簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 唐榕徽
Tang, Jung-Hui
論文名稱: 臺灣中小企業家族企業接班與傳承歷程之研究
A Study of Succession Process for Small Medium-Size Enterprises in Taiwan
指導教授: 康敏平
Kang, Min-Ping
口試委員: 康敏平
Kang, Min-Ping
張朝清
Chang, Chao-Ching
林舒柔
Lin, Shu-Jou
口試日期: 2024/06/27
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 全球經營與策略研究所
Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 其他
論文頁數: 218
中文關鍵詞: 臺灣中小企業接班與傳承信任衝突管理家族財富
英文關鍵詞: Taiwanese small and medium-sized businesses, Business Succession and Legacy Transition, trust, conflict management, family wealth
研究方法: 個案研究法紮根理論法半結構式訪談法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401851
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:40下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究聚焦於臺灣中小型家族企業的接班與傳承歷程,通過多個案建構理論和紮根理論,以及「家族企業接班與傳承路徑模型」,深入探討其中的關鍵因素。研究結果表明,臺灣中小型家族企業的接班與傳承過程存在一定的固定路徑,且該過程依賴於接班人的能力展示與現任領導人的信任建立。接班過程中,每次任務的成功與失敗對接班人的成長起著關鍵作用,並逐步促使權力的平穩轉移。當無法找到合適的接班人時,現任領導人應靈活採取退出策略,如出售、結束營業、上市或創業,以保障家族企業的延續性,並為未來重新進入市場提供支持。接班人的外部歷練和專業教育在補充家族企業管理資源、推動企業創新與增強競爭力方面具有重要意義。然而,外部歷練的時間必須合理安排,以避免錯失最佳接班時機。在接班過程中,現任領導人、家庭成員和資深員工扮演著指導者與調解者的角色,協助接班人逐步建立權威,平衡家族內部的權力結構,並促進接班的順利進行。虛性和諧作為避免直接衝突的策略,在接班初期能提供穩定的過渡期,但長期依賴可能導致更嚴重的衝突。因此,調解者的介入至關重要,以促進有效溝通,確保接班過程的順利進行。本研究填補了多個研究空白。首先,通過驗證和擴展適合中小型家族企業的模型,證明了其在不同文化背景和企業規模下的適用性,彌補了接班理論在中小企業家族接班應用中的不足。其次,研究深入分析了接班過程中的動態互動,特別是現任領導人與接班人之間通過任務成功或失敗建立信任的過程。此外,本研究將接班策略與退出策略結合考量,提供了應對接班失敗的多種選擇,豐富了現有文獻。研究還擴展了對家族企業內部衝突管理的理解,強調了調解者在促進家庭和諧中的關鍵作用,特別是在缺乏外部顧問時。最後,研究聚焦於臺灣中小型家族企業,提供了東亞背景下家族企業接班與傳承的實證資料,補充了過去以西方企業為主的研究視角。

    This study focuses on the business succession and legacy transition processes in small and medium-sized family businesses in Taiwan, using multiple case construction theory, grounded theory, and the "Family Business Succession and Legacy Transition Path Model" to explore key factors in these processes. The research findings indicate that there is a certain fixed path in the business succession and legacy transition processes of Taiwanese small and medium-sized family businesses, and this process relies on the demonstration of the successor's capabilities and the establishment of trust by the incumbent leader. Each task's success or failure during the succession process plays a crucial role in the successor's growth and gradually facilitates a smooth transfer of power. When a suitable successor cannot be found, the incumbent leader should flexibly adopt exit strategies such as selling, closing the business, going public, or starting a new venture to ensure the continuation of the family business and provide support for future re-entry into the market. The external experience and professional education of the successor are of significant importance in supplementing the management resources of the family business, driving innovation, and enhancing competitiveness. However, the timing of external experience must be carefully planned to avoid missing the optimal succession period. During the succession process, the incumbent leader, family members, and senior employees play the roles of mentors and mediators, assisting the successor in gradually establishing authority, balancing internal power structures, and promoting a smooth transition. Pseudo harmony, as a strategy to avoid direct conflict, can provide a stable transitional period in the early stages of succession, but long-term reliance on it may lead to more severe conflicts. Therefore, the intervention of mediators is crucial to facilitate effective communication and ensure the smooth progression of the succession process. This study fills several research gaps. First, by validating and expanding models suitable for small and medium-sized family businesses, it demonstrates their applicability across different cultural contexts and business scales, addressing the lack of application of succession theory in small family business succession. Second, the study provides an in-depth analysis of dynamic interactions during the succession process, particularly how trust is built between the incumbent leader and the successor through task success or failure. Additionally, the study combines succession strategies with exit strategies, offering various options for dealing with succession failures, thereby enriching existing literature. The research also extends the understanding of internal conflict management in family businesses, emphasizing the critical role of mediators in fostering family harmony, especially when external advisors are absent. Finally, the study focuses on Taiwanese small and medium-sized family businesses, providing empirical data on business succession and legacy transition in an East Asian context, supplementing previous research primarily centered on Western businesses.

    第一章 導論 1 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節、家族企業接班與傳承的背景與挑戰 3 第二節、接班文化、管理資源與衝突觀點 12 第三節、研究問題 18 第三章 研究模型與假設 19 第ㄧ節、研究模型 19 第二節、研究假設模型 23 第四章 研究方法 27 第一節、研究對象與樣本選擇 27 第二節、資料蒐集方法 29 第三節、研究流程 30 第五章 資料分析結果 33 第ㄧ節、個案分析(P-1) 33 第二節、個案分析(NG-1) 38 第三節、個案分析(P-2) 43 第四節、個案分析(NG-2) 48 第五節、個案分析(NG-3) 53 第六節、總結 58 第六章 研究貢獻與討論 66 第ㄧ節、研究結論 66 第二節、理論貢獻 71 第三節、實務意涵 72 第四節、實踐意涵 73 第四節、研究限制與未來建議 75 參考文獻 77 附錄 85 附件一 訪問大綱 85 附件二 資料文本與編碼(ㄧ) 88 附件三 資料文本與編碼(二) 90 附件四 資料文本與編碼(三) 91 附件五 資料文本與編碼(四) 92 附件六 資料文本與編碼(五) 94 附件七 資料文本與編碼(六) 95 附件八 資料文本與編碼(七) 97 附件九 資料文本與編碼(八) 98 Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review 4 2.1 Background and Challenges of Succession and Legacy Transition in Family Businesses 4 2.2 Succession Culture, Management Resources, and Conflict Perspectives 17 2.3 Research Questions 26 Chapter 3 Research Model and Hypothesis 28 3.1 Research Models 28 3.2 Research Hypothesis Model 32 Chapter 4 Research Methodology 37 4.1 Research Subjects and Sample Selection 37 4.2 Data Collection Methods 40 4.3 Research Process 42 Chapter 5 Results 46 5.1 Case Analysis (P-1) 46 5.2 Case Analysis (NG-1) 51 5.3 Case Analysis (P-2) 57 5.4 Case Analysis (NG-2) 63 5.5 Case Analysis (NG-3) 69 5.6 Conclusion 75 Chapter 6 Contribution and Discussion 84 6.1 Research Conclusions 84 6.2 Theoretical Contributions 90 6.3 Practical Implications 91 6.4 Practical Implications 92 6.5 Research Limitations and Future Recommendations 95 References 98 Appendix 106 Appendix 1: Interview Guidelines 106 Appendix 2: Data Transcript and Coding (1) 109 Appendix 3: Data Transcript and Coding (2) 111 Appendix 4: Data Transcript and Coding (3) 113 Appendix 5: Data Transcript and Coding (4) 114 Appendix 6: Data Transcript and Coding (5) 116 Appendix 7: Data Transcript and Coding (6) 117 Appendix 8: Data Transcript and Coding (7) 119 Appendix 9: Data Transcript and Coding (8) 120

    王健全, 彭素玲, 黃勢璋, 洪志銘, 賴偉文, 蔡鳳凰, 簡淑綺, & 陳穎萱. (2023). 中小企業白皮書 (第一版第一刷). 經濟部中小及新創企業署. https://www.sme.gov.tw/list-tw-2345
    王毓茹, & 張玉琦. (2024, 七月). 經理人月刊 7月號 / 2024 第236期. 236, 70.
    司徒達賢. (2021). 家族企業的治理、傳承與接班. 遠見天下文化出版股份有限公司.
    周愚文. (2008). 科舉制度三個重要問題的現代分析. 教育研究集刊, 4:1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200803_(54-1).0001
    洪慈勵. (2008). 試論唐代之士族門第觀念. 問學集, 4, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29450/wenxueji.200804.0023
    康敏平, 陳雯虹, & 陳柏元. (2012). 管理限制對企業成長之影響:管理者心力限制觀點. 臺大管理論叢, 22(2), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.6226/2012.(22-2).05
    郭宗銘, & 洪連盛. (2017). 家族企業接班傳承與對話. 會計研究月刊, 82, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.6650/ARM.201709_(382).0014
    陳其南. (1990). 家族與社會: 台灣與中國社會研究的基礎理念. 聯經出版公司. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282272758131072
    陳啓雲. (2003). 漢初“子學沒落、儒學獨尊”的思想史底蘊. 中國文哲研究集刊, 2, 127–156. https://doi.org/10.6351/BICLP.200303.0127
    馮天樂. (2012). 毛澤東對孔子評價的轉變及其原因. 政大史粹, 2, 53–79. https://doi.org/10.30384/CHNCCU.201206_(22).0003
    黃囇莉. (1996). 中國人的和諧觀/衝突觀:和諧化辯證觀之研究取徑. 本土心理學研究, 5, 47–71. https://doi.org/10.6254/1996.5.47
    黃囇莉, & 許詩淇. (2006). 虛虛實實之間:婆媳關係的和諧化歷程與轉化機制. 本土心理學研究, 25, 3–45. https://doi.org/10.6254/2006.25.3
    虞邦祥, 林月雲, & 張小鳳. (2009). 傳承或變革:台灣企業接班歷程之質性研究. 組織與管理, 2(2), 109–153. https://doi.org/10.6792/OM.200908.0109
    詹哲裕. (1994). 西漢獨尊儒術下禮法思想之探析. 復興崗學報, 3, 201–226.
    賈志揚. (2023). 宋代科舉. 東大圖書股份有限公司.
    龍柏濤. (2005). 從魏晉士族到唐代科舉-以瑯琊臨沂顏氏為例 [Thesis]. https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/27790
    謝國雄. (2019). 經濟社會學觀點下的「台灣奇蹟」:現象、重新概念化與另類可能. 台灣社會學, 37. https://doi.org/10.6676/TS.201906_(37).04
    鍾喜梅, & 林佳慧. (2009). 家族集團接班資源與角色鑲嵌關係:網絡觀點之初探. 組織與管理, 2(2), 155–195. https://doi.org/10.6792/OM.200908.0155
    Barach, J. A., & Ganitsky, J. B. (1995). Successful Succession in Family Business. Family Business Review, 8(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00131.x
    Beckhard, R., & Dyer Jr., W. G. (1983). Managing Continuity in the Family-Owed Business. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(83)90022-0
    Bjuggren, P.-O., & Sund, L.-G. (2001). Strategic Decision Making in Intergenerational Successions of Small- and Medium-Size Family-Owned Businesses. Family Business Review, 14(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00011.x
    Brown, P. A. (2008). A Review of the Literature on Case Study Research. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education/ Revue Canadienne Des Jeunes Chercheures et Chercheurs En Éducation, 1(1), Article 1. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjnse/article/view/30395
    Cabrera-Suárez, K. (2005). Leadership transfer and the successor’s development in the family firm. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.010
    Cabrera-Suárez, K., De Saá-Pérez, P., & García-Almeida, D. (2001). The Succession Process from a Resource- and Knowledge-Based View of the Family Firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x
    Cadieux, L. (2007). Succession in Small and Medium-Sized Family Businesses: Toward a Typology of Predecessor Roles During and After Instatement of the Successor. Family Business Review, 20(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00089.x
    Carlock, R. S., & Ward, J. L. (2010). When family businesses are best: The parallel planning process for family harmony and business success. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family Firm. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x
    Chung, W. W. C., & Yuen, K. P. K. (2003). Management succession: A case for Chinese family‐owned business. Management Decision, 41(7), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310495577
    Churchill, N. C., & Hatten, K. J. (1987). Non-Market-Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework for Family Businesses. American Journal of Small Business, 12(2), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878701200205
    Churchill, N. C., & Hatten, K. J. (1997). Non-Market-Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework for Family Business. Family Business Review, 10(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00053.x
    Colli, A. (2002). The History of Family Business, 1850–2000 (1 本). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615009
    Cooper, J. T., Kidwell, R. E., & Eddleston, K. A. (2013). Boss and Parent, Employee and Child: Work-Family Roles and Deviant Behavior in the Family Firm. Family Relations, 62(3), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12012
    Cosier, R. A., & Harvey, M. (1998). The Hidden Strengths in Family Business: Functional Conflict. Family Business Review, 11(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00075.x
    Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
    Debicki, B. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., Pearson, A. W., & Spencer, B. A. (2016). Development of a socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.01.002
    Donckels, R., & Fröhlich, E. (1991). Are Family Businesses Really Different? European Experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review, 4(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00149.x
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
    Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00065-3
    Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Simon and Schuster.
    Gerschenkron, A. (1953). Social Attitudes, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Development. Explorations in Entrepreneurial History, 6(1). https://www.proquest.com/docview/1305251411/citation/F4EE54E1595647B5PQ/1
    Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
    Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/258214
    Handler, W. C. (1989). Methodological Issues and Considerations in Studying Family Businesses. Family Business Review, 2(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00257.x
    Handler, W. C. (1991). Key Interpersonal Relationships of Next-Generation Family Members in Family Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(3), 21–32.
    Handler, W. C. (1992). The Succession Experience of the Next Generation. Family Business Review, 5(3), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1992.00283.x
    Handler, W. C. (1994). Succession in Family Business: A Review of the Research. Family Business Review, 7(2), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00133.x
    Handler, W. C., & Kram, K. E. (1988). Succession in Family Firms: The Problem of Resistance. Family Business Review, 1(4), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00361.x
    Holland, P. G., & Boulton, W. R. (1984). Balancing the “Family” and the “Business” in family business. Business Horizons, 27(2), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(84)90004-1
    Hu, B., & Lin, T. (2017). 進擊的巨人: 台灣企業規模迅速成長的原因與後果. 收入 未竟的奇蹟―轉型中的台灣經濟與社會 (頁 229–266). 中央研究院社會學研究所.
    Ibrahim, A. B., Soufani, K., & Lam, J. (2003). Family business training: A Canadian perspective. Education + Training, 45(8/9), 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910310508865
    Jehn, K. A. (1995). Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393638
    Jehn, K. A. (1997). A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530–557. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393737
    Jehn, K. A. (2014). Types of conflict: The history and future of conflict definitions and typologies. 收入 Handbook of Conflict Management Research (頁 3–18). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781781006931/9781781006931.00007.xml
    Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069453
    Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2004). Feuding Families: When Conflict Does a Family Firm Good. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00040.x
    Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2007). A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1048–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.018
    Knapp, J. R., Smith, B. R., Kreiner, G. E., Sundaramurthy, C., & Barton, S. L. (2013). Managing Boundaries Through Identity Work: The Role of Individual and Organizational Identity Tactics. Family Business Review, 26(4), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512474036
    Lansberg, I. (1988). The Succession Conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1(2), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x
    Lansberg, I. (1999). Succeeding Generations: Realizing the Dream of Families in Business. Harvard Business Review Press.
    Le Breton–Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. P. (2004). Toward an Integrative Model of Effective FOB Succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00047.x
    Lewis, S. (2015a). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Health Promotion Practice, 16(4), 473–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915580941
    Lewis, S. (2015b). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Health Promotion Practice, 16(4), 473–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915580941
    Lewis, S. (2015c). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Health Promotion Practice, 16(4), 473–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915580941
    Malone, S. C. (1989). Selected Correlates of Business Continuity Planning in the Family Business. Family Business Review, 2(4), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.tb00003.x
    Massis, A. D., Sharma, P., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2012). Family Business Studies: An Annotated Bibliography. Edward Elgar Publishing.
    McCann, J. E., III, Leon-Guerrero, A. Y., & Haley, Jr., Jonathan D. (2001). Strategic Goals and Practices of Innovative Family Businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/0447-2778.00005
    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE.
    Miller, D., Steier, L., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
    Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press.
    Pieper, T. M., Smith, A. D., Kudlats, J., & Astrachan, J. H. (2015). The Persistence of Multifamily Firms: Founder Imprinting, Simple Rules, and Monitoring Processes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(6), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12179
    PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2020). 2020 臺灣家族企業傳承白皮書. pwc. https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-family-business/2020-taiwan-family-business.html
    Qiu, H., & Freel, M. (2020). Managing Family-Related Conflicts in Family Businesses: A Review and Research Agenda. Family Business Review, 33(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519893223
    Robson, C. (2023). Real world research: A resource for users of social research methods in applied settings (Fifth edition). John Wiley & Sons.
    Ruiz Jiménez, M. C., Vallejo Martos, M. C., & Martínez Jiménez, R. (2015). Organisational Harmony as a Value in Family Businesses and Its Influence on Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1941-6
    Sambrook, S. (2005). Exploring succession planning in small, growing firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(4), 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000510628243
    Saracho, O. N., & Spodek, B. (2006). Handbook of research on the education of young children, 2nd ed (頁 xvi, 600). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003a). Exploring the Agency Consequences of Ownership Dispersion Among The Directors of Private Family Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040613
    Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003b). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00054-5
    Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (1996). A Review and Annotated Bibliography of Family Business Studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2003). Succession Planning as Planned Behavior: Some Empirical Results. Family Business Review, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2003.00001.x
    Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
    Sonnenfeld, J. A., & Spence, P. L. (1989). The Parting Patriarch of a Family Firm. Family Business Review, 2(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.tb00004.x
    Wall, V. D., Galanes, G. J., & Love, S. (1987). Small, Task-Oriented Groups: Conflict, Conflict Management, Satisfaction, and Decision Quality. Small Group Behavior, 18(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649648701800102
    Ward, J. (1987). Keeping the Family Business Healthy: How to Plan for Continuing Growth, Profitability, and Family Leadership. Springer.
    Yan, J., & Sorenson, R. L. (2004). The Influence of Confucian Ideology on Conflict in Chinese Family Business. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 4(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595804041521
    Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE.
    Zattoni, A., Gnan, L., & Huse, M. (2015). Does Family Involvement Influence Firm Performance? Exploring the Mediating Effects of Board Processes and Tasks. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1214–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312463936

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2027/08/15
    QR CODE