埤塘係因先民在桃園地區灌溉需求所開鑿，經歷270餘年。如今卻因為都市發展而逐步消失填平，並且改建為工業用地、機關用地、私人用地或是學校用地。在過去的許多研究中，皆論及埤塘之重要性，政府也業已制定濕地保育法茲以保護；惟在現有法規的保護之下，埤塘仍持續流失。本研究咸認在政府政策的制定規範，以及民眾對於發展和保育之間渴望和需求衝突之際，其溝通之橋樑，需要藉由民眾之認同度藉以進行情感連結。
因此本研究之目的，係為了解民眾對於濕地保育法在2015年2月2日實施之後，桃園民眾對於埤塘濕地保護的政策認同度。首先，本研究探討民眾對於埤塘價值的傾向與社會信任度，對於政策認同度的影響，研究係以網路問卷Survey Cake問卷調查平台的方式進行，研究場域為桃園市區民眾，透過網路問卷針對居住桃園地區的居民為對象進行調查；問卷內容分為下列四個部分：(一)受測者背景；(二)埤塘價值傾向；(三)社會信任度，以及(四)濕地保育法政策認同度。桃園台地自2008年至2023年的埤塘數量及總面積，經由GIS的數化結果得知，15年間埤塘個數消失37%，總面積消失17.6%，埤塘消失速度急遽，僅有6成多的民眾了解此一現象。本研究發現埤塘價值、社會信任度係為解釋變項，受測者背景設定為控制變項，民眾在進行政策認同度之判斷時會受其埤塘價值與社會信任度之影響，但在社會信任度，僅有信任層面與經濟面的政策受到影響，其餘的影響皆不明顯。經過分析結果，桃園地區受訪者人類中心主義的得分高於自然中心主義，本研究結合埤塘價值與社會信任度之後，具體了解民眾對於濕地保育法於明智利用的政策之看法。

Farm ponds have been created for the irrigation needs on the Taoyuan Tableland. Now it has been filled in by the progress of urban development and conversion to institutions, industrial uses, or schools. The importance of the farm ponds has been mentioned in many studies in the past, thus, the government has enacted wetland legislation to protect them. However, the losses of ponds continue despite the protection of wetland regulations. The bridge between policy making and the public needs should be made by policy recognition. Therefore, the purpose of this study is aimed to find out the level of public acceptance of the Wetland Conservation Act based on Cognitive Hierarchical Theory. Exploring the impact of public awareness of the value of ponds and social trust on policy approval will be conducted by questionnaire. However, the number and total area of Taoyuan farm ponds from 2008 to 2023, through the results of GIS digitalization, learned that the number of farm ponds disappeared by 37%, and the total area disappeared by 17.6% within 15 years. Only 60 % residents understand this phenomenon. The questionnaire has divided into the following four items: (i) Socio-economic background; (ii) The value of ponds; (iii) Social trust; and (iv) Policy recognition of Wetland Conservation Act. The subsequent analysis has examined the relevance of the value of ponds and social trust as explanatory variables, and the socio-economic context as a control variable, to the extent that they are related to policy approval. When judging the degree of policy recognition, the public will be affected by the value and social trust in pond issues. After analyzing the results, respondents in the Taoyuan area scored higher on anthropocentrism than on natural centrism. By combining the value of the ponds with the trust of the community, this study has provided a better understanding of public perceptions of the various components of wetland policies in all objectives.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116
Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust.
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of environmental management, 90(5), 1692-1702.
Bruskotter, J., & Fulton, D. (2007). The influence of angler value orientations on fisheries stewardship norms. Aquatic Stewardship Education in Theory and Practice, 55.
BOXALL, P. C. (2000). Factors Influencing Forest Values and Attitudes of Two Stakeholder Groups: The Case of the Foothills. Society & Natural Resources, 13, 649-661.
Change, I. P. O. C. (2014). Ipcc. Climate change.
CHIEN, W. H., HO, C. C., CHIU, W. C., WANG, T. S., & TSAI, Y. C. (2021). A Study on the Benefits of Water Resources Utilization for Connecting Farm Ponds in Taoyuan. 台灣水利, 69(4), 1-11.
Davidson, N. C. (2014). How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Marine and Freshwater Research, 65(10), 934-941.
Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30(4), 450-471.
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 425-442.
Earle, T. C., & Cvetkovich, G. (1995). Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Fang, W. T., & Huang, Y. W. (2012). Modelling geographic information system with logistic regression in irrigation ponds, Taoyuan Tableland. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 12, 505-513.
