簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳小英
Chen, Hsiao-Ying
論文名稱: 已婚女性對婆家與娘家的代間支持及情感關係-夫妻互動和孝道信念的作用
The Relationships of Married Women’s Intergenerational Support and Affectional Tie with In-law and Original family – The Effect of Husband-Wife Interaction and Filial Piety Beliefs
指導教授: 周麗端
Chou, Li-Tuan
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 人類發展與家庭學系
Department of Human Development and Family Studies
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 163
中文關鍵詞: 代間支持與情感關係夫妻互動孝道信念調節作用
英文關鍵詞: intergenerational support and affective tie, husband-wife interaction, filial peity beliefs, moderator effect
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204146
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:295下載:19
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究探討已婚女性的孝道信念與夫妻互動對代間支持與情感關係的影響,研究目的為:(1)瞭解已婚女性的「孝道信念」、「夫妻互動」與提供婆家∕娘家「代間支持」、「情感關係」的樣貌。(2)探討已婚女性的「孝道信念」、「夫妻互動」與提供婆家∕娘家「代間支持」、「情感關係」的關連。(3)探討已婚女性的「夫妻互動」在與「孝道信念」交互作用下,與提供婆家、娘家「代間支持」、「情感關係」的關連。本研究以社會變遷調查2011年(六期二次)的資料進行次級分析,研究對象為已婚女性且雙邊親代至少有一位健在,本研究有效樣本257位。研究結果如下:
    一、「孝道信念」、「夫妻互動」與提供婆家∕娘家「代間支持」、「情感關係」的樣貌
    (一)女性對婆家、娘家兩邊的經濟支持相當;對婆家的家務支持多於娘家;對娘家的情感優於婆家。
    (二)夫妻間雖然情感支持多,然一旦衝突則「不忍」的頻率高。
    (三)已婚女性對相互性孝道信念的認同高於對權威性孝道信念。
    二、「孝道信念」、「夫妻互動」與提供婆家∕娘家「代間支持」、「情感關係」的直接效果
    (一)經濟支持
    1. 相互性孝道信念,在提供婆家、娘家經濟支持上,扮演推手的角色;而權威性孝道則無解釋力。
    2. 夫妻間情感支持,在提供婆家、娘家經濟支持上,乃為重要作手;但衝突時能「忍」則僅會嘉惠婆家。
    3. 教育普及促使工作機會增加,讓已婚女性有權力分配資源,對婆家經濟支持乃愛屋及烏的外溢作用;對娘家乃孝道的回饋效果
    (二)家務支持
    1.夫妻衝突時能「忍」,則獨厚娘家,對婆家則無效果。
    2. 與婆家、娘家皆循互惠模式交換

    (三)情感關係
    1. 夫妻間情感支持牽動與婆家、娘家的情感關係,但對婆家的作用強於娘家
    2. 相互性孝道信念牽引與婆家、娘家的情感關係,但與娘家的親情強過婆家
    三、「夫妻互動」與「孝道信念」相遇後,對提供婆家∕娘家「代間支持」、「情感關係」的調節作用
    (一)當夫妻互動的情感支持、衝突因應與相互性孝道信念相遇時,無法引發代間經濟與家務支持的動能
    (二)當「忍」與低權威性孝道信念相遇時,「忍」夫妻衝突則提供婆家經濟支持,「不忍」則資源給娘家
    (三)當夫妻間情感支持與相互性孝道信念相遇時,則令女性與婆家情感關係越趨親密的變化
    依據研究結果而做以下幾點建議:
    一、孝道乃普世價值,再莫以權威性孝道規範來期待女性;透過平等、尊重的雙向溝通,強化代間情感,娘、婆同款親代間關係更和諧
    二、增加夫妻的「WE」感,降低衝突時不願「忍」的「ME」感,讓婚姻與代間連帶增強,讓親代獲得好支持
    三、強調「親慈子孝」互益性的交流,以相互性孝道信念為支撐,強化與雙邊家族的互動,讓老年支持更完善
    四、夫妻互動的「忍」能翻轉低孝道信念對代間支持的作用,強化夫妻關係則能嘉惠老人
    伍、不同國情、價值取向的代間關係,宜由跨國資料中深入探究

    This study investigates the influence of the filial peity beliefs and husband-wife interaction of married women on intergenerational support and affective relationship. The research aims are as follows: (1) To investigate the connection between the “filial peity beliefs” and “husband-wife interaction” of married women, and their “intergenerational support” for and “affective tie” with their in-law/ original families. (2) To investigate the connection between the “husband-wife interaction” of married women in its interaction with their “filial peity beliefs”, and their provision of “intergenerational support” for and “affective tie” with their in-law/original families. This study based its analysis on the data from the Social Change Survey, 2011 (Round 6, Year 2) and its subjects were married women with at least one parent from both families still alive. There were 257 valid samples. The research results are encapsulated below:
    1. The connection between the “filial peity beliefs” and “husband-wife interaction” of married women, and the provision of intergenerational support and affection tie:
    (a) Reciprocal filial peity belief plays an important facilitating role in the provision of economic support for in-law and original families.
    (b) The affective support in husband-wife interaction has a stronger effect on the economic support for in-law than original families.
    (c) Housework support for both in-law and original families follows the model of “simultaneous reciprocity,” and if I “tolerate” in the husband-wife interaction, favor will be showered on the original family alone.
    (d) The affective support between husbands and wives has an effect on the affective relationship with in-law families, while the parent-child affective link impacts the affective relationship with original families.
