本研究旨在探討漢娜鄂蘭的行動生活觀如何轉化為教育實踐，並著重於如何通過這種教育精進台灣公民素養的培育。鄂蘭半個世紀前對當代政治問題，如極權與民粹主義的浪潮，有著深刻的預見，本研究以此為出發點，探討其教育理念在當代的適用性與意義。研究方法主要包括對鄂蘭原著的詳細分析以及當代鄂蘭學者觀點的綜合詮釋。研究結果表明，鄂蘭的主要政治理論：行動生活觀實際上係作為其教育思想之基礎，通過有意義的融合與詮釋，得進一步厚實其教育思想內容。其教育觀特點在於著重培育公民行動能力，並確保這種能力對人類世界的持續貢獻。基於這些發現，本文嘗試性提出了三種教學策略：世界咖啡館、保羅式批判性思考及楷模導向的德行教育，旨在為教育者和學者提供具體的教學方法，除試圖將鄂蘭教育觀自哲學到實踐的轉化外，更嘗試促進有效的公民意識培養。透過這些方法的實施，期望本研究得為我國之公民素養教育實踐提供新的視角與方法。

This study examines how Hannah Arendt's concept of the "vita activa" can be transformed into an educational framework to enhance civic consciousness in Taiwan. Drawing on Arendt's prescient insights into contemporary political challenges such as the resurgence of totalitarianism and populism, this research explores the relevance of her educational ideas today. The methodology primarily involves a detailed analysis of Arendt's seminal works, supplemented by interpretations from contemporary Arendt scholars. The findings demonstrate that Arendt’s political philosophy, particularly her views on active life, can be effectively integrated into educational thought to reinforce citizens' capacity for action and ensure their enduring contribution to the human world. Based on these results, the study proposes three pedagogical strategies: World Café, Paulo-style critical thinking, and virtue education through role models, aimed at providing educators and researchers with concrete methods to foster effective civic education. By implementing these strategies, this research hopes to offer new perspectives and approaches for educational practice in Taiwan.

王心美（2013）。經典教育與公民素養之培育－以「經典研讀：梁啟超《新民說》」課程為例。通識教育學刊，(12)，63-89。https://doi.org/10.6360/TJGE.201312_(12).0003
王音力（2002）。鄂蘭。生智。
王素蓮（2008，12月5日）。遇到「恐夫子」，家長怎麼辦？ 親子天下。更新於2018年8月6日。https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5020857
王錦雀（1998）。從檢視國中「公民與道德」教科書內容談民主內涵之建構。公民訓育學報，(7)，295-318。https://doi.org/10.6231/CME.1998(7)16
田光進（2009）。全球化與全球變化關係研究。熱帶地理，29(2)，150-155。
朱美珍（2019）。九年一貫課程國中社會教科書公民內涵之課程發展。教科書研究，12(2)，37-69。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201908_12(2).02
但昭偉（2023）。不要怕學生參與校務會議！。點教育，5(1)，65-66。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20200409001-N202307110009-00023
李壬癸 (2017) 。國內人文與社會科學研究的困境。人文與社會科學簡訊，24(4)50-52。
李奉儒（2014）。教育哲學研究之詮釋學方法。載於林逢祺、洪仁進（編）教育哲學：方法篇（45-75頁）。學富文化。
李威撰（2011）。漢娜•鄂蘭的自由概念。［未出版之碩士論文］。國立政治大學。
李建漳（2018）。漢娜．鄂蘭。聯經出版。
李逢堅（2021）。「我」對「他們」：都會弱勢國中生公民素養之研究。公民教育與活動領導學報，(26)，37-81。https://doi.org/10.6231/CEL.202109_(26).0002
沈宗瑞（2002）。兩種公民資格觀的歷史發展與對話。教育與社會研究，(3)，1-34。https://doi.org/10.6429/FES.200202.0001
周維萱（2018）。以世界咖啡館討論模式提升大專學生公民參與態度及教學成效之研究。教育科學研究期刊，63(3)，37-67。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201809_63(3).0002
周維萱、莊旻達（2013）。世界咖啡館研究構初探－教學場域之實證性分析。通識教育學刊，(11)，37-66。https://doi.org/10.6360/TJGE.201306_(11).0002
林淑芬（2014）。愛與自由：漢娜．鄂蘭的政治存有學研究。［未出版之博士論文］。國立政治大學。
林植堅（2002）。柏拉圖的宇宙論與自然法思想。臺大法學論叢，31(3)，75-183。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=a0000446-200205-31-3-75-183-a
林麗珊（2020）。「無路用」人文學科的未來。哲學與文化，47(2)，93-109。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10158383-202002-202002250008-202002250008-93-109
金耀基（1983）。大學之理念。時報文化出版事業有限公司。
胡正光、江素慧（2020）。民粹主義在台灣─韓國瑜及其支持者。台灣國際研究季刊，16(3)，155-183。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18162622-202010-202010300008-202010300008-155-183
徐敏雄（2013）。公民素養融入大學通識課程之實踐經驗研究：以「探究多元文化中的自我」課程為例。教育研究與發展期刊，9(3)，59-85。https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042013090903003
馬雨沛（2017）。Arendt與傳播倫理─2位記者的「新聞」判斷與人道關懷研究［未出版之博士論文］。國立臺灣師範大學。
張秀雄（1999）。建構適合台灣社會的公民資格觀。公民訓育學報，(8)，99-121。https://doi.org/10.6231/CME.1999(8)05
張秀雄（2002）。九年一貫課程「社會學習領域」中的公民道德教育。公民訓育學報，(11)，39-52。https://doi.org/10.6231/CME.2002(11)02
張秀雄（2004）。民主與民主公民教育。公民訓育學報，(16)，113-138。https://doi.org/10.6231/CME.2005(16)06
張秀雄、李琪明（2002）。理想公民資質之探討－台灣地區個案研究。公民訓育學報，(12)，1-32。https://doi.org/10.6231/CME.2002(12)01
教育部（2014）。12年國教課程綱要/108課綱重點。108課綱資訊網。https://12basic.edu.tw/12about-3-1.php
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf
淩君浩（2023，12月28日）。《教師法》勒緊基層！老師難為等同被廢武功。品觀點。https://www.pinview.com.tw/News/21941.html
莊國銘（2017）。霍布斯論恐懼與政治秩序。民主與治理，4(2)，39-69。https://doi.org/10.3966/2311505X2017080402002
莊惟任（2014）。漢娜‧鄂蘭論自由的扭曲。［未出版之碩士論文］。東吳大學。
許育典（2010）。媒體素養教育在我國公民教育的現況與檢討。當代教育研究季刊，18(4)，121-159。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2010.1804.04
郭台輝（2009）。Citizenship的內涵檢視及其在漢語界的表述語境。學海，2009(3)，68-72。
郭敏蓉（2016）。對話與分享。師友月刊，(587)，79-80。https://doi.org/10.6437/EM.201605_(587).0017
陳伊琳(2012). A Critical Examination of the Appropriateness of Characterising Character Education in Terms of the Incu1cation of Virtues. 當代教育研究季刊, 20(3), 129-169. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2012.2003.04
陳伊琳(2013). The Doctrine of the Unity of the Virtues and its Implications for Character Education. 教育研究集刊, 59(4), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082013125904003
陳伊琳（2018）。書評：評介《亞里斯多德式品格教育》（2015）。當代教育研究季刊，26(3)，107-119。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.201806_26(3).0004
陳伊琳（2022）。亟需「化零為整」的品格教育：道德認同的轉向及其對品格教育的啟示。教育科學研究期刊，67(4)，255-283。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0008
陳伊琳（2023）。道德欽佩感的價值、疑慮與品德教育啟示－楷模主義的觀點。當代教育研究季刊，31(4)，3-7+9-40。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202312_31(4).0001
陳彩梅（2024，6月18日）。獲黃仁勳加持！4大名校電機系近乎滿招 新鮮人「年薪200萬」比教授還高。Yahoo奇摩新聞。https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E7%8D%B2%E9%BB%83%E4%BB%81%E5%8B%B3%E5%8A%A0%E6%8C%81-4%E5%A4%A7%E5%90%8D%E6%A0%A1%E9%9B%BB%E6%A9%9F%E7%B3%BB%E8%BF%91%E4%B9%8E%E6%BB%BF%E6%8B%9B-%E6%96%B0%E9%AE%AE%E4%BA%BA-%E5%B9%B4%E8%96%AA200%E8%90%AC-%E6%AF%94%E6%95%99%E6%8E%88%E9%82%84%E9%AB%98-055414688.html
陳清芳（2023，11月28日）。調查：台生公民認知國際第1 性別族群平權觀最佳。中央通訊社。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/202311280283.aspx
傅佩榮（2011）。一本就通：西方哲學史。聯經。
曾蕙雯（2022）。以教師為品德典範的可能問題與可行方法。臺灣教育評論月刊，11(6)，200-205。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20130114001-202206-202206020013-202206020013-200-205
游金純、杜昱潔、陳芊卉（2014）。由「對話的力量」一書之編撰淺談世界咖啡館技法於公部門之運用。人事月刊，56(9)，64-71。
湯梅英（2016）。驀然回首，公民教育仍在昏暗幽微處。台灣人權學刊，3(3)，187-193。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=22246622-201606-201606210012-201606210012-187-193
程晏鈴（2017，11月18日） 台灣中二生的公民素養為何能打敗芬蘭、排世界第二？。天下雜誌。 https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5086064
黃品瑄、湯仁燕（2017）。國中公民科初任教師學科教學知識發展之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，10(3)，1-26。https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492017121003001
黃藿（2019）。民主社會中的公民德行與公民教育－教育哲學角度的省思。哲學與文化，46(4)，3-21。
楊俊鴻（2018）。世界各國國家課程中的核心素養：以日本、韓國與新加坡為例。中等教育，69(2)，21-39。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.201806_69(2).0016
楊貴、陳韻暄（2020）。公民意識對臺灣民衆政治參與之影響：2012與2018兩個年度的觀察。人文及社會科學集刊，32(3)，367-410。
葉柏毅（2018，5月11日）。令人失笑的文理之爭。中廣新聞網。https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E4%BB%A4%E4%BA%BA%E5%A4%B1%E7%AC%91%E7%9A%84%E6%96%87%E7%90%86%E4%B9%8B%E7%88%AD-231659731.html
葉浩（2018）。以撒．柏林。聯經出版。
遊振鵬（2014）。從H. Arendt與P. Ricoeur的權威概念省思我國教育改革之「反權威」意涵。載於中國教育學會（編），教改20年：回顧與前瞻（71-96頁）。學富文化。
劉兆達（2005）。體育師資培育的危機與轉機。學校體育，(91)，101-106。https://doi.org/10.29937/PES.200512.0016
劉瑞玲（2003，10月24日）。文理組失衡老師教學品質難兼顧。人間福報。取自 https://www.merit-times.com.tw/NewsPage.aspx?unid=564647
蔡英文（2003）。極權主義與現代民主。政治科學論叢，(19)，57-84。https://doi.org/10.6166/TJPS.19(57-84)
蔡英文（2007）。從極權主義批判到共和民主政治：漢娜•鄂蘭政治思想的遺產。思想，(4)，177-206。https://doi.org/10.29848/SX.200703.0008
鄧毓浩（2006）。九年一貫課程社會學習領域公民基本內容評析。公民訓育學報，(18)，1-18。https://doi.org/10.6231/CME.2006(18)01
鄧毓浩、黃美筠、董秀蘭、林佳範（2012）。ICCS 2009認知測驗與我國相關中學學生公民教育學習成就評量之比較。中等教育，63(2)，51-74。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2012.63.2.03
盧子平（2020）。身份與能動性： 論 威廉∙福克納《八月之光》中人的主體危機。［未出版之碩士論文］。國立政治大學。
蕭揚基（2001）。公民與公民教育─新世紀公民教育發展方向。公民訓育學報，(10)，125-148。https://doi.org/10.6231/CME.2001(10)06
蕭詣軒（2022）。文理學科失衡的臺灣教育。點教育，4(2)，43-44。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20200409001-N202301110015-00017
魏光莒（2012）。漢娜˙鄂蘭的公共領域與空間理論。環境與藝術學刊，12（1），01–12。
羅梅英（2019，10月2日）。尊重過頭其實就是放縱！什麼事都問小孩「好不好、可不可以」，只會讓孩子的「自我」過度膨脹。未來Family。更新於2021年7月9日。https://futureparenting.cwgv.com.tw/family/content/index/16062

Arendt, H. & Scott, J. V. (1996). Love and Saint Augustine. University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1946). What is Existenz philosophy? Partisan Review, 18(1), 34-56.
Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Schocken Books.
Arendt, H. (1958a). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1958b). Totalitarian imperialism: reflections on the hungarian revolution. The Journal of Politics,20(1), 5–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2127387
Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future: Six exercises in political thought. Viking Press.
Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Viking Press.
Arendt, H. (1968). Men in dark times. Harcourt Brace & Co.
Arendt, H. (1971). Martin Heidegger at eighty. New York Review of Books Translated by A. Hofstadter, 17(6), 50-54.
Arendt, H. (1978). The life of the mind (Edited by M. McCarthy). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. (1989). Lectures on Kant's political philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (2003). Responsibility and judgment (Edited by J. Kohn). Schocken Books.
Arendt, H. (2005). The promise of politics (Edited by J. Kohn). Schocken Books.
Arnett, R.C. (2013). Arendt on Media Ethics: Revisiting Traditions as the Heart of the Public Sphere. In Couldry, N., Madianou, M., Pinchevski, A. (Eds.) Ethics of Media (pp.57-71). Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137317513_4
Bandura, A., & National Institute of Mental Health. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. Oxford University Press.
Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2005). How difficult should education be? Educational Theory, 51(4), 385–400.
Birmingham, P. (2006). Hannah Arendt and human rights: The predicament of common responsibility. Indiana University Press.
Breger, C. (2022). Embodiment, agency, and ethics in Margarethe von Trotta’s cinema: From Rosa Luxemburg (1986) to Hannah Arendt (2012). Feminist German Studies, 38(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1353/fgs.2022.0006
Cane, L. (2019). Hannah Arendt and the fragility of human dignity. Contemporary Political Theory, 18(Suppl 1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0260-1
Canovan, M. (1980). On Levin’s “Animal Laborans and Homo Politicus in Hannah Arendt.” Political Theory, 8(3), 403–405. http://www.jstor.org/stable/190921
Canovan, M. (1995). Hannah Arendt: A reinterpretation of her political thought. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Čelutka, S. (2023). The Ontological Grounding of Hannah Arendt’s Political Ethics. The European Legacy, 28(5), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2023.2229150
Conover, P. (1995). Citizen Identities and Conceptions of the Self. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 3 (2), 133-165.
Dahl, R. A. (1998). On democracy. Yale University Press.
Dahlgren, P. (2006). Reflections for a small island: Hannah Arendt, Shakespeare’s The Tempest and the politics of childhood. Journal of Religious and Cultural Theory, 7, 35–46.
Demiryol, İ. G. (2023). That there be a beginning”: Arendt and natality. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Ve Sanat Araştırmaları, 2(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.32955/neuissar202321681
Disch, L. J. (1996). Hannah Arendt and the limits of philosophy. Cornell University Press.
Dolgoy, E.A., Hurd Hale, K., & Peabody, B. (Eds.). (2021). Political Theory on Death and Dying (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003005384
Esh, S. (1964). Kurt Blumenfeld on the modern jew and zionism. W. Heinemann.
Falk, R. (1994). The making of global citizenship. In B. Steenbergen (Ed.), The condition of citizenship (pp. 127-139). Sage Publications.
Galston, W. A. (2018). The populist challenge to liberal democracy. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 5-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0020
Gaus, G. [Interviewer] & Arendt, H. [Interviewee]. (1964). Zur Person [Video interview]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsoImQfVsO4&ab_channel=StackAltoids
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
Gómez, N. (2016). A critical approach to Hannah Arendt’s concept of worldliness and its applicability in the social sciences. Human Affairs, 26(2), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2016-0019
Goodlad, J. I., Klein, M. F., & Tye, K. A. (1979). The domains of curriculum and their study. In J. I. Goodlad & Associates (Eds.), Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice (pp. 43-76). McGraw-Hill.
Gordon, M. (2015). For the Love of Our Children: Hannah Arendt, the Limits of Freedom and the Role of Education in a Culture of Violence. Educational Studies, 51(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2015.1033518
Gordon, M. (Ed.). (2001). Hannah Arendt and education: Renewing our common world. Westview Press.
Gunter, H. M. (2014). Educational leadership and Hannah Arendt. Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1992). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Polity Press.
Hammer, D. (1997). Hannah Arendt, identity and the politics of visibility. Contemporary Politics, 3(4), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569779708449937
Hammer, D. (2007). Book in Review: Why Arendt Matters, by Elisabeth Young-Bruehl. Political Theory, 35(5), 689–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707305067
Hayden P. (2014). Hannah Arendt : key concepts. Acumen Publishing.
Hayden, M. J. (2012). Arendt and cosmopolitanism: The human conditions of cosmopolitan teacher education. Ethics & Global Politics, 5(4), 239–258.
Henry, W., Morehouse, M., & Gardner, S. T. (2017). Combatting consumer madness. Teaching Ethics, 17(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.5840/tej2017111549
Hobbes, T. (1950). Leviathan. E.P. Dutton and Company.
Jacobitti, S. D. (1991). The Public, the Private, the Moral: Hannah Arendt and Political Morality. International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 12(4), 281–293. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1601466
Jacobs, N. (1960). Introduction to the Issue “Mass Culture and Mass Media.” Daedalus, 89(2), 273–277. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20026570
Jelen, T. G. (2015). Gender role beliefs and attitudes toward abortion: A cross-national exploration. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 5(1), 11–22.
Jowett, B., & Davis, H. W. C. (trans.) (1920). Aristotle's Politics. Clarendon Press.
Kershaw, I. (2001). Hitler. Penguin.
Klockars, K. (2008). Plurality as a value in Arendt’s political philosophy. Topos, 19(2), 62–71.
Koehn, D. (2019). Toward a new (old) theory of responsibility: Moving beyond accountability. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16737-0
Kreber, C. (2016). The ‘Civic-minded’ Professional? An exploration through Hannah Arendt’s ‘vita activa.’ Educational Philosophy & Theory, 48(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.963492
Lau, G., & Ho, K.K. (2018). Hannah Arendt’s “The Human Condition” in the realm of early childhood education: perceptions and reality. The International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(2), 13-28.
Lessnoff M. H. (1999). Political Philosophers of the Twentieth Century. Blackwell.
Levin, M. (1979). On Animal Laborans and Homo Politicus in Hannah Arendt: A Note. Political Theory, 7(4), 521–531. http://www.jstor.org/stable/191165
Locke, J. (1690/1948). An essay concerning human understanding. In W. Dennis (Ed.), Readings in the history of psychology (pp. 55–68). Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/11304-008
Locke, J. (1999). Two treatises of government (M. Goldie, Ed.). Everyman.
Markell, P. (2011). Arendt’s Work: On the Architecture of “The Human Condition.” College Literature, 38(1), 15–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27917782
Nica, E., & Potcovaru, A.-M. (2015). Labor management and dress culture in the Victorian textile industry. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 10(2), 96–101.
Nixon, J. (2013). Thinking about thinking with Hannah Arendt. Prospero (13586785), 19(4), 8–11.
Nixon, J. (2020). Hannah Arendt: The promise of education. Springer.
Nohlen, D. & Stöver, P. (2010). Elections in Europe : a data handbook (1st ed.). Nomos.
Norris, T. (2006). Hannah Arendt & Jean Baudrillard: Pedagogy in the consumer society. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 25(6), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-0014-z
Pascal, B, (1958). Pascal's Pensées. E.P. Dutton.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (1999). Critical thinking: Teaching students to seek the logic of things. Journal of Developmental Education, 23(1), 34-35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42775020
Peters, M. A., & Heraud, R. (2015). Toward a political theory of social innovation: Collective intelligence and the co-creation of social goods. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 3, 7–23.
Pitkin, H. F. (1987). Rethinking Reification. Theory and Society, 16(2), 263–293. http://www.jstor.org/stable/657354
Plato. (2018). Republic. Simon & Brown.
Ringer, F. K. (1990). The decline of the German mandarins : the german academic community 1890-1933. University Press of New England.
Rogers, B. (2013, January). Why Arendt? Employing Hannah Arendt's concepts of plurality, thinking and judgement to inform a reconsideration of Educational Leadership [Paper presentation]. AARE 2013 Shaping Australian Educational Research, Adelaide.
Sartre, J.-P. (2003). Being and nothingness (H. E. Barnes, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Routledge. (Original work published 1943)
Scheel, J. (2002). A Politics of Natality. Social Research, 69(2), 461–471. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40971558
Schutz, A. (2002). Is political education an oxymoron? Hannah Arendt’s resistance to public spaces in schools. In S. Rice (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2001 (pp. 324–332). IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Schutz, A., & Sandy, M. G. (2015). Friendship and the Public Stage: Revisiting Hannah Arendt’s Resistance to “Political Education”. Educational Theory, 65(1), 21–38.
Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of public man. Alfred A. Knopf.
Smith, A. (2022). The wealth of nations. Fall River Press. https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/PublicFullRecord.aspx?p=7096957.
Snelgrove, D. (2014). Political upheaval and turmoil’s shaping educational philosophy: Hannah Arendt on education. Journal of Philosophy & History of Education, 64, 21–38.
Sosnowska, P. (2019). Hannah Arendt and Martin Heidegger : Philosophy modernity and education. Lexington Books.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.
Tocqueville, A. de, & Reeve, H. (Trans.). (1835). Democracy in America. Saunders and Otley. https://www.loc.gov/item/09021576/
Totschnig, W. (2017). Arendt’s notion of natality: An attempt at clarification. Ideas Y Valores, 66(165), 327-346.
Totschnig, W. (2019). Unpredictable yet Guided: Arendt on Principled Action. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 50(3), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2018.1539437
Villa, D. (2001). Arendt and Heidegger : the fate of the political. Princeton University Press. Retrieved March 31 2023 from https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=581665.
Villa, D. (Ed.). (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willsen, J., Binker, A. J. A., Nosich, G. M., Paul, R., Elder, L., & Foundation for Critical Thinking. (2012). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Young-Bruehl, E. (2004). Hannah Arendt : for love of the world (Second). Yale University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt32bk2f.
Young-Bruehl, E. (2006). Why Arendt matters. Yale University Press.