本研究採取質性研究法，探究四位新北市國中初任特殊教育教師的職場經驗、職場導入的歷程及感受。經整理後詮釋為四則故事，從中看見國中初任特教教師職場導入歷程的真實樣貌，主要的發現如下：
一、初任教師的工作信念在先前的生命經驗中是有跡可循的
過去的生命經驗帶給他們的不只是具體的作法或策略，還有潛在、抽象的信念，影響著他們對於教師形象最初的認同，進而引領著他們做人處事的方式。
二、初任歷程是一個不斷調適的過程
當初任教師的信念與現實環境發生衝突時，他們會對環境重新定義，採取自己可接受的因應方式進行調適，以達到平衡。
三、初任教師個人特質及環境脈絡交織影響下，產生個別化的導入意義
同一位輔導老師所輔導的初任教師，因個人特質及環境脈絡交互影響，而產生個別化的導入意義。
四、需求與回饋的契合度是有效導入的關鍵
輔導老師的回饋是否能切合初任教師職場適應中的成長需求，將為成功導入的關鍵。

The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore four beginning special education teachers’occupational experience, the process of occupational induction and their perceptions of the induction. Their experience were arranged into four stories. The real situations of occupational induction of beginning special education teachers can be seen in these stories. The main findings of the study are as follows：
1.The working belief of beginning teachers can be traced back to the early life experiences.
The early life experiences bring them not only strategies to handle affairs but also abstract belief which influence their initial recognition of teacher identities. Furthermore, how they behave is accordingly guided.
2.Initial induction is a process that keeps on amending.
When beginning teachers’ belief conflicts with the realistic environment, they will redefine and accommodate to the environment with either active or negative attitudes.
3.Because of the reciprocal influence of the environment and the personalities of beginning teachers, the meaning of the induction varies from person to person.
Under the reciprocal influence of the environment and the personalities, , the meaning of the induction varies from person to person even if a beginning teacher is tutored by the same mentor teacher.
4.The fitting of need-feedback is the key to the effective induction.
If mentor teachers’ feedbacks can match the developmental needs of beginning teachers, the induction will be effective.

中文部分
丁一顧(2003)：美、英、紐、日初任教師導入方案及其對我國之啟示。課程與教學季刊，6(3)，87-104。
丁一顧、張德銳、高紅瑛(2007)：臺北市中等學校教學輔導教師制度實施成效與困難之研究。國民教育研究學報，18，115-144。
王秋絨(1991)：教師專業社會化理論在教育實習設計上的蘊義。台北：師大書苑。
石乃如(2007)：國中特殊教育教師生涯發展及其相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
白青平(2000）：台北縣市國民小學初任教師工作困擾與解決途徑之研究。國立台北師範院碩士論文（未出版）。
朱盈潔(2006)：台北縣國民中小學資源班初任教師工作困擾與專業發展需求之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文（未出版）。
李婉玲(2005)：教師發展─理論與實踐。台北：五南。
林心茹譯(2004)：J. Boreen, M. K. Johnson, D. Niday, & J. Potts 著。啟導初任教師：貴人啟導制的引導、反思與教練方法（Mentoring beginning teachers）。台北市：遠流。
林素貞(2009)：資源教室方案與經營。台北：五南。
施冠慨譯(1993)：初任教師的輔導。台北：五南。
洪盈潔(2007)：公立高中初任輔導教師之工作適應歷程研究。國立新竹教育大學教育心理與諮商學系碩士班(未出版)。
胡幼惠(1996)：質性研究─理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北：巨流。
高強華(1988)：教師生涯發展及其影響因素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，30，113-133。
徐享良(2000)：緒論。載於王文科主編，特殊教育導論。台北：心理。
許子云(2008)：教學輔導互動歷程及其對教學導師專業成長影響之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
許雅惠(2004)：臺北市國民小學教學輔導教師制度試辦現況與實施成效之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
許籐繼、張德銳、張新仁、謝寶梅、丁一顧、黃嘉莉、張民杰（2010)：中小學教學輔導教師制度規劃與推動策略之研究。臺北市：教育部國民教育司。
莊忠和(2007)：國民小學初任教師專業發展與輔導之研究。國立新竹教育大學職業繼續教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
康玉琳(2007)：鴻溝的跨越-五位國中初任教師教學實踐之敘事探究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
梁碧明、連君瑋(2011)：良師典範：優秀特教教師的教師角色與教育信念之探究。教育與多元文化研究，5，41-81。
張芬芬(2001)：教學生活：新手老師的成長之路。載於黃政傑、張芬芬(主編)，學為良師—在教育實習中成長(425-457 頁)。臺北市：師大書苑。
張芬芬(2010)：質性資料分析的五步驟：在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊，35，87-120。
張春興(1996)：教育心理學：三化取向。臺北市：東華。
張益誌(2013)：國民中學初任特殊教育教師專業發展歷程之研究。逢甲大學公共政策碩士班(未出版)。
張蓓莉(2009)：台灣的融合教育。中等教育，60(4)，8-18。
張德銳(2003)：中小學初任教師的教學困境與專業發展策略。教育研究集刊，28，129-144。
張德銳、李俊達、蔡雅玲(2006)：教學檔案對國小初任教師教學省思影響之研究。課程與教學，9，35-50。
張德銳(2009)：美國教學輔導制度及其在我國中小學教師專業成長之應用。教育資料集刊,42,181-202。
張德銳、簡賢昌(2009)：教學輔導教師與夥伴教師互動歷程與專業發展之研究。台北市立教育大學學報，40，1-34。
陳美玉(1999)：教師專業學習與發展。臺北：師大書苑。
陳訓祥(2000)：特殊教育人員。載於王文科主編，特殊教育導論。台北：心理。
陳國泰(2006)：學習教學：一位國小初任教師教學知識成長的歷程。彰師大教育學報，10，33-66。
陳慧儒(2006)：國小身心障礙類初任特教教師導入方案內涵之研究。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士論文。
陳蘋琪譯(2007)：Kathleen M. Bailey, Andy Curtis, David Nunan著。教師專業生涯發展(Pursuing professional development：the self as source)。台北：湯姆生。
黃繼仁(2011)：我國師資培育改革的挑戰與展望：典範轉點的觀點。教師專業研究期刊，1，79-100。
鈕文英(2012)：質性研究方法與論文寫作。台北：雙葉。
蔡培村、孫國華（1996）：我國中小學教師生涯發展之實證分析。載於蔡培村主編，教師生涯與職級制度。(頁191－226)。高雄市：麗文。
劉謹睿(2012)：教學輔導教師對國中初任教師教學信念影響之探究。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
潘淑滿(2003)：質性研究理論與實務。台北：心理。
韓玉芬(2003)：初任教師工作壓力因應歷程之質的研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
魏韶勤(2004)：教學輔導教師教學觀察與回饋對國小初任教師教學效能影響之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
羅綸新(2002)：中等學校初任教師工作適應與輔導需求之調查研究。台東師院學報，13，1-29。
饒見維(2003)：教師專業發展─理論與實務。台北：五南。
英文部分
Bartell, C. A., (2005).Cultivating high-quality teaching through induction and mentoring. Los Angeles, CA：Corwin Press.
