簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉紹勝
Shao Sheng Liu
論文名稱: 一般與偏遠地區國小電腦教學現況差異與影響因素分析
An analysis of the differences between remote rural and regular elementary schools in their computer courses and the influencing factors
指導教授: 林美娟
Lin, Mei-Chuen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 95
中文關鍵詞: 國民小學教育電腦課程偏遠學校
英文關鍵詞: elementary school education, computer courses, remote rural schools
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:127下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 一般與偏遠地區國小電腦教學現況差異與影響因素分析
    劉紹勝
    本研究延續蔡依玲(2008)針對國我國國民小學電腦課程教學內涵之研究,旨在進一步探討偏遠地區國小在電腦課程教學內涵上與一般學校之差異及其影響因素,研究分問卷調查及網路論壇等兩階段實施。問卷調查階段所收集之有效問卷共計754份,包括一般學校491份及偏遠學校263份,分佔各該類學校之25.54%及35.97%。網路論壇階段針對問卷調查結果進行了兩項線上座談會,共有80餘位老師上網瀏覽或參與討論,總共發表約500篇文章。經彙整並分析所收集之量化與質性資料後發現,偏遠地區學校在實施電腦課程時,有七項問題明顯較一般地區學校嚴重,包括各班授課內容因教師不同而異、年級間的課程內容未能適當銜接、授課教師資訊專業知識不足、授課教師未能落實教學計畫、電腦數量不足上課時無法一人一機、缺乏經費購置授課所需軟體、以及上課時電腦網路常出狀況等。在授課內容方面,一般與偏遠地區學校所講授之電腦軟體前五名皆為文書處理、網路與郵件應用、作業系統基本操作、簡報製作、及中文打字練習,僅順序略有不同;至於兩類學校在「是否採用自由軟體於電腦課教學」方面並未有顯著差異。一般與偏遠地區學校所講授之電腦概念亦相同,皆為電腦使用規範、電腦使用安全、網路資源的運用、正確使用網路、以及電腦與生活等五項。針對是否在電腦課採用市售教科書,偏遠學校不採用市售教科書顯著高於一般學校。在「師資」方面,兩類學校的電腦教師具資訊相關學位者均未達四成,且偏遠學校顯著低於一般學校,此現象似亦造成偏遠學校在決定電腦課教學內容時,「配合授課教師所具備之專業知能」之因素顯著高於一般學校。對於是否贊成訂定國小電腦教科書送審機制,一般地區與偏遠學校均有超過七成贊成,兩類學校並無顯著差異。

    ABSTRACT

    An analysis of the differences between remote rural and regular elementary schools in their computer courses
    and the influencing factors

    Shao Sheng Liu

    This study extends the survey research conducted by Tsai (2008) to further investigate the differences between remote rural and regular elementary schools in the implementation of their computer courses as well as the influencing factors that may have caused such differences. A follow-up questionnaire survey and an on-line forum were used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data. The survey generated 754 valid responses, including 491 from regular elementary schools and 263 from remote rural schools, representing 25.54% and 35.97% of the total number of schools in each category. The on-line forum was conducted to solicit opinions and feedback on the survey results from computer teachers in elementary schools. More than 80 teachers participated in the forum and approximately 500 articles were posted. Results of this study reveal that the implementation of computer courses in the remote rural schools encounter significantly more difficulties in seven areas—variation among individual teachers of the same grade in the course content taught, lack of continuity between grades in the course content taught, computer teachers’ lack of professional competence, computer teachers’ inability to carry out the instructional plans, insufficient number of computers to support one-computer-per-student hands-on practice during lab sessions, insufficient funds to acquire software for instructional purposes, and frequent network connection problems during lab sessions. In terms of the content taught in computer courses, the five most-taught software applications in both school categories are basically the same, only differing in priority ranking. They include word processors, Internet browsers and email applications, basic functions of operating systems, presentation software, and Chinese keyboarding. Moreover, remote rural schools do not differ significantly from regular schools in whether free software was adopted as a substitute for commercial software in computer courses. This study also find that both regular and remote rural schools teach computer usage rules, computer usage security, adequate access to web resources, responsible use of the Internet, and computers and everyday life in their computer courses. As for the adoption of computer textbooks, significantly fewer remote rural schools use computer textbooks than regular schools. In terms of teacher qualifications, less than 40% of the computer teachers in both school categories have computer-related college degrees, with remote rural schools showing a significantly lower percentage. This may have accounted for the phenomenon that the professional competence of computer teachers in remote rural schools play a significantly more crucial part in determining the course content taught to the students. Finally, more than 70% of the respondents in both school categories, with no significant difference between them, favor the idea of having computer textbooks reviewed by the government education agency before they are released to the market.

