簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳宥尹
Yo-Yin Chen
論文名稱: 模擬情境經驗對職前及新手教師自我效能影響之研究
Effects of Simulation-Supported Experience on Pre-service and Novice Teachers' Self-Efficacy
指導教授: 張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En
宋曜廷
Sung, Yao-Ting
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 110
中文關鍵詞: 自我效能教師自我效能情境模擬多媒體情境判斷測驗
英文關鍵詞: Self-Efficacy, Teacher Self-Efficacy, Situational Simulation, Stituational Judgement Testing System
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:196下載:29
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究探討操作多媒體情境判斷測驗之經驗對職前及新手教師自我效能的影響,以及其與操作文字式測驗結果的比較;同時也希望驗證現行電腦化職涯輔導系統之設計是否有所缺失。
    研究方法採2x2多因子不等組前後測準實驗設計,研究結果以t檢定、單因子共變數分析檢驗各組前後測分數的差異;以雙因子共變數分析(two-way ANCOVA)比較新手教師與職前教師各組間之交互作用及主要效果;同時也分析測驗系統之教學潛力分數與效能分數間的相關。
    結果指出,單純填答文字式教師自我效能量表與使用多媒體教學情境判斷測驗系統之職前教師間於教學自我效能量表之後測分數有顯著差異;同樣的設計,新手教師組間之後測分數無顯著差異。「教學經驗」與「系統操作」有顯著交互作用,單純主要效果方面,職前教師操作不同系統之組間後測分數有顯著差異;有操作系統之職前教師與新手教師組間亦有顯著差異。
    本研究之主要結論為,操作模擬教學情境之經驗的確會降低職前教師之教學自我效能,然而,已有實習經驗之新手教師,其教學自我效能並不會因為系統操作與否而有所改變。

    This research aims to examine the effects of the situational simulation experience on pre-service and novice teachers' self-efficacy. A multimedia-stituational judgement testing system (MSJTS) and an online text-based testing system were used to be the treatments. This research used quasi-experimental method, also an 2 x 2 factorial, pretest-posttest design was used. The collected data was analyzed by dependent t-test, correlation analysis, and investigated the effects of treatments by two-way analysis of covariance (two-way ANCOVA).
    The results indicate that there are significant differences on posttest between the pre-service teachers who used MSJTS and who used the online text-based testing system. However, there are no differences between the groups of novice teacher. Besides, teaching-experience factor has significant interaction with system factor. The simple main effect analysis shows that system factor makes the posttest significantly different between control and experiment groups of pre-service teacher. With testing-system experience, novice teachers are significantly lower than pre-service teachers.
    In conclusion, system-operation experience reduces the pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy; however no influence on novice teachers who had half-year teaching experience after used MSJTS.

    第一章 緒論.................................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機.......................................1 第二節 研究目的............................................6 第三節 研究問題與研究假設....................................6 第四節 名詞解釋............................................7 第二章 文獻探討..........................................9 第一節 自我效能............................................9 第二節 電腦輔助生涯輔導系統.................................22 第三節 情境模擬與情境判斷測驗...............................27 第三章 教學潛力情境判斷測驗系統..............................33 第一節 系統背景...........................................33 第二節 系統架構...........................................37 第四章 研究方法............................................45 第一節 研究架構...........................................45 第二節 研究對象...........................................46 第三節 研究設計...........................................47 第四節 研究工具...........................................49 第五節 實驗流程...........................................52 第五章 研究結果與討論.......................................53 第一節 職前教師實驗結果分析.................................53 第二節 新手教師實驗結果分析.................................57 第三節 教學經驗x系統操作分析結果............................60 第四節 自編教師自我效能測驗信效度考驗........................64 第五節 系統使用滿意度問卷分析...............................68 第六節 教學潛力測驗結果分析.................................76 第七節 討論..............................................80 第六章 結論、建議及未來研究方向..............................83 第一節 結論..............................................83 第二節 建議..............................................85 第三節 未來研究方向.......................................87 參考文獻...................................................88 附錄一:前測教學自我效能與歸因量表...........................101 附錄二:後測教學自我效能與歸因量表...........................104 附錄三:自編教師自我效能量表................................107 附錄四:測驗系統與文字量表滿意度問卷.........................109