Billingsley, B., Carlson, E.,& Klein, S.(2004).The working condition and induction support of early career special educators. Council for Exceptional Children, 70(3), 333-347.
Boyer, L. & Gillespie, P. (2000). Keeping the committed: The importance of induction and support programs for new special educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(6), 10-15.
Boyer, L., & Lee, C. (2001). Converting challenge to success: Supporting a new teacher of students with autism. Journal of Special Education, 35(2), 75-83.
Brock, B. L. & Grady, M. L. (2007). From first-year to first-rate: Principals guiding beginning teachers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Burden, P. R. (1990). Teacher development. In W. R. Houston (Ed.). Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 311-328). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Dempsey, I., Arthur-Kelly, M., & Carty, B. (2009). Mentor¬ing early career special education teacher. Australian Jour¬nal of Education, 59(3), 294-305.
Estes, G. D. (1990). Assessment component of the California New Teacher Project：First year report. Washington, D.C.：Office of Education Research and improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED323197)
Feiman-Nemser, S., Schwille, S., Carver, C., & Yusko, B. (1999). A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction. East Lansing, MI: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
Fessler, R. & Christensen, J. (1992). The teacher career cycle: Understanding and guiding the professional development of teachers. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Fessler, R. (1992). The teacher career cycle. In R. Fessler & J. C. Christensen (Eds.), The teacher career cycle: Understanding and guiding the professional development of teachers(pp. 21-23). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Fletcher, S. H., Strong, M., & Villar, A. (2008). An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110, 2271–2289.
Gersten, R. , Keating, T., Yovanoff, R., & Harniss, M. K. (2001). Working in special education: Factors that enhance special educator's intent to stay. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 549-553.
Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support, attrition, mentoring and induction. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp.548-559). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Gordon, S. P. (1991). How to help beginning teachers succeed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Gordon, S. & Maxey, S. (2000). How to help beginning teachers succeed, 2nd edition. Baltimore, MD: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Griffin, C. C., Winn, J. A., Otis-Wilborn, A., & Kilgore, K. L. (2003). New teacher induction in special education: prepare for the center on personnel studies in special education, executive summary. Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education, University of Florida.
Huling-Austin, L. (1990). Teacher induction programs and internships. In W. R. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 535-548). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Hunt, J. H., Powell, S., Little, M. E., & Mike, A. (2013). The effects of e-mentoring on beginning teacher competencies and perceptions. teacher education and special education, 36(4), 286–297.
Ingersoll R. M. ＆ Smith T. M. (2004). Do Teacher Induction and Mentoring Matter? NASSP Bulletin. 88(638), 28-40.
Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Education Research. 81(2), 201-233.
Katz. L. G. (1972). Development stages of preschool teachers. Elementary School Journal. 73(1). 50-54.
Moir, E. (1999). The stages of a teacher’s first year. In M. Scherer (Ed.), A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educatuon Research Journal, 41, 681-714.
Strong, M. (2009). Effective teacher induction and mentoring: assessing the evidence. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Steffy, B. E. (1989). Career stages of classroom teachers. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing.
Veenman S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of educational research, 54(2), 143-178.
Whitaker, S. D. (2000a). What do first- year special education teachers need？Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(1), 28-36.
Whitaker, S. D. (2000b). Mentoring beginning special education teachers and the relationship to attrition. Exceptional Children, 66,546-566.
Whitaker, S.D. (2001). Supporting beginning special education teachers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(4), 1-18.
Wong, H. K. (2005). New teacher induction: The foundation for comprehensive, coherent, and sustained professional development. In H. Portner (Ed.), Teacher mentoring and induction (pp. 41-58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.