Fang, W. T. (2005). A landscape approach to conserving farm ponds for wintering bird refuges in Taoyuan, Taiwan. Planning, People and Practice. Northampton, IALE, 63-71.
Fang, W. T., Chou, J. Y., & Lu, S. Y. (2014). Simple patchy-based simulators used to explore pondscape systematic dynamics. PloS one, 9(1), e86888.
Fulton, D. C., Manfredo, M. J., & Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human dimensions of wildlife, 1(2), 24-47.
Gardner, R. C., & Davidson, N. C. (2011). The Ramsar Convention. In B. A. LePage (Ed.), Wetlands: Integrating Multidisciplinary Concepts (pp. 189-203). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0551-7_11
Hargrove, E. C., & Costa Carvalho, M. (2014). On environmental philosophy: an interview with Eugene C. Hargrove. Kairos. Revista de Filosofia e Ciência, 11, 139-161.
Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(4), 638.
Hsu, C.-H., Chou, J.-Y., & Fang, W.-T. (2019). Habitat selection of wintering birds in farm ponds in Taoyuan, Taiwan. Animals, 9(3), 113.
Imran, S., Alam, K., & Beaumont, N. (2014). Environmental orientations and environmental behaviour: Perceptions of protected area tourism stakeholders. Tourism management, 40, 290-299.
Inglehart, R. (2018). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press.
Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? 1. Rural sociology, 57(1), 28-47.
Kanagy, C. L., Humphrey, C. R., & Firebaugh, G. (1994). Surging environmentalism: Changing public opinion or changing publics? Social Science Quarterly.
Lange, E., & Hehl-Lange, S. (2011). Citizen participation in the conservation and use of rural landscapes in Britain: the Alport Valley case study. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 7(2), 223-230.
Liu, J., Ouyang, Z., & Miao, H. (2010). Environmental attitudes of stakeholders and their perceptions regarding protected area-community conflicts: A case study in China. Journal of environmental management, 91(11), 2254-2262.
Luhmann, N. (2018). Trust and power. John Wiley & Sons.
Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and Personality,(rev. ed.) Harper and Row. New York.
McFarlane, B. L., & Boxall, P. C. (2000). Factors influencing forest values and attitudes of two stakeholder groups: The case of the Foothills Model Forest, Alberta, Canada. Society & Natural Resources, 13(7), 649-661.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Gupta, J., & Petry, D. (2008). Governance and the global water system: a theoretical exploration. Global governance, 14, 419.
Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 23(5), 961-972.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431.
Renn, O. (2005). Partizipation–ein schillernder Begriff: Reaktion auf drei Beiträge zum Thema. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 14(3), 227-228.
Renn, O., & Levine, D. (1991). Credibility and trust in risk communication. Springer.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free press.
Saarinen, J. (2006). Traditions of sustainability in tourism studies. Annals of tourism research, 33(4), 1121-1140.
Schwartz, S. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative sociology, 5(2-3), 137-182.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27(6), 723-743.
Tyler, T., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(5), 913.
Vaske, J. J., & Donnelly, M. P. (1999). A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society & Natural Resources, 12(6), 523-537.
Vaske, J. J., & Kobrin, K. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of environmental education, 32(4), 16-21.
Winter, C., & Lockwood, M. (2004). The natural area value scale: A new instrument for measuring natural area values. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 11(1), 11-20.
Xianwei, L., & Jianping, W. (2013). Environmental values and pro-environmental behaviors of college students: Mediating role of environmental concern. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 11(6), 780.
Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, P., & Niu, Y. (2017). Functions and Suggestions of Wetland in Construction and Sustainable Development of Sponge City.
方偉達（2015）。埤塘溼地歷史變遷管理數位模式之探討。濕地學刊，4(1)，43-56。
方偉達（2009）。城鄉-生態規劃、設計與批判. 六合出版社.