    一、中文部份
    毛國楠(1995)。國中教師的樂觀信念、自我效能、對壓力的認知評估、因應方式與工作調適及身心健康的關係。教育心理學報 28,頁177-193。

    王玉珍(1998)。生涯探索團體對高二女學生職業建構系統及生涯自我效能之影響研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。

    田秀蘭(2003)。社會認知生涯理論之興趣模式驗證研究。教育心理學報,34(2),頁247-266。

    李詠秋(2002)。原住民大學生生涯發展狀況、生涯自我效能與其生涯阻礙因素之關係研究。國立新竹教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。

    吳璧如(2002)。教師效能感之理論分析。教育研究資訊,10(2),頁45-64。

    李嵩賢(2003)。評鑑中心法的基本概念及其在公務人力發展的應用。T&D飛訊, 14。

    林清山、金樹人、林世華、陳清平、王蕙蘭(1990)。電腦輔助大學科系資訊系統之設計與評估。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報,23,頁207-236。

    林碧芳、邱皓政(2008)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊,4(1),頁141-169。

    周曉虹(譯)(1995)。社會學習理論(原作者:Albert Bandura)。台北市:桂冠。(原
    著出版年:1977)

    周慶祥(2007)。網路多媒體新聞學習成效之研究。中華傳播學會2007年會論文。

    邱卉綺(2004)。高中生生涯決定困難、生涯自我效能與焦慮憂鬱情緒之相關研究。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系在職進修碩士班學位論文。

    施郁芬(1996)。二十一世紀的教師與電腦。教育革新研討會。台北。

    施文玲(2007)。以學習理論為基礎的數位化教學策略。生活科技教育月刊,40(2)。

    計惠卿、黃姿閔、 陳詣蕎、郭靜華(2010)。「Top Sales服務銷售技巧」情境模
    擬教材的研發。電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用研討會論文集。

    孫志麟(2001)。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係--實徵取向的分析。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,頁109+111-140。

    孫志麟(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報,34(2),頁139-156。

    孫志麟(2005)。跨越科層:學校組織對教師自我效能的影響。國立臺北師範學院學報:教育類,18(1),頁29-61。

    孫志麟(2009)。建立信心:教師自我效能七部曲。台北市:學富文化。

    徐易稜(2001)。多媒體呈現方式對學習者認知負荷與學習成效之影響研究。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

    張峰森(2011)。國民小學教師參加在職進修課程與教師效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所碩士論文。

    許育齡(2006)。教師效能感研究的取向及限制-邁向變動教師效能感的探究。慈濟大學教育研究學刊,2,頁109-137。

    郭明德(1999)。國小教師自我效能、班級經營策略與班級經營成效關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文。

    陳小鶴(1995)。電腦在教育上的應用:新新人類篇— 上課像遊戲。特教園丁,11(1),頁18-21。

    陳奕蒲(2009)。結合遊戲與模擬特性之教學情境判斷測驗。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。

    陳清溪(1999)。啟智班教師教學支援需求與教學自我效能之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系博士論文。

    游淑燕(1987)。年級、性別、自我統整與成就歸因關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。

    游麗蓉、龔心怡(2009)。當代動機理論及其在教育上的應用。東海大學教育專業發展學術研討會論文集,頁321-342。

    曾芳代、胡均立、陳韻宇(2011)。人力資本或是信心資產?自我效能對大學畢業
    生的學習經驗與就業力間之中介效果。長庚人文社會學報,4(2), 335-456。

    黃光雄(2003)。實習教師效能感與工作壓力之相關研究。國立政治大學學校行政碩士論文。

    葉又慈、吳和堂(2007)。國小教師自我評鑑與教學效能關係之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,4,頁25-48。

    廖誼婷(2008)。建立多媒體教學情境式判斷測驗。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。

    潘義祥(2005)。台灣地區國民小學健康與體育學習領域教師自我效能之研究。大專體育學刊,7(3),頁51-59。

    潘慧玲、王麗雲、簡茂發、孫志麟、張素貞、張錫勳…蔡濱如(2004)。國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標之發展。教育研究資訊,12(4)。

    厲瑞珍(2002)。南部地區大學應屆畢業生自我統合危機與生涯自我效能之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。