    2. The connection between the “husband-wife interaction” of married women in its interaction with their filial peity beliefs, and the provision of “generational support” for and “affective relationship” with in-law and original families:
    (a) The meeting of positive and negative interaction between husbands and wives with reciprocal filial peity beliefs can hardly trigger the dynamics of intergenerational support.
    (b) When “tolerance” and low-authoritarian filial peity beliefs meet, economic support will be provided for the in-law family if I “tolerate” in husband-wife conflicts, but will be for the original family if I do not “tolerate.”
    (c) When the affective support between husbands and wives and reciprocal filial peity beliefs meet, the affective relationship of women with their in-law families tends to grow increasingly intimate.

    Based on the above research results, some recommendations are made for family education and future studies.

    第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………… 1 第一節 研究動機…………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題…………………… 6 第三節 名詞釋義…………………………………………… 7 第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………… 9 第一節 代間支持與情感關係………………………… 9 第二節 孝道信念……………………………………… 23 第三節 夫妻互動……………………………………… 28 第四節 影響已婚女性對婆家∕娘家代間支持與情感關係的因素……………………………………… 32 第三章 研究方法……………………………………… 52 第一節 次級資料研究法……………………………… 52 第二節 研究架構與假設……………………………… 55 第三節 資料來源與研究樣本………………………… 59 第四節 資料處理方式………………………………… 66 第四章 研究結果與討論…………………………… 71 第一節 孝道信念、夫妻互動與代間支持、情感關係的資料分析…………………………………… 71 第二節 影響代間支持與情感關係的因素…………… 78 第五章 結論與建議 127 第一節 結論……………………………………………. 127 第二節 建議……………………………………………. 140 參考文獻 144 表目錄 頁次 表2-1 西方大型資料庫代間支持調查項目……………… 12 表3-1 樣本數……………………………………………… 60 表3-2 受訪者基本背景描述……………………………… 69 表4-1 孝道信念與夫妻互動……………………………… 73 表4-2 代間支持與情感關係……………………………… 74 表4-3 代間支持與情感關係—對婆家與娘家提供的比較 75 表4-4 代間支持、情感關係與各變項間的相關……….. 79 表4-5 已婚女性提供給婆家經濟支持的影響因素……… 82 表4-6 已婚女性提供給娘家經濟支持的影響因素……… 92 表4-7 已婚女性提供給婆家家務支持的影響因素……… 100 表4-8 已婚女性提供給娘家家務支持的影響因素……… 108 表4-9 已婚女性與婆家情感關係的影響因素…………… 114 表4-10 已婚女性與娘家情感關係的影響因素…………… 121 圖目錄 圖2-1 夫妻情感支持的調節作用………………………… 47 圖2-2 夫妻衝突因應的調節作用………………………… 48 圖3-1 研究架構圖………………………………………… 56 圖4-1 衝突因應對權威性孝道信念與婆家經濟支持之調節效果……………………………………………… 88 圖4-2 情感支持對相互性孝道信念與婆家情感關係之調節效果……………………………………………… 97 圖4-3 衝突因應對權威性孝道信念與娘家經濟支持之調節效果……………………………………………… 118

    中文部分:
    孔祥明(1999)。婆媳過招為哪樁?婆婆媳婦與兒子(丈夫)三角關係的探討。應用心理研究,4,57-96。
    王齡竟、陳毓文(2010)。家庭衝突、社會支持與青少年憂鬱情緒:檢視同儕、專業與家外成人支持的緩衝作用。中華心理衛生學刊,23(1),65-97。
    伊慶春(2001)。華人家庭夫妻權力的比較分析。載於「二十一世紀的中國社會學與人類學」。臺北市:麗文出版社。
    伊慶春(2006)。社會變遷中的台灣家庭:夫妻關係的研究發展。發表於變遷中的台灣婚姻與家庭研究與實務,台北市:中華家政學會。
    伊慶春(2009)。回應「華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻」。本土心理學研究,32,187-197。
    伊慶春、呂玉暇(1998)。經濟發展與婦女家庭地位:臺灣家庭結構、婦女就業型態與家庭權力結構之關聯。行政院科學委員會專題研究成果報告。
    伊慶春、章英華(2008)。父系家庭的持續與變遷:臺灣的家庭社會研究1960-2000。載於謝國雄主編,群學爭鳴:臺灣社會學發展史,23-73。臺北市:中央研究院。
    伊慶春、章英華(2012)。臺灣的社會變遷1985~2005家庭與婚姻:臺灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之一。臺北市:中央研究院。
    伊慶春、陳玉華(1998)。奉養父母方式與未來奉養態度之關聯。人口學刊,19,1~32。
    朱瑞玲、章英華(2001)。華人社會的家庭倫理與家人互動:文化及社會的變遷效果。發表於華人家庭動態資料庫學術研討會,臺北市:中央研究院經濟研究所、國科會社會科學研究中心主辦,2001-07-27 ~ 2001-07-28。
    呂玉瑕(2011)。台灣民眾性別角色態度的變遷:1991-2001。台灣社會學刊,48,51-94。
