數位學習在於企業中，由於部份課程基於成本及時效性的考量需要更快速的發展流程，因此如何快速的發展數位教材是企業界仍待解決之問題。本研究建立了一線上教學設計平台，依據系統化教學設計理論，規劃一系統化教學設計步驟，以達到有效率之教學設計流程。並且結合學習物件之教學設計樣板，以提升編寫教學內容之效率。最後，於平台內嵌入形成性評鑑機制，以更有效的提升數位教材品質。完成平台設計後，以實徵研究收集線上教學設計平台的教學設計歷程，以探討平台之使用成效。在研究中發現，系統化之線上教學設計流程，有助於引導學科專家進行教學設計，但是在效率上未能達到預期之目的。線上教學設計平台內嵌之形成性評鑑機制能有效提升數位教材品質。學習物件之教學設計樣板能提供學科專家有組織且結構化的填寫教案內容，但是學科專家對於以學習物件為基礎的設計方式接受度不高。

The purpose of this study were to develop a on-line instructional design system.Our system was contstructed by three main theories.First,the system was designed by systematic instructional design theory to increase the efficiency of instructional design process.Second,the system used instructional design templates of learning object to increase the efficiency of instructional design.Third,the system embeded formative evaluation to increase the quality of content.Four instrucional design experts and nine master students in National Taiwan Normal University were invited to participate the experiment.The results we finded that,the system can guide subject matter experts to deisgn content and improve the quality of the content,but the efficiency of the system was not expected.

朱湘吉(1994)。教學科技的發展理論與方法。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
李世忠(1999)。教學科技--評鑑與應用。台北：五南。
陳德華、黃亮華(主編)(民92)。邁向數位學習社會。臺北市：遠流。
數位學習品質服務中心(民93)。數位學習教材品質規範。民國94年6月12日。取自：http://www.epark.org.tw/QSC/Specification/Material/spec_material_list.aspx
馬克．羅森伯格(民91)。e-Learning 提升個人競爭力、強化企業優勢的終極學習策略(樂為良譯)。台北市：麥格羅希爾。(原著出版年：2001)
Andrews, D. H.,& Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3, 2-16.
Blease, D. (1986). Evaluating educational software, London: Croom Helm.
Cisco Systems, Inc. (2001). Reusable learning Object strategy V4.0. Retrieved (n.d.) from the World Wide Web: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/elearning/implement/guides.html
Castellan, N. J. (1993). Evaluating information technology in teaching and learning. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25(2), 233-237.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1985). The systematic design of instruction (second edition). Glenview IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1991). Formative evaluation. In L. J. Briggs, K. L. Gustafson & M. H. Tillman (Eds), Instructional design: Principles and applications(2nd ed., pp.227-267). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology.
Hamel, C. J., & Ryan-Jones, D. (2002). Designing instruction with learning objects. International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1).
J. Bersin. (2004). Rapid E-Learning: What works. Bersin & Associates Publishers. http://www.bersin.com/
Krause, K. (1984). Choosing computer software that works. Journal of Reading, 28, 24-27.
Oliver, M.(2000). An introduction to the evaluation of learning technology. Educational Technology & Society, 3(4), 20-30.
Russell, J. D., & Blake, B. L. (1988). Formative and summative evaluation of instructional products and learners. Educational Technology. Sept. 1988, 22-28.
Stirling, D. L. (1998). Evaluating Instructional Software. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.stirlinglaw.com/deborah/software.htm.
Weston, C, McAlpine, L, & Bordonaro, T. (1995). A model for understanding formative evaluation in instructional design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43(3), 29-48.