王福慶（1995）。航空城產業發展對地方經濟影響之研究－以桃園生活圈為例〔碩士論文，中興大學〕。
王价巨、張馨心（2016）。埤塘與滯洪空間關聯性探討－以桃園為例。都市與計劃，43(2)，157-187。https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.43.2.157
王正祥（2021）。論桃園埤塘水圳地景於城市發展與地景藝術節中的弔詭定位以及介入中壢後寮地景的行動。雕塑研究，(26)，25-80。
行政院環境保護署（2022）。環保政策性別知悉情形比較。https://www.moenv.gov.tw/DisplayFile.aspx?FileID=D5D6FD87792D9328&P=0800ec82-9104-4a4e-ae37-1a7c50ecbbc9
朱建民（2000）。由儒家觀點論西方環境倫理學人類中心主義與自然中心主義的對立。鵝湖學誌，(25)，1-40。https://doi.org/10.29653/LS.200012.0001
朱達仁（2005）。石門水庫集水區溪流生態情勢調查研究。中華大學水域生態環境。
李宗鴻、彭薏芳（2017）。埤塘溼地永續發展模式：桃園埤塘的案例分析。社區永續觀光研究，1(2)，1-15。https://doi.org/10.6744/SCTS.201712_1(2).0001
陳鴻圖（2003）。從陂塘到大圳－桃園臺地的水利變遷。東華人文學報，(5)，183-207。https://doi.org/10.6420/DHJHS.200307.0183
陳鴻圖（2002）。官營移民村與東臺灣的水利開發(1909~1946)。東台灣研究，(7)，135-163。https://doi.org/10.6275/JETS.7.135-163.2002
陳其澎（2013）。水利建設對文化地景的改變之研究：以百年來桃園縣為例。建築學報，(85)，77-98。
陳冠璋（2012）。埤塘生態觀光維護站選址研究－以桃園縣觀音鄉為例〔碩士論文，中原大學〕。
陳正達、朱容練、許晃雄、盧孟明、隋中興、周佳、翁叔平、陳昭銘、林傳堯、鄭兆尊、吳宜昭、卓盈旻、陳重功、張雅茹、林士堯、林修立、童裕翔、楊承道（2014）。台灣氣候變遷推估研究。大氣科學，42(3)，207-251。
陳桓敦、鍾政偉、蔡進祥、王維民（2008）。桃園地區埤塘永續觀光之發展策略研究。休閒暨觀光產業研究，3(2)，105-122。https://doi.org/10.6158/JLTIR.200810_3(2).0006
許晉誌（2016）。臺灣濕地保育策略及管理機制。濕地學刊，5(1)，1-11。
莊慶信（1998）。早期儒家與人類中心主義環境哲學的對話。哲學與文化，25(9)，836-855。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.199809.0836
莊采蓁、顏添明（2017）。民眾的森林價值與社會信任度對平地造林政策認同度影響之探討－以惠蓀林場為例。農林學報，64(4)，189-199。https://doi.org/10.30089/JAF.201703_64(4).0001
張景皓、王浩中、蘇明道、林俊男（2006）。桃園水利會埤塘管理與多角化經營問題之探討。農業工程學報，52(3)，1-8。https://doi.org/10.29974/JTAE.200609.0001
張育銘（2016）。從環境美學探討環境教育的場域概念。應用倫理評論，(60)，123-136。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10282483-201604-202004080024-202004080024-123-136
黃裕和、黃慶輝、鄧志浩（2021）。桃園台地埤圳對土地利用之影響。載於中原大學設計學院（主編），ICFXD 2021 未來x設計國際學術研討會論文集（頁a07-07-1-9）。中原大學設計學院。https://doi.org/10.29673/ICFXD.202110.0007
黃國鋒（2012）。農塘、蓄水池及滯洪池之功效。水保技術，7(1)，63-65。https://doi.org/10.30040/JSWCT.201201.0007
黃書禮、李煌樟（1988）。排水成本函數之建立與土地使用適宜性分析之應用。中華水土保持學報，19(1)，89-100。https://doi.org/10.29417/JCSWC.198805_19(1).0008
曾瓊儀（2014）。從桃竹苗客家民間故事看移民文化及其影響。中國文化大學中文學報，(29)，117-129。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10238808-201410-201512090050-201512090050-117-129
楊冠政（2002）。環境倫理-環境教育的終極目標。環境教育學刊。
楊冠政（1992）。環境教育發展簡史. 博物館學季刊, 6(3), 3-9.
劉翠溶（2011）。環境保護之演變. In 中華民國發展史‧ 經濟發展, 下冊, 頁 629-660 (臺北: 國立政治大學, 聯經出版公司). 國立政治大學, 聯經出版公司.
鄧屬予、劉聰桂、陳于高、劉平妹、李錫堤、劉桓吉、彭志雄（2004）大漢溪襲奪對台北盆地的影響。地理研究報告，(41)，61-78。
簡傳彬、方文村、陳淑貞、翁懿凡（2010） 。桃園航空城埤塘再生利用規劃研究。農業工程學報，頁71-83。