    目 錄 附表目錄 i 附圖目錄 iii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究範圍 4 第四節 研究步驟 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 我國國民中小學電腦課程發展歷程 6 第二節 九年一貫課程資訊教育議題的內涵與特色 8 第三節 國小電腦課所遭遇的問題 10 第四節 偏遠地區中小學資訊教育概況 13 第五節 國外的電腦課程實施情形 15 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 問卷調查實施過程 20 第二節 線上論壇實施方式 21 第三節 資料收集與分析 23 第四章 研究結果分析與討論 29 第一節 問卷調查結果 29 第二節 網路論壇 64 第五章 結論與建議 78 第一節 結論 78 第二節 建議 82 參考文獻 85 附錄一 國小電腦課程教學內涵問卷調查 88

    參考文獻
    Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of Netherlands (1998). Education in the Netherlands. Retrieved April 5 ,2009 ,From http://www.essex.ac.uk/guest/auanetherlands/Educ%20in%20NL/ednl00.htm
    Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of Netherlands (2007). The Education System in the Netherlands 2007.
    Ministry of Education and Training of Ontario (1998). The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8 Science and Technology.
    Ministry of Education and Training of Ontario (1999). The Ontario Curriculum Grades 9-10 Technological Education.
    Ministry of Education of Ontario (2000). The Ontario Curriculum Grades11-12 Technological Education.
    Ministry of Education of Ontario (2007). The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8 Science and Technology.
    Ministry of Education of Singapore (2007). Baseline ICT Standards for Pupils (Version 4).
    Ministry of Education of Ontario (2008). The Ontario Curriculum Grades 10-12 Computer Studies..
    QCA(2009). National Curriculum.Retrieved April 5 ,2009 ,From Qualifications and Curriculum Authority Web site:http://curriculum.qca.org.uk.
    Tucker,A. (2004). A New K–12 Computer Science Curriculum. Learning & Leading with Technology , 31(7),16-20.
    Tucker,A., Deek ,F. et al.(2003). A Model Curriculum for K–12 Computer Science: Final Report of the ACM K–12 Task Force Curriculum Committee. The Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.

    王奐敏(2005)。不利偏遠地區學校資訊素養教育推動因素之研究。國立交通大學傳播研究所論文。
    台北市教育局(1998)。台北市資訊教育白皮書。
    行政院研究發展考核委員會(2006)。國中小學生數位能力與數位學習機會調查報告。摘自:http://www.rdec.gov.tw/public/Attachment/774935671.pdf
    何榮桂(1994)。國中電腦課程標準的內涵與特色。資訊與教育,51,2-10。
    何榮桂(1999)。教育部「資訊教育基礎建設計畫」與北、高兩市「資訊教育白皮書」簡介。資訊與教育,70,2-8
    何榮桂(2002)。台灣資訊教育的現況與發展:兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教育,87,22-48。
    吳正己(2007a)。被Delete的電腦課。自由時報「自由廣場」,2007年11月14日。擷取自:http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2007/new/nov/14/today-o5.htm
    吳正己(2007b)。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書期中報告---分項三學生資訊能力。
    香港教育局(2007)。資訊科技學習目標。
    香港課程發展議會(2002)。科技教育學習課程指引(小一至中三) 。擷取自:http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/TC/Content_3126/cover.pdf
    徐瑞奎(2004)。從學校端看九年一貫資訊教育。研習資訊,21(3),49-58。
    教育部(1995)。國民中學電腦課程標準。台北:正中書局。
    教育部(1997a)。資訊教育基礎建設計畫。
    教育部(1997b)。遠距教學中程發展計畫。
    教育部(1998)。資訊教育基礎建設計畫擴大內需方案。
    教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。
    教育部(2001)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖。
    教育部(2002)。挑戰2008國家發展重點計畫-e世代人才培育。
    教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程重大議題---資訊教育。台北市:作者。
    教育部(2005)。創造偏鄉數位機會推動四年計畫書。
    教育部(2007)。推動四年三十億國中小資訊教育及設備更新。
    教育部(2008)。中小學資訊教育白皮書。
    郭嘉琪(2000)。國中電腦課程實施現況調查。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所論文。
    劉秀娟(2002)。偏遠地區學生資訊素養現況探討研究─以台東縣國中生為例。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所論文。
    蔡依玲(2008)。國小電腦課教學現況調查。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所論文。
    鄧育泙(2002)。國中學生資訊基本能力檢測之研究。國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所論文。
    顏妙純(2003)。九年一貫資訊課程設計與實施初探。第三屆離島資訊技術與應用研討會。

    下載圖示
    QR CODE