    鄭文實、陳志賢、連廷嘉(2010)。國小組織氣氛、教師自我效能感與專業評鑑意願之相關研究。大仁學報,36。

    鄭英耀、黃正鵠(1996)。教師自我效能相關因素之研究。教育學刊,12,頁219-244。

    謝寶梅(1995)。國小教師自我效能感之調查研究。初等教育研究集刊,3。

    簡瑋成(2011)。大學生核心就業素養之探究。教育人力與專業發展,4(28),75-87。

    顏朱吟(2009)。大學行政人員自我效能與工作競爭力關係之實徵研究。屏東教育大學學報-教育類,33,頁335-396。

    二、英文部份
    Abele, A. E. & D. Spurk (2009). How do objective and subjective career success interrelate over time? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(4), 803-824.

    Alessi, S.M. & S.R. Trollip (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd Ed.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, U.S.A.

    Andreas Hirschi(2010). Vocational Interests and Career Goals: Development and Relations to Personality in Middle Adolescence. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(3), 223-238.

    Angehrn, K. M. A. A. (2008) Games in career guidance:Effectiveness of using a SmallWorld simulation to develop social skills in the workplace. Faculty & Research Working Paper.

    Andreas Hirschi(2010). Vocational Interests and Career Goals: Development and Relations to Personality in Middle Adolescence. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(3), 223-238.

    Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G.(1976).Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools, REPORT NO. R-2007-LAUSD. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.

    Bandura, A., Ed. (1997). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge University Press.

    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Worth Publishers.

    Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 307-337.

    Bandura, A., & Menlove, F. L. (1968). Factors determining vicarious extinction through symbolic modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 99-108.

    Becky L. Bobek., Steven B. Robbins., Paul A. Gore Jr.., JoAnn Harris-Bowlsbey., Richard T. Lap an., Carol A. Dahir., &David A. Jepsen(2005). Training Counseiors to Use Computer-Assisted Career Guidance Systems More Effectiveiy: A Model Curricuium. The Career Development Quarterly, 53, 363-371.

    Betz, N. E. & F. H. Borgen (2009). Comparative Effectiveness of CAPA and FOCUS Online Career Assessment Systems With Undecided College Students. Journal of Career Assessment, 17(4), 351-366.

    Betz, N. E., & Borgen, F. H. (2010). The CAPA Integrative Online System for College Major Exploration. Journal of Career Assessment, 000(00), 1-11.

    Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self- efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 399-410.

    Bobek, B. L., S. B. Robbins, et al. (2005). Training Counseiors to Use Computer-Assisted Career Guidance Systems More Effectiveiy: A Modei Curricuium. The Career Development Quarterly, 53, 363-371.

    Borgen, F. H. & N. E. Betz (2008). Career Self-Efficacy and Personality:Linking Career Confidence and the Healthy Personality. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(1), 22-43.

    Brown, S.P., Jones, E., & Leigh, T.W. (2005). The attenuating effect of role overload on relationships linking self-efficacy and goal level to work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 972–979.

    Caprara, G. V., R. Fida, et al. (2008). Longitudinal Analysis of the Role of Perceived Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning in Academic Continuance and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525–534.

    Carol S. Aneshensel(1992). Social Stress: Theory and Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 15-38.

    Carrington, L., Kervin, L. & Ferry, B. (2009). Enhancing the development of pre-service teacher professional identity through the use of a virtual learning environment. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 , 1402-1409. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

    Chen, H., H.-T. Hou, et al. (2012). Perfect PAPA©: Designing and Evaluating Digital Instructional Game Combining Situated Learning and Role-playing Strategies for Life Skill Training. Fourth IEEE International Conference On Digital Game And Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning.

    Denzine, G. M., J. B. Cooney, et al. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Teacher Efficacy Scale for prospective teachers." British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 689–708.

    Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: a construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582.

    Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627-643.

    Henson, R. K. (2001). Teacher Self-Efficacy: Substantive Implications and Measurement Dilemmas.

    Horton, W. (2006). E-learning by design. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Hoy, A. W. & R. B. Spero (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching:Acomparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343–356.

    Jeng, Y.-C., S.-C. Lu, et al. (2011). Using E-Learning and Situated Learning Theory: Practical Lessons from the Vocational Special Education Students. 2011 Eighth IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering.

    Mihai JIGAU ed.(2007). Career Counselling: Compendium of Methods and Techniques. AFIR, ISBN 973-7714-29-6.

    Kanfer, R., & Zeiss, A. (1983). Interpersonal standard setting and self efficacy expectations in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 319-329.

    Kinshuk, A. T. a. & T. Tretiakov (2003). Designing Multimedia Support for Situated Learning. The 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

    Lapan, R. T., Boggs, K. R., & Morrill, W. H. (1989). Self-efficacy as a mediator of investigative and realistic general occupational themes on the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 176–182.

    Lapan, R. T. & Jingeleski, J. (1992). Circumscribing vocational aspirations in junior high school. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(1), 81-90.

    Lievens, F., H. Peeters, et al. (2008). Situational judgment tests:a review of recent research. Personnel Review,37(4).

    Lunce, L. M. (2006). Simulations: Bringing the benefits of situated learning to the traditional classroom. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 3(1).

    Maxwell, K. & A. A. Angehrn (2008) Games in career guidance:Effectiveness of using a SmallWorld simulation to develop social skills in the workplace.

    McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Russell, D. (1992). Measuring causal attributions: The revised Causal Dimension Scale(CDSII). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 566-573.

    Melanie Zibit, D. G. (2005). simSchool: The Game of Teaching. Journal of Online Education, 1(6).

    Mulholland J., & Wallace J. (2001). Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy.Teaching and Teacher Education, 17 (2), 243-261.

    Nguyen, N. T., M. D. Biderman, et al. (2005). Effects of Response Instructions on Faking a Situational Judgment Test. International Journal Of Selection And Assessment.

    Ployhart, R. E., J. A. Weekley, Et Al. (2003). WEB-BASED AND PAPER-AND-PENCIL TESTING OF APPLICANTS IN A PROCTORED SETTING:ARE PERSONALITY, BIODATA, AND SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS COMPARABLE? PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY 56: 733-775.
    Posnanski, T. J. (2002). Professional Development Programs for Elementary Science Teachers: An Analysis of Teacher Self-Efficacy Beliefs and a Professional Development Model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(2), 189-220.

    Post-Kammer, P., & Smith, P. (1985). Sex differences in career selfefficacy, consideration and interests of eighth and ninth graders. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(4), 551-559.

    P.T. Ashton(1985). Motivation and the teacher's sense of efficacy. Research motivation in education: The classroom milieu, Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York, 141–174.

    Rashid, A. M., A. R. Bakar, et al. (2009). Career Development Interventions in Secondary Schools in the State of Terengganu, Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 62-67.
    Rayman, J. R. & J. Harris-Bowlsbey (1977). DISCOVER: A Model for a Systematic Career Guidance Program. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 26(1), 3-12.

    Roberts, J. K., R. K. Henson, et al. (2001). An Examination of Change in Teacher Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Science Education Based on the Duration of Inservice Activities. Journal of Science Teacher Education,12(3), 199-213.

    Rojas, E. M. & A. Mukherjee (2003). Visualizing Situational Simulation Information. Construction Congress, ASCE, 18th.

    Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 95, 534–562.

    Ross, J. A. (1994). Beliefs that make a difference: the origins and impacts of teacher efficacy. The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, June.

    Ross, J. A. (1998). The antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In J. Bropy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 7 (pp. 49–73). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Russell, D. (1982). The Causal Dimension Scale: A Measure of How Individuals Perceive Causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(6), 1137-1145.

    Tamai, M., M. Inaba, et al. (2011). Constructing Situated Learning Platform for Japanese Language and Culture in 3D Metaverse. IEEE 2011 Second International Conference on Culture and Computing.

    Tschannen-Moran, M. & A. W. Hoy (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944–956.

    Watkins, M., A. Mukherjee, et al. (2008). Using Situational Simulations To Collect And Analyze Dynamic Construction Management Decision-Making Data. IEEE 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.

    Weinstein C. S.(1988). Preservice Teachers’ Expectations About The First Year Of
    Teaching. Teachrng & Teacher Educarron, 4(1), 31-40.

    Yorke, M. & P. Knight (2006). Embedding employability into the curriculum, The Higher Education Authority.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE