簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鄭淑芬
Cheng, Shu-Fen
論文名稱: 競爭策略與優勢性分析:以X公司為例
Competitive Strategy and Advantage Analysis: The Case Study for X Company
指導教授: 周德瑋
Chou, De-Wai
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 46
中文關鍵詞: 製造業創新策略動態競爭核心能力
英文關鍵詞: Manufacturing Industry, Innovation Strategy, Dynamic Competition, Core Competence.
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.EMBA.039.2018.F08
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:162下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 產業內競爭激烈、外在環境動盪,組織可藉由不斷地察覺-動機-能力(Awareness-Motivation-Capability,A-M-C) 來了解競爭互動中應如何更有效去預測競爭對手的行動與回應以取得競爭優勢,因此以動態觀點可以補足過去靜態分析策略之不足。

    許多製造業者也逐漸體認到單在成本、技術與產品品質上的領先已經無法提高產業之附加價值,唯有創新才能維持市場地位。其中創新服務已成為許多製造業在進行創新時會採行之致勝方式。然而,製造業推動服務創新主要是探討產業轉型及經營模式,幾乎沒有去探討製造業服務化發展內涵之個案研究。因此本研究利用深入訪談之個案研究方法,針對成功推動服務化發展之某一石化製造業廠商,以動態競爭理論為基礎來探討其服務創新概念及其內涵,並輔以核心能耐之觀點以及十大創新原點架構,來探討製造業服務創新的推動與組織核心能耐建構之關係。

    結果發現:個案公司會根據數據來預先備料,將資訊科技應用組織與管理之慣例;採主動創新服務作為與前瞻性思維;讓產業規模繼續提升,做到向上整合並與下游廠商的合作,持續產生共創價值;以極佳的配合度和異於其他公司無法做到的極短交貨期,都是建立在技術的成熟跟穩健度基礎之上所發展出來的創新作為。

    With intense competition and external environment turbulence, an organization can understand how competition interactions can more effectively predict competitors' actions and responses by means of Awareness-Motivation-Capability (AMC). Therefore, dynamic strategy viewpoint can complement the shortcomings of static analysis strategies.

    Manufacturers have also gradually realized that the leading position in cost, technology and product quality cannot increase the added value of the industry. Only innovation can maintain its market position. Thus, innovative services have become a good method to adopt for manufacturing industries. However, the manufacturing industry promotes service innovation mainly to explore the industrial transformation and business model. There is almost no case study to explore the implication of manufacturing service development. Therefore, this research uses case study motheh of in-depth interviews to explore the concept of service innovation based on dynamic competition theory and an innovation framework from Ten Types of Innovation : The Discipline of Building Breakthroughs.

    The findings are as follows: The case company will pre-stock materials based on the big data and use information technology application; adopt forward-looking innovation services; make large scale by vertical collaboration with manufacturers to create co-creative value; with excellent cooperation and afford a very short delivery time, are based on the maturity of the technology development.

    誌謝 I 摘要 II ABSTRACT III 表次 VI 圖次 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究範圍與限制 2 第四節 研究流程和架構 2 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 石化業現況 5 第二節 動態競爭理論 10 第三節 核心能力 15 第四節 服務創新 19 第三章 研究方法 24 第一節 研究設計 24 第二節 研究對象 25 第三節 訪談提綱 26 第四章 研究結果 27 第一節 訪談記錄重點整理 27 第五章 個案介紹 33 第一節 公司概況 33 第二節 營運概況 33 第三節 未來發展 34 第六章 結論與建議 36 第一節 研究摘述 36 第二節 研究結果討論 37 第三節 研究限制與建議 44 參考文獻 45

    中文部分:
    1.吳豐祥,2004。企業的核心能耐,5月29日,經濟日報。
    2.高熏芳、林盈助、王向葵,2001。質化研究設計-一種互動取向的方法,台北:心理出版社。
    3.梁秋錦,2012。超越顧客期望的創新服務。取自https://mymkc.com/article/content/21383
    4.產業價值鏈資訊平台,2018。石化及塑橡膠產業鏈簡介。取自http://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=N000
    5.黃光玉、劉念夏、陳清文,2004。媒介與傳播研究方法:質化與量化途徑。台北:風雲論壇。
    6.賴瑞‧基利, 萊恩‧皮可, 布萊恩‧昆恩, 海倫‧華特斯,2016。創新的10個原點(洪慧芳,譯)。台北:天下雜誌。

    英文部分:
    1. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
    2. Bettencourt, L. A. (1997). Customer voluntary performance: Customers as partners in service delivery. Journal of retailing, 73(3), 383-406.
    3. Betz, F. (1998). Managing Technological Innovation – Competitive Advantage from Change. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
    4. Collis, D. J. (1996). Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage. London: Sage.
    5. Den Hertog, P., & Bilderbeek, R. (1999). Conceptualising service innovation and service innovation patterns. Research Programme on Innovation in Services (SIID) for the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Dialogic, Utrecht.
    6. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
    7. Hafeez, K., Zhang, Y., & Malak, N. (2002). Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. International journal of production economics, 76(1), 39-51.
    8. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic management journal, 12(S1), 83-103.
    9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1993). Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard business review, 71(2), 75-84.
    10. Keeley, L., Walters, H., Pikkel, R., & Quinn, B. (2013). Ten types of innovation: The discipline of building breakthroughs. John Wiley & Sons.
    11. Leonard‐Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13(S1), 111-125.
    12. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1999). The core competence of the corporation. In Knowledge and strategy (pp. 41-59).
    13. Rumelt, R. P. (1991). How much does industry matter?. Strategic management journal, 12(3), 167-185.
    14. Tampoe, M. (1994). Exploiting the core competences of your organization. Long range planning, 27(4), 66-77.
    15. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE