本研究旨在瞭解國小聽覺障礙學生加、減法文字題閱讀理解能力，蒐集閱讀理解困難部分、並分析其閱讀理解錯誤表現，最後比較中、高年級聽覺障礙學生加、減法文字題閱讀理解能力的差異。
研究利用自編工具「加、減法文字題閱讀理解測驗」(包含35個句型)蒐集大台北地區十所國小共八十三名中、高年級啟聰資源班學生的閱讀理解能力，資料整理分析結果如下：
一、 加、減法文字題閱讀理解能力：整體而言，中、高年級聽覺障礙學生加、減法文字題閱讀理解能力普遍低落且能力發展緩慢，但學生閱讀理解能力個別差異大。
二、 加、減法文字題閱讀理解困難部分：
(1) 中、高年級聽覺障礙學生加、減法文字題閱讀理解困難部分遍布於各類文字題。兩個年段學生閱讀理解困難一致的句型共有29個，另有5個改變類句型是中年級學生閱讀理解有困難而高年級學生沒有困難的部分，只有1個句型「…和…一樣多」是兩個年段學生閱讀理解都沒有困難的部分。
(2) 高年級聽覺障礙學生閱讀理解表現顯著優於中年級的句型共有10個。
(3) 語意關係對閱讀理解表現的影響因句型包含的語詞不同而有差異。
三、 加、減法文字題閱讀理解錯誤表現：
(1) 聽覺障礙學生的閱讀理解錯誤表現以系統性錯誤為主（個案在單一題目各選項作答時，所持想法一致，即稱為系統性錯誤），其中高年級學生答題時出現顯著系統性錯誤情形多於中年級學生。
(2) 聽覺障礙學生無法區辨不同語意結構的句型，常出現以等量概念理解各類不同句型的錯誤表現。
(3) 從不同語意結構來看：學生掌握改變類題目中表示最初量及最終量語詞的能力差，而當改變量語詞為抽象動詞時，學生無法將之與移轉基模結合；學生無法判別合併類題目中表示總量的語詞，誤解為子集合或將之與加法策略連結；學生無法將比較類題目中「…比…」句型與多--少基模結合；學生無法理解等化類題目中表示互斥集合大小、有差異的語詞。
本研究並針對研究結果及研究限制，對聽覺障礙學生的教學輔導及未來研究提出建議。
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
關鍵字：聽覺障礙；加、減法文字題；閱讀理解；國小學生。

The purposes of the study are to explore the reading comprehension ability of elementary school students with hearing impairment, to find out their difficulties and to analyze their errors in addition and subtraction word problems. A further attempt is made to compare the differences of the reading comprehension ability between the middle and the high graders.
Eighty-three middle and high graders with hearing impairment who came from resource rooms in ten elementary schools in Taipei City and County participated in this study. Data were collected with a self-developed instrument “The Test of Reading Comprehension in Addition and Subtraction Word Problems”, which contained thirty-five test items.
The main findings of the study are stated as follows:
1. The reading comprehension ability in addition and subtraction word problems: Hearing–impaired students’ reading comprehension ability is basically poor and develops slowly with age. Nevertheless, there are individual differences among them.
2. The reading comprehension difficulties in addition and subtraction word problems:
(1) When hearing-impaired students read the word problems, multitudinous difficulties are found in different types of word problems. Twenty-nine out of the thirty-five problems cause the difficulties for both the middle and the high graders. Another five change problems are found difficult for the middle graders, but not for the high graders. There is only one problem “…and …be equal” that both the middle and the high graders can resolve without difficulty.
(2) The high graders perform better than the middle graders in ten problems.
(3) The influence of the semantic structure of word problems on the students’ performances depends on the usage of terms in the sentences.
3. The reading comprehension errors in addition and subtraction word problems:
(1) When students use the same principle to judge each item in a problem, it is called systematic errors. The major errors students make are systematic ones. The number of significant systematic errors of the high graders is higher than that of the middle graders.
(2) The students cannot discriminate the semantic structure of word problems. They often apply the same “equal” concept to different types of word problems.
(3) As regards different types of semantic structures, the students are weak in understanding the terms which represent the start quantity and the result quantity in change problems. Moreover, if the terms which represent the transfer quantity are abstract, they cannot activate the transfer schema. In terms of combine problems, the students usually cannot recognize the terms which represent the superset, and further misunderstand it as another subset or activate the combination strategy. As for compare problems, the students cannot activate more/less schema to help themselves comprehend the sentence pattern ”…more/less than …” With respect to equalizing problems, the students cannot understand the terms which represent the differences between two sets.
