題的解題研究(未出版)。國立高行師範大學數學研究所碩士論文,高雄。
張春興(民85)。教育心理學。臺北:台灣東華書局。
張素貞(2002)。從實施九年一貫課程探討身心障礙學生的教與學。特殊教育季刊,82,9-15。
陳柏璋(1990)。教育研究方法的新取向—質的研究方法。台北:南宏。
陳盈言(2000)。國二學生變數概念的成熟度對齊函數概念發展的影響(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學數學研究所碩士論文,台北。
教育部盲人點字研究小組(1984)。聶美茲數學點字與科學點字記號彙編。國立台南師範學院。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要—數學學習領域。台北:教育部。
教育部(2005)。特殊教育統計年報。教育部:特殊教育工作小組編印。
郭汾派(1988)。國中生文字符號運算的錯誤型態。數學科教學輔導論文集,11-128頁。
郭汾派、林光賢與林福來(1989)。國中生文字符號概念的發展。國科會專題研究計劃報告。
董小平、孫名符、鄭素琴、王曄和孫傑遠合編(1996)。數學教學原理。台北:建宏出版社。
曾怡惇(2012)。盲生觸覺與生物科教學策略之探究。國小特殊教育,53,1-12。
黃鈺荃(2011)。透過敘說分析探討一位在數學探究教學情境的普通班級之七年級視障生的數學學習經驗(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,彰化。
黃雅鳳(2005)。打通視覺溝通障礙—雙視點字圖書的開發與運用。師友月刊,2005-1,83-86。
萬明美(2001)。視障教育。臺北市:五南。
萬明美(2013)。視覺障礙者教育。載於許天威、徐享良、張勝成(主編),新特殊教育通論(275-305頁)。臺北市:五南。
謝夢珊(2000)。以不同符號表徵未知數對國二學生解方程式表現之探討(未出版)。國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文,台北。
Collis, K. F.(1975). The development of formal reasoning. Newcastle, Australia:University of Newcastle.
Giudice. N. A., Bakdash. J. Z., & Legge. G. E.(2007). Wayfinding with words: spatial learning and navigation using dynamically-updated verbal descriptions. Psychological Research, 71(3), 347-358.
Hatwell, Y., Streri, A., & Gentaz, E.(2003). Touching for knowing: Cognitive psychology of haptic manual perception. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heller, M. A.(1989). Texture perception in sighted and blind observers. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 49–54.
Heller, M. A.(1991). Haptic perception in blind people. In M. A. Heller & W. Schiff (Eds.), The psychology of touch (pp. 239–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heller, M. A.(1989). Texture perception in sighted and blind observers. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 49–54.
Heller, M. A.(1991). Haptic perception in blind people. In M. A. Heller & W. Schiff (Eds.), The psychology of touch (pp. 239–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Herscovics N., & Kieran, C.(1980). Constructing meaning for the concept of equation. Mathematics Teacher,73,572-80.
Kuchemann, D.(1978). Children’s understanding of numerical variable. Mathematic in School,7(4),23-26.
Lincoln,Y.S.,& Guba, E. G.(1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
Lowenfeld, B.(1981). Effects of blindness on the cognitive functioning of children. In Berthold Lowenfeld on blindness and blind people: selected papers(pp.67-78). New York: American Federation for the Blind.
Marion, W.(1974). Use of geoboards to teach mathematics. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 6(2), 59-62.
Miles. T. R.(1992). The use of structured materials with older pupils. In T.R. and E. Miles(eds.):Dyslexia and Mathematics.83-97.New York:Routledge.
Nicholas, J. (2010). From active touch to tactile communication - what’s tactile cognition got to do with it? eaf-blind International Review. January-June, p4-9.Perkins, C.(2002). Cartography:progress in tactile mapping. Progress in Human Geography. 26,(4), 521~530.
Rapp, D. W., & Rapp, A. J.(1992). A survey of the current status of visually impaired students in secondary mathematics. Journal of Visual Impairment & blindness, 86, 115-117.
Silbert, J., Carnine, D. W., & Stein, M.(1990). Direct instruction in mathematics Columbus. OH: Merrill.
Skemp,R.(1979). Goals of learning and qualities of understanding. Mathematics Teaching,88,44-49.
Skemp, R.(1971). The Psychology of Learning Mathematics: Penguin
Thomas, D. & Evelyn, K.(1997). Issues and aids for teaching mathematics to the blind. Mathematics teacher, 90, 344-350.
Vanlierde, A. & Wanet-Defalque, M. C.(2005). The Role of visual experience in mental imagery. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness,165~178.
Wagner,S. (1981).Conservation of equation and function under transformation of variable. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,12,107-118.

下載圖示
QR CODE