    余德慧、顧瑜君(2000)。父母眼中的離合處境與現代倫理意涵。應用心理研究,6,173 – 211。
    利翠珊(1995)。夫妻互動歷程之探討-以台北地區年輕新婚夫妻為例的一項初探性研究。本土心理學研究,4,260-321。
    利翠珊(2002)。婆媳與母女:不同世代女性家庭經驗的觀點差異。女學學誌-婦女與性別研究,13(新刊1號),179-218。
    利翠珊(2010)。夫妻間的忍與支持:對偶關係的效應。「2010年華人家人關係研討會」,中央研究院:民族學研究所。
    利翠珊(2012)。夫妻關係間的忍與婚姻滿意度之關連。中華心理衛生學刊,25(3),447-475。
    利翠珊、張妤玥(2010)。代間照顧關係:台灣都會地區成年子女的質性訪談研究。中華心理衛生學刊,23(1),99-124。
    利翠珊、陳富美(2004)。配偶親職角色的支持與分工對夫妻恩情的影響。本土心理學研究,21,49-83。
    利翠珊、蕭英玲(2008)。華人婚姻品質的維繫:衝突與忍讓的中介效果。本土心理學研究,29,77-116。
    吳明燁、伊慶春(2003)。婚姻其實不只是婚姻:家庭因素對於 婚姻滿意度的影響。人口學刊,26,71-95。
    吳嘉瑜(2003)。代間關係研究的新思維:代間矛盾研究趨勢的興起與相關文獻。輔導季刊,39(4),1-9。
    吳嘉瑜(2004)。子代夫妻對偶代間關係經驗:「他」的矛盾?「她」的矛盾?。中華輔導學報,15,123-149。
    吳齊殷、張明宜、陳怡蒨(2008)。尋找機制與過程:長期追蹤研究的功用。αβγ量化研究學刊,2(1),1-26。
    呂玉瑕、伊慶春(2005)。社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工:台灣七○年代與九○年代社會文化脈絡的比較。台灣社會學,10,41-94。
    呂玉瑕(2011)。台灣民眾性別角色態度的變遷:1991-2001。台灣社會學刊,48,51-94。
    李青芬、唐先梅(2008)。家務工作近30年之回顧。生活科學學報,12,77-109。
    李美玲、楊亞潔、伊慶春(2000)。家務分工:就業現實還是平等理念。臺灣社會學,24,59-88。
    李敏龍、楊國樞(2005)。忍的心理與行為。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳(主編):華人本土心理學。臺北市:道聲出版公司。
    李清松、林歐貴英、陳若琳、潘榮吉(2010)。老人與家庭。臺北市:國立空中大學。
    周玉慧(2009)。夫妻間衝突因應策略類型及其影響。中華心理學刊,51(1),81-100。
    周玉慧(2015)。婚姻家庭觀與夫妻互動觀。發表於民族學研究所60週年所慶,「跨・文化學術研討會」。臺北市:中央研究院民族學研究所。
    周玉慧、朱瑞玲(2013)。殊異或趨同?台灣民眾價值觀之變遷及其影響因素。發表於葉光輝主編《華人的心理與行為:哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究》,台北:中央研究院。
    周麗端(1999)。家庭理論與運用。載於李淑娟(主編),婚姻與家人關係(26-57頁)。新北市:國立空中大學。
    周麗端(2001)。夫妻的家庭價值觀與婚姻滿意度之研究。生活科學學報,7,133-155。
    周麗端、唐先梅(2011)。100年教育部辦理家庭教育「愛家515-小手做家務」主軸論述。教育部。
    林如萍(1996)。老年人與成年子女之代間關係-代間交換研究。中華家政,25,77-85。
    林如萍(2012)。臺灣家庭的代間關係與代間互動類型之變遷趨勢。「台灣的社會變遷1985~2005:家庭篇,台灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之一」,臺北市:中央研究院。
    林如萍、伊慶春(2007)。規範、情感、交換?成年子女與老年父母的代間支持。「家庭價值、行為與態度:台灣社會變遷基本調查第九次研討會」會議論文,臺北市:中央研究院社會研究所,2007年11月3日。
    林如萍、高淑貴(1999)。臺灣農家代間關係:老年父母與其最親密的成年子女之代間連帶。「臺灣社會問題研究學術研討會」會議論文,臺北市:中央研究院社會問題研究推動委員會,1999年12月29-30日。
    林松齡(1993)。〈老年人社會支持來源與老人社會需求:兼論四個社會支持模式〉。見王國羽(編著):《社會安全問題之探討》。嘉義: 中正大學社會福利研究所。
    林松齡(1997)。台灣中部地區已婚婦女之婚姻品質的決定因素:一個社會學理論的解釋。台灣大學社會學刊,25,179-220。
    林津如(2007)。父系家庭與女性差異認同:中產階級職業婦女家務分工經驗的跨世代比較。臺灣社會研究,68,1-73。
    胡幼慧、周雅容(1996)。代際的交換與意涵:臺灣老年婦女的家務變遷研究。臺灣社會學刊,20,1-48。
    胡幼慧、周雅容(1996)。婦女與三代同堂:老年婦女的經濟依賴與居住困境探索。婦女與兩性學刊,7,27-57。
    唐先梅(1995)。雙薪家庭家事分工之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(NSC 85-2412-H-180-00)。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
    唐先梅(1996)。什麼事家務工作?--家務工作本質初探。空大生活科學學報,2,209-236。
    唐先梅(1997)。家事分工理論模型-從層級觀念的思索。空中大學生活科學學報,3, 63-90。
    唐先梅(1999)。家庭收縮期。載於李淑娟(主編),婚姻與家人關係(202-236頁)。新北市:國立空中大學。
    唐先梅(2005)。家務分工:責任與壓力?愛與關懷?應用心理研究,25,8-10。
    徐德隆(譯)(1988)。中國人與美國人(原作者:許烺光)。臺北市:巨流圖書公司。
    馬國勳(2010)。夫家妻家誰較親:比較已婚子女和雙方家長之聯絡頻率及同住安排。研究臺灣,6,46-82。
    高淑貴、林如萍(1998)。農村老人對財產分配、吃住安排與家務分工的看法 。社區發展季刊,84,135-151。
    高淑貴、林如萍、王瑞禎 (1999)。農家已婚婦女與其女性尊親屬代間關係之研究-婆媳、母女之代間交換分析。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告NSC-88-2412-H-002-014。
    張月霞(譯)(1997)。老年人的家庭支持(原作者:Kendly, H. L., Hashimto, A., & Coppard, L. C.)。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。
    張晉芬、李奕慧(2007)。「女人的家事」、「男人的家事」:家事分工性別化的持續與解釋。人文及社會科學集刊,19(2),203-229。