Based on the results and the research limitations, some suggestions are made for mathematics instruction and future studies.
Key words: hearing impairment; addition and subtraction word problem; reading comprehension; elementary school student.

一、 中文部分
古明峰（民88）：加、減法文字題語意結構、問題難度及解題關係之探討。新竹師院學報，12期，1-25頁。
呂玉琴（民86）：國小低年級學生對加減法文字題的了解。中華民國第十三屆科學教育學術研討會，370-376頁。
呂玉琴譯（民77）：加、減文字題的分類、解題策略及影響因素。國民教育，28卷，17-29頁。
周台傑、詹士宜（民82）：國中智能不足學生數學應用問題解題歷程研究。特殊教育與復健學報，3期，179-215頁。
林月仙（民88）：國民小學中低年級數學診斷測驗之發展及其相關研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，未出版。
林淑玲（民88）：國小數學學習障礙學生對「比較類」加減應用題表徵之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
林麗慧（民79）：聽覺障礙學生數學教學策略初探。載於中華民國特殊教育學會編印，聽覺障礙者之教育與福祉（729-740頁）。台北：中華民國特殊教育學會、國立台灣師範大學特殊教育中心、台北市立師範學院特殊教育中心。
林寶貴、李如鵬（民79）：聽覺障礙學生數學能力測驗之編制極其相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系叢書，85輯，1-122頁。
林寶貴、李真賢（民76）：聽覺障礙學生國語文能力之研究。教育學院學報，12期，1-27頁。
林寶貴、錡寶香（民78）：聽覺障礙學生「高級瑞文氏圖形補充測驗」常模之建立及其相關之研究。特殊教育學報，4期，111-146頁.
林寶貴、錡寶香（民79）：高職階段聽覺障礙學生「高級瑞文氏圖形補充測驗」之研究。特殊教育學報，5期，159-185頁.
林寶貴、錡寶香（民80）：高職階段聽覺障礙學生國語文與數學能力之研究。特殊教育學刊，7期，109-128頁。
邱上真、王惠川、朱婉艷、沈明錦（民84）：解題歷程導向教學對國小四年級數學科低成就學生解題表現之成效研究。特殊教育與復健學報，2期，235-271頁。
洪美連（民84）：國小聽覺障礙學生數學口語應用問題教學效果之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
范金玉（民76）：國民小學數學能力發展測驗編製之研究。特殊教育學報，2期，275-290頁。
翁素珍（民78）：國小六年級聽覺障礙學生數學能力之分析。國立彰化師範大學碩士論文，未出版。
翁嘉英（民77）：國小兒童解數學應用問題的認知歷程。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
張蓓莉（民70）：聽覺障礙學生之智力結構。師大學報，26期，333-352頁。
張蓓莉（民76）：回歸主流聽覺障礙兒童語言能力研究。特殊教育學刊，3期，119-134頁。
張蓓莉（民78）：聽覺障礙學生語文能力之研究。特殊教育學刊，5期，165-204頁。
張蓓莉（民80）：國小聽覺障礙學生句型理解能力研究。特殊教育學刊，7期，87-108頁。
張蓓莉（民83）：台灣地區聽覺障礙學生句型理解能力。特殊教育研究學刊，10期，209-227頁。
張蓓莉（民90）：國小階段聽覺障礙學生數學學習資料庫及建構式教學效果之研究第一年研究報告，未出版。
楊美伶、蔣治邦（民81）：國民小學數學科加減法教材關鍵字之分析研究。國教學報，4期，109-128頁。
蔣治邦、鍾思嘉（民80）：低年級學童加減概念的發展。國立政治大學教育心理與研究，14期，35-68頁。
蔣治邦(82)：中年級學童解決加減文字題能力之探討：多餘資訊與兩步驟問題。科學教育學刊，1卷，189-212頁。
鄧少林、蔣治邦（民83）：三、五年級學生對比較應用問題的分類。國教學報，6卷，97-113頁。
盧台華（民84）：身心障礙學生數學能力比較研究。特殊教育研究學刊，12期，25-50頁。
謝毅興（民80）。國小兒童解數學應用問題的策略。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
蕭金土（民85）。聽覺障礙學生數學錯誤類型分析與補救教學效果之研究。特殊教育學報，11期，1-33頁。
二、英文部分
Adetula, L. O. (1990). Language factor: Does it affect children’s performance on word problems? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 351-365.