    章英華(1994)。臺灣家庭結構:從家戶到家人關係。社區發展,68,35-40。
    章英華(1994)。變遷社會中的家戶組成與奉養態度-臺灣的例子。國立臺灣大學社會學期刊,23,1-34。
    莊耀嘉、楊國樞(1997)。角色規範的認知結構。本土心理學研究,7,281-338。
    許皓宜(2013)。媳婦角色在家庭照顧中的文化期待。家庭教育與諮商學刊,14,33-52。
    許詩淇、黃囇莉(2006)。虛虛實實之間:婆媳關係的和諧化歷程與轉化機制。本土心理學研究,25,3-45。
    陳小英(2006)。媳婦角色規範與婆媳諧和關係之探究。中華家政學刊,40,149-164。
    陳正昌(2006)。教育基礎研究的兩個量化基礎–資料庫及統計。發表於高雄師範大學「教育專業發展:教育研究理論與實務之整合學術研討會」,高雄市。
    陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2005)。多變量分析方法—統計軟體應用。臺北市:五南出版社。
    陳育青(1990)。台灣地區世代移動之探討。台灣大學經濟學研究所, 碩士論文。
    陳建良(2005)。親子居住安排在家庭內與跨家戶成員間的權力互動。住宅學報,14(2),51-81。
    陳弱水(1997)。試探唐代婦女與本家的關係。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,68,167-248。
    陳富美、利翠珊(2004)。不同情感組型夫妻在家事分工上的差異:對偶資料的分析。應用心理研究,24,95-115。
    陳富萍(2006)。牽手一生:女性的婚姻承諾在婚姻中的變化。臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文。未出版。
    陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙編:人文及社會科學集刊,8(1),115-137。
    陸洛(2003)。人我關係之界定:折衷自我的現身,本土心理學研究,29,39-207。
    陸洛、高旭繁、陳芬憶(2006)。傳統性、現代性孝道觀念及其對幸福感的影響:一項親子對偶設計。本土心理學研究,25,197-232。
    黃宗堅、葉光輝、謝雨生(2004)。夫妻關係中權力與情感的運作模式:以衝突因應策略為例。本土心理學研究,21,3-48。
    黃迺毓、柯澍馨、唐先梅(1996)。家庭管理。台北:國立空中大學。
    黃國彥(1984)我國當前祖孫三代價值觀念差異之研究。國立政治大學學報,50,139-185。
    黃聖哲(2012年3月)。社會性的雙重結構。「2012年第五屆「社會學與心理學的對話」國際學術研討會」發表之論文,台北市世新大學社會心理學系。
    黃囇莉(2002)。控制與忍之間——從現代化到本土化。發表於「現代到本土」學術研討會2002年,2月,台北:台灣大學心理學系,華人本土心理學追求卓越計畫中心主辦。
    黃囇莉、朱瑞玲(2011)。是亂流?還是潮起、潮落?-尋找台灣的「核心價值」及其變遷。高雄行為科學學刊,3,119-145。
    黃囇莉、鄭婉蓉、黃光國(2008)。邁向發聲之路:上下關係中「忍」的歷程與自我之轉化。本土心理學研究,29,3-76。
    楊玲玲(1995)。婦女在家庭中所扮演的角色。社會建設,89,43-48。
    楊國樞(1985)。現代社會的新孝道。中華文化復興月刊,19,51-67。
    楊國樞 (1993)。中國人的價值觀─社會科學觀點。台北:桂冠。
    楊國樞(1996)。父子軸家庭與夫妻軸家庭的運作特徵與歷程。行政院國家科學委員會專題計畫,NSC 85-2417-H-002-028-G6。
    楊國樞、葉光輝與黃囇莉(1988)。 孝道的社會態度與行為:理論與測量。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,65,171-227。
    楊梵妤、張文哲(2010)。心情與自我覺察對助人意向及助人行為之影響。教育心理學報,42(2),339 -358。
    葉光輝(1997)。親子互動的困境及其因應方式:從孝道觀點的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,82,65-114。
    葉光輝(2009)。台灣民眾的代間交換行為:孝道觀點的探討。本土心理學研究,31,97-141。
    葉光輝(2009)。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,32,101-148。
    葉光輝、章英華、曹惟純(2012)。臺灣民眾家庭價值觀之變遷與可能心理機制。見伊慶春、章英華主編:《台灣的社會變遷1985-2005:家庭與婚姻,台灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之一》,29-73。臺北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。
    葉光輝、楊國樞(2008)。中國人的孝道:心理學的分析。臺北市:台灣大學出版中心出版。
    傅仰止、張晉芬(編)(2007)。台灣社會變遷基本調查第五期第二次計畫。台北:中央研究院社會學研究所。
    董緒英、黃儀娟(譯)(2000)。次級資料研究法(原作者:Stewar, D. W., Kamins, M. A.)。臺北市: 弘智文化。(原著出版年:1993)。
    劉淑娟(2006)。談女性與家庭照護。家庭教育雙月刊,1,78-84。
    劉惠琴(1993)。親密關系的衝突化解歷程。婦女與兩性學刊,4,207-244。
    劉惠琴(1996)。中國人之心理與行為本土化研究:社會關係與人際互動-社會變遷中的夫妻衝突與影響歷程(I)。行政院國科會專題研究計劃成果報告。NSC 85-2417-H-031-002-G6。
    蔡文輝、李紹嶸(2014)。社會學概論。臺北市:五南出版社。
    蔡采秀(1992)。工業化對台灣親屬關係的影響。女學學誌,3,59-88。
    鄭凱文(2002)。台灣家庭金錢移轉與居住安排之探討。未出版碩士論文,新北市:國立台北大學。
    魯慧中、鄭保志(2012)。孝道的認同與實踐─以「成年兒子與父母同住決策」為分析對象。人口學刊,45, 111-154。
    謝玉玲(2007)。「道德媳婦」的當代生活實踐:女性代間照護處境之經驗研究。嘉義縣:國立中正大學社會福利研究所博士論文。
    藍佩嘉(2008)。跨國灰姑娘:當東南亞幫傭遇上台灣新富家庭。台北:遠流出版社。
    西文部分:
    Argyle, M. & Furnham, A. (1983). Sources of satisfaction and conflict in long-term relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family,45, 481-493.
    Bengtson, V.L.(2001). Beyond the Nuclear Family: The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational Bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 1–16.
    Bengtson, V.L., & Roberts, R.E.L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 856-870.
    Bengtson, V.L., Rosenthal, C.J., & Burton, L.M. (1990). Families and ageing: Diversity and heterogeneity. In: Binstock, R.H., and George, L.K. (eds.).Handbook of aging and the social sciences. New York: Academic Press: 263-287.
    Benson, M. J., Buehler, C., & Gerard, J. M. (2008). Interparental hostility and early adolescent problem behavior: Spillover via maternal acceptance, harshness, inconsistency, and intrusiveness. Journal of Early Adolescence, 28, 428-454.
    Blau, P.(1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York : Wiley.
    Bryant, C. M., Conger, R. D., and Meehan, J. M. (2001). The influence of in-law on change in marital success. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63,614-626.
    Caplan,R.D.(1974).Suport systems and community mental health consultation.New York:Basic Books.
    Chattopadhyay, A., & Marsh, R.(1999). Changes in Living Arrangement and Familial Support for the Elder in Taiwan: 1963-1991. Journal of Comparative Family Study,30(3), 523-37.
    Chen, F. M. (陳富美), & Li, T. S. (利翠珊) (2007). Marital Enqine: An examination of its relationship to spousal contribution, sacrifices, and family stress in Chinese couples’ marriage. Journal of Social Psychology, 147(4), 393-412.
    Chesley, N., Poppie, N.(2009). Assisting Parents and In-Laws : Gender, Type of Assistance, and Couples’ Employment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 247-262.
    Cheung, C., Kwan, Y. H. & Ng, S. H. (2006). Impacts of filial piety on preference for kinship versus public care. Journal of Community Psychology,34(5),617-634.
    Cohen, S., & Will, A. T.(1985). Stress, Social Support, and Buffering Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2),310-357.
    Coleman, J. S. (1988).Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
    Connidis, I. A., and McMullin, J. A.(2002). Sociological Ambivalence and Family Ties: A Critical Perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, (3), 558-567.
    Corso, A, Rossi Del, & Lanz, M.(2013). Felt obligation and the family life cycle : A study on intergenerational relationships. International Journal of Psychology, 48(6),1196-1200.
    Cox, M., Paley, B., & Harter, K. (2001). Interparental conflict and parent-child relationships. In J. H. Grych & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 249–272). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511527838.011
    Davey, A., Savla, J. T., & Belliston, L. M. (2003). Intergenerational relations. In J. J. Ponzetti (ED.), International encyclopedia of Marriage and family (pp. 918-922). New York : Macmillan.
    DePaulo, B. (2006). Singled out: How singles are stereotyped, stigmatized, and ignored, and still live happily ever after. NY: St. Martin’s Press.
    Eggebeen, D. J., & Hogan, D. P. (1990). Giving between generations in American families. Human Nature, 1, 211-232.
    Eggebeen, D. J., & Davey, A.(1998). Do safety nets work? The role of anticipated help in times of need. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 939-950.
    Emmons, R. A. ; McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 84 (2), 377-389.
    Erel, O., & Burman, B. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 108–132. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.108
    Fergus, S., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2005). Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health, 26(1), 399-419.
    Fincham, F. D. (2003). Marital conflict: Correlates, structure and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 23-27.
    Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples.Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47-77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.47.
    Fingerman, K. L., Gilligan, M., VanderDrift, L. E., & Pitzer, L. (2012). In-law relationships before and after the wedding: Husbands, wives, and their mothers-in-law. Research on Human Development, 9, 106-125.
    Fingerman, K., Miller, L., Birditt, K., & Zarit, S. (2009). Giving to the Good and the Needy : Parental Support of Grown Children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1220-1233.
    Finley, N. J., Roberts, M. D., & Banahan, B. F. (1988). Motivators and inhibitors of attitudes of filial obligation toward aging parents. The Cerontologist, 28, 73-78.
    Gagnon, M. D., Hersen, M., Kabacoff, R. I., & VanHa ss e lt, V. B. (1999). Interpersonal and psychological correlates of marital dissatisfaction in late life: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 359-378.
    Gagnon, M. D., & Coleman , M.(2005). Measuring Intergenerational Obligations. Journal of Marriage and Family,67(4),1003-1011.
    Gans, D., Silverstein, M.(2006). Norms of Filial Responsibility for Aging Parents Across Time and Generations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 961–976.
    Geist, R. L., & Gilbert, D. G. (1996). Correlates of expressed and felt emotion during marital conflict: Satisfaction, personality, process, and outcome. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 49-60.
    Gerstel, N., & Gallagher, S.K.(2001). Men’s Caregiving : Gender and the Contingent Character of Care. Gender & Society,15(2),197-217.
    Gerstel, N., & Sarkisian, N. (2006). Marriage: The good, the bad, and the greedy. Contexts, 5, 16-21.
    Hagestad, G. O.( 1981). Problems and promises in the social psychology of intergenerational relations. In R. Fogel et al. (Eds.), Stability and Change in the Family, 11-46. NY : Academic Press.
    Hermalin, A.(1993). Fertility and Family Planning among the Elderly in Taiwan, or Integrating the Demography of Aging into Population Studies. Demography, 30(4), 507-71.
    Heneretta, J. C., Hill, M. S., Li, W., Soldo, B. J., & Wolf, D. A.(1997). Selection of Children to provide care : The effect of earlier parental transfers. The Journal of Gerontology Series B : Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52B, 110-119.
    Henz, U. (2009). Couples’ provision of informal care for parents and parents-in-law : far from Sharing equally? Aging & Society, 29,369-395.
    Hermalin, A. I., Hareven, T. K., Ofsstedal, M. B., Chang, M.-C. , & Hareven, K.. (1996).Types of Supports for the Aged and Their Providers in Taiwan. Aging and Generational Relations: Life-course and Cross-cultural Perspectives. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
    Hermalin, A. I., Ofstedal, M. B., & Lee, M.-L. (1992). Characteristics of children and intergenerational transfers: Comparative study of the elderly in Asia research Report No. 92-21. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Population Studies Center.
    Hirshorn, B. A. (1995). Intergenerational relation. In D. Levinson(ED.), Encyclopedia of marriage and family (pp. 390-396). New York: Macmillan.
    Hofferth, S.L.(2005). Secondary Data Analysis in Family Research. Journal of Marriage and Family,67(4), 891–907.
    Hogan, D. P., Eggebeen, D. J. & Clogg, C. C. (1993). The structure of interpersonall exchanges in American Families. American Journal of Sociology, 98,1428-1458.
    Holroyd EE. (2003). Chinese family obligations toward chronically ill elderly members: comparing caregivers in Beijing and Hong Kong.Qualitative Health Research 13(3):302-18.
    Hsu, F. L. K. (1965). The effect of dominant kinship relationship on kin and non-kin behavior: A hypothesis. American Anthropology, 67, 638-661.
    Ikkink, K. K., Van Tilbuarg, T., & Knipscheer, K.(1999). Perceived instrumental support exchanges in relationships between elderly parents and their adult children :Normative and Sturctural explanations. Journal of Marriage and the family, 61(4),831-844.
    Jaccard, J. & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in Multiple regression (Second ED.). Sage Publications, Inc.
    Kalmijn, M.(2005). Intergenerational solidarity : A review of three theories and their evidence. Department of Social Cultural Sciences, Tilburg University.
    Katz, J., Monnier, J, Libet, J., Shaw, D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Individual and crossover effects of stress on adjustment in medical student marriages. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 26, 341-351.
    Kim, K., Zarit, S., Fingerman, K. L., & Han, G. (2015). Intergenerational exchanges of middle-age adults with their parents and parents-in-law in Korea. Journal of marriage and family, 77 ,791–805.
    Klein, R. C. A., & Johnson, M. P. (1997). Strategies of couple conflict. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 469-486). New York: Wiley.
    Lawler, E. J. & Yoon, J. (1996) Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion. American Sociological Review 61, 89-108.
    Lawler, E. J., Thye, S., & Yoon, J. (2000). Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. American Journal of Sociology,106,616-657.
    Lee, E., Spitze, G., & Logan, J. R. (2003). Social Support to Parents-in-law : The interplay of gender and kin hierarchies. Journal of marriage and family,65(2),396-403.
    Lee, G. R., Netzer, J. K.; & Coward, R. T. (1994). "filial responsibility expectations and patterns of intergenerational assistance. Journal of marriage and the family,56,559–565.
    Lee, G. R., Peek,C.W. and Cowar, R. T. (1998). Race defference in filial responsibility expectations among older parents. Journal of Marriage and the family, 60,404-412.
    Lee, J. E., Zarit, S. H., Rovine, M. J., & Birditt, K. S.(2012). Middle-age couples’ exchanges of support with aging parents : patterns and association with marital satisfaction. Gerontology, 58,88-96.
    Lee, K. (2003). Maternal Coping Skills as a Moderator Between Depress and Stressful Life Events : Effects on Children’s Behavioral Problems in an Intervention Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(4),425-437.
    Lee, K. S.(2014). Gender, care work, and the complexity of family membership in Japan. Gender & Society, 24, 647-671.
    Lee-Baggley, D., Preece, M., & DeLongis, A. (2005). Coping with interpersonal stress: Role of big five traits. Journal of Personality, 73, 1141-1180.