Allen, T. E.(1986). Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students: 1974 and 1983’. In A. N. Schildroth & M. A. Karchmer(Eds.), Deaf children in American (pp. 161-206). San Diego, CA: College Hills Press.
Barham, J., & Bishop, A. (1993). Mathematics and the deaf child. In K. Durkin & B. Shire, (Eds), Language in Mathematical Education Research and Practice (pp. 179-189). Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
Briars, D. J., & Larkin, J. H. (1984). An intergrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 245-296.
Cummins, D. D. (1991). Children’s interpretations of arithmetic word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 261-289.
Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 405-438.
De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1985). Beginning first grader’s initial representation of arithmetic word problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 4,3-21.
De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1991). Some factors influencing the solution of addition and subtraction word problems. In K. Durkin & B. Shire (Eds.), Language in mathematical education research and practice (pp. 117-130). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Pauwels, A. (1990). Influence of the semantic structure of word problems on second grades’ eye movements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 359-365.
Fuson, K. C., Carrrol, W. M. & Landis, J. (1996). Levels in conceptualizing and solving addition and subtraction compare word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 345-371.
Geary, D. C. (1996). Children’s mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gregory, S. (1998). Mathematics and deaf children. In S. Gregory, P. Knight, W. McCracken, S. Powers, & L. Watson(Eds.), Issues in deaf education (pp. 119-126). London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.
Hudson, T. (1983). Correspondences and numerical differences between disjoint sets. Child Development, 54, 84-90.
Kelly, R. R., & Mousley, K. (2001). Solving word problem: More than reading issues for deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 146, 251-262.
Kidd, D. H., Madsen, A. L., & Lamb, C. E. (1993). Mathematics vocabulary: Performance of residential deaf students. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 418-422.
King, C., & Quigley, S. (1985). Reading and deafness. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92, 109-129.
Lappan, G. (2000). The language of mathematics: The meaning and use of variable. NCTM News Bulletin, 36, 3.
Mayer, R. E. (1991). Thinking, problem solving , cognition. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Moores, D. F. (1997). Psycholinguistics and Deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 142, 80-89.
Mousley, K., & Kelly, R. R. (1998). Problem-solving strategies for teaching mathematics to deaf students. American Annals of The Deaf, 143, 325-336.
Orton, A. (1992). Does Language interfere with mathematics-learning? In A. Orton(Ed.), Learning Mathematics: Issues, theory and classroom practice(2nd ed., pp. 128-147). New York: Cassell.
Pau, C. S. (1995). The deaf child and solving problems of arithmetic. American Annals of The Deaf, 140, 287-290.
Paul, P. (1997). Reading for students with hearing impairments: Research Review and implications. The Volta Review, 99, 73-87.
Paul, P. (1998). Literacy and deafness: The development of reading, writing, and literate thought. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Polya, G. (1971). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method(2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Reed, S. K. (1999). Word problems: Research and curriculum reform. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asscoiates.
Riley , M. S., & Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153-196). New York: Academic Press.
Ross, M., Brackett, D., & Maxon, A. B. (1991). Assessment and management of mainstreamed hearing-impaired children: Principles and practices. Austin, Texas: Pro-ed.
Sowder, L. (1988). Children’s solutions of story problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 227-238.
Stiff, L. V. (2001). Prsidental’s message: Leave no child behind. NCTM News Bulletin, 37, 3.
Thompson, D. R., & Rubenstein, R. N. (2000). Learning mathematics vocabulary: Potential pitfalls and instructional strategies. The Mathematics Teacher, 93, 568-574.
Walker, L., Munro, J., & Rickards, F. W. (1998). Literal and inferential reading comprehension of students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Volta Review, 100, 87-103.
Wilson, T., & Hyde, M. (1997).The use of signed English pictures to facilitate reading comprehension by deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 142, 333-341.
Riley , M. S., & Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153-196). New York: Academic Press.
Wilson, T., & Hyde, M. (1997).The use of signed English pictures to facilitate reading comprehension by deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 142, 333-341.
Sowder, L. (1988). Children’s solutions of story problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 227-238.