    Lee, Y., & Xiao, Z. (1998). Children's support for elderly parents in urban and rural China: Results from a national survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 13, 39-62.
    Leopold, T., & Raab, M.(2011). Short-Term Reciprocity in Late Parent-Child Relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family,73,105-119.
    Leopold, T., & Raab, M.(2013). The temporal structure of intergenerational exchange: A within-family analysis of parent-child reciprocity. Journal of Aging studies,27,252-263.
    Li, Tsui-Shan & Chen, Fu-Mei (2002). Affection in marriage: A study of marital enqing and intimacy in Taiwan. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Society, 3(1),37-59.
    Lin, I. F., Goldman, N., Weinstein, M., Lin, Y. H., Gorrindo, T., & Seeman, T. (2003). Gender differences in adult children’s support of their parents in Taiwan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 184-200.
    Lin, J-P., Yi, C-C. (2011). Filial norms and intergenerational support to aging parents in China and Taiwan. International Journal of social welfare,20,109-120.
    Litvin,S. J., Albert, S. M., Brody, E. M. & Hoffman, C. (1995). Marital Status, Competing Memands, and Role Priorities of Parent-Caring Daughters. Journal of Applied Gerontlogy, 14,372-390.
    Long, S. O., Campbell, R., & Nishimura, C.(2009). Does it matter who cares? A comparison of daughters versus daughters-in-law in Japanese elder care. Social Science Japan Journal,12(1),1-21.
    Lowenstein, A., & Daatland S. O. (2006). Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context : evidence from the OASIS study. Aging & Society, 26,203-223.
    Lowenstein, A., Katz, R., & Gur-Yaish, N. (2007). Reciprocity in parent-child exchange and life satisfaction among the elderly : A cross-national perspective. Journal of social issue, 63(4),865-883.
    Lundberg, S., & Pollack, R. A. (1996). Bargaining and distributeon in Marriage. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4),139-158.
    Luo, B., and Zhan, H. (2012). Filial Piety and Functional Support : Understanding Intergenerational Solidarity Among Families with Migrated Children in Rural China. Ageing Int., 37, 69-92.
    Lye, D. N. (1996). Adult child-parent relationships. Annual Review of sociology,22,79-102.
    Lynch, S. A. (1998). Who supports whom? How age and gender affect the perceived quality of support from family and friends. Gerontologist, 38, 231-238
    Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1-2, Serial No. 209), 66-104.
    Mancini, J. A., & Blieszner, R. (1989). Aging parents and adult children: Research themes in intergenerational relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 275-290.
    Marchand, J. F., & Hock, E.(2000).Avoidance and Attacking Conflict-Resolution Strategies Among Married Couples: Relations to Depressive Symptoms and Marital Satisfaction. Family Relations,49,201–206.
    Merrill, D. M. (1993). Daughter-in-law as caregivers to the elderly. Research on Aging,15,70-91.
    Merz, E. M., Schuengel, C., & Schulze, H. J..(2007).Intergenerational solidarity: An attachment perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 21(2),175-186.
    Merz, E-M., & Consedine, N. S. (2009). The association of family support and wellbeing in later life depends on adult attachment style. Attachment & Human Development, 11(2), 203 – 221. DOI: 10.1080/14616730802625185.
    Mutran, E., & Reitzes, D. C. (1984). Intergenerational support activities and well-being among the elderly: A convergence of exchange and symbolic interaction perspectives. American Sociological Review, 49, 117-130.
    Ng,A.,C-Y., Phillips, D. R., & Lee, W. K-M.(2002). Persistence and Challenges to filial piety and informal support of older persons in a modern Chinese Society : A case study in Tren Mun, Hong Kong. Journal of aging studies, 16(2),135-153.
    Peter-Davis, N. D., Moss, M. S., & Pruchno, R. A.(1990). Children-in-law in caregiving families. The Gerntoogist,39,66-75.
    Pezzin, L. E., & Schone, B. S. (1999). Intergenerational household formation, female labor supply and informal caregiving: A bargaining approach. Journal of Human Resources, 34, 475–503.
    Pezzin, L. E., & Schone, B. S. (1999b). Parental marital disruption and intergenerational : An Analysis of Lone Elderly Parents and Their Children. Demography, 36, 287-297.
    Pilisuk, M., & Parks, S. H.(1986). The healing web: Social networks and human survival. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
    Pimentel, E. E. (2000). Just how do I love thee ? Marital relations in urban China. Journal of marriage and the family,62,32-47.
    Reczek, C., Liu, H., & Umberson, D. (2010). Just the two of Us? How parent Influence Adult Children’s Marital Quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72,1205-1219.
    Roberto, K. A., and Jarrott, S.(2014). Caregiving in late life : A life span human development perspective. Springer Science+Business Media New York.
    Roloff, M. E., & Soule, K. P. (2002). Interpersonal conflict: A review. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 475-528). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    Rosenthal, C. J.(1985).Kinkeeping in the familial division of labor. Journal of marriage and the family, 47,965-974.
    Rossi, A. S., & Rossi, P. H. (1990). Of human bonding : Parent-child relations across the life course. New York : Aldine de Gruyter.
    Santos, J. D., & Levitt, M. J.(2007). Intergenerational Relations with in-laws in the context of the Social Convoy : Theoretical and Practical Implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 827-843.
    Sarason, Irwin G.; Levine, Henry M.; Basham, Robert B.; Sarason, Barbara R. (1983).Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1),
    Sarkisian, N. (2008). Till marriage do us part : Adult children’s relationships with their parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 360-376.
    Schulze, H-J., Tyrell, H., Künzler, J.(1989). Vom Strukturfunktionalismus zur Systemtheorie der Familie. S. 31-43 in: Nave-Herz, Rosemarie/Markefka, Manfred (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Familien- und Jugendforschung. Neuwied: Luchterhand.
    Sechrist, J., Suitor, J. J., Pillemer, K.,Gilligan, M.,Howard, A. R., & Keeton, S.(2012). Aging parents and adult children: Determinants of relationship quality. Handbook of families and aging family(chap 7). Rosemary Blieszner, Victoria Hilkevitch Bedford.
    Sherrell, K. & Newton, N.(1996). Parent care as a developmental task. Farm Soc, 77,174-181.
    Shuey, K., & Hardy, M. A.(2003). Assistance to Aging Parents and Parents-In-Law: Does Lineage Affect Family Allocation Decisions? Journal of Marriage and Family,65(2), 418–431.
    Silverstein, M. Parrott, T., &Bengtson, V. L. (1995).Factors that Predispose Middle-Aged Sons and Daughters to Provide Social Support to Older Parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,57, 465-475.
    Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child-parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 429-460.
    Silverstein, M., & Gans, D. (2006).Intergenerational Support to Aging Parents The Role of Norms and Needs. Journal of Family Issues, 27(8), 1068-1984.
    Silverstein, M., Conroy, S. J., Wang, H., Giarrusso, R., & Bengtson, V. L.(2002). Reciprocity in parent-child relations over the adult life course. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57B,3-13.
    Sodei, T. (1998). Role of the family in long-term care. Keio Journal of Medicine, 47(2), A16-A17.
    Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595-608.
    Stein, C. H. (1992). Ties that bind : Three Studies of obligation in adult relationships with family. Journal of social and personal relationship, 9,525-547.
    Stein, C. H. (2009). “I owe it to them “ : Understanding felt obligation towards parents in adulthood. In K. Shifren (ED.), How caregiving affects development : Psychological implications for child, adolescent, and adult caregivers. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
    Stoller, E. P. (1985). Exchange patterns in the informal support networks of the elderly: The impact of reciprocity on morale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 335-342.
    Suitor, J. J. & Pillemer, K. (1996). Sources of Support and Interpersonal Stress in the Networks of Married Caregiving Daughters : Findings From a 2-year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Gerontology :Social Science,51B(6),297-306.
    Suitor, J.J., & Pillemer, K. (1987). The presence of adult children: A source of stress for elderly couples’ marriages? Journal of Marriage and Family, 49, 717–725.
    Szinovacz, M. E., & Davey, A.(2008). The division of parent care between spouses. Ageing and Society, 28, 571-597.
    Tiwari, A., Wong, M., & Ip, H. (2001). Ren and Yuan: a cultural interpretation of Chinese women’s responses to battering. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 33(3), 63-79.
    Weigel, D. J., & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (1999). How couples maintain marriages: A closer look at self and spouse influences upon the use of maintenance behaviors inmarriages. Family Relations, 48(3), 263-269.
    Weiss, R. L., & Dehle, C. (1994). Cognitive behavioral perspectives on marital conflict. In D. D. Dudley (Ed.), Conflict in personal relationships (pp. 95-115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    White, J. M., and Klein, D. M.(2007).Family theories. Sage publications, Inc.
    Willson, A. E., Shrey, K. M., & Elder, G. H. (2003). Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to aging parents and in-laws. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1055-1072.
    Wolf, D. A., Soldo, B. J. (1994). Married Women’s Allocation of Time to Employment and Care of Elderly Parents. Journal of Human Resources, 29(4),1259-1276.
    Wright, L. M. & Leahy, M. (1987). Families and Chronic Illness. Spnnghouse Corporation, Spnnghouse, Pennsylvania.
    Xie, Y., and Zhu,H.(2009).Do Sons or Daughters Give More Money to Parents in Urban China?. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 174-186.
    Yamamoto, N., Wallhagen, M.(1997). Continuation of Family Caregiving in Japan. Journal of health and social behavior, 2(38),164-176.
    Yeh, K. H. & Bedford, O. (2003). A Test of the Dual Filial Piety Model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 6(3), 15-228.
    Yi, C-C., & Lin, J-P(2009). Types of Relations between Adult Children and Elderly Parents in Taiwan: Mechanisms Accounting for Various Relational Types. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 40(2), 305-324.
    Yi, C-C., & Lu,Y-H. (1999). Who Are My Family Members? Lineage and Marital Status in The Taiwanese Family. The American Journal of Chinese Studies, 6, 249-278.
    Yoon, J., & Lawler, E. J. (2006). Relational cohesion model of organizational commitment. In O. Kyirakidou & M. Ozbilgin (eds.), Relational perspective in organizational studies : A research companyon. Northampton, MA: Elgar.
    Zarit, S.H., & Eggebeen D. J. (2002). Parent-child relationships in adulthood and later years. In: Bornstein MH, editor.Handbook of Parenting: Children and parenting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum;. pp. 135–161.
    Zedeck, S., &Mosier, K. L (1990). Work in the family and employing organization. American Psychologist, 45(2), 240- 251.
    Zhan, H. J., Montgomery, R. J. V.(2003). Gender and elder care in China : The influence of filial piety and structural contraints. Gender & Society,17(2),209-229.
    Zhang, W.(2009). “A married out daughter is like spilt water”? Women’s increasing contacts and enhanced ties with their natal families in post-reform rural north China. Modern China, 35( 3),